题名

開放近用的陰暗面：掠奪型出版商及其問題

并列篇名

The Shady Side of Open Access: The Emergence of Predatory Publishers and Its Problems

DOI

10.6575/JoLIS.2014.85.01

作者

林奇秀(Chi-Shiou Lin)；賴璟毅(Ching-Yi Lai)

关键词

掠奪型出版社 ； 掠奪型學術期刊 ； 開放近用 ； Predatory publishers ； Predatory journals ； Open access

期刊名称

圖書與資訊學刊

卷期/出版年月

85期（2014 / 11 / 01）

页次

1 - 21

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

學術期刊的開放近用將期刊出版的成本由訂閱者移轉至作者身上，然而，近年來，作者付費出版制度卻繁衍出以牟利為目標的掠奪型出版商，該類出版商僅以收取高昂出版費為目標，對論文審查草率，並以欺瞞與悖離學術出版倫理的方式出版論文，嚴重破壞學術秩序與信任，並可能對知識發展帶來負面影響。本文介紹掠奪型出版商的崛起與成因、營運手段與可疑行為，並討論掠奪者對學術發展帶來的影響與挑戰。
英文摘要

Open access (OA) movement shifts the cost of journal publishing from subscribers to authors. The author-fee model of open access journals, however, has unexpectedly fertilized a new type of unethical for-profit publishers that predate on unaware authors. The predatory publishers lure unknowing scholars into costly traps by deceptively advertising their journals and often publish papers with loose or even no peer review. The corruptive conducts of the predators seriously challenge the existing scholarly communication and the trust within the academia. This paper discusses on the spawning undesirable phenomenon, the roots and symptoms of such unscrupulous practices, and its problems and threats to scholarship.
主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. 吳紹群、吳明德(2007)。開放資訊取用期刊對學術傳播系統之影響。圖書資訊學研究，2(1)，21-54。
    連結：
  2. 陳亞寧(2006)。開放式資訊取用對館藏發展與服務的衝擊。圖書與資訊學刊，57，61-73。
    連結：
  3. York University Libraries. (2013). Open access publishing toolkit. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://researchguides.library.yorku.ca/content.php?pid=258206&sid=2131076
  4. Suber, P. (2013). Open access overview. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
  5. SAGE. (2013). SAGE choice. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.sagepub.com/sagechoice.sp
  6. T Singh. (2013, May 3). Appeals [Web blog message]. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://scholarlyoa.com/other-pages/appeals/
  7. Poynder, R. (2013). The OA interviews: Arshy Aly of Ashdin publishing. Open and Shut. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://poynder.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-oa-interviews-arshy-aly-of-ashdin.html
  8. Elsevier. (2013). Open access options. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.elsevier.com/journal-authors/open-access/open-access-options
  9. Asian Network for Scientific Information. (n.d.). Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.ansinet.com/
  10. University at Buffalo Libraries. (2012). Predatory online journal publishers–Be careful. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://libweb.lib.buffalo.edu/blog/Faculty/?p=794
  11. joy macdermid. (2013, June 20). Appeals [Web blog message]. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://scholarlyoa.com/other-pages/appeals/
  12. OMICSGroup. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://omicsonline.org/about.php
  13. Beall, J. (2013). List of standalone journal. Scholarly open access. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from http://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/
  14. Aldhous, P. (2009). CRAP paper accepted by journal. New Scientist. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-journal.html#.UsIwj_QW3FA.
  15. Insight Knowledge. (n.d.). Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://insightknowledge.co.uk/
  16. Springer. (n.d.). Springer open choice–Your research. Your Choice. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.springer.com/open+access/open+choice?SGWID=0-40359-0-0-0
  17. Callan, P. (2013). Fake paper highlights predatory publishers. ABC science. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2013/10/04/3862443.htm
  18. EBSCO. (n.d.). Five year journal price increase history (2009-2013). Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.ebscohost.com/promoMaterials/FiveYrJournalPriceIncreaseHistoryfinal.pdf
  19. Bentham Open. (n.d.). Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://benthamopen.com/
  20. Beall, J. (2014). OMICS Publishing Group's abuse of researchers: More evidence. Scholarly open access. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://scholarlyoa.com/2014/08/07/omics-publishing-groups-abuse-of-researchers-more-evidence/#more-3999
  21. Beall, J. (2013). List of publisher. Scholarly open access. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/
  22. The University of Queensland. (n.d.). Vanity and predatory publishing. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.library.uq.edu.au/research-support/vanity-and-predatory-publishing
  23. Dove Medical Press. (n.d.). Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.dovepress.com/
  24. Godfrey. (2013, July 3). Appeals [Web blog message]. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://scholarlyoa.com/other-pages/appeals/
  25. Beall, J. (2012a). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers (2nd edition). Scholarly open access. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/11/30/criteria-for-determining-predatory-open-access-publishers-2nd-edition/
  26. Medwell Publishing. (n.d.). Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.medwelljournals.com/home.php
  27. New, J. (2013). Librarians rally behind blogger sued by publisher over critical comments. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://chronicle.com/article/Librarians-Rally-Behind/137329/
