比較不同生產方式婦女產後60天內的門診醫療利用

Comparison of Ambulatory Utilization among Women at 60-day Postpartum with Different Mode of Delivery

10.6288/TJPH2009-28-01-02

陳楚杰(Chu-Chien Chen)；劉得泰(Te-Tai Liu)；王本仁(Pen-Jen Wang)；陳靖宜(Chin-Yi Chen)；張琇珺(Hsiu-Chun Chang)

生產方式 ； 產後 ； 醫療利用 ； delivery method ； postpartum ； medical utilization

台灣公共衛生雜誌

28卷1期（2009 / 02 / 01）

16 - 25

繁體中文

目標：本研究旨在比較不同生產方式婦女產後60天內的門診醫療利用。方法：本研究材料來自國家衛生研究院發行之20萬人全民健康保險承保抽樣歸人檔於1996-2003年之申報資料，以4,995位產婦為研究對象，並採用二部模型對產後有就醫的產婦進行分析，比較不同生產方式婦女產後60天內的門診醫療利用。結果：剖腹產婦女產後60天內有就醫者的平均門診就醫次數及門診就醫費用均高於自然產婦女，且平均門診就醫間隔天數則比自然產婦女短。結論：剖腹產可能會增加產後60天內門診醫療利用。

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the mode of delivery and utilization of ambulatory care by women at 60-days postpartum. Methods: Claims data between 1996 and 2003 for a representative sample of 200,000 people randomly selected from all beneficiaries enrolled in Taiwan's NHI program in 2000 were analyzed. A total of 4,995 women were included to estimate ambulatory care utilization 60-days postpartum with the different modes of delivery using a two part model. Results: Women at 60-days postpartum with Caesarean delivery had higher average numbers of outpatient visits and expenditures with shorter intervals between visits, than women with vaginal births. Conclusions: The findings indicated that ambulatory care utilization may increase among women with Caesarean delivery at 60-days postpartum.

1. 羅紀琼(2003)。良辰吉時與剖腹生產。台灣衛誌，22，134-140。
   連結：
2. Allen VM,O''Connell CM,Farrell SA,Baskett TF.(2005).Economic implications of method of delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol,193,192-197.
3. Andersen RM.(1995).Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?.J Health Soc Behav,36,1-10.
4. Hemminki E,Shelley J,Gissler M.(2005).Mode of delivery and problems in subsequent births: a registerbased study from Finland.Am J Obstet Gynecol,193,169-177.
5. Liu S,Heaman M,Joseph KS(2005).Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery.Obstet Gynecol,105,836-842.
6. Lydon-Rochelle M,Holt VL,Martin DP,Easterling TR.(2000).Association between method of delivery and maternal re-hospitalization.JAMA,283,2411-2416.
7. Madlon-Kay DJ,DeFor TA.(2005).Maternal postpartum health care utilization and the effect of Minnesota early discharge legislation.J Am Board Fam Pra,18,307-311.
8. Meikle S F,Lyons E,Hulac P,Orleans M.(1998).Rehospitalizations and outpatient contacts of mothers and neonates after hospital discharge after vaginal delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol,179,166-171.
9. Petrou S,Henderson J,Glazener C.(2001).Economic aspects of caesarean section and alternative modes of delivery.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,15,145-163.
10. Stephenson P.(1992).International Differences in the Use of Obstetrical Interventions.Copenhagen:WHO European Regional Office.
11. Webb DA,Robbins JM.(2003).Mode of delivery and risk of postpartum rehospitalization.JAMA,289,46-47.
12. 跨世紀婦女政策藍圖
13. 公務統計年報－各級全民健保特約醫療院所婦幼衛生工作
14. 徐美菁(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立陽明大學。
15. 全民健康保險資料庫網站
16. 張珏(2003)。婦女與健康。台北:財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會。
17. 陳怡秀(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所。
18. 曾億郎(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園，長庚大學醫務管理研究所。
19. 黃俊元、楊銘欽、陳維昭(1997)。產婦特性與採用剖腹產－以台大醫院為例。中華衛誌，16，309-318。
20. 趙天麗(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所。
21. 蘇純閨譯(2000)。產科學。台北:美商麥格羅希爾。