题名

健康促進學校推動團隊領導方式、集體效能與團體效果之現況及關係模式驗證－以台灣小學為例

并列篇名

The Relationship between Leadership Style and Collective Efficacy on the Effectiveness of Health Promotion Work Teams in Taiwanese Elementary Schools

DOI

10.6288/TJPH2010-29-03-08

作者

牛玉珍(Yu-Zhen Niu)；劉潔心(Chieh-Hsing Liu)；邱詩揚(Shy-Yang Chiou)；晏涵文(Han-Wen Yen)

关键词

健康促進學校 ； 集體效能 ； 團體效果 ； Health Promoting School ； Collective Efficacy ； Group Effectiveness

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

29卷3期（2010 / 06 / 01）

页次

247 - 260

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the leadership style and collective efficacy on the effectiveness of health promotion work teams in Taiwanese elementary schools. Methods: The study design was cross-sectional. According to the size of the districts and individual schools, a stratified random sample was used to select subjects from 518 health promotion work teams approved by the Ministry of Education in 2007. Four hundred and ninety-seven subjects were recruited and the response rate was 86.32% (n=429). Structured questionnaires including demographics, leadership style, collective efficacy and group effectiveness were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, regression and SEM. p＜.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The leadership style had. 49 direct effect and. 32 indirect effect on Group Effectiveness through collective efficacy. The total effect of leadership style on Group Effectiveness was .81. Leadership style and collective efficacy were the major predictors as they accounted for 53.9% of the total variance for Group Effectiveness. Conclusions: Better leadership style will have direct and indirect effects on group effectiveness.
英文摘要

