Study of PDRI for the Project Management of Intelligent Green Building

智慧綠建築專案管理PDRI之研究

10.6220/joq.2015.22(4).02

張岸礕(An-Pi Chang)；朱惕之(Tih-Ju Chu)；黃兆龍(Chao-Lung Hwang)；林志棟(Jyh-Dong Lin)

智慧建築 ； 綠建築 ； 營建專案管理 ； 專案先期規劃 ； intelligent building ； green building ； construction project management ； pre-project planning ； IGBP-PDRI

品質學報

22卷4期（2015 / 08 / 30）

299 - 320

英文

本研究以美國CII於1995年所研發Project Definition Rating Index（PDRI）評估模式為方法論，結合智慧建築、綠建築設計評估基準，以及營建專案管理作業，研發一套評估方法稱之為智慧綠建築專案管理評估系統（Intelligent Green Building Project Management EvaluationSystem）。評估系統可整合專案開發作業需求，進行專案策略、目標、流程等管理作業的整合。主要應用於專案先期規劃（Pre-Project Planning）評估，可利用規劃所得檢核表持續對專案執行過程進行監視與控制，確保專案達成進度、成本、品質、變更設計預算等目標績效。本研究所建立之IGBP-PDRI評估模式，包括4個部分、11個分類及60個元素，最後經本研究驗證，當總體評估總分≤200分的情況時，智慧綠建築專案執行成本低於預算2%，進度超前3%，設計變更預算控制在總預算的2%以內，且在建築物電力節能成效高於預期節省22.01%，營建廢棄物回收百分比高達78.22%，計畫書審查績效超越績效目標值6.59%，施工圖審查績效超越績效目標值4.87%，安全與衛生稽查合格率高達96.34%，施工查驗合格率高達90.45%，營建材料檢試驗合格率達99.43%，研究驗證成果顯示，IGBP-PDRI評估模式對於先期專案計畫（pre-project planning）的評估，可滿足整體營建工程的品質。

By combining the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) with intelligent buildings, green buildings, and construction project management, this study developed the Intelligent Green Building Project (IGBP) to define the scope of pre-project planning. The IGBP can effectively integrate the development strategy, processes, and objectives based on project development needs. The PDRI was developed and applied to industry and construction businesses respectively in 1996 and 1999. It was mainly used to assess pre-project planning and evaluate the performance of project execution, quality, cost, and design change, as well as predict project success. The IGBP-PDRI model in this study included four sections, 11 categories, and 60 elements. The model verification results show that when the total score is ≤ 200, IGBP implementation cost is 2% below budget, schedule is 3% ahead, design change budget is below 2%, building energy saving performance is 22.01% higher than expected, construction waste recycling rate is up by 78.22%, plan review performance is 6.59% higher than the target, construction drawing review performance is 4.87% higher than the target, safety and health audit pass rate is 96.34%, construction review pass rate is 90.45%, and building material inspection pass rate is 99.43%. These results show that IGBP-PDRI can fulfill the overall project quality demand in pre-project planning assessment.

1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2009, (accessed February, 2013), Implementation of project definition rating index (AF MILCON), Engineering and Construction Bulletin. .
2. U.S. Department of Energy, 2001, (accessed February, 2013), Office of Environmental Management Project Definition Rating Index (EM•PDRI) Manual. .
3. Berlin, S.,Raz, T.,Glezer, C.,Zviran, M.(2009).Comparison of estimation methods of cost and durations in IT projects.Information and Software Technology,51(4),738-748.
4. Chang, A. P.(2013).Taoyuan, Taiwan,National Central University.
5. Chang, A. P.,Chou, C. C.,Lin, J. D.,Chen, Y. H.(2013).Road construction project environmental impact assessment scope definition using project definition rating index (PDRI).Advanced Materials Research,723,885-892.
6. Chen, C. C.,Chiou, H. R.(2012).Implementing green implications: qualitative calculations of carbon reduction in construction projects.Construction News Record, Taiwan Construction Research Institute,358,17-27.
7. Construction Industry Institute(2009).Project Definition Rating Index-Industrial Projects.Austin, TX.:Construction Industry Institute.
8. Construction Industry Institute(1995).Pre-Project Planning Handbook.Austin, TX.:Construction Industry Institute.
9. Construction Industry Institute(2011).Value of Best Practices Report.Austin, TX.:Construction Industry Institute.
10. Construction Industry Institute(2009).Project Definition Rating Index-Building Projects.Austin, TX.:Construction Industry Institute.
11. Construction Industry Institute(2006).Front End Planning: Break the Rules.Austin, TX.:Construction Industry Institute.
12. Gibson, G. E. ,Wang, Y. R.(2001).Scope definition a key to project success.COBRA 2001-Construction & Building Research Conference
13. Gibson, G. E.,Dumont, P.R.(1996).Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI).Austin, TX.:Construction Industry Institute.
14. Gibson, G. E.,Hamilton, M. R.(1994).Analysis of Pre-Project Planning Effort and Success Variables for Capital Facility Projects.Austin, TX.:Construction Industry Institute.
15. Ho, M. C.,Lin, H. T.,Chuang, H. E.,Chen, C. N.(2012).Green Building Evaluation Manual -Basic Version.Taipei, Taiwan:Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior.
16. Ho, M. C.,Wen, S. L.,Lin, Y. C.,Chen, Y. T.,Huang, G. S.,Yan, S. L.(2011).Intelligent Green Building Description and Assessment Handbook.Taipei, Taiwan:Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior.
17. Kim, D. Y.,Han, S. H.,Kim, H.,Park, H.(2009).Structuring the prediction of project performance for international construction projects: a comparative analysis.Expert Systems with Applications,36(2),1961-1971.
18. Smith, M.,Tucker, R.(1983).An Assessment of the Potential Problems Occurring in the Engineering Phase of an Industrial Project.Austin, TX.:Construction Industry Institute.
19. Wang, Y. R.,Gibson, G. E.(2010).A study of pre-project planning and project success using ANNs and regression models.Automation in Construction,19(3),341-346.
20. Wang, Y. R.,Gibson, G. E.(2006).Pre-project planning and its practice in industry.International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, ISARC 2006