民主作為一種治理的藝術－知識、技藝與主體化

Democracy as an Art of Government-Knowledge, Technique and Subjectification

吳彥明(Yen-Ming Wu)

民主 ； 治理性 ； 知識 ； 技藝 ； 主體化 ； democracy ； governmentality ； knowledge ； technique ； subjectification

台灣社會研究季刊

97期（2014 / 12 / 01）

111 - 174

繁體中文

傅柯一系列的權力概念，例如知識、規訓、維安、佈署、治理性、主體化，不應僅侷限於性／別、醫學、軍事、殖民體制等這些形式上比較負面的討論，權力經常狡猾地介入與隱藏於我們標示為正面意義的人事物之中，「民主」就是一個免疫的例子。我將著重於「民主作為一種治理的藝術」這個面向，將民主視為一種由知識、技藝與主體化所構成「民主複合體」（democratic complex）：首先，民主不只是一種政治菁英擘劃的政治議程，它更是一種確立、劃界與定義如何思考民主的專家／知識體系。其次，民主不只是一種文化，更是一種由治理技藝打造的技術物，它既是治理的手段也是治理的目的。最後，與其說民主的正當性基礎是公民，我們必須將民主視為一種將人民轉化為民主主體的權力投資。

The critical concepts in Foucault's oeuvre, like savoir, discipline, police, deployment, governmentality and subjectification, are usually applied to the analysis of gender, medicine, military or colonial apparatus. Inevitably, however, power insinuate into a variety of fields we labeled as positive. Democracy is indeed the example. In this article, the author tries to elaborate democracy as an art of government, which means democracy is a democratic complex constitued by knowledge, technique and subjectification. First, rather than as the political agenda set by political elites, we should take democracy as the forms of knowledge formulated by expertise that valorize, delimit and certificate the problematics of democracy. Second, more than delineates it as culture, we suppose democracy as an artifact fabricated by governmental techniques. Last, but not least, citizens are more as the democratic subjects invested by democracy than as the legitimacy of democracy.

