勞動疆界的拓邊？傳統女性勞動場域中男性勞動者之考察

Crossing the Labors' Boundary? An Investigation of Male Workers in Traditional Women's Work

10.29816/TARQSS.200812.0001

馬財專(Tsai-Chuan Ma)；葉郁菁(Yu-Ching Yeh)

性別隔離 ； 性別認同 ； 男子氣概 ； gender segmentation ； gender identity ； masculinity

台灣社會研究季刊

72期（2008 / 12 / 01）

1 - 48

繁體中文

早期性別角色在傳統勞動市場的研究論述中，男女因性別隔離所產生了僵固化的工作類別。時至今日，當越來越多的男性跨越性別藩籬進入非男性的傳統工作場域之中，便開啟了對適當性別工作傳統認定及觀念的挑戰。因此，現代的勞動市場中，傳統兩性的工作類別疆界之毀壞及相互穿透的現象也越為普遍。從台灣勞動現象的觀察，就從事於傳統女性工作類別的男性工作者而言，男性對於女性傳統的工作領域所產生穿透(infiltration)程度亦有隨之升高的趨勢。 本文透過勞動市場中男、女對於工作場域與類別相互跨越的現象進行考察，探索勞動者在穿越傳統工作概念之後所產生的工作關係與適應。初步發現長期傳統社會化過程對於性別認同的塑造與性別的期待，似乎無法徹底的解消於現代台灣的勞動市場結構之中。此外，從經驗資料的考察與檢視顯示Williams的玻璃手扶梯現象並未明顯的發生於這群受訪的男性勞動者身上。系統化的性別概念似乎仍然作用在多數初入傳統女性勞動職場的男性勞動者身上，並影響著部分勞動者的升遷與發展。當分析勞動者所承載的壓力與其壓力來源的差異時，可發現這群不同職類的勞動者亦透過不同的反應方式，例如透過關係的建立及積極的勞動認同、或與職場中女性勞動者產生保持距離亦或抗拒於勞動過程中。這群勞動者必須透過這些反應來轉化個人在職場上的壓力，並藉以重構其在職場上的社會關係。最後，本文的考察指出台灣傳統社會中普遍存在的男子氣概，在這群男性勞動者從事傳統女性勞動工作歷程中仍然存在隱晦的影響關係。

This paper is concerned with the early research in traditional labor market from gender role. The gender segmentation enhances the occupational division which causes their fixed work in the traditional labor market. Meanwhile, the more male workers crossed the gender boundary to enter the non-traditional male work and this gradual universal situation leads to many challenges in the traditional concept of suitable gender behavior. Therefore, the penetration of occupational categories by gender will increase in modern Taiwan's labor market. This research will concentrate on those men who did women's work and describe the situation of mutual infiltration in their work field. This paper points out the infiltration between male and female workers in workplace enhances the transformation in gender and labor work relationships which restructuralize and operate in Taiwan's labor market. Moreover, we recognize the long-term socialization and the respects creations of gender identification which can not disappear in Taiwan's labor market. By way of the collection of male workers in traditional female work and explores the response of male workers who are engaged in traditional female work. This paper analyzes the possible of interviewees' different pressures and their emergence. By way of those different categories, interviewees rely on the different responses (identification, keep the distance and resistance) and reconstruct the transformation pressure from their labor process. Beside, we indicate the masculinity which undertakes the obscure influence in the labor process.

