住院中與出院後病人滿意度差異比較－系絡觀點

Comparison of Satisfaction of Hospitalized and Discharged Patients

10.6288/TJPH2007-26-03-05

陳建立(Chien-Li Chen)；梁素琴(Su-Chin Liang)

病人滿意度 ； 系絡觀點 ； 因素恆等性 ； 效果量 ； patient satisfaction ； contextual perspective ； factorial invariance ； effect size

台灣公共衛生雜誌

26卷3期（2007 / 06 / 01）

208 - 217

繁體中文

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to find out the measurement invariance of satisfaction factor structure of hospitalized and discharged patients and to compare the differences of satisfaction assessment between them. Methods: THIS questionnaire was used to measure patient satisfaction before and after discharge in the same interval. We selected 1128 hospitalized patients for exploratory factor analysis to get the satisfaction factor. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed among 685 hospitalized random patients and 641 discharged patients, using multi-group structural equation modeling to test the factorial invariance of satisfaction. We compared effect size between hospitalized and discharged patients' satisfaction. Results: Five factor structures were found in the hospitalized patient satisfaction, which explained 72.8% of the total cumulative variance. Factor loading of the two groups was between 0.78 and 0.92 with factorial invariance. Hospitalized patient satisfaction was higher than discharged patient satisfaction (p＜0.001, Cohen's d). Effect size had a medium different level between 0.46 and 0.71. Conclusions: Physical environment and social context affect hospitalized patient satisfaction. Satisfaction perception between hospitalized and discharged patients was significantly different. Construct validity and biases should be assessed in measuring service satisfaction.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to find out the measurement invariance of satisfaction factor structure of hospitalized and discharged patients and to compare the differences of satisfaction assessment between them. Methods: THIS questionnaire was used to measure patient satisfaction before and after discharge in the same interval. We selected 1128 hospitalized patients for exploratory factor analysis to get the satisfaction factor. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed among 685 hospitalized random patients and 641 discharged patients, using multi-group structural equation modeling to test the factorial invariance of satisfaction. We compared effect size between hospitalized and discharged patients' satisfaction. Results: Five factor structures were found in the hospitalized patient satisfaction, which explained 72.8% of the total cumulative variance. Factor loading of the two groups was between 0.78 and 0.92 with factorial invariance. Hospitalized patient satisfaction was higher than discharged patient satisfaction (p＜0.001, Cohen's d). Effect size had a medium different level between 0.46 and 0.71. Conclusions: Physical environment and social context affect hospitalized patient satisfaction. Satisfaction perception between hospitalized and discharged patients was significantly different. Construct validity and biases should be assessed in measuring service satisfaction.

1. 林鉦棽、彭台光(2006)。多層次管理研究：分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報，23，649-675。
   連結：
2. Bagozzi RP,Yi Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.J Acad Mark Sci,6,76-94.
3. Barnard CI.(1938).The Functions of the Executive.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
4. Brock JK-U.(2003).The `power` of international business research.J Int Bus Stud,34,90-99.
5. Cohen J.(1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
6. Conlon DE,Van Dyne L,Milner M,Ng YK.(2004).The effects of physical and social context on evaluations of captive, intensive service relationships.Acad Manage J,47,433-445.
7. Crobach LJ.,Thorndike RL (ed)(1971).Educational Measurement.Washington, DC:American Council on Education.
8. DiMaggio PJ,Powell WW.(1983).The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.Am Sociol Rev,48,147-160.
9. Fischer E,Gainer B,Bristor J.(1997).The sex of the service provider :does it influence perceptions of service quality?.J Retail,73,361-382.
10. Gutek BA.(1995).The Dynamics of Service.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
11. Gutek BA,Bhappu A,Liao-Troth M,Bennett C.(1999).Distinguishing between service relationship and service encounters.J Appl Psychol,84,218-233.
12. Kerlinger FN,Lee HB.,黃營杉,汪志堅（編譯）(2002).研究方法.台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司.
13. Kotler P.(1996).Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implement, and Control.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Inc.
14. Lispsy MW,Wilson DB.(1993).The efficacy of psychological.Am Psychol,48,1181-1209.
15. Mone MA,Mueller G C,Mauland W.(1996).The perceptions and usage of statistical power in applied psychology and management research.Pers Psychol,49,103-120.
16. Murphy K.,SG Rogelberg (ed.)(2002).Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology.Malden, MA:Blackwell.
17. Paulhus DL.,Braun HI,Wiley DE,Jackson DN (eds.)(2002).The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
18. Pfeffer J.,DT Gilbert,ST Fiske,G Londzey (eds.)(1998).Handbook of Social Psychology.New York:McGraw-Hill.
19. Podsakoff PM,Mackenzie SB,Podsakoff NP.(2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.J Appl Psychol,88,879-903.
20. Roethlisberger FJ,Dickson WJ.(1939).Management and the Worker.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
21. Rousseau RM,Fried Y.(2001).Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research.J Organ Behav,22,1-13.
22. Salancik GR,Pfeffer J.(1978).A social information processing approach to job attitudes.Adm Sci Q,23,224-253.
23. Stokols D.(1995).The padadox of environmental psychology.Am Psychol,50,821-837.
24. Vandenberg RJ,Lance CE.(2000).A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research.Organ Res Meth,3,4-70.
25. 台灣醫務管理學會(2003)。台灣醫療照護品質指標系列。台北:台灣醫務管理學會。
26. 石曜堂(1978)。醫療品質評估。醫院，11，106-109。
27. 民國93年國民醫療保健支出
28. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式，LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
29. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會(2006)。95年度新制醫院評鑑基準暨評分說明手冊。台北:財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會。

1. 黃琡珺、王琪雅(2009)。門診醫療服務品質量表之建構。行銷評論，6(2)，221-248。