  28. Taylor & Francis. (n.d.). Information for funders & institutions. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.tandfonline.com/page/openaccess/funders
  29. 毛慶禎(2009)。開放近用運動的發展。上網日期：2014 年10 月9 日，檢自http://sites.google.com/site/maolins/teaching/openaccess/dvofoa
  30. Michael, S. (2012). Predatory online journals lure scholars who are eager to publish. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://chronicle.com/article/Predatory-Online-Journals/131047/
  31. 毛慶禎(2004)。開放近用學術文獻資源。上網日期：2014 年10 月9 日，檢自http://www.lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/works/oainf.htm
  32. Jack. (2012). One response to I always thought you looked dodgy. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://openise.wordpress.com/2012/10/02/i-always-thought-you-looked-dodgy/#comments
  33. The University of Manchester. (n.d.). Advice on predatory journals and publishers. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.openaccess.manchester.ac.uk/checkjournal/predatoryjournals/
  34. Kolata, G. (2013, April 7th). For scientists, an exploding world of pseudo-academia. The New York Times. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html
  35. University of Victoria Libraries. (2013). Predatory online journals. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://blogs.library.uvic.ca/index.php/sc/2013/01/09/predatory-online-journals
  36. Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
  37. Robinson-Rechavi, M. (2013). Predatory open access publishers: What's the worst which can happen? Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://people.unil.ch/marcrobinsonrechavi/2013/02/predatory-openaccess-publishers-whats-the-worst-which-can-happen/
  38. 國立成功大學人類研究倫理治理架構(2013)。Scientific Articles Accepted (Personal Checks, Too)。上網日期：2014 年10 月9 日，檢自https://rec.chass.ncku.edu.tw/tidings/1543
  39. George Mason University. (n.d.). Predatory Open Access Publishers. Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://scholarly.gmu.edu/?page_id=556
  40. Academic Journals Inc. (n.d.). Retrieved October 9, 2014 from http://www.academicjournalsinc.com/
  41. Kaiser, J. (2013, May 9th). US government accuses open access publisher of trademark infringement. Science/AAAS. Retrieved October 9, 2014 form http://news.sciencemag.org/2013/05/u.s.-government-accuses-open-access-publisher-trademark-infringement
  42. Beall, J.(2009).Bentham Open.The Charleston Advisor,11(1),29-32.
  43. Beall, J.(2012).Unethical practices in scholarly, open-access publishing.Journal of Information Ethics,22(1),11-20.
  44. Beall, J.(2012).Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.Nature,489(7415),179.
  45. Beall, J.(2010).Update: Predatory open-access scholarly publishers.The Charleston Advisor,12(1),50.
  46. Beall, J.(2013).Medical publishing triage-chronicling predatory open access publishers.Annals of Medicine and Surgery,2(2),47-49.
  47. Beall, J.(2013).Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access.Learned Publishing,26(2),79-83.
  48. Beall, J.(2012).Predatory publishing.The Scientist
  49. Björk, B.-C.(2004).Open access to scientific publications-An analysis of the barriers to change?.Information Research,9(2)
  50. Bohannon, J.(2013).Who's afraid of peer review?.Science,342(6154),60-65.
  51. Butler, D.(2013).Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing.Nature,495(7422),433-435.
  52. Gilbert, N.(2009).Editor will quit over hoax paper.Nature
  53. King, D. W.(2010).An approach to open access author payment.D-Lib Magazine,16(3/4)
  54. Liesegang, T. J.(2013).The continued movements for open access to peer-reviewed literature.American Journal of Ophthalmology,156(3),423-432.
  55. Millard, W. B.(2013).Some research wants to be free, some follows the bogus journals complicate the open access movement.Annals of Emergency Medicine,62(2),14A-20A.
  56. Papin-Ramcharan, J. I.,Dawe, R. A.(2006).Open access publishing: A developing country view.First Monday,11(6)
  57. Poynder, R.(2004).Ten years after.Information Today,21(9),1+23-24+44+46.
  58. Sawyer, S.,Eschenfelder, K. R.(2002).Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends.Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,36,392-425.
  59. Stratford, M.(2012).'Predatory' online journals lure scholars who are eager to publish.Chronicle of Higher Education,27,A1-A8.
  60. Truth, F.(2012).Pay big to publish fast: Academic journal rackets.Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies,10(2),54-105.
  61. Vardi, M. Y.(2012).Predatory scholarly publishing.Communications of the ACM,55(7),5.
  62. Ware, M.,Mabe, M.(2009).,未出版
  63. Willinsky, J.(2006).The access principle-The case for open access to research and scholarship.The MIT Press.
  64. Wilson, K.(2013).Librarian vs. (open access) predator: An interview with Jeffery Beall.Serials Review,39(2),125-128.
  65. 毛慶禎(2007)。開放近用運動的真諦。台灣圖書館管理季刊，3(2)，1-14。
  66. 邱炯友、蔣欣樺(2005)。學術出版傳播之Open Access 模式。中國圖書館學會會報，74，165-183。
  67. 國立臺灣大學圖書館(2013)。小心學術有「詐」─您不可不提防的「學術詐騙」。國立臺灣大學圖書館館訊，電子版，109
  68. 劉聰德、張朝欽、梁晉嘉、謝青宏、任孝祥、林聖勇、蔡艾玲(2010)。開放近用的機會與展望。
被引用次数
  1. 歐俐伶(2017)。開放取用期刊投稿推廣：以BioMed Central為例。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，26，55-66。
  2. 彭台光(2018)。商管領域掠奪型出版：學術期刊黑名單與白名單及因應建議。管理學報，35(2)，241-266。
  3. 葉乃靜(2022)。資訊素養教育的特徵與重要性。通識教育學刊，30，11-32。
print cancel