题名

Growth Opportunities, Agency Conflicts, and the Effectiveness of Busy Outside Directors

并列篇名

由企業成長機會與代理衝突分析獨立董事兼任與公司績效之相關性

DOI

10.6545/JFS.2009.17(4).5

作者

陳家偉(Chia-Wei Chen)

关键词

董事兼任 ; 董事會 ; 代理衝突 ; Multiple directorships ; Boards of directors ; Agency costs

期刊名称

財務金融學刊

卷期/出版年月

17卷4期(2009 / 12 / 31)

页次

123 - 151

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

獨立董事兼任其它公司之董事職位是否會影響公司績效?學術上關於此議題的探討始終缺乏一致性的結論。兼任其它董事職位一方面暗示了該董事的能力及專業但是同時也可能限制該董事的可分配時間來有效監督經理人。本文透過近幾年的資料試著證明這個缺乏一致性的結論是因為忽略了衡量兼任其它公司董事的成本及價值。進一步而言,公司本身的特質決定了獨立董事兼任情形與公司價值的相互關係:當公司潛在嚴重的僱傭問題時,獨立董事兼任其它公司董事將無法扮演好一個監督的角色,以至於損害投資人的權益;相反的,當僱傭問題不存在或較不嚴重以及公司具有高度成長空間時,兼任其它公司董事賦予了獨立董事豐富的經驗及知識,使獨立董事成為公司重要的咨詢對象。本文之實證結果不僅解釋了為何獨立董事兼任情形及公司價值潛在著不一致的關條,另一方面,我們也提供了一套如何衡量獨立董事的方法。最後本文之結論亦透露:限制獨立董事兼任其它董事可能也限制了獨立董事的潛在價值。

