题名

不同超長住院定義對急性住院病患之影響

并列篇名

Implication of Different Definitions of Overstay for Acute Inpatients

DOI

10.6288/TJPH2008-27-04-04

作者

葉馨婷(Shin-Ting Yeh);吳肖琪(Shiao-Chi Wu)

关键词

超長住院 ; 住院日數 ; 診斷關聯群 ; 風險校正 ; overstay ; length of stay ; DRGs ; risk adjustment

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

27卷4期(2008 / 08 / 01)

页次

301 - 308

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

目標:針對急性病患,探討不同超長住院定義下超長住院之情形。方法:以台灣地區2000年全民健保申報急性住院病患為對象,依超過住院日數30日、25日、90百分位、DRGs校正法及迴歸風險校正法定義超長住院;DRGs校正法及迴歸風險校正法皆是以校正後偏離常態分佈1.285個標準差(90百分位)定義超長住院,而迴歸風險校正法除校正病患疾病組合,亦校正病患性別及年齡。結果:超長住院率以超過30日定義為2.41%,超過25日定義為3.65%,超過住院日數90百分位定義為9.49%,以DRGs校正法定義為10.13%,以迴歸風險校正法定義為8.49%。各評鑑層級別醫院、公私立別醫院或不同科別之病患經由DRGs及迴歸風險校正法所計算出的超長住院率,均較傳統上超過30日或25日定義之超長住院率為高,顯示急性病患實際超長之住院情形嚴重。結論:將DRGs校正、或迴歸風險校正納入超長住院定義中有其重要性;DRGs校正或迴歸風險校正法能呈現病患超長住院的真實情形,建議健保局及醫院管理者可據以訂定可以改善超長住院的措施、提高急性病床之利用。

英文摘要

Objectives: To investigate the condition of overstay in acute inpatients under the different definitions of overstay. Methods: The subjects were acute inpatients from the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) databases in 2000. The five different definitions of overstay are: 1) over 30 hospital days, 2) over 25 hospital days, 3) over 90 percentile of hospital days, 4) over DRGs adjusted, and 5) over regression risk adjusted days of hospitalization. The DRGs adjusted and regression risk adjusted overstay are defined as being over the 1.285 standard deviation and standardized residual of normal distribution. Regression risk adjusted patients' case mix, age and sex. Results: According to the different definitions of overstay, the rate of overstay is 2.41% as defined by over 30 days, 3.65% as defined by over 25 days, 9.49% as defined by over 90 percentile of hospital days, 10.13% as defined by the DRGs adjusted method and 8.49% as defined by the regression risk adjusted method, respectively. The rate of overstay as defined by the DRGs and regression risk adjusted method is significantly higher than the traditional definition (over 30 or 25 days) used in different departments and levels of hospitals. It exposes the serious nature of overstay in acute patients. Conclusions: It is important to calculate overstay using the DRGs adjusted or regression risk adjusted methods. These adjusted methods could reveal the actuality of overstay for the administrators of NHI and hospitals, which could be applied to policy that would eliminate the problem of overstay and increase the utility of hospital beds for acute patients.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 陳婉茗、朱慧凡、錢慶文、蘇喜、吳肖琪(2006)。醫院對即將全面實施DRGs支付制度之因應表現。醫務管理期刊,7,193-205。
    連結:
  2. Allman RM,Goode PS,Burst N,Bartolucci AA,Thomas DR(1999).Pressure ulcers, hospital complications, and disease severity: impact on hospital costs and length of stay.Adv Wound Care,12,22-30.
  3. MCHP Glorssary and Related Terms
  4. Collins TC,Daley J,Henderson WH,Khuri SF(1999).Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery.Ann Surg,230,251-259.
  5. Coulam RF,Gaumer GL(1991).Medicare`s prospective payment system: a critical appraisal.Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl,45-47.
  6. Fetter RB(1992).Hospital payment based on diagnosisrelated groups.J Soc Health Syst,3,4-15.
  7. Guterman S,Dobson A(1986).Impact of the Medicare prospective payment system for hospitals.Health Care Financ Rev,7,97-114.
  8. Hackbarth GM RR,Miller ME,Miller ME,Thomas S (eds.)(2004).Report to the Congress: New Approaches in Medicare.Washington, DC:Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.
  9. Iezzoni LI,Shwartz M,Ash AS,Mackiernan YD(1996).Does severity explain differences in hospital length of stay for pneumonia patients.J Health Serv Res Policy,1,65-76.
  10. Mckee M,Healy J(2002).Hospitals in a Changing Europe.Bukingham, Philadelphia:Open University Press.
  11. Medicare announces final payment changes for long-term care hospitals for rate year 2005
  12. Shachtman RH,Snapinn SM,Quade D,Freund DA,Kronhaus AK(1986).A method for constructing case-mix indexes, with application to hospital length of stay.Health Serv Res,20,737-762.
  13. Shwartz M,Iezzoni LI,Ash AS,Mackiernan YD(1996).Do severity measures explain differences in length of hospital stay? The case of hip fracture.Health Serv Res,31,365-385.
  14. Adjusting outcomes for case mix: indirect standardisation and logistic regression
  15. 醫院總額專業醫療服務品質報告
  16. 吳肖琪(1997)。中央健康保險局委託研究報告。台北:中央健保局。
  17. 吳肖琪、林麗嬋(2002)。行政院二代健保規劃小組九十一年期末檢討聯席會。台北:行政院。
  18. 吳肖琪、林麗嬋、藍忠孚、吳義勇(1998)。全民健保實施後急性病床住院病患超長住院情形之分析。中華衛誌,17,139-147。
  19. 梁忠詔、簡世霖、宋英聖、范文光、王舜光、楊士賢(2004)。台灣東部某醫學中心復健科病患長期住院因素之探討。慈濟醫學,16,99-109。
  20. 鄒淑英(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園,元智大學資訊管理所。
  21. 趙玫珍(1991)。中部地區住院三十天以上患者長期住院因素之分析研究。行政院衛生署委託研究報告。
  22. 魏中仁(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台灣大學公共衛生醫療機構管理研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 胡漢華、洪燕妮、林麗嬋、吳冠穎、吳肖琪、吳君誠(2012)。台灣腦中風病人急性後期照護需要之探討。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,31(3),251-262。
  2. 葉馨婷、吳肖琪(2010)。醫院住院病人超長住院狀況之分析。醫務管理期刊,11(2),131-145。