解讀《巴西，如斯壯麗》：回應台灣學界對於卡多索自傳的評論與簡介

A Critique of Some Responses from the Taiwanese Academic Community to "The Accidental President of Brazil: A Memoir"

10.29816/TARQSS.201108.0007

蔡侑霖(You-Lin Tsai)

台灣社會研究季刊

83期（2011 / 08 / 01）

241 - 269

繁體中文

巴西前總統卡多索的自傳近來被譯成中文出版後，引起一些台灣學者針對該書提出評論與簡介。當許多出身於或研究拉丁美洲的學者對卡多索的新自由主義轉型提出批判時，台灣學界的迴響顯得相當正面，不但讚揚卡多索在從政時仍持續身為學者時的關懷，也肯定他在社會正義、經濟繁榮，以及將巴西整合進全球經濟的貢獻。透過重讀卡多索的早期著作，以及回顧他的政策與政績，本文指出這些對卡多索治下的「巴西奇蹟」之正面評價，乃源自對近年巴西發展經驗的片面理解。此外，本文也認為，當討論卡多索時，其早年的立場與轉變也較少獲得關注。最後，本文試圖指出，當全球面對新自由主義全球化之際，台灣學界對卡多索的解讀與「奇蹟」經濟的理解經常忽略了由拉丁美洲衍生而出的反思與辯論。因此，藉由本文的討論，期待著能拋磚引玉，觸動更多對新自由主義全球化的在地批判性探討。

By reviewing Fernando H. Cardoso's memoir, ”Dependency and Development in Latin America”, and the relevant discussion on his policies, this paper offers a critique to the general interpretation and understanding of his early scholarship and his neoliberal reform at Brazil within the academic sphere in Taiwan. In contrast with the critical attitude from Latin American scholars, Taiwanese intellectuals in general have responded quite positively to Cardoso's work, emphasizing his contribution to social justice, economic prosperity, and the integration of Brazil into the global economy. This paper argues that the recognition given to Cardoso in Taiwan is built on the lack of a strong, reflexive critique toward neoliberal globalization and limited understanding of the critiques from Latin America. Moreover, although Taiwan, like Brazil, is also facing neoliberal globalization, very few Taiwanese scholars examine Latin American perspectives on neoliberal reforms and recontextualize these neoliberal critiques to shed light on the processes of neoliberalization in Taiwan. In sum, in response to Taiwanese researchers' extant interpretation of Cardoso's early scholarship and political actions, this paper aims to posit an alternative understanding of his neoliberal reform, hoping to generate a dynamic discussion on neoliberalism in Taiwan.

