建構長期照護體系先導計畫－理念與實踐

A Pilot Program for the Development of Long-Term Care System - Concepts and Practices

10.6288/TJPH2004-23-03-08

吳淑瓊(Shwu-Chong Wu)；戴玉慈(Yu-Tzu Dai)；莊坤洋(Kun-Yang Chuang)；張媚(Mei Chang)；呂寶靜(Pau-Ching Lu)；曹愛蘭(Ai-Lan Tsao)；王正(Cheng G. Wang)；陳正芬(Chen-Fen Chen)

長期照護體系 ； 資源發展 ； 財務支持 ； 照顧管理 ； 實驗社區 ； long-term care system ； resource development ； financial support ； care management ； experimental communities

台灣公共衛生雜誌

23卷3期（2004 / 06 / 01）

249 - 258

繁體中文

目標：本文說明建構長期照護體系先導計畫的理念、計畫策略、和初步執行結果。該計畫希望能以可負擔的居家和社區式服務協助身心功能障礙者，以達到「在地老化」的目標。方法：在 2000 年行政院核定「建構長期照護體系先導計畫」三年計畫。該計畫選擇嘉義市和台北縣三鶯為實驗社區，於2001年10月分別在兩社區成立社區中心，每一中心配置4-5位照顧經理，一位主任，和一位行政專員，負責推展照顧管理服務、及督導新型服務模式的發展。從2002年1月起，社區開始提供各項居家和社區式服務。結果：到2002年7月為止，照顧經理總共替 1031位個案擬定照顧計畫，其中，469位個案依據照顧計畫接受服務。除補助兩社區新型服務的開辦費（約1400萬元）外，兩社區補助民眾接受服務的費用共約474萬元。結論，初步結果顯示服務提供者有發展居家和社區式服務的意願，但是民眾對此服務並不熟悉，可能造成初始之低使用率。在計畫的補助標準和照顧管理制度的設計下，提供居家和社區式服務的財務負擔並不如預期沈重，但須更長的觀察，才能驗證上述之成果。

Objectives: This report described the conceptual framework, strategic planning and implementation, and preliminary results of the Pilot Program for the Development of Long-Term Care System. The program aimed to achieve “Aging in Place” by making home and community-based services affordable to the disabled. Methods: In the year 2000, the Executive Yuan approved a three-year project, the Pilot Program for the Development of Long-Term Care. Chia-Yi City, and the San-Yin Townships of Taipei County were selected as experimental communities. In October, 2001, a community center was established in each experimental community. Personnel included 4-5 care managers, 1 director, and 1 administrative assistant. The main tasks of the center were to carry out care management scheme, and to supervise new long-term care service models being implemented in the communities. Starting in February 2002, home and community based services became available to the disabled in the communities. Results: By the end of July 2002, care managers had drawn up care plans for l,031 disabled residents. Among them, 469 people had used home or community-based services according to a care plan. Subsidies to service providers were at about 14 million NT dollars. Reimbursement for services totaled about 4.74 million NT dollars . Conclusions: Initial results had shown that service providers were willing to invest in developing resources for home and community based services. Unfamiliarity with the services had probably initially led to lower than expected level of utilization. Under the current care management and service reimbursement schemes, financial burden of providing home and community based services was not as heavy as anticipated. However, continual observation 15 needed to confirm initial findings.

1. 吳淑瓊、莊坤洋、陳亮汝(2004)。建構長期照護體系先導計畫：實驗社區介入前的照護需求與自付費用。台灣衛誌，23，209-220。
   連結：
2. (1999).With Respect to Old Age: Long-Term Care Rights and Responsibilities.UK:Stationery Office.
3. Campbell JC,Ikegami N(2000).Long-term care insurance comes to Japan.Health Aff,19,26-39.
4. Cuellar AE,Wiener JM(2000).Can social insurance for long-term care work? The experience of Germany.Health Aff,19,8-25.
5. Fine MD(1999).Coordinating health extended care, and community support services: reforming aged care in Australia.J Aging Soc Policy,11,67-90.
6. Gibson D(1998).Aged Care: Old Policies, New Problems.New York:Cambridge University Press.
7. Kane AR,Kane RL,Ladd RC(1998).The Heart of Long-term Care.New York:Oxford University Press.
8. Kono S,Ogawa N,Maeda D(1996).Aging in Japan.Tokyo:Japan Aging Research Center.
9. Myers GC(1990).Handbook of Aging and Social Sciences.New York:Academic Press.
10. OECD(1996).OECD social Policy Studies No 19.Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
11. Stuart M,Weinrich M(2001).Home- and community-based long-term care: lessons from Denmark.Gerontologist,41,474-480.
12. Sundstrom G,Thorslund M,Sweden(1994).International Handbook on Services for the Elderly.London:Greenwood Press.
13. Watanabe R,Lai OK(2001).Aged care service delivery in Japan: preparing for the long-term care insurance scheme.J Aging Soc Policy,13,21-34.
14. 行政院社會福利推動委員會長期照護專案小組(2002)。建構長期照護體系先導計畫問與答。
15. 行政院經濟建設委員會(2002)。中華民國台灣地區民國91年到140年人口推計。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
16. 吳淑瓊、江東亮(1995)。台灣地區長期照護的問題與對策。中華衛誌，14，246-255。
17. 吳淑瓊、呂寶靜、王正、莊坤洋、張媚、戴玉慈(2002)。建構長期照護體系先導計畫第二年計畫期中報告。
18. 吳淑瓊、呂寶靜、盧瑞芬(1998)。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
19. 吳淑瓊、張明正(1997)。台灣省家庭計畫研究所台灣老人研究叢刊系列（六）。台大公共衛生研究所暨衛生政策研究中心與台灣省家庭計畫研究所。
20. 吳淑瓊、莊坤洋(2001)。在地老化：台灣二十一世紀長期照護的政策方向。台灣衛誌，20，192-201。
21. 吳淑瓊、陳正芬(2000)。長期照護資源的過去、現在與未來。社區發展，92，19-31。
22. 呂寶靜(1999)。台灣社會福利的發展：回顧與展望。台北:五南圖書。
23. 陳亮汝(2002)。台北，國立台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所。
24. 傅子珍(1996)。高雄，高雄醫學院公共衛生研究所。
25. 曾昭蓉(1998)。高雄，高雄醫學院公共衛生研究所。

1. 洪永男(2017)。高齡產業商業模式創新之分類、發展與驗證－服務設計取向。長榮大學高階管理碩士在職專班（EMBA）學位論文。2017。1-199。