题名

冠狀動脈繞道手術量與療效關係之實證研究

并列篇名

The volume-outcome Relationships in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

DOI

10.6288/TJPH2009-28-01-07

作者

許碧峰(Pi-Fem Hsu)

关键词

Cox比例危險模型 ; 醫療品質 ; 醫院手術量 ; Cox proportional hazard model ; hospital quality ; surgical volume-outcome relationships

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

28卷1期(2009 / 02 / 01)

页次

69 - 77

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

目標:本文利用2000-2005年全民健保資料庫之冠狀動脈繞道手術(CABG)病患資料,探討醫院手術量與病患療效之關係。二者的關係是因醫院的熟能生巧效果?亦或是各醫院的醫療品質差異?方法:本文利用Cox比例危險模型探討病患死亡危險率之影響因素。另外,為考量各醫院因醫療品質差異對病患療效之影響,在病患的存活模型中加入各醫院的個別效果。結果:在病患的存活模型中發現每增加1%的醫院手術量將使病患死亡的危險率下降17.5%。但是,若在病患的存活模型中加入各醫院的個別效果,以醫院手術量與病患療效的時間變化量衡量二者關係,將發現二者的關係不再顯著。結論:醫院手術量與病患療效的關係主要是反映各醫院醫療品質的差異,並非是熟能生巧效果。當醫院有較佳的醫療品質時,不僅使其病患有較佳的療效,也因常被選擇與推薦而擁有高手術量,使得手術量與病患療效產生正向關係。

英文摘要

Objectives: To investigate the surgical volume-outcome relationships for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Methods: We analyzed the records in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database for CABG patients during the period 2000-2005. Cox proportional hazard was used to identify factors relevant to patient survival. The hospitalspecific effects are also included in the model to account for quality differences between hospitals. Results: Our initial estimates showed that surgical volume was negatively associated with hazard rate such that a 1% increase in surgical volume was associated with a 17.5% lower probability of dying in the hospital. However, when we re-estimated the model accounting for quality differences between hospitals by including hospital-specific effects, the effect of volume disappeared. Conclusions: The volume-outcome relationship for CABG patients appears to reflect quality differences between high-and low-volume hospitals, rather than the principle of ”practice makes perfect.”

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 王庭荃、楊長興(2008)。醫師年資、醫療服務量與消化性潰瘍治療效果之相關研究。台灣衛誌,27,57-66。
    連結:
  2. 簡麗年、朱慧凡、劉見祥(2003)。醫院、醫師手術量與醫療品質之關聯性探討-以全股(髖)關節置換為例。台灣衛誌,22,118-126。
    連結:
  3. Begg CB,Cramer LD,Hoskins WJ,Brennan MF.(1988).Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.JAMA,280,1747-1751.
  4. Birkmeyer JD,Siewers AE,Finlayson EV(2002).Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.N Engl J Med,346,1128-1137.
  5. Farley DE,Ozminkowski RJ.(1992).Volume-outcome relationships and in-hospital mortality: the effect of changes in volume over time.Med Care,30,77-94.
  6. Gaynor MG,Seider H,Vogt WB.(2005).The volume-outcome effect, scale economies and learning-by-doing.Am Econ Rev,95,243-247.
  7. Halm EA,Lee C,Chassin MR.(2002).Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.Ann Intern Med,137,511-520.
  8. Hamilton BH,Hamilton VH.(1997).Estimating surgical volume-outcome relationships applying survival models: accounting for frailty and hospital fixed effects.Health Econ,6,383-395.
  9. Hamilton BH,Ho V.(1998).Does practice make perfect? Examining the relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcomes for hip fracture patients in Quebec.Med Care,36,892-903.
  10. Hughes RG,Garnick DW,Luft HS,McPhee SJ,Hunt SS.(1988).Hospital volume and patient outcomes: the case of hip fracture patients.Med Care,26,1057-1067.
  11. Klein MC,Spence A,Kaczorowski J,Kelly A,Grzybowski S.(2002).Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?.CMAJ,166,1257-1263.
  12. Kreder HJ,Grosso P,Williams JI(2003).Provider volume and other predictors of outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a population study in Ontario.Can J Surg,46,15-22.
  13. Lieberman MD,Kilburn H,Lindsey M,Brennan MF.(1995).Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy.Ann Surg,222,638-645.
  14. Luft HS,Hunt SS,Maerki SC.(1987).The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective referral patterns?.Health Serv Res,22,157-182.
  15. Van Lanschot JJ,Hulscher JB,Buskens CJ,Tilanus HW,ten Kate FJ,Obertop H.(2001).Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy.Cancer,91,1574-1578.
被引用次数
  1. 鍾國彪、陳靖怡、郭年真(2016)。作者回覆:高風險手術集中化政策之探討。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,35(4),393-394。
  2. 鍾文誠、李曉伶、吳肖琪(2013)。參與論質計酬方案對接受冠狀動脈繞道手術之糖尿病病人之預後影響。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,32(6),615-625。