疆域走出來－原住民傳統領域之身體行動論述

Walking through Ancestral Lands: Visual Representations of Taiwan's Aboriginal Movements in Defense of Traditional Territory

林文玲(Wen-Ling Lin)

傳統領域 ； 走路 ； 體現技能 ； 原住民運動 ； traditional territory ； walking ； embodied skills ； aboriginal movements

台灣社會研究季刊

91期（2013 / 06 / 01）

33 - 92

繁體中文

「祖居地」、「舊部落」、「傳統領域」經常是台灣原住民族各類社會、文化活動的主要訴求議題。每個「重返舊遺址」或「舊部落勘查」事件，多少都意味著原先居處的不在，後代子孫依循老人家的指示，翻山越嶺尋覓著祖先活動與生活的地方。「移動身體去到某處」成為這些活動事件的共同主題與主軸，而每次走動的路徑都成為可能的疆域範圍。原住民對祖居地的一再重訪，用身體勞動將老人家口中的「原鄉」具體、實體化，這與當下社會生活中空間越來越非物質化的現象，有著完全不同的感受與表達，其中的深刻意涵將是本文聚焦之所在。本文將透過三部關於土地、部落地圖、爬山以及尋找原居地的台灣原住民族紀錄影片，所開啟的三個不同層次場所／地方營造的參與可能：一為拍攝過程中人事物遇合所營造的場所╱地方；二為鏡頭媒介下的某種再製、再現的場所╱地方；第三則是影片文本所提供對場所╱地方的認識、想像或理解的可能。進而探討三個相互關聯的問題區塊：（1）紀錄影像中的走路、身體活動與透露的感官經驗，如何去呈述關於土地、領域與族群故事的主題。（2）鏡頭前後的走路與身體行動，表述了何種有別於文字的或幾何、國家式的繪圖論述行動。（3）走路、身體行動所展現的與土地、傳統、文化與環境的倫理互動關係。透過本文分析與探討之核心議題，本文最終企圖帶出原住民傳統領域之身體行動論述以及透過影片所彰顯出來的視覺主權。

Ancestral place, ＂old tribe＂, and ＂traditional territory＂ have often been the main appeal issues of aboriginal social and cultural activities in Taiwan. With the illustration of several Taiwan aboriginals documentaries on topics of land, tribal maps, hiking and searching for the original habitat, this essay investigates the following three inter-related questions through the embodiments and multiple sensory experiences evoked by the visual medium: (1) How do the walking, body movement and sensory experiences shown in the documentary footage narrate the themes of land, territory and ethnic legends? (2) What graphic-discursive actions are articulated by the walking and bodily movements shown in the documentaries, which differ from literal, geometrical and national discourse? (3) What are the interacting ethical relationships between land, tradition, culture and environment as expressed in these walking and body actions? By investigating and analyzing these core issues, this essay attempts to foreground the aboriginal body movement discourse of traditional territory and the visual sovereignty as manifested in these documentaries.