1. 林津如(2000)。「外傭政策」與女人之戰：女性主義策略再思考。台灣社會研究季刊，39，65-103。
   連結：
2. 陳月娥(2001)。職業性別隔離因素之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，5，5-53。
   連結：
3. 黃淑玲(2003)。男子氣概與喝花酒文化。台灣社會學，5，73-132。
   連結：
4. Anker, R(1998).Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World.Geneva:International Labour Office.
5. Bagilhole, B(1994).Women, Work and Equal Opportunity.Aldershot:Avebury.
6. Birkelund, Gunn E.(1996).The Latent Structure of Job Characteristics of Men and Women.American Journal of Sociology,102,80-113.
7. Blood, R,Wolfe, D(1960).Husbands and Wivies: the Dynamicx of Married Living.New York:Free Press.
8. Bradley, H,Williams, C.L. (Eds)(1993).Doing 'Women's Work': Men in Nontraditional Occupations.Thousand Oaks. CA:Sage.
9. Chodorow, Nancy(1994).Femininities, Masculinities, Sexualities: Freud and Beyond.Lexington, KY:The University Kentucky Press.
10. Chodorow, Nancy(1978).The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender.Berkeley:University of California Press.
11. Christle, A(1998).Is Social Work a "Non-traditional" Occupation for Men?.British Journal of Social Work,28,491-510.
12. Chusmir, L.H(1990).Men Who Make Nontraditional Career Choices.Journal of Counselling and Development,69,11-16.
13. Cockburn, C(1991).In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations.London:Macmillan.
14. Collinson, D.L(2004).Naming Men as Men: Implications for Work, Organization and Management.Gender, Work and Organization,1(1),2-20.
15. Collinson, D.L,Hearn, J,Davidson, M,Burke R(2000).Women in Management: Current Research Issues, Ⅱ.London:Sage.
16. Connell, R.W(1998).Masculinities and Globalization.Men and Masculinities,1(1),3-23.
17. Connell, R.W(1995).Masculinities.Cambridge:Polity Press.
18. Connell, R.W(1987).Gender and Power.Cambridge:Polity Press.
19. Connell, R.W(2002).Gender.Cambridge:Polity Press.
20. Conventry, B. T(1999).Do Men Leave Feminizing Occupations?.Social Science Journal,36(1),47-71.
21. Crampton, R(1996).Man about the House.The Times.
22. Crompton, R (Eds)(1999).Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
23. Cross, Simon,Bagilhole, Barbara(2002).Girl's Jobs for the Boys? Men, Masculinity and Non-Traditional Occupations.Gender, Work and Organisation,9,204-226.
24. Denzin, N.K.,Lincoln, Y.S(1994).Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
25. Donaldson, M(1993).What is Hegemonic Masculinity?.Theory and Society,22,643-657.
26. Egeland, J. W.,Brown, J.S(1989).Men in Nursing: Their Fields of Employment, Preferred Fields of Practice, and Role Strain.Health Serv Res.,24(5),693-707.
27. Ehrensaft, Diane,Karen, V.H(Eds),Ilene, J Philipson (Eds)(1990).Women, Class and the Feminist Imagination.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
28. Evans, J(1997).Men in Nursing: Exploring the Male Nurse Experience.Nursing Inquiry,4,142-145.
29. Evans, J(1997).Men in Nursing: Issues of Gender Segregation and Hidden Advantage.Journal of Advanced Nursing,26,26-231.
30. Gillian, Creese(1999).Contracting Masculinity: Gender: Class and Race in a White-Collar Union, 1944-1994.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
31. Gilmore, D(1993).Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity.New Heaven, CT:Yale University Press.
