論清代補史志學風與姚振宗《後漢藝文志》

A study of Yao Chên-tsung's Hou-Han I-wên chih with the Academic Trend of the Supplement with I-wên chih in Ch'ing Dynasty

10.29976/BHARC.200910.0011

黃世豪(Shih-Hao Huang)

明史藝文志 ； 補史藝文志 ； 姚振宗 ； 後漢藝文志 ； Ming-shih i-wên chih ； Ch'ing dynasty ； Yao chên-tsung ； Hou-Han i-wên chih

中國歷史學會史學集刊

41期（2009 / 10 / 01）

405 - 424

繁體中文

東漢班固《漢書》據劉歆《七略》刪其要而成〈藝文志〉，以記載圖書典籍等文獻，其功用在於辨章學術，考鏡源流，為史書中最早之史志。在班固《漢書》以後，各朝代史書或著〈藝文志〉，或名〈經籍志〉，皆為載錄各朝各代圖書典籍之存佚，然而並非每一朝之史書皆有修撰〈藝文志〉。清代開館編修《明史》，由纂修《明史•藝文志》的討論，而興起了補史〈藝文志〉的學風。最初以補宋、遼、金、元四代藝文為主，而後由於錢大昭的補《後漢書•藝文志》的著作，由宋、遼、金、元四代上溯至東漢，而將整個補志學風擴展到補各朝代所缺之〈藝文志〉。而此補《後漢書•藝文志》來說，錢大昭之後有侯康、顧懷三、姚振宗、曾樸等相繼為補，其中以姚振宗《後漢藝文志》最為精審完善，故文中考察清代補史志學風的興起，並以姚振宗《後漢藝文志》為主，探討其書之分類與體制之特點。

The research foundation of I-wên chih (＜藝文志＞)in Pan-ku’s(班固) Han-shu was based on Ch'i-lűeh(《七略》) written by Liu-hisn(劉歆) that recorded ancient books in order to classify the knowledge and trace academic sources in ancient China. The function of I-wên chih in Han-shu was the valuable part. So that, almost every official historical records in different dynasties had this part or named as Ching-chi chih(＜經籍志＞) inside, while some did not have. Because of this reason, after dissussed how to edite Ming-shih i-wên chih (《明史‧藝文志》), the academic trend which encouraged to develop the supplement of I-wên chih was raised in Ch'ing dynasty. To put more concretely, the academic trend began with the supplement of I-wên chih just in Song, Liao, Chin, Yüen dynasty. Then dued to the supplement of Hou-Han i-wên chih (《後漢‧藝文志》)written by Ch'ien ta-chao(錢大昭), it became the compiling movement which enlarged the supplement of I-wên chih to the historical records in which lacked this part in the previous time. In Addition, turning now to the movement with supplements of Hou-Han i-wên chih. After Ch'ien ta-chao, there were still some Ch’ing scholars did the similar works which followed in turn by Hao k'ang(侯康), Ku huai-san(顧懷三), Yao chên-tsung(姚振宗), Tsu p'u(曾樸). In comparison with other works, the supplement which made by Yao chên-tsung was the best publication. Accordingly, the purpose of this study will focus on the two ways: one way is to observe the academic trend with the supplement of I-wên chih in Ch'ing dynasty; the other way will analyze the structure and classification in Yao chên-tsung's Hou-Han i-wên chih.

1. (1978)。合印四庫全書總目提要及四庫未收書目禁燬書目。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
2. 明焦竑撰(1972)。國史經籍志。台北:廣文書局。
3. 唐道宣撰集(2003)。大正新脩大藏經。台北:白馬精舍印經會。
4. 清吳騫撰(2002)。《續修四庫全書》集部冊1454。上海:上海古籍出版社。
5. 清姚振宗撰(1974)。後漢藝文志。台北:開明書店輯印。
6. 清倪燦撰(1963)。明史藝文志廣編。台北:世界書局。
7. 清張廷玉纂修(2002)。明史。北京:中華書局。
8. 清黃虞稷撰、瞿鳳起整理、潘景鄭整理(2001)。千頃堂書目。上海:上海古籍出版社。
9. 清盧文弨撰(2006)。抱經堂文集。北京:中華書局。
10. 清盧文弨撰、徐德明、吳平主編(2005)。清代學術筆記叢刊，冊十八。北京:學苑出版社。
11. 清錢大昭撰(1974)。補後漢書藝文志。台北:開明書店輯印。
12. 漢班固撰(2002)。漢書。北京:中華書局。
13. 王重民(1984)。中國目錄學史論叢。北京:中華書局。
14. 王樹民(2005)。史部要籍解題。北京:中華書局。
15. 姚名達(1988)。中國目錄學史。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
16. 陳訓慈(1935)。山陰姚海槎先生小傳。文瀾學報，1
17. 陶存煦(1935)。姚海槎先生年譜。文瀾學報，1