题名

Assessing Slipperiness of Commonly Used Floors on the Campus Building

并列篇名

教學大樓常用地板之防滑性評估

作者

許耀文(Yao-Wen Hsu);鍾宜展(Yi-Chan Chung);邱重欽(Chung-Ching Chiu);蔡志弘(Chih-Hung Tsai);黃曉令(Hsiao-Ling Huang)

关键词

滑倒 ; 可攜式測滑儀 ; 地板材質 ; 地表狀況 ; slip and fall ; portable skid resistance tester ; floor material ; floor condition

期刊名称

品質學報

卷期/出版年月

18卷1期(2011 / 03 / 01)

页次

75 - 85

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

滑倒與跌倒在學校的教學場所中是常見的意外,因此本研究至教學大樓實地使用可攜式測滑儀(portable skid resistance tester)量測12種常用地板的防滑性,並探討三種地板狀況下(乾、濕與沙子覆蓋)摩擦係數的影響情形。結果發現一旦地板潮濕後或覆有沙子時會明顯的降低其摩擦係數,而影響到地板的防滑性;其中地板在潮濕的狀況時會喪失最多的防滑性,其次是有沙子覆蓋的狀況。另外結果也發現到地板表面的特性(如材質與表面粗糙度等)會影響到地板的防滑性。

英文摘要

Slipping and falling are common incidents on school campuses. In this research, we measured the coefficient of friction of 12 floors commonly used on the campus building in Taiwan, under 3 kinds of floor conditions (dry, wet and sand-covered) using the portable skid resistance tester. The results of this study showed that there were significant friction reductions when the floors got wet or covered by sand as compared with dry conditions. And the effects of wet on the friction were more significant than that of the sand-covered conditions. The results indicated that the coefficient of friction was also affected by the floor surface features, such as its material and roughness.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Council for Labor Affairs, (Accessed March 1, 2010), Labor inspection yearbook (in Chinese).
  2. America Society for Testing and Materials E303-93(2008).Annual Book of AMTM Standards.West Conshohochen, PA:
  3. Chang, W. R.(1998).The effect of surface roughness on dynamic friction between neolite and quarry tile.Safety Science,29(2),89-105.
  4. Chang, W. R.(2002).The effect of slip criterion and time on friction measurements.Safety Science,40(7-8),593-611.
  5. Chang, W. R.(1999).The effect of surface roughness on the measurements of slip resistance.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,24(3),299-313.
  6. Chang, W. R.,Kim, I. J.,Manning, D. P.,Bunterngchit, B.(2001).The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness.Ergonomics,44(13),1200-1216.
  7. Chang, W. R.,Li, K. W.,Huang, Y. H.,Filiaggi, A.,Courtney, T. K.(2004).Assessing floor slipperiness in fast-food restaurants in Taiwan using objective and subjective measures.Applied Ergonomics,35(4),401-408.
  8. Chang, W. R.,Matz, S.(2001).The slip resistance of common footwear materials measured with two slipmeters.Applied Ergonomics,32(6),540-558.
  9. Giles, C. G.,Sabey, B. E.,Carden, K. W. F.(1964).Road Research Technical PaperRoad Research Technical Paper,UK Road Research Laboratory.
  10. Goldsmith, A.(1986).Slip and fall accident.Hazard Prevention,5,16-18.
  11. Grönqvist, R.(1995).Mechanisms of friction and assessment of slip resistance of new and used footwear soles on contaminated floors.Ergonomics,38(2),224-241.
  12. Grönqvist, R.,Hirvonen, M.,Tohv, A.(1999).Evaluation of three portable floor slipperiness testers.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,25(1),85-95.
  13. James, D. I.(1989).A standard slider for slip measurements.Polymer Testing,8(1),9-17.
  14. Kennedy, C. K.,Young, A. E.,Bulter, I. C.(1990).Measurement of skidding resistance and surface texture and use of results in the United Kingdom.Surface Characteristics of Roadways: International Research and Technologies,Philadelphia, PA:
  15. Leamon, T. B.(1992).The reduction of slip and fall injuries: part II the scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,10(1-2),29-34.
  16. Leclercq, S.,Tisserand, M.,Saulnier, H.(1995).Tribological concepts involved in slipping accident analysis.Ergonomics,38(2),197-208.
  17. Li, K. W.,Chang, W. R.,Leamon, T. B.,Chen, C. J.(2004).Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions.Safety Science,42(6),547-565.
  18. Li, K. W.,Chen, C. J.(2005).Effects of tread groove orientation and width of the footwear pads on measured friction coefficients.Safety Science,43(7),391-405.
  19. Li, K. W.,Chen, C. J.(2004).The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants.Applied Ergonomics,35(6),499-507.
  20. Li, K. W.,Hsu, Y. W.,Chang, W. R.,Lin, C. H.(2007).Friction measurements on three commonly used floors on a college campus under dry, wet, and sand-covered conditions.Safety Science,45(9),980-992.
  21. Manning, D. P.,Jones, C.(2001).The effect of roughness, floor polish, water, oil and ice on underfoot friction: current safety footwear solings are less slip resistant than microcellular polyurethane.Applied Ergonomics,32(2),185-196.
  22. Proctor, T. D.(1993).Slipping accidents in Great Britain-an update.Safety Science,16(3-4),367-377.