大學院校學生事務處服務品質與滿意度之研究－以元智大學為例

The Study of Service Quality and Satisfaction in the Student Affairs Office of the Universities and Colleges

湯玲郎(Ling-Lang Tang)；蔡瑋真(Wen-Jen Tsai)；陳玫燕(Mei-Yen Chen)

服務品質 ； 人格特質 ； 滿意度調查 ； 品質重要度 ； Service quality ； Human characteristics ； Satisfaction survey ； Quality importance

品質學報

14卷4期（2007 / 12 / 01）

377 - 388

繁體中文

本文探討大學院校學生對學生事務處服務品質之重視與滿意程度，分析影響學生事務工作顧客滿意度之因素，以作爲提昇學務工作品質之參考。本研究以國內獲得國家品質獎之元智大學學生爲例，回收577份有效樣本並且採用SPSS統計軟體做爲分析工具。根據學生背景及五大類人格特質，探討不同類型學生對學生事務服務品質滿意度是否有差異。其次採用服務品質缺口一及缺口五分析服務品質認知差異。最後應用屬性重視與滿意程度劃分四個象限，瞭解學生對學務處服務品質需求所在及滿意情形，以做爲各大學學生事務工作者策略擬定與資源配置之參考。研究發現學生對學務處服務品質之重視程度與滿意程度有顯著差異。本研究不同於一般服務品質之研究，在學生背景加入人格特質構面的討論；分析結果發現某些特性會對學務處「整體滿意度」有顯著差異。

For promoting the quality of the works in Student Affairs, this research aims to realize students' views on service quality by analyzing the key factors of customer satisfaction in universities. The research takes the university in Taiwan who got the national quality award, Yuan Ze University, as the example with 577 valid samples analyzing by SPSS. Based on the variation of student numbers and 5 human characteristics, the research tries to find out if different types of students have different expectations upon the service quality provided by Office of Student Affairs and analyzed service quality perceived deviation with gap 1 and gap 5 approaches. At last, the research applied ”Importance-Satisfaction model” to divide students' value and satisfaction level into 4 quadrants, in order to realize students demands as the strategy directions suggested to universities. The research finds that there is an obvious difference in students' expectation and acknowledgement in the quality of service provided by Office of Student Affairs in gap 5. We try to discuss variation of student numbers and 5 human characteristics with quality of service studies especially. Final result shows that variation of student numbers and 5 human characteristics have significant impact on the ”overall satisfaction”.

1. Andrew, J. D.,Faubion, C. W.,Palmer, C. D.(2002).The relationship between counselor satisfaction and extrinsic job factors in state rehabilitation agencies.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,45,223-232.
2. Costa, P. T.,McCrae, R. R.(1992).Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual.Florida:Psychological Assessment Resources Inc..
3. Costa, P. T.,McCrae, R. R.(1992).NEO PI-R Professional Manual.Florida:Psychological Assessment Resources Inc..
4. Huang, Y. C.,Wu, C. H.,Hsu, J. C. J.(2006).Using importance-performance analysis in evaluating Taiwan medium and long distance national highway passenger transportation service quality.Journal of American Academy of Business,8,98-104.
5. Kotler, P.(1994).Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control.Prentice Hall.
6. Marr, J. W.(1986).Letting the customer be the judge of quality.Quality Progress,19,46-49.
7. Martilla, J. A.,James, J. C.(1977).Importance-performance analysis.Journal of Marketing,41,77-79.
8. Mathew, J.(1998).Determinants of service quality in education: a New Zealand perspective.Journal of Professional Services Marketing,16,43-71.
9. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A.,Berry, L. L.(1988).SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.Journal of Retailing,64,12-40.
10. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A.,Berry, L. L.(1985).A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research.Journal of Marketing,49,41-50.
11. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A.,Berry, L. L.(1991).Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale.Journal of Retailing,67,420-450.
12. Russell, M.(2005).Marketing education: a review of service quality perceptions among international students.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,17,65-77.
13. Szymanski, D. M.,Henard, D. H.(2001).Customer satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,29,16-35.
14. Yang, C. C.(2003).Improvement actions based on the customers` satisfaction survey.TQM and Business Excellence,14,919-930.
15. Zeithaml, V. A.,Bitner, M. J.(2000).Service Marketing.New York:McGraw-Hill.
16. 池文海、王碧霞(2004)。全面品質管理對大學校院行政品質影響之探討。品質學報，11，253-282。
17. 陳正文譯、Schultz, D.、Scultz, S. E.著(1997)。人格理論。台北:揚智文化。
18. 陳伯璋、侯永琪(2003)。美國大學學術聲譽排名指標之研究：以「美國新聞與世界報導」爲例。教育研究月刊，116，77-96。
19. 陳昭雄(2000)。學生事務與社團輔導第四輯。台北:東吳大學。
20. 陳進丁(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。義守大學工業工程與管理研究所。
21. 湯玲郎(2004)。元智大學服務品質研究報告。桃園:元智大學。
22. 黃玉(2001)。論中小學學生事務專業人才之培育。訓育研究理論與實務，40，21-28。
23. 楊錦洲(2001)。顧客需求與滿意度調查。台北:台灣檢驗科技股份有限公司。
24. 葉至誠(2002)。高等教育發展的策略與願景。台北:揚智文化。
25. 劉若蘭(2003)。從學生滿意度談大學教學成果的提昇。學生事務，42，22-33。

1. 蘇冠年、王如鈺、王仁宏(2012)。司機人格特質與服務品質對乘客再購行為之影響─以 A 計程車隊為例。台北海洋技術學院學報，5(1)，15-43。
2. 趙志揚、張彩珠、林致瑋、林永順(2008)。高級職業學校總務行政服務品質之探討。學校行政，56，14-35。