32. Guba, E(1990).The Paradigm Dialogue.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
33. Harding, Sandra(2003).Representing Reality: The Critical Realism Project.Feminist Economics,9(1),151-159.
34. Harding, Sandra(1999).The Case for Strategic Realism: A Response to Lawson.Feminist Economics,5(3),127-133.
35. Harry Brod,M Kimmel (eds)(1987).Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity.Sage.
36. Hawkins, Alan J. (Eds),Dollahite, David C (Eds)(1997).Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives.CA:Sage.
37. Hearn, J(1992).Men in the Public Eye: The Construction and Deconstruction of Public Men and Public Patriarchies.London:Sage.
38. Hearn, J,MacanGhaill, M. (eds)(1996).Understanding Masculinities: Social Relations and Cultural Arenas.Buckingham:Open University Press.
39. Hochschild, A(1989).The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home.New York:Viking.
40. Jacobs, J.A(1994).Sex Segregation at Work: Trends and Prediction.Social Science Journal,31(2),153-168.
41. Kenneth, C(1990).Contemporary Perspectives on Masculinity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
42. Kirsten Dellinger,Christine L. Williams(1997).Make-up at Work: Negotiating Appearance Rules in the Workplace.Gender & Society,11(2),151-177.
43. Krais, Beate,Craig Calhoun(Eds),Edward LiPuma(Eds),Moishe Postone (Eds)(1993).Gender and Symbolic Violence: Female Oppression in the Light of Pierre Bourdien's Theory of Social Practice.Bourdieu, Critical Perspectives.
44. Kvande, E,Morgan, D,Brandth, B(2005).Gender, Bodies and Work.New York:Ashgate.
45. Lennon, M,Sarah Rosenfield(1994).Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework: the importance of Options.American Journal of Sociology,100,506-531.
46. Lupton, Ben(2000).Maintaining Masculinity: Men Who Do 'Women's Work'.British Journal of Management,11,33-48.
47. MacDougall, G(1997).Caring: a Masculine Perspective.Journal of Advanced Nursing,25,809-813.
48. MacInnes, J(1998).The End of Masculinity: The Confusion of Sexual Genesis and Sexual Difference in Modern Society.Buckingham:Open University Press.
49. Meadow, P (Eds)(1996).Work Out-or Work in? Contributions to the Debate on the Future of Work.York:Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
50. Morgan, D(1992).Discovering Men.London:Rontledge Press.
51. Oppenheimer, Valerie K(1976).The Female Labor Force in the United States: Demographic and Economic Factors Governing its Growth and Changing Composition.USA:Greenwood Publishing Group.
52. Parsons, T(1964).Levels of organizations and the Mediation of Social Interaction.Sociological Inquiry,45,62-65.
53. Patrick, B(2001).In Women, Gender and Work.Switzerland:ILO Press.
54. Pleck, Joseph(1976).Men's New Roles in the Family: Housework and Child Care.Ann Arbor, Mich:Institute for Social Research.
55. Pleck, Joseph(1985).Working Wives/Working Husbands.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
56. Reskin, Barbara F,Roos, Patricia A(1990).Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.USA:Temple University Press.
