探討中國社會現象中PPP專案建設運營階段績效評估指標之重要度

THE IMPORTANCE OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION INDICATORS FOR PPP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AT THE OPERATIONAL STAGE IN CHINESE SOCIAL PHENOMENA

10.6220/joq.202006_27(3).0003

施勝烽(Sheng-Feng Shih)；張栩溢(Xu-Yi Zhang)

公私合營模式 ； 熵值法 ； 決策試驗與實驗評估法 ； 績效評價 ； public private partnerships (PPP) ； entropy method ； decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) ； performance evaluation

品質學報

27卷3期（2020 / 06 / 30）

171 - 195

繁體中文

隨著經濟體制改革、基礎設施建設迅速擴張，公私合營模式（public private partnerships, PPP）在基建領域受到日益廣泛應用。首先對PPP專案發展狀況和特點和績效評價的意義進行論述並分析總結相關研究，引入較為客觀的熵值法確定PPP專案的績效評價指標權重，並引用決策試驗與實驗評估法考慮指標間的相互影響性，進一步整合與修正得到組合權重。同時引入模糊數學理論對專家判斷進行模糊化處理，以達到較為準確的組合權重，建立相對完整的PPP專案績效評估體系。基於分析結果得知，將指標間相互影響性納入PPP專案建設運營階段的績效評價考量後，對專案績效評價指標的重要度產生一定影響。在熵值權重中，政府部門滿意度與私營部門滿意度權重相對較低，但加入決策試驗與實驗評估（decision making trial and evaluation laboratory, DEMATEL）法考慮指標間相互影響性後，兩者最終權重中排在第四和第五位。而技術管理與創新能力、風險分擔與轉移和專案投資回報率在熵值法考量中比較重要，但組合權重後，技術管理與創新能力和風險分擔與轉移的重要度權重有所下降。

The development of market-oriented reforms, infrastructure construction has also expanded rapidly, and the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) model has been widely used in the field of infrastructure. Firstly, it introduces the background of the research and significance of PPP project performance evaluation, and analyzes and summarized related research. Introduce a more objective entropy method to determine the weight of the performance evaluation index of the PPP project, and use the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) to consider the interaction between the indicators, and then further integrate and correct the combined weights. At the same time, the fuzzy mathematics theory is introduced to fuzzy the expert judgment to achieve a more accurate combination weight and establish a relatively complete PPP project performance evaluation system. Based on the analysis results, it is known that the importance of project performance evaluation indicators will be affected to some extent by incorporating the interaction of indicators into the performance evaluation of PPP project construction and operation stage. Among the weights of entropy, the weights of government department satisfaction and private sector satisfaction are relatively low, but when DEMATEL method is added to consider the interaction between indicators, the final weights of the two rank fourth and fifth. Technology management and innovation capability, risk sharing and transfer, and return on project investment are more important in the consideration of entropy method, but the weight of importance of technology management and innovation capability and risk sharing and transfer decreases after combining weights.

1. Askar, M. M.,Gab-Allah, A. A.(2002).Problems facing parties involved in build, operate, and transport projects in Egypt.Journal of Management in Engineering,18(4),173-178.
2. Chan, A. P. C.,Lam, P. T. I.,Chan, D. W. M.,Cheung, E.,Ke, Y.(2010).Critical success factors for PPPs in infrastructure developments: Chinese perspective.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,136(5),484-494.
3. Cheung, E.,Chan, A. P. C.,Kajewski, S.(2009).Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects: findings from a survey conducted in Hong Kong and Australia compared to findings from previous research in the UK.Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction,14(1),7-20.
4. Engel, E.,Fischer, R.,Galetovic, A.(2014).Risk and public-private partnerships.CESifo DICE Report,12(3),3-7.
5. Hellowell, M.(2019).Are public–private partnerships the future of healthcare delivery in sub Saharan Africa? Lessons from Lesotho.BMJ Global Health,4(2),e001217.
6. Jefferies, M.(2006).Critical success factors of public private sector partnerships: a case study of the Sydney SuperDome.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,13(5),451-462.
7. Kosycarz, E. A.,Nowakowska, B. A.,Miko ajczyk, M. M.(2019).Evaluating opportunities for successful public–private partnership in the healthcare sector in Poland.Journal of Public Health,27(1),1-9.
8. Leigland, J.(2018).Public-private partnerships in developing countries: the emerging evidence-based critique.The World Bank Research Observer,33(1),103-134.
9. Nguyen Duc Trung(2017)。湖南，湖南大學。
10. Nisar, T. M.(2007).Value for money drivers in public private partnership schemes.International Journal of Public Sector Management,20(2),147-156.
11. PricewaterhouseCoopers, (accessed July, 2019), 2017, Reimagining public private partnerships, .
12. Warsen, R.,Nederhand, J.,Klijn, E. H.,Grotenbreg, S.,Koppenjan, J.(2018).What makes public-private partnerships work? Survey research into the outcomes and the quality of cooperation in PPPs.Public Management Review,20(8),1165-1185.
13. Yuan, J.,Zeng, A. Y.,Skibniewski, M. J.,Li, Q.(2009).Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public-private partnership projects to achieve value for money.Construction Management and Economics,27(3),253-270.
14. Zhao,Z.-Y.,Zuo, J.,Zillante, G.(2013).Factors influencing the success of BOT power plant projects in China: a review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,22,446-453.
15. 王洪強,李思茹,張英婕(2019)。我國PPP發展環境成熟度差異研究。管理現代化，6，69-74。
16. 王珮(2017)。浙江，浙江財經大學。
17. 吳小軍(2016)。陝西，西安建築科技大學。
18. 李洪偉,周德群,章玲(2006)。運用DEMATEL方法及交叉增援矩陣法對層次分析法的改進。統計與決策，8，10-11。
19. 李娜(2018)。陝西，陝西科技大學。
20. 孫瑞山,馬廣福(2016)。基於熵權和DEMATEL的管制員疲勞風險因素分析。交通信息與安全，34(4)，44-49。
21. 秦韜,張雲甯,歐陽紅祥(2018)。城市軌道交通項目可持續性績效影響因素研究。武漢理工大學學報(信息與管理工程版)，40(6)，644-648。
22. 畢青松(2017)。石家莊鐵道大學，河北，石家莊鐵道大學。
23. 陳龍(2017)。PPP項目績效評價研究綜述。財政科學，4，90-96。
24. 楊鳳嬌(2016)。重慶，重慶大學。
25. 趙忠坤(2015)。雲南，雲南大學。
26. 趙新博(2009)。北京，清華大學。
27. 錢俞瑩(2016)。江蘇，東南大學。
28. 羅瑞雪,楊成文(2017)。基於DEMATEL法的PPP項目風險因素分析─以青島地鐵三號線為例。當代經濟，15，136-137。
29. 嚴丹良(2014)。陝西，西安建築科技大學。
30. 蘭蘭,高成修(2013)。基於AHP的PPP績效評估體系研究。海南大學學報 (人文社會科學版)，31(3)，115-119。