题名

國小低年級學童家長對其子女接種流感疫苗意向之轉變情形及其相關因素分析-以雲林縣學童家長為例

并列篇名

A Study of the Changes in Parental Intent to Approve Influenza Vaccine Inoculation for Their low-grade Primary School Children in Yunlin County

DOI

10.6288/TJPH2010-29-04-06

作者

許淑雲(Shu-Yun Hsu);廖宏恩(Hung-En Liao);洪百薰(Baai-Shyun Hurng);林柏煌(Po-Huang Lin);高昆裕(Kun-Yue Kao);王俊毅(Jiun-Yi Wang)

关键词

流行性感冒 ; 疫苗接種 ; 健康信念模式 ; 行動線索 ; influenza ; vaccine inoculation ; health belief model ; cues to action

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

29卷4期(2010 / 08 / 15)

页次

326 - 336

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

目標:96年政府首度將國小一二年級學童納入流感疫苗免費接種實施對象,本研究在97年疫苗未開打前,調查學童家長對其子女接種流感疫苗的意向,並探討影響家長轉變意向之相關因子。方法:97年5至6月間採二階段集群抽樣,以結構式問卷調查雲林縣24所國小共1,125名家長。結果:96年子女有接種的家長佔57.9%,其中有7.7%在97年轉而不同意其子女接種流感疫苗;而96年子女未接種者則佔42.1%,其中有51.4%在97年轉而同意其子女接種流感疫苗。援引健康信念模式,並經由多項式羅吉斯迴歸分析發現,學童就讀私立學校、父母教育程度較高、未收到接種同意書及須知,對家長願意讓其子女接種疫苗的意向有負面影響;而家長自我效能較高、接種疫苗之利益性較高或障礙性較低、情境感受較強,則對家長意向有正面影響。結論:建議衛生單位可結合社區醫療網絡,藉由醫師的專業角色,提升家長對接種流感疫苗的認知與態度。並可針對未繳交同意書或不同意接種的家長,透過電話提醒和說明,降低其障礙信念。政府亦可利用大眾傳播宣導施打流感疫苗的重要性及優點,並公佈疫苗相關資訊,以澄清民眾對疫苗安全上的疑慮,提升民眾對疫苗接種的意願。

英文摘要

Objectives: The government initiated a voluntary, free influenza vaccination program for lowgrade primary school students in 2007. This study was done before the inoculation program started in 2008 and investigated parental intent with regard to their children's inoculations and identified factors associated with a change in parental intent. Methods: Identified by two-stage cluster sampling, 1125 parents from 24 schools in Yunlin County were recruited and interviewed with a structured questionnaire in May and June, 2008. Results: Children of 57.9% of the parents had been inoculated in 2007. Among these parents, 7.7% changed their minds and now would not allow their children to have inoculations in 2008. On the other hand, 42.1% of the parents did not allow their children to have inoculations in 2007. Among these, 51.4% changed their minds and would allow their children to have inoculations in 2008. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that children attending private schools, a higher level of parental education, and failure to receive letters of notice and consent were negative factors associated with parental intent to vaccinate their children. The perceptions of higher benefits or lower barriers to inoculation, higher self-efficacy, and perceptions of a higher inoculation rate were all shown to be positively associated with parental intent. Conclusions: We suggest Health Bureaus to exploit physician resources in the network of community medical groups to enhance parental knowledge about and belief in inoculation, and remind those parents who did not receive notification or did not allow their children to have inoculations of the availability of this information. The government can promote the importance and advantage of inoculation via mass communications, and publish related information about influenza vaccine in order to eliminate public doubt about the safety of the vaccine and to let parents have strong intent to vaccinate their children.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 行政院衛生署疾病管制局全球資訊網:防疫專區/傳染病防治核心教材,2007。http://www.cdc.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=22075&ctNode=1956&mp=1。引用2009/08/31。
  2. Becker, MH,Maiman, LA(1975).Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations.Med Care,13,10-24.
  3. Bridges, CB,Thompson, WW,Meltzer, MI(2000).Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA,284,1655-1663.
  4. Curnock, E,Wynne, H(2002).Older people's view on the treatment and prevention of influenza in older people.Age Aging,31,322-323.
  5. Evers, DB(2000).Insights on immunizations from caregivers of children receiving Medicaid-funded services.J Soc Pediatr Nurs,5,57-66.
  6. Gray, RM,Kesler, JP,Moody, PM(1966).The effects of social class and friends' expectations on oral polio vaccination participation..Am J Public Health,56,2028-2032.
  7. Halloran, ME,Longini, IM(2006).Community studies for vaccinating school children against influenza.Science,311,615-616.
  8. Harrington, PM,Woodman, C,Shannon, WF(2000).Low immunization uptake: is the process the problem?.J Epidemiol Commun Health,54,394-400.
  9. Hedlund, J,Christenson, B,Lundbergh, P,Ortqvist, A(2003).Effects of a large-scale intervention with influenza and 23-valent pneumococcal vaccines in elderly people: a 1-year follow-up..Vaccine,21,3906-3911.
  10. Houseman, C,Butterfoss, FD,Morrow, AL,Rosenthal, J(1997).Focus groups among public, military, and private sector mothers: insights to improve the immunization process.Public Health Nurs,14,235-243.
  11. King, JC,Cummings, GE,Stoddard, J(2005).A pilot study of the effectiveness of a school-based influenza vaccination program.Pediatrics,116,868-873.
  12. King, JC,Stoddard, JJ,Gaglani, MJ(2006).Effectiveness of school-based influenza vaccination.N Engl J Med,355,2523-2532.
  13. Lewis, HP,McCann, R(2002).Achieving national influenza vaccine