1. 馬耀．比吼 2006《阿里山．鄒》，紀錄片，50分鐘。
2. 馬耀．比吼 2005a《光復．噶馹佤》，紀錄片，56分鐘。
3. Postma, Metje, 1998 Of Men and Mares : Workhorses in Zeeland, documentary, 90mins.
4. 馬耀．比吼 2003《走一趟故事Cilangasan》，紀錄片，24分鐘。
5. MacDougall, David and MacDougall, Judith, 1979 Lorang's Way, documentary, 70mins.
6. 馬耀．比吼 2005b《復興．比亞外》，紀錄片，48分鐘。
7. 達嗨．閔奇暖 2002《打開台灣歷史的窗口：重返內本鹿》，紀錄片，60分鐘。
8. Bender, Barbara(1993).Landscape: Politics and Perspectives.Oxford:Berg.
9. Casey, Edward S.(1993).Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-world.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
10. Crawford, Peter Ian(ed.),Turton, David(ed.)(1992).Film as Ethnography.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
11. de Certeau, Michel,Rendall, Steven(trans.)(1984).The Practice of Everyday Life.Berkeley:University of California.
12. Feld, Steven,Basso, Keith(1996).Senses of Place.Santa Fe:School of American Research Press.
13. Gieser, Thorsten(2008).Embodiment, Emotion and Empathy: A Phenomenological Approach to Apprenticeship Learning.Anthropological Theory,8(3),299-318.
14. Harris, Mark(ed.)(2007).Ways of Knowing: New Approach in the Anthropology of Experience and Learning.Oxford:Berghahn.
15. Hirsch, Eric(ed.),O''Hanlon, Michael(ed.)(1995).The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and Space.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
16. Hockings, Paul(ed.)(1995).Principles of Visual Anthropology.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Howes, David(ed.)(2005).Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader.Oxford:Berg.
18. Ingold, Tim(2011).Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description.London:Routledge.
19. Ingold, Tim(2004).Culture on the Ground: The World Perceived Through the Feet.Journal of Material Culture,9(3),315-340.
20. Ingold, Tim(2000).The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill.London:Routledge.
21. Ingold, Tim(ed.)(2011).Redrawing Anthropology: Materials, Movements, Lines.Ashgate.
22. Ingold, Tim(ed.),Vergunst, Jo Lee(ed.)(2008).Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot.Ashgate.
23. Lewis, Randolph(2006).Alanis Obomsawin: The Vision of a Native Filmmaker.Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press.
24. Lippert, Richard(1993).The Sight of Sound: Music, Representation, and the History of the Body.University of California Press.
25. MacDougall, David(2005).The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses.NJ:Princeton University.
26. MacDougall, David(1998).Transcultural Cinema.NJ:Princeton University.
27. Marchand, Trevor H.J.(ed.)(2010).Making Knowledge: Exploration of the Indissoluble Relation Between Mind, Body and Environment.Chichester:John Wiley.
28. Marks, Laura(2000).The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses.Durham:Duke University Press.
29. Massey, Doreen B.(2005).For Space.London:Sage.
30. Oakes, Jill(ed.),Riewe, Rick(ed.),Kinew, Kathi(ed.),Maloney, Elaine(ed.)(1998).Sacred Lands: Aboriginal World Views, Claims, and Conflicts.Edmonton:Canadian Circumpolar Institute Press.
31. Pink, Sarah(2007).Waling with Video.Visual Studies,22(3),240-252.
32. Pink, Sarah(2009).Doing Sensory Ethnography.London:Sage.
33. Pink, Sarah(ed.)(2009).Visual Interventions: Applied Visual Anthropology.New York:Berghahn Books.
34. Postma, Metje(ed.),Crawford, Peter Ian(ed.)(2006).Reflecting Visual Ethnography: Using the Camera in Anthropological Research.Leiden:CNWS Publications.
35. Raheja, Michelle(2007).Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat.American Quarterly,59(4),1159-1185.
36. Rodman, Margaret C.(1992).Empowering Place: Multilocality and Multivocality.American Anthropology,94(3),640-656.
37. Rundstrom, Robert(1991).Mapping, Postmodernism, Indigenous People and the Changing Direction of North American Cartography.Cartographica,28(2),1-12.
38. Rundstrom, Robert(1993).The Role of Ethics, Mapping, and the Meaning of Place in Relations between Indians and Whites in the United States.Cartographica,30(1),21-28.
39. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai(1999).Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples.London:Zed Books.
40. Somomon, Thomas(2000).Dueling Landscapes: Singing Places and Identities in Highland Bolivia.Ethnomusicology,44(2),257-280.
41. Tilley, Christopher(2004).The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology.Oxford:Berg.
42. Tilley, Christopher(1994).A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments.Oxford:Berg.
43. Witmore, Christopher(2004).Four Archaeological Engagements with Place: Mediating Bodily Experience through Peripatetic Video.Visual Anthropology Review,20(2),57-72.
44. Young, Iris Marion(1980).Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality.Human Studies,3,137-156.
45. 以撒克．阿復(2008)。紀念作為文化抵抗：大港口事件作為「危險記憶」的解放意涵。台灣原住民研究論叢紀念文集
46. 台邦．撒沙勒(2004)。尋找失落的箭矢：部落主義的視野和行動。台北:財團法人國家展望文教基金會。
47. 白皇湧(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮，國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所。
48. 李敏惠(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台灣師範大學地理系。
49. 李道明(2003)。懷念一位令人愛戴的阿公。阿美影展Ⅳ．部落的智者Lekal Makor紀念文集
50. 林瑞珠(2011)。重返內本鹿：布農族尋根之旅。原住民族季刊，2011(夏季號（2）)，50-57。
51. 阿力曼(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮，國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所。
52. 海樹兒．犮剌拉菲(2006)。布農族部落起源及部落遷移史。台北:行政院原住民族委會。
53. 黃雅鴻(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮，國立東華大學族群關係與文化研究所。
54. 黃應貴(2001)。台東縣史布農族篇。台東:台東縣政府文化局。
55. 葉家寧(2002)。臺灣原住民族史：布農族史篇。南投:國史館台灣文獻館。
56. 舞賽．庫拉斯(2003)。我生命中的導師mama Lekal Makor。阿美影展Ⅳ．部落的智者Lekal Makor紀念文集
57. 蔡善神(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立政治大學民族學系。

1. 陳毅峰,余崇維(2019)。從關係性論述探究轉型正義中的原住民族傳統領域議題。台灣社會研究季刊，114，57-103。
2. 洪廣冀、何俊頤(2018)。自然資源治理與原住民部落發展：後發展與後人類的視角。考古人類學刊，89，93-141。
3. 林文玲(2022)。同時不共代的道路時間景觀。考古人類學刊，97，65-122。
4. 鄭玠甫(2020)。從尋根到協同：拉庫拉庫溪流域布農族舊部落的原住民考古學研究。考古人類學刊，93，87-132。
5. 鄭玠甫(2022)。舊社還是asang？拉庫拉庫溪流域布農族傳統地景的考古學研究。考古人類學刊，97，1-57。
6. (2019)。「蕃地」開發、「蕃人」控制及臺灣原住民族群性的展現：以蘭陽溪中上游地域為中心（上篇）。考古人類學刊，90，1-44。