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the leadership style and collective efficacy on the effectiveness of health promotion work teams in Taiwanese elementary schools. Methods: The study design was cross-sectional. According to the size of the districts and individual schools, a stratified random sample was used to select subjects from 518 health promotion work teams approved by the Ministry of Education in 2007. Four hundred and ninety-seven subjects were recruited and the response rate was 86.32% (n=429). Structured questionnaires including demographics, leadership style, collective efficacy and group effectiveness were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, regression and SEM. p＜.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The leadership style had. 49 direct effect and. 32 indirect effect on Group Effectiveness through collective efficacy. The total effect of leadership style on Group Effectiveness was .81. Leadership style and collective efficacy were the major predictors as they accounted for 53.9% of the total variance for Group Effectiveness. Conclusions: Better leadership style will have direct and indirect effects on group effectiveness.
主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 晏涵文、劉潔心、牛玉珍、邱詩揚(2009)。國民小學健康促進學校推動團隊現況及團體效能影響因素之探討。健康促進與衛生教育學報，31，108-128。
    連結：
  2. 曾勤媛、蘇慧芳、謝碧晴(2005)。領導型態與團體效果相關性探討：以大台北地區醫院品管圈為例。台灣衛誌，24，230-238。
    連結：
  3. WHO. The Bangkok charter for health promotion in a globalized world. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/6gchp/bangkok_charter/en/. Accessed July 10, 2009.
  4. Jones JT, Furner M. WHO's global school health initiative. Health promoting schools: a health setting for living, learning and working. Available at: http://www.who.int/school_youth_health/media/en/92.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2009.
  5. Avolio, BJ(ed),Yammarino, FJ(ed)(2002).Transformational and Cbarismatic Leadership : The Road Ahead.Oxford:Elsevier Science.
  6. Avolio, BJ(ed.),Yammarino, FJ(ed.)(2002).Transformational and Cbarisnatic Leadership: The Road Ahead.Oxford, UK:Elsevier Science.
  7. Avolio, BJ,Bass, BM,Jung, DI(1999).Re-examining the components of transformational andtransactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire.J Occup Organ Psychol,72,441-462.
  8. Bandura, A(2000).Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy.Curr Dir Psychol Sci,9,75-78.
  9. Bandura, A(1997).Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control.USA:W.H.Freeman and Company.
  10. Bass, BM(1998).Transformational Leadership: Industry, Military, and Education Impact.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
  11. Bass, BM,Avolio, BJ(1994).Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership.USA:Sage.
  12. Booth, ML,Samdal, O(1997).Health-promoting school in Australia: models and measurement.Aust N Z J Public Health,21,365-370.
  13. Diamantopoulos, A,Siguaw, JA(2000).Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  14. Eriksson, A,Jansson, B,Haglund, BJA,Axelsson, R(2008).Leadership, organization and health at work: a case study of a Swedish industrial company.Health Promot Int,23,127-133.
  15. Gully, SM,Incalcaterra, KA,Joshi, A,Beaubien, JM(2002).A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.J Appl Psychol,87,819-832.
  16. Hair, JF,Anderson, RE,Tatham, RL,Black, W(1998).Multivariate Data Analysis.NJ:Prentice Hall.
  17. Hoyle, TB,Samek, BB,Valois, RF(2008).Building capacity for the continuous improvement of health-promoting schools.J Sch Health,78,1-8.
  18. Inchley, J,Muldoon, J,Currie, C(2006).Becoming a health promoting school: evaluating the process of effective implementation in Scotland.Health Promot Int,22,65-71.
  19. Jex, SM,Bliese, PD(1999).Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: a multilevel study.J Appl Psychol,84,349-361.
  20. Jung, DI,Sosik, JJ(2002).Transformational leadership in work groups. The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance.Small Group Res,33,313-336.
  21. Kark, R,Shamir, B,Chen, G(2003).The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency.J Appl Psychol,88,246-255.
  22. Knight, D,Durham, CC,Locke, EA(2001).The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance.Acad Manage J,44,326-338.
  23. Leithwood, KA,Aitken, R,Jantzi, D(2006).Making School Smarker Leading with Evidence.USA:Corwin.
  24. Leurs, MTW,Schaalma, HP,Jansen, MWJ,Mur-Veeman, IM,St Leger, LH,De Vries, N(2005).Development of a collaborative model to improve school health promotion in the Netherlands.Health Promot Int,20,296-305.
  25. Little, B,Madigan, R(1997).The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams.Small Group Res,28,517-534.
  26. Mohrman, SA,Cohen, SG,Mohrman, AM(1995).Designing Team-Base Organizations: New Forms of Knowledge Work.San Francico, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  27. Mukoma, W,Flisher, AJ(2004).Evaluations of health promoting schools: a review of nine studies.Health Promot Int,19,357-368.
  28. National Health and Medical Research Council(1996).Effective School Health Promotion.Canberra:Australian Government Publishing Service.
  29. O''Hara, J,McNamara, G(2001).Process and product issues in the evaluation of school development planning.Evaluation,7,99-109.
  30. Prussia, GE,Kinicki, AJ(1996).A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory.J Appl Psychol,81,187-198.
  31. Shen, MJ,Chen, MC(2007).The relationship of leadership, team trust and team performance: a comparison of the service and manufacturing industries.Soc Behav Pers,35,643-658.
  32. Smith, KG,Smith, KA,Olian, JD,Sims Jr, HP,O''Bannon, DP,Scully, JA(1995).Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication.Adm Sci Q,39,412-438.
  33. St. Leger, L.(2001).Schools health literacy and public health: possibilities and challenges.Health Promot Int,16,197-205.
  34. Stajavic, AD,Lee, DS(2001).A meta-analysis of the relationship between collective efficacy and group performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Management Meeting,USA:Washington, DC:
  35. Tjosvold, D(1988).Cooperative and competitive interdependence: collaboration between departments to service customers.Group Organ Stud,13,274-289.
  36. Turunen, H,Tossavainen, K,Jakonen, S,Vertio, H(2006).Did something change in health promotion practices? a three-year study of Finnish European Network of Health Promoting Schools.Teachers Teach Theor Pract,12,675-692.
  37. Walumbwa, FO,Wang, P,Lawler, JJ,Shi, K(2004).The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes.J Occup Organ Psychol,77,515-530.
  38. Weiner, BJ,Lewis, MA,Linnan, LA(2009).Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs.Health Educ Res,24,292-305.
  39. Wells, J,Barlow, J,Stewart-Brown, S(2003).A systematic review of universal approaches to mental health promotion in schools.Health Educ,103,197-220.
  40. 吳淑任(2008)。嘉義，國立中正大學教育學研究所。
  41. 張家鳳(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台北護理學院醫護管理研究所。
  42. 黃敏萍(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北，國立台灣大學商學研究所。
  43. 黃敏萍、戚樹誠、黃國隆(2002)。跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能：一項結構權變之觀點。管理學報，19，979-1007。
  44. 黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、王建忠(1993)。轉型領導、團隊內互動、及團隊與成員效能：IPO模式之驗證。管理學報，20，397-427。
  45. 劉嘉貞(2007)。嘉義，國立中正大學教育學研究所。
  46. 劉潔心(2009)。97-98年度健康促進學校推動中心計畫成果報告書。台北:行政院衛生署國民健康局。
被引用次数
  1. 劉潔心(2013)。臺灣推動健康促進學校之現況與展望。中等教育，64(1)，6-25。
print cancel