1. Huang, Min-hua(2004).How can political culture be a useful independent variable?.Taiwanese Political Science Review,8(1),147-191.
   連結：
2. 吳乃德(2000)。人的精神理念在歷史變革中的作用：美麗島事件和台灣民主化。台灣政治學刊，4，57-104。
   連結：
3. 李丁讚、林文源(2000)。社會力的文化根源：論台灣環境權感受的歷史形成；1970-86。台灣社會研究季刊，38，133-206。
   連結：
4. 姚人多(2001)。認識台灣：知識、權力與日本在台之殖民治理性。台灣社會研究季刊，42，119-182。
   連結：
5. 姚人多(2003)。傅柯、殖民主義、後殖民文化研究。台灣社會學，6，223-266。
   連結：
6. 范雲(2010)。說故事與民主討論：一個公民社會內部族群對話論壇的分析。臺灣民主季刊，7(1)，65-105。
   連結：
7. 湯志傑(2006)。重探台灣的政體轉型：如何看待1970 年代國民黨政權的正當化。台灣社會學，12，141-189。
   連結：
8. 蕭新煌(2004)。台灣的非政府組織、民主轉型與民主治理。臺灣民主季刊，1(1)，65-84。
   連結：
9. (2006).democracy: Asian perspectives, voices and traditions.Hong Kong:Civic Enchage.
10. 姚人多。2010。〈為什麼要「民主」：台灣近百年來「民主」理念的歷史考察〉（未發表講稿）。台北：中研院。
11. Foucault, M. 1972. Intellectuals and power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. Online available at http://postcolonial.net/@/DigitalLibrary/_entries/35/file-pdf.pdf
12. Abrams, P.(1988).Notes on the difficulty of studing the state.Journal of Historical Sociology,1(1),58-89.
13. Ahamben, G.(2011).Democracy in what states?.New York:Columbia University Press.
14. Alagappa, M.(Ed.)(2004).Civil society and political change in Asia.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
15. Alford, R.、王志弘譯(2011)。好研究怎麼做：從理論、方法、證據構思研究問題。台北:群學。
16. Amir-Moazami, S.(2011).Dialogue as a governmental technique: Managing gendered Islam in Germany.Feminist Review,98,9-27.
17. Ashenden, S.(Ed.),Owen, D.(Ed.)(1999).Foucault contra Habermas.London:Sage.
18. Ayers, A. J.(2006).Demystifying democratisation: The global contitution of (neo)liberal polities in Africa.Third World Quarterly,27(2),321-338.
19. Baehr, P.,Gordon, D.(2013).From the headscarf to the burqa: The role of social theorists in shaping laws against the veil.Economy and Society,42(2),249-280.
20. Baker, K. M.(1994).A foucauldian French revolution?.Foucault and writing of history,Cambridge:
21. Banjac, M.(2010).Developing Tanzanian civil society: Desiring democracy, self-empowerment and the world Bank.Journal of Organizational Change Management,23(6),669-688.
22. Biesta, G.(2011).The ignorant citizen: Mouffe, Ranciere, and the subject of democratic education.Studies in Philosophy and Education,30(2),141-153.
23. Brossat, A.、羅惠珍譯(2012)。傅柯：危險哲學家。台北:麥田。
24. Bunce, V.(2000).Comparative democratization: Big and bounded generalization.Comparative Political Studies,33(6/7),703-734.
25. Burchell, D.(1995).The attributes of citizens: Virtue, manners and the activity of citizenship.Economy and Society,24(4),540-558.
26. Cambell, S.(Ed.),Fainstein, S. S.(Ed.)(2003).Readings in planning theory 2nd.Oxford:Blackwell.
27. Capoccia, G.,Ziblatt, D.(2010).The historical turn in democratization studies: A new research agenda for Europe and beyond.Comparative Political Studies,43(8/9),931-968.
28. Carothers, T.(2002).The end of transition paradigm.Journal of Democracy,13(1),5-21.
29. Chang, Yu-tzung,Chu, Yun-han,Huang, Ming-hua(2011).Procedural quality only? Taiwanese democracy reconsidered.International Political Science Review,32(5),598-619.
30. Chang, Yu-tzung,Chu, Yun-han,Tasi, Frank(2005).Confucianism and democratic values in three Chinese societies.Issue & Studies,41(4),1-33.
31. Cheng, Tun-Jen(1989).Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist regime in Taiwan.World Politics,41(1),471-499.
32. Chu, Yangsun,Nathan, A.(1987).Democratizing transition in Taiwan.Asian Survey,27(3),277-299.
33. Chu, Yun-han(1992).Crafting democracy in Taiwan.Taipei:Institute for National Policy Research.
34. Chu, Yun-han(Ed.)(2008).How East Asians view democracy.New York:Columbia University Press.
35. Coles, K. A.(2007).Democratic designs: International intervention and electoral practices in postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina.Michigan:University of Michigan Press.