英文摘要

In this paper, we focus on potential tradeoffs between the costs and benefits of multiple directorships held by outside directors and attempt to determine how firm characteristics affect such tradeoffs. It is widely believed that outside directors of a firm play important functions of monitoring and advising. As a result. the basic hypothesis of this paper is that multiple directorships by outside directors can have different implications for firms that have different levels of monitoring and advising needs. Consistent with this hypothesis, our findings suggest that firm performance is positively associated with multiple directorships for firms with high growth opportunities and low agency conflicts. Such firms would benefit more from better advising while not suffering much from less monitoring. Likewise, firm performance is negatively associated with multiple directorships for firms likely with low growth opportunities and high agency conflicts.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
参考文献
  1. Adams, Renée B.(2002).Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkWorking paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York,未出版
  2. Workinig paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
  3. Agrawal, Anup,Charles R. Knoeber(1996).Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders.The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,31,377-397.
  4. Agrawal, Anup,Charles R. Knoeber(2001).Do some outside directors play a political role?.The Journal of Law and Economics,44,179-198.
  5. Working paper, National University of Singapore
  6. Beasley, Mark(1996).An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud.The Accounting Review,71,443-465.
  7. Bhagat, Sanjai,Bernard Black(2001).The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance.Journal of Corporation Law,27,231-274.
  8. Brickley, James A.,James S. Linck,Jeffrey L. Coles(1999).What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives.Journal of Financial Economics,52,341-377.
  9. Chung, Kee H.,Stephen W. Pruitt(1994).A simple approximation of Tobin's q.Financial Management,23,70-74.
  10. Coles, Jeffrey L.,Chun-Keung Hoi(2003).New evidence on the market for directors: Board membership and Pennsylvania Senate Bill 1310.The Journal of Finance,58,197-230.
  11. Coles, Jeffrey L.,Naveen D. Daniel,Lalitha Naveen(2008).Boards: Does one size fit all?.Journal of Financial Economics,87,329-356.
  12. Core, John E.,Robert W. Holthausen,David F. Larcker(1999).Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance.Journal of Financial Economics,51,371-406.
  13. Dalton, Dan R.,Catherine M. Daily,Jonathan L. Johnson,Alan E. Ellstrand(1999).Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis.The Academy of Management Journal,42,674-686.
  14. Evans, David S.(1987).The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries.The Journal of Industrial Economics,35,567-581.
  15. Fama, Eugene F.(1980).Agency problems and the theory of the firm.Journal of Political Economy,88,288-307.
  16. Fama, Eugene F.,Michael C. Jensen(1983).Separation of ownership and control.Journal of Law and Economics,26,301-325.
  17. Ferris, Stephen P.,Murali Jagannathan,A.C. Pritchard(2003).Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments.The Journal of Finance,58,1087-1112.
  18. Fich, Eliezer M.(2005).Are some outside directors better than others? Evidence from director appointments by Fortune 1000 Firms.The Journal of Business,78,1943-1972.
  19. Fich, Eliezer M.,Anil Shivdasani(2006).Are busy boards effective monitors?.The Journal of Finance,61,689-724.
  20. Gilson, Stuart C.(1990).Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders: Evidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default.Journal of Financial Economics,27,355-387.
  21. Gompers, Paul,Joy Ishii,Andrew Metrick(2003).Corporate governance and equity prices.Quarterly Journal of Economics,118,107-155.
  22. Harris, Ira C.,Katsuhiko Shimizu(2004).Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors.Journal of Management Studies,41,775-798.
  23. Hart, Oliver D.(1983).The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme.Bell Journal of Economics,14,366-382.
  24. Healy, Paul M.,Krishna G. Palepu(2001).Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature.Journal of Accounting and Economics,31,405-440.
  25. Hermalin, Benjamin E.,Michael S. Weisbach(1998).Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO.The American Economic Review,88,96-118.
  26. Hermalin, Benjamin E.,Michael S. Weisbach(1991).The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance.Financial Management,20,101-112.
  27. Jensen, Michael C.(1986).Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers.American Economic Review,76,323-329.
  28. Jiraporn, Pornsit,Young Sang Kim,Wallace N. Davidson(2007).Multiple directorships and corporate diversification.Journal of Empirical Finance,15,418-435.
  29. Klein, April(1998).Firm performance and board committee structure.The Journal of Law and Economics,41,275-304.
  30. Lasfer, Ameziane M.(2006).The interrelationship between managerial ownership and board structure.Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,33,1006-1033.
  31. Lipton, Martin,Jay W. Lorsch(1992).A modest proposal for improved corporated governance.Business Lawyer,48,59-77.
  32. Mace, Myles L.(1986).Directors: Myth and reality.Boston, MA:Harvard University Press.
  33. Morck, Randall,Andrei Shleifer,Robert W. Vishny(1988).Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis.Journal of Financial Economics,20,293-315.
  34. Rechner, Paula L.,Dan R. Dalton(1991).CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis.Strategic Management Journal,12,155-160.
  35. Rosenstein, Stuart,Jeffrey G. Wyatt(1990).Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth.Journal of Financial Economics,26,175-191.
  36. Shivdasani, Anil,David Yermack(1999).CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis.The Journal of Finance,54,1829-1853.
  37. Uzun, Hatice,Samuel H. Szewczyk,Raj Varma(2004).Board composition and corporate fraud.Financial Analysts Journal,60,33-43.
  38. Weisbach, Michael S.(1988).Outside directors and CEO turnover.Journal of Financial Economics,20,431-460.
  39. Yermack, David(1996).Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors.Journal of Financial Economics,40,185-211.
被引用次数
  1. Wu, Chen-Hui(2013).Board Training and Firm Performance: Evidence from Taiwan.財務金融學刊,21(4),59-89.
  2. Yeh, Yin-Hua,Chou, Hsin-I(2016).Corporate Governance in Taiwan: A Survey.經濟論文叢刊,44(1),127-184.
  3. 魏慧珊、歐仁和、黃志偉、張傳章(2016)。臺灣財務領域研究之回顧與展望。管理學報,33(1),105-137。