题名

機構典藏之作者調查研究

并列篇名

A Study of Authorial Opinions on Institutional Repositories

DOI

10.6575/JoLIS.2007.60.02

作者

林呈潢(Cheng-Huang Lin);曾品方(Pin-Fang Tseng)

关键词

機構典藏 ; 開放取用 ; 自行典藏 ; Institutional repositories ; Open access ; Self-archiving

期刊名称

圖書與資訊學刊

卷期/出版年月

60期(2007 / 02 / 01)

页次

12 - 27

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

機構典藏宗旨在以數位化方式保存機構內全面性的研究成果,並付之開放取用模式供大眾點閱,期許對學術傳播有所助益。機構典藏的基礎乃植基於所屬成員的共識和參與,作者是機構典藏之內容提供者同時也是使用者,其提交資料的意願及支持程度攸關機構典藏的成敗,為順利推展機構典藏,針對作者意見的研究調查,益發重要。本文以政治大學之作者為實證研究對象,研究發現作者對於機構典藏的認同著重在學術上的回饋;學校應協助作者確認授權相關事宜;典藏的資料類型以能展現研究成果為主,至於影響作者參與意願的因素,則可分為著作權相關議題、整體成效、機構典藏的服務方式以及激勵制度等四個主要因素。最後根據研究發現,分別就學術單位發展機構典藏以及政府單位推動機構典藏提出建議。

英文摘要

The institutional repositories have nowadays been highly valued in the academic circle. The purpose is to provide an open access to digitized resources for all users. This study adopts the National Chengchi University as the research subject to investigate the faculty members' attitudes towards the idea of institutional repositories. The result shows that the interviewees mostly take a positive attitude to the scholarly value of openly accessible institutional repositories and hope to confirm the copyright license agreements with appropriate measures regulated by the university. The types of collection are primarily focused on the works that may demonstrate their respective contribution to different fields. In addition, this study also reveals the factors that influence the faculty members' willingness to participate in the system of institutional repositories, including their concerns for issues related to copyright, the effectiveness of institutional repositories, the service types of this collection, and its incentive policy. According to the analysis, this study proposes suggestions for related research units and the government in their further development of institutional repositories.

主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. MIT Libraries' DSpace business plan project final report to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  2. DSpace in the News
  3. Chronicle of Higher Education
  4. Foster, N. F.,Gibbous, S.(2005).Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories.D-Lib Magazine,11(1)
  5. Gibbons, S.(2004).Establishing au institutional repository.Library Technology Reports,40(4),1-67.
  6. Ariadne
  7. Ariadne
  8. Ariadne
  9. Hughes, C. A.(2004).EScholarship at the University of California: A case study in sustainable innovation for open access.New Library World,150(3/4),118-124.
  10. Kohl, D.F.(2005).Academic Publication學術出版專題講座.臺北市:臺灣師範大學.
  11. Kohl, D.F.(2005).在Academic Publication學術出版專題講座.臺北市:臺灣師範大學.
  12. The library of tomorrow: Library Planning and Action Initiative advisory task force final report
  13. Bimonthly Report
  14. If you build it will they come: Filling an institutional repository
  15. Prosser, D.(2003).Institutional repositories and open access: The future of scholarly communication?.Information Services & Use,23(2/3),167-170.
  16. High Energy Physics Libraries Webzine
  17. van Westrienen, G.,Lynch, C. A.(2005).Academic institutional repositories: Deployment status in 13 nations as of mid 2005.D-Lib Magazine,11(9)
  18. Ware, M(2004).Institutional repositories and scholarly publishing.Learned Publishing,17,115-124.
  19. 項潔(2004)。DSPace中文化的相關經驗。新時代圖書館:3C數位學習資源整台研討會,臺北市:
  20. 羅靜純(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北縣,淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系。
被引用次数
  1. 林鳳儀(2010)。臺灣大學機構典藏推廣經驗分享。大學圖書館,14(1),131-156。