36. Coles, K. A.(2004).Election day: The construction of democracy through technique.Cultural Anthropology,19(4),551-580.
37. Connolly, W.(1987).Politics and ambiguity.Madison:The University of Wisconsin Press.
38. Cruikshank, B.(1999).The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects.NY:Cornell University Press.
39. Dahl, R.(1992).The problem of civic competence.Journal of Democracy,3(4),45-59.
40. Dahl, R.(1989).Democracy and its critics.New Haven:Yale University Press.
41. Dahl, R.(1999).On Democracy.New Haven:Yale University Press.
42. Dalacoura, K.(2005).US democracy promotion in the Arab Middle East since 11 September 2001: a critique.International Affairs,81(5),963-979.
43. Dalton, R.(Ed.),Shin, Doh, Chull(Ed.)(2006).Citizens, democracy, and market around the pacific rim.New York:Oxford University Press.
44. Donzelot, J.(1979).The poverty of political culture.Ideology & Consciouness,5,73-86.
45. Dorsey, J.,Manchester, W.(1980).On Mencken.New York:Alfred A. Knopf.
46. Durrheim, K.,Foster, D.(1999).Technologies of social control: Crowd management in liberal democracy.Economy and Society,28(1),56-74.
47. Elkin, S. L.(Ed.),Soltan, K. E.(Ed.)(1999).Citizen competence and democratic institutions.Pennsylvania:Pennsylvania State University Press.
48. Elliott, C.(2009).The day democracy died: The depoliticizing effects of democratic development.Alternative: Global, Local, Political,34(3),249-274.
49. Engelmann, S. G.(2011).Review article: Social science against democracy.History of Human Sciences,24(5),167-179.
50. Ericson, R. V.(Ed.),Stehr, N.(Ed.)(2000).Governing modern societies.Toronto:University of Toronto Press.
51. Eyal, G.,Buchholz, L.(2010).From the sociology of intellectuals to the sociology of interventions.Annual Review of Sociology,36,117-13.
52. Eyal, G.,Szelényi, I.,Townsley, E.(1998).Making capitalism without capitalists: Class formation and elite struggles in post-communist central europe.London:Verso.
53. Fisher, W.(1997).Doing good? the politics and antipolitics of NGO practices.Annual Review of Anthropology,26,439-464.
54. Foucault, M.(1977).Discipline and punish:The birth of the prison.New York:Pantheon Books.
55. Foucault, M.(1978).The history of sexuality-volume 1: An introduction.New York:Pantheon Books.
56. Gauchet, M.,Swain, G.(1999).Madness and democracy.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
57. Gordon, C.(Ed.)(1980).Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977.New York:Pantheon Books.
58. Gordon, N.(2001).Dahl's procedural democracy: A Foucauldian critique.Democratization,8(4),23-40.
59. Haddad, M. A.(2010).The state-in-society approach to the study of democratization with examples from Japan.Democratization,17(5),997-1023.
60. Haggerty, K.(Ed.),Samatas, M.(Ed.)(2010).Serveillance and democracy.Oxon:Rouledge-Cavendish.
61. Hall, J. R.(Ed.),Grindstaff, L.(Ed.),Lo, Ming-Cheng(Ed.)(2010).Handbook of cultural sociology.London:Routledge.
62. Hall, J.(Ed.)(1970).The State: Critical concepts (Volume 3).London:Routledge.
63. Haugaard, M.(Ed.),Clegg, S.(Ed.)(2009).The sage handbook of power.London:Sage.
64. Hauggard, M.(2010).Democracy, political power, and authority.Social Research,77(4),1049-1074.
65. Heelas, P.(Ed.),Lash, S.(Ed.),Morris, P.(Ed.)(1996).Detraditonalization: Critical reflections on authortity and identity.London:Blackwell.
66. Holc, J. P.(1997).Liberalism and the construction of the democratic subject in postcommunism: The case of Poland.Slavic Review,56(3),401-427.
67. Hoover, J.(Ed.),Sabaratnam, M.(Ed.),Schouenborg, L.(Ed.)(2011).Interrogating democracy in world politics.London:Routledge.
