题名

探討台灣地區醫院品質報告卡之可行指標

并列篇名

Exploring the Applicable Quality Indictors on Hospital Report Cards in Taiwan

DOI

10.6288/TJPH2002-21-04-08

作者

陳楚杰(Chu-Chienh Chen);林恆慶(Herng-Ching Lin);勞寬(Kuan Lao)

关键词

醫院品質報告卡 ; 醫療照護市場 ; 品質指標 ; hospital report cards ; medical care market ; quality indicators

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

21卷4期(2002 / 08 / 01)

页次

296 - 304

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

目標:本研究之目的為探討台灣地區醫院認為適當的主導推行醫院品質報告卡之組織及其公佈品質資訊的意願狀況和願意公佈的指標。方法:本研究以495家地區級(含)以上醫院為研究對象,採取郵寄問卷的方式蒐集所需的資料。結果:問卷回收183份,總回收率為37%,其中地區教學級(含)以上醫院的回收率為68.75%,但地區醫院回收率僅有25.9%。有57.7%的樣本醫院認為由財團法人醫院評鑑醫療品質策進會主導進行較適當。有52%的樣本醫院願意公佈其品質資訊。有50%以上樣本醫院願意公佈品質資訊,平均住院日及病人滿意度等10項。結論:有52%的樣本醫院願意公佈品質資訊,衛生主管機關可考慮推動醫院品質報告卡,促使醫院提升醫療服務品質。以保障民眾就醫權益及增進醫療照護市場的效率。

英文摘要

Objectives: The purposes of this study are to explore the appropriate organization to initiate hospital report cards and to understand hospitals’ willingness to use report cards and publishable quality indicators. Methods: The study used 495 hospitals including medical centers, regional hospitals, teaching district hospitals, and district hospitals as the study sample. A mailing survey was performed to collect applicable data. Results: There were 183 questionnaires returned. This equaled a response rate of 37%. The response rate for medical centers, regional hospitals, and district teaching hospitals was as high as 68.75%. However, the response rate for district hospitals was only 25.9%. Among the sampled hospitals, 57.7% chose the Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation as the most appropriate organization to initiate hospital report cards. Over 50% of hospitals are willing to publish 10 quality indicators including physician specialty and practice experience, average length of stay, and patient satisfaction. Conclusions: In total, 52% of the sampled hospitals are willing to publish performance information. It is recommended that policy makers consider initiating hospital report cards. The report cards could help hospitals improve quality of services in order to protect consumers’ rights and enhance the efficiency of the health market.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. Anderson, P.(1999).England Publishes First Tables of Hospital Performance.British Medical Journal,318
  2. Chen, J., Radford, M. J., Wang, Y., Marciniak, T. A., Krumholz, H. M.(1999).Performance of the ' 100 Top Hospitals' : What Does Report Card Report?.Health Affairs (Millwood),18
  3. Fogg, D. M.(1998).Health Care Report Cards.AORN Journal,67(3)
  4. Frist, B.(1998).Patients' Bill of Rights.Tennessee Medicine: Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association,91(12)
  5. Harris, N.(1994).Report Cards, Part 2: How Hospitals Measure Up.Business and Health,12(8)
  6. Hass, J.(2001).Canada Lags in Development of Report Cards for Hospitals.Canadian Medical Association Journal,164(6)
  7. HealthGrades(2002).How to Choose a Hospital.
  8. Hibbard, J. H., Jewett, J. J.(1997).Will Quality Report Cards Help Consumers?.Health Affairs (Millwood),16(3)
  9. Jaklevic, M. C.(1999).Hospital Report-Card Model in Peril.Modern Healthcare,29(3)
  10. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations(2002).About Performance Report.
  11. Marshall, M. N.(2001).Accountability and Quality Improvement: the Role of Report Cards.Quality in Health Care,10
  12. Maxwell, C. I.(1998).Public Disclosure of Performance Information in Pennsylvania: Impact on Hospital Charges and the View of Hospital Executives.Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement,24(9)
  13. Mukamel, D. B., Mushlin, A. I.(1998).Quality of Care Information Makes a Difference: an Analysis of Market Share and Price Changes After Publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports.Medical Care,36
  14. Romano, P. S., Rainwater, J. A., Antonius, D.(1999).Grading the Graders: How Hospitals in California and New York Perceive and Interpret Their Report Cards.Medical Care,37
  15. Romano, P. S., Zach, A., Luft, H. S., Rainwater, J., Remy, L. L., Campa, D.(1995).The California Hospital Outcomes Project: Using Administrative Data to Compare Hospital Performance.Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement,21(12)
  16. Royal Women''s Hospital(2000).Review of Existing Models of Reporting to Consumers on Health Service Quality.Victoria:Turner ACT.
  17. Schauffler, H. H., Mordavsky, J. K.(2001).Consumer Reports in Health Care: Do They Make a Difference?.Annual Review of Public Health,22
  18. Schultz, J., Thiede, C. K., Feldman, R., Christianson, J.(2001).Do Employees Use Report Cards to Assess Health Care Provider Systems?.Health Services Research,36(3)
  19. Slovensky, D. J., Fottler, M. D., Houser, H. W.(1998).Developing an Outcomes Report Card for Hospitals: a Case Study and Implementation Guidelines.Journsl of Healthcare Management/American College of Healthcare Executives,43(1)
  20. Tu, J. V., Schull, M. J., Ferris, L. E., Hux, J. E., Redelmeier, D. A.(2001).Problems for Clinical Judgment: 4. Surviving in the Report Card Era.Canadian Medical Association Journal,164(12)
  21. 吳肖琪 Wu, Shiao-Chi(1999)。評估醫院醫療品質指標。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
  22. 陳佩妮 Chan, Pey-Ni、 鄭守夏 Cheng, Shou-Hsia、 鍾國彪 Chung, Kuo-Piao、 林王美園 Wang, Lin Mei-Yuan(1997)。臺灣地區醫療品質指標適用性之探討 A Study on the Applicability of Medical Quality Indicators in Taiwan。中華公共衛生雜誌 Chinese Journal of Public Health,16(2)
  23. 謝?瑞 、 盧瑞芬 Lu, Rachel Jui-Fen(2000)。醫療經濟學 Health economics。臺北:學富文化。
  24. 藍忠孚 Lan, Chung-Fu、 熊惠英 Hsiung, Hui-Yin、 胡澤芷 、 葉佳禧(2000)。臺灣地區醫療機構品質管理現況分析 Status Quo of Medical Quality Management in Taiwan。醫療品質 Healthcare Quarterly,2(1)
被引用次数
  1. 郭年真(2019)。評論:醫療品質指標風險校正模型,是否應納入病患社經特性?。台灣公共衛生雜誌,38(3),301-302。
  2. 黃耀慧、傅鍔、姚振華(2004)。台灣地區醫院牙科現況調查—建立牙科評鑑之先驅研究。醫務管理期刊,5(3),322-339。
  3. 游雅涵、陳建和(2009)。保健旅遊產品屬性偏好之研究:以來台外國旅客健檢旅遊為例。觀光休閒學報,15(3),267-288。
  4. 鍾國彪、賴美淑、陳宗泰(2007)。另一種流行趨勢—論成效計酬的趨勢與展望。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,26(5),353-370。