57. Salzinger, Leslie(2000).Manufacturing Sexual Subjects: 'Harassment' Desire and Discipline on a Maquiladora Shopfloor.Ethnography,1(1),67-92.
58. Segal, L(1999).Why Feminism.Cambridge:Polity Press.
59. Segal, L(1993).Changing Men: Masculinities in Context.Theory and Society,22,625-641.
60. Sinn, J(1997).The Predictive and Discriminate Validity of Masculinity Ideology.British Journal of Management,117-135.
61. Tony, Jefferson(2002).Subordinating Hegemonic Masculinity.Theoretical Criminology,6,63-88.
62. Villeneuve, M(1994).Recruiting and Retaining Men in Nursing: a Review of the Literature.Journal of Professional Nursing,10(4),217-228.
63. Walby Sylvia(1998).The New Regulatory State: The Social Powers of The European Union.British Journal of Sociology,50,118-140.
64. Walby Sylvia(1990).Theorizing Patriarchy.Cambridge:Basil Blackwell Ltd.
65. Walby Sylvia(1986).Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchy and Capitalist Relations in Employment.Cambridge:Polity Press.
66. Williams, C.L(1989).Gender Differences at Work: Women and Men in Nontraditional Occupations.University of California Press.
67. Williams, C.L(1995).Still a Man's World: Men Who do Women s Work.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
68. Williams, C.L(1995).Hidden Advantages for Men in Nursing.Nursing Administration Quarterly,19(2),63-70.
69. Williams, C.L(1992).The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the Female Profession.Social Problems,39(3),253-267.
70. Williams, C.L,M. Kimmel(Eds),M. Messner (Eds)(1998).Men's Lives.Needham Heights, MA:Ally and Bacon.
71. Witz, A(1992).Professions and Patriarchy.London:Routledge Press.
72. 王春源(1995)。台灣產業結構變動之回顧、省思與展望。台灣經濟，226，65-112。
73. 行政院主計處編印(2004)。中華民國九十二年台灣地區婦女婚育與就業調查報告。
74. 呂玉瑕(1984)。婦女就業與家庭角色：權力結構之關係。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，56，111-143。
75. 金春華、林壽惠、王子芳、葉明珍、呂淑美(1996)。台灣地區男護士人力異動及工作性質之相關因素調查。榮總護理，13(3)，278-288。
76. 政院勞工委員會編印(2005)。性別統計調查。台北:行政院勞工委員會。
77. 政院勞工委員會編印(2003)。兩性工作平等狀況調查報告。
78. 洪文龍(2000)。男性當兵的身體經驗。台北:台灣查某社論壇。
79. 唐先梅(2001)。雙薪家庭夫妻在不同家務項目之分工情形及個人影響因素。空大生活科學學報，7，105-131。
80. 徐宗國(1995)。工作內涵與性別角色。台北:稻香出版社。
81. 徐宗國(2001)。拓邊照顧工作：男護士在女人工作世界中得其所在。台灣社會學刊，26，163-210。
82. 徐宗國、胡幼慧主編(1996)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北市:巨流。
83. 婦女論壇(1997)。兩性教育篇。台北:
84. 張晉芬(2002)。找回文化：勞動市場中制度與結構的性別化過程。台灣社會學刊，29，97-125。
85. 張晉芬、女性學學會著(1995)。台灣婦女處境白皮書。台北:時報文化。
86. 張晉芬、林芳玫、瞿海源、王振寰編(2002)。社會學與台灣社會（精簡版）。台北:巨流。
87. 梁雙蓮、女性學學會著(1995)。台灣婦女處境白皮書。台北:時報文化。
88. 陳建志(2000)。台灣地區科系職業性別隔離與收入性別差異之變遷。教育與心理研究，23，285-312。
89. 楊錦蘭(1999)。給女人們的一封信，男人也要看：談兩性平權。社教雜誌，254，15-18。
90. 楊瓊樺(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義，南華大學社會研究所。
91. 劉秀娟譯(1996)。兩性關係：性別刻板化與角色。台北:揚智出版社。
92. 劉梅君、王雅各主編(1999)。性屬關係：性別與社會建構（上）。台北:心理出版社。
93. 蔡淑玲(1987)。職業隔離現象與教育成就：性別之比較分析。中國社會學刊，11，61-91。
94. 蕭英玲(2005)。台灣的家務分工：經濟依賴與性別的影響。台灣社會學刊，34，115-145。
95. 謝國雄(1997)。純勞動：台灣勞動體制序論。中央研究院社會所。
96. 瞿海源、王振寰主編(2002)。社會學與台灣社會。台北:巨流圖書公司。
97. 藍佩嘉(1998)。銷售女體，女禮勞動：百貨專櫃化妝品女銷售員的身體勞動。台灣社會學研究，2，38-72。
98. 嚴祥鸞(1996)。「兩性關係的課程是什麼？一個社會學的觀點。台灣社會學社通訊，17
99. 嚴祥鸞(1997)。工作場所性別文化的形塑。福利社會，49，18-22。
100. 護理師護士工會全國聯合會(2008)。全國護士參與資料。台北:

1. 林東龍(2014)。從男子氣概分析男性口腔癌存活者的韌性形成過程。臺大社會工作學刊，30，139-186。
2. 邱琡雯(2017)。聖俗共構、剛柔相濟：佛教道場男性氣概初探。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，55(4)，1-46。