68. Horowitz, I.(1982).Socialization without politicization: Emile Durkheim's theory of the modern state.Political Theory,10(3),353-377.
69. Housley, W.,Wahl-Jorgensen, K.(2008).Theorizing the democratic gaze: Visitor' experiences of the New Welsh assembly.Sociology,42(4),726-744.
70. Hua, Shiping(Ed.)(2001).Chinese politcal culture 1989-2000.New York:An East Gate Book.
71. Irving, W.、鄒化民譯(1965)。李伯大夢。台北:天人。
72. Isin, E. F.(Ed.)(2000).Democracy, citizenship and the global city.London:Routledge.
73. Jamieson, L.(1999).Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the "pure relationship".Sociology,33(3),477-494.
74. Jamieson, L.、蔡明璋譯(2002)。親密關係：現代社會的私人關係。台北:群學。
75. Joyce, P.(2003).The rule of freedom-liberalism and the modern city.London:Verso.
76. Kane, J.(Ed.),Patapan, H.(Ed.)(2011).Political legitimacy in Asia: Challenges for leaders.New York:Palgrave.
77. Keane, J.(2009).The life and death of democracy.New York:W. W. Norton & Company.
78. Koelble, T. A.,Lipuma, E.(2008).Democratizing democracy: A postcolonial critique of conventional approaches to the 'measurement of democracy'.Democratization,15(1),1-28.
79. Kofmel, E.(Ed.)(2008).Anti-democratic thought.UK:Imprint Academic.
80. Law, J.(2009).Seeing like a survey.Cultural Sociology,3(2),239-256.
81. Marinetto, M.(2003).Who wants to be an active citizen? the politics and practice of community involvement.Sociology,37(1),103-120.
82. Matsuda, T.(2007).Soft power and its perils: U.S. cultural policy in early postwar Japan and permanent dependency.Washington:Woodrew Wilson Center Press.
83. Mitchell, T.(1999).The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics.The American Political Science Review,85(1),77-96.
84. Mitchell, T.(2005).The work of economics: How a discipline makes its world.European Journal of Sociology,46(2),297-320.
85. Moore, B.(1967).Social origins of dictatorship and democracy lord and peasant in the making of the modern world.Boston:Bacon Press.
86. Moss, J.(Ed.)(1998).The later Foucault.London:Sage.
87. Munck, G.(2009).Measuring democracy: A bridge between scholarship and politics.Maryland:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
88. O'Donnell, G.、廖錦桂譯、張聖昌譯(2007)。第三波：後民主理論的歷史回顧。台灣智庫通訊，24，3-7。
89. Olson, K.(2008).Constructing citizens.Journal of Politics,70(1),40-53.
90. Oppenheimer, D.,Edwards, M.(2012).Democracy despite itself: Why a system that shouldn't work at all works so well.MA:MIT Press.
91. Parekh, B.(1992).The cultural particularity of liberal democracy.Political Studies,40,160-175.
92. Peel, M.(1990).Reviews.Thesis Eleven,27(1),240-242.
93. Peters, M. A.(Ed.),Besley, T.(Ed.)(2007).Why Foucault? -new directions in educational research.New York:Peter Lang.
94. Pizzorno, A.(1992).Foucault and liberal view of the individual.Michel Foucault philosopher,New York:
95. Plattner, M.(2004).A skeptical afterword.Journal of Democracy,15(4),106-110.
96. Potte-Bonneville, M.(2011).Risked democracy: Foucault, castoriads and the greeks.Radical Philosophy,166,29-38.
97. Power, M.(2011).Foucault and sociology.Annual Review of Sociology,37,35-56.
98. Putnam, R.(2000).Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community.New York:Simon & Schuster.
99. Putnam, R.(1993).Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
100. Raffenne, C.,Toumi, M.(2009).Democracies in action: A Foucaultian perspective on British and French tax enforcement.E-rea,7(1),1-14.
101. Rancière, J.(2006).Hatred of democracy.London:Verso.
102. Rimke, H. M.(2000).Governing citizens through self-help literature.Cultural Studies,14(1),61-78.
103. Roberts, N. S.(2009).Grand designs: Parliamentary architecture, art, and accessibility.Political Science,61(2),75-86.
104. Robinow, P.(Ed.)(1997).Ethics-subjectivity and truth.New York:The New Press.