1. 李宗榮，2010/03/21，〈社會學家總統的美好的仗〉，《中時電子報》，2010/07/20，取自http://news.chinatimes.com/2009Cti/Channel/Life/life-article/0,5047,11051801+112010032100071,00.html
2. Amann, E.,Baer, W.(2002).Neoliberalism and its Consequences in Brazil.Journal of Latin American Studies,34(4),945-959.
3. Amsden, A. H.(1989).Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization.Oxford University Press.
4. Cardoso, F. H.,Faletto, E.(1979).Dependency and Development in Latin America.University of California Press.
5. Castañeda, J. G.(2006).Latin America's Left Turn.Foreign Affairs,85(3),28-43.
6. Conniff, M. L.(ed.)(1999).Populism in Latin America.University of Alabama Press.
7. Cumings, B.(1987).The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy.The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism
8. Deyo, F. C.(1989).Beneath the Miracle: Labor Subordination in the New Asian Industrialism.University of California Press.
9. Deyo, F. C.(1987).State and labor.The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism
10. Ellner, S.(2004).Leftist Goals and the Debate over Anti-Neoliberal Strategy in Latin America.Science & Society,68(1),10-32.
11. Fernandes, S.(2010).Who Can Stop the Drums? Urban Social Movements in Chávez's Venezuela.Duke University Press.
12. Font, M. A.(2003).Transforming Brazil: A Reform Era in Perspective.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
13. Font, M. A.(ed.)(2001).Charting a New Course: the Politics of Globalization and Social Transformation.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
14. Gates, L. C.(2010).Electing Chávez: The Business of Anti-neoliberal Politics in Venezuela.University of PittsburghPress.
15. Goertzel, T. G.(1999).Fernando Henrique Cardoso: Reinventing Democracy in Brazil.Lynne Rienner Publishers.
16. Harvey, D.(2005).A Brief History of NeoLiberalism.Oxford University Press.
17. Johnson, C.(1999).The Developmental State; Odyssey of a Concept.The Developmental State
18. Johnson, C.(1987).Political Institutions and Economic Performance; The Government-Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism
19. Johnson, C.(1982).Miti and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975.Stanford University Press.
20. Löwy, M.(2000).A 'Red' Government in the South of Brazil.Monthly Review,52(6),16-20.
21. Marx, K.(1977).Capital.Vintage (Random House).
22. Medeiros, L. S. D.(2007).Social Movements and the Experience of Market-led Agrarian Reform in Brazil.Third World Quarterly,28(8),1501-1518.
23. Mollo, M. L. R.,Saad-Filho, A.(2006).Neoliberal Economic Policies in Brazil (1994-2005): Cardoso, Lula and the Need for a Democratic Alternative.New Political Economy,11(1),99-123.
24. Ong, A.(2006).Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty.Duke University Press.
25. Pereira, A.(2003).Brazil's Agrarian Reform: Democratic Innovation or Oligarchic Exclusion Redux?.Latin American Politics and Society,45(2),41-65.
26. Pereira, J. M. M.(2007).The World Bank's 'Market-Assisted' Land Reform as a Political Issue: Evidence from Brazil (1997-2006).European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies,82,21-49.
27. Petras, J. F.,Veltmeyer, H.(2003).Cardoso's Brazil: a Land for Sale.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
28. Robinson, M.(ed.),White, G.(ed.)(1998).The Democratic Developmental State: Politics and Institutional Design.Oxford University Press.
29. Sáo Paulo Justice and Peace Commission(1978).Sáo Paulo: Growth and Poverty.The Bowerdean Press.
30. Sauer, S.(2009).Market-led 'Agrarian Reform' in Brazial: A Dream has Become a Debt Burden.Progress in Development Studies,9(2),127-140.
31. Silva, E.(2009).Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America.Cambridge University Press.
32. Skidmore, T. E.(2004).Brazil's Persistent Income Inequality: Lessons from History.Latin American Politics & Society,46(2),133-150.
33. Wade, R.(1990).Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization.Princeton University Press.
34. White, G.(ed.)(1988).Developmental States in East Asia.Martin's Press.
35. Whitehead, L.(2002).Stirrings of Mutual Recognition.Emerging Market Democracies: East Asia and Latin America
36. Wolford, W.(2005).Agrarian Moral Economies and Neoliberalism in Brazil: Competing Worldviews and the State in the Struggle for Land.Environment and Planning A,37(2),241-261.
37. Wong, J.(2005).Re-marking the Developmental State in Taiwan: The Challenges of Biotechnology.International Political Science Review,26(2),169-191.
38. Woo-Cumings, M.(ed.)(1999).The Developmental State.Cornell University Press.
39. 林志懋譯、Cardoso, F. H.、Winter, B.(2010)。巴西，如斯壯麗：傳奇總統卡多索回憶錄。早安財經文化。
40. 段承璞譯、陳玉璽(1992)。台灣的依附型發展：依附型發展及其社會政治後果─台灣個案研究。人間出版社。
41. 蔡侑霖(2010)。新自由主義的特洛伊木馬：慈濟大愛園區的個案分析。社區發展季刊，131，278-293。
42. 龐建國(1993)。國家發展理論：兼論台灣發展經驗。巨流圖書公司。