淺談Web 2.0與通俗分類於圖書資訊服務之應用

The Applications of Web 2.0 and Folksonomy to Library Information Services

10.6575/JoLIS.2006.57.06

張淇龍(Chi-Lung Chang)；卜小蝶(Hsiao-Tieh Pu)

網路應用 ； 通俗分類 ； 圖書資訊服務 ； Web 2.0 ； Folksonomy ； Library information services

圖書與資訊學刊

57期（2006 / 05 / 01）

74 - 93

繁體中文

隨著以使用者社群為基礎的Web 2.0網路應用風潮，圖書資訊界也相當關心其發展，其中以通俗分類(Folksonomy)的應用最受矚目。本文簡介Web 2.0與通俗分類之意涵與發展，並針對其於資訊組織與資訊檢索的可能應用與影響提出討論。此外，也嘗試探究圖書資訊專業人員在面對此趨勢，所應具備的新思維。

With the trend of user-community-based Web 2.0 applications, the circle related to library information have great concern about the development of the trend. Among the variety applications, Folksonomy shows much potential in library information services. This paper first introduces the respective definition and development of Web 2.0 and Folksonomy. Next, the study further discusses their implications in areas of information organization and information retrieval. Finally, future roles of librarianship in accordance with the new trend are also explored.

1. Abram, Stephen(2005).Web 2.0-Huh?! library 2.0, librarian 2.0.Information Outlook,9(12)
2. Castells, Manuel(1996).The rise of the network society.
3. Chad、 Ken, K.,Miller, Paul(2005).Do Libraries matter?.
4. Crawford、 Walt, W.(2006).Library 2.0 and "Library 2.0".Cites and Insights: Crawford at Large,6(2)
5. Cuene, Jim(2005).Web 2.0: Evolution towards a read/write platform.
6. Fan, Bing-Si,Hu, Xiao-Jing(2006).Library 2.0: Building the new library services=圖書館2.0：構建新的圖書館服務.大學圖書館學報,24(1)
7. Gorman、 Michael, M.,Crawford, Walt, W.(1995).Future Libraries: Dreams, Madness, and Reality.
8. Hammond、 Tony,Hannay, Timo,Lund, Ben,Scott, Joanna, J.(2005).Social bookmarking tool(1)-A general review.D-Lib Magazine,11(4)
9. Hodge, Gail(2000).Concil on Library and Information Resources.
10. Mathes, Adam(2004).Folksonomies-cooperative clasification and communication through shared metadata.
11. McAleese, Ray(1987).Interact 87-2nd IFIP international conference on human-computer interaction.
12. Merholz, Peter(2004).Metadata for the masses.
13. Nielsen, Jakob(2000).Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity.
14. Cnet News.com
15. O''Reilly, Tim(2005).What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software.
16. Paul, Miller(2005).Web 2.0: Building the new library.Ariadne,45
17. Russell, Terrell(2005).Contextual authority tagging: Cognitive authority through folksonomy.
18. Schauer, Brandon(2005).Experience attribute: Crucial DNA of web 2.0.
19. Schneider, Karen G.(2006).The revolution will be folksonomied.
20. Sheth, Jagdish N.,Newman, Bruce I.,Gross, Barbara L.(1991).Consumption values and market choices: Theory and applications.
21. Smith, Gene(2004).Folksonomy: Social classification.
22. Spertus, Ellen(1997).Proceedings of the Sixth International World Wide Web Conference.
23. Sturtz, David N.(2004).Communal categorization: The folksonomy.
24. Szekely, Benjamin,Torres, Elias(2005).Ranking bookmarks and bistros: Intelligent community and folksonomy development.
25. Taylor、 Arlene G., A. G.(1999).The Organization of Information.
26. Weibel(1997).Proceedings of the International Symposium on Research, Development and Practice in Digital Library(ISDL97).
27. Weinberger, David(2005).Taxonomy and tags: From trees to pile of leaves.Release 1.0,23(2)
28. 數位文化誌
29. 侯漢清(1999)。評《中文圖書標題表》─兼談標題表的敘詞化改進。圖書與資訊學刊，31

1. 羅子文、柯皓仁(2007)。Web 2.0概念的圖書館個人化推薦系統。臺北市立圖書館館訊，24(4)，1-30。
2. 吳紹群(2011)。Museum 2.0概念的可能性與真實性―由博物館觀點探討Web 2.0 與社群媒體之應用及問題。博物館學季刊，25(2)，93-105。
3. 張淇龍(2012)。淺論社群媒體於圖書資訊服務之實踐。圖書與資訊學刊，80，96-116。