105. Robinow, P.(Ed.)(1982).The Foucault reader.New York:Vintage Books.
106. Rogin, M.(1989).The tranquilizing text?.Political Theory,17(1),141-148.
107. Rose, N.(1993).Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism.Economy and Society,22(3),283-299.
108. Rose, N.(1999).Inventiveness in politics.Economy and Society,28(3),467-493.
109. Rose, N.(1996).Psychiatry as political science: Advanced liberalism and administration of risk.History of Human Science,9(2),1-23.
110. Rose, N.(1991).Governing by numbers: Figuring our democracy.Accounting Organization and Society,16(7),673-692.
111. Rose, N.(1996).Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
112. Rose, N.(1999).Powers of freedom.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
113. Schudson, M.(1997).Why conversation is not the soul of democracy.Critical Studies in Mass Communication,14(4),297-309.
114. Schudson, M.(2006).The trouble with experts: And why democracies need them.Theory and Society,35(5/6),491-506.
115. Solomon, Y.(2002).Intimate talk between parents and their teenage children: Democratic openness or covert control?.Sociology,36(4),965-983.
116. Squires, J.(2002).Democracy as flawed hegemon.Economy and Society,31(1),132-151.
117. Steinmetz, G.(Ed.)(2005).The politics of method in the human sciences.Durham:Duke University Press.
118. Sudjic, D.、Jones, H.、李白云譯、任永杰譯(2006)。建築與民主。上海:上海人民出版社。
119. Sudjic, D.、張季芳譯(2008)。建築！建築！誰是世界上最有權力的人。台北:漫遊者文化。
120. Tarrow, S.(1996).Making social science work across space and time: A critical reflection on robert Putnam's making democracy work.American Political Science Review,90(2),389-397.
121. Tilly, C.(2007).Democracy.New York:Cambridge University Press.
122. Tocqueville, A.、秦修明譯(2000)。民主在美國。台北:貓頭鷹。
123. Twitchell, J.(2000).Twenty ads that shook the world: The century's most groundbreaking advertising and how it changed Us all.New York:Three Rivers Press.
124. Walters, W.(2002).Social capital and political sociology: Re-imaging politics?.Sociology,36(2),377-397.
125. Wang, Jenn-hwan(2000).Civil society, democratization, and governance in Taiwan.Transitional societies in comparison: East central Europe vs. Taiwan,Frankfurt am Main:
126. Weymans, W.(2009).Revising Foucault's model of modernity and exclusion: Gauchet and Swain on madness and democracy.Thesis Eleven,98,33-51.
127. Whimster, S.(Ed.),Lash, S.(Ed.)(1987).Max Weber, rationality and modernity.London:Routledge.
128. White, M.,Hunt, A.(2000).Citizenship: Care of the self, character and personality.Citizenship Studies,4(2),93-116.
129. Wolf, E.、賈士蘅譯(2003)。歐洲與沒有歷史的人。台北:麥田。
130. Wrong, D.(1961).The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology.American Sociological Review,26(2),183-193.
131. Zanotti, L.(2006).Taming chaos: A Foucauldian view of UN peacekeeping, democracy and normalizations.International Peacekeeping,13(2),150-167.
132. Zanotti, L.(2008).Normalizing democracy and human rights: Discipline, resistence and carceralization in Croatia's Euro-Atlantic integration.Journal of International Relations and Development,111,222-250.
133. 王振寰(1999)。邁向常態化政治：臺灣民主化中統理機制的轉變。兩岸黨國體制與民主發展，台北:
134. 王振寰(1989)。台灣的政治轉型與反對運動。台灣社會研究季刊，2(1)，71-116。
135. 江宜樺(2007)。台灣戰後政治思想與民主運動。台灣社會研究季刊，65，191-199。
136. 吳乃德(1989)。搜尋民主化的動力：兼論民主轉型的研究取向。台灣社會研究季刊，2(1)，145-161。
137. 吳乃德(2001)。社會科學和反動論述：台灣威權時期的反民主論。台灣史研究，8，125-161。
138. 吳彥明(2013)。特洛伊木馬：市民社會的治理藝術。公共性危機：2013 年文化研究年會，台北:
139. 李丁讚(2007)。社運與民主。思想，7，85-118。
140. 李丁讚(2004)。導論：市民社會與公共領域在台灣的發展。公共領域在台灣—困境與契機，台北:
141. 李丁讚(2004)。公共領域中的親密關係。公共領域在台灣：困境與契機，台北:
142. 李丁讚(2009)。民主社會是一種共治。思想，11，201-218。
143. 林佳龍(1999)。解釋臺灣的民主化：政體類型與菁英的策略選擇。兩岸黨國體制與民主發展，台北:
144. 潘光哲(2011)。遙想「德先生」：百年來知識份子的歷史格局。台北:南方家園。
145. 謝國雄編(2008)。群學爭鳴：台灣社會發展史：1945-2005。台北:群學。

1. (2022)。為民主服務：論中小學教師專業學習社群政策的挑戰與可能。教育行政與評鑑學刊，31，85-122。