開放近用期刊對圖書資訊學者研究的影響

The Research Impact of Open Access Journals on Library and Information Science Scholars in Taiwan

10.6575/JoLIS.2012.80.03

王梅玲(Mei-Ling Wang)

開放近用期刊 ； 圖書資訊學 ； 研究影響 ； 學術期刊 ； 電子期刊 ； Scholarly journals ； Electronic journals ； Open access journals ； Research impact ； Library and information science scholars

圖書與資訊學刊

80期（2012 / 05 / 01）

37 - 58

繁體中文

面臨開放近用運動風潮，臺灣地區圖書資訊學期刊開始採用開放近用（Open Access，OA）模式出版，但鮮有相關研究。本論文探討開放近用期刊（Open Access Journals，OAJ）對我國圖書資訊學者的學術研究有何影響。本論文使用書目計量法與引用文獻法，並採用二項研究影響力評鑑指標：學者發表論文之開放近用OA論文比率，以及OA論文與非OA論文被引用率比值。本研究以華藝公司ACI期刊引文資料庫與ISI公司的Social Science Citation Index資料庫，蒐集分析臺灣圖書資訊學教師在2000-2009年間發表期刊論文。研究顯示受調查72位圖書資訊學者有64人在2000-2009年間共在49種期刊發表745篇論文，包括499篇OA期刊論文，246篇非OA期刊論文，OA論文占全部期刊論文的66.98%。745篇發表論文被引用次數達726次，平均OA與非OA論文被引用率比值為1.29。從研究影響力指標分析，中文的開放近用期刊對臺灣圖書資訊學者具有研究影響；但英文發表的論文則相反，英文非開放近用學術期刊對圖書資訊學者較有研究影響。

Some library and information science (LIS) journals in Taiwan have begun to adopt the open access (OA) model of publication. The aim of this study is to investigate what kind of impact open access journals may have on library and information science scholars' research in Taiwan. Therefore, the objective of the study is to explore the scholarly productivity of LIS scholars in Taiwan, to find out the rate of their publications in OA journals, and to calculate the mean citation rate between OA articles and non-OA articles that are not freely available online. A bibliometric method is used in the study. Data of OA publications and citation counts of LIS scholars in Taiwan from 2000 to 2009 are collected from the ACI Database and Social Science Citation Index Database. The study shows that among 72 LIS scholars who are subjects of the investigation, 64 of them have published 745 articles within the previous ten years: 679 articles in Chinese and 66 articles in English; 499 of these are OA articles, and 246 are non-OA articles; OA articles constitute 66.98% of the total number of academic articles. The mean citation rate of OA articles versus non-OA articles is 1.29. Analyses of these impact indicators moreover show that OA journals with contributions written in Chinese have an increasing impact on the research of LIS scholars in Taiwan, whereas contributions written in English and published in non-OA journals are more influential to LIS research in Taiwan than those published in OA journals.

1. Suber, Peter (2007). Open Access overview: focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm.
2. 華藝數位股份有限公司(2010)。臺灣學術期刊引文分析報告。臺北：華藝數位。
3. Open Access Institute (2001). The Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved January, 10, 2012, from
4. Antelman, Kristin(2004).Do open-access articles hamve a greater research impact?.College and Research Libraries,65(5),372-382.
5. Harnad, S.,Brody, T.(2004).Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. Non-OA articles in the same journals.D-Lib Magazine,10(6)
6. Jacobs, N.(Ed.)(2006).Open Acess : Key strategy, technical and economic aspects.Oxford:Chandos.
7. Lawrence, S.(2001).Online or Invisible?.Nature,411(6837),521.
8. Mukherjee, Bhaskar March(2009).Do Open-Access Journals in Library and Information Science Have Any Scholarly Impact? A Bibliometric Study of Selected Open-Access Journals Using Google Scholar.Journal of the American society for information science and technology,60(3),581-594.
9. Testa, J.,McVeigh, M. E.(2004).,未出版
10. Turk, N.(2008).Citation impact of open access journals.New Library World,109(1/2),65-74.
11. Willinsky, J.、王秀華譯(2007)。The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship。臺北市:五南。
12. 王梅玲(2010)。圖書資訊學者使用開放近用期刊研究。圖書與資訊學刊，75，1-24。
13. 李治安、林懿萱(2007)。從傳統到開放的學術期刊出版─開放近用出版相關問題初探。圖書館工作與研究，4，34-43。
14. 邱炯友(2006)。Open Access Hybrid期刊的另類策略。教育資料與圖書館學，44(1)，1-2。

1. (2019)。開放取用與傳統付費期刊之被引用差異：跨領域比較研究。圖書資訊學研究，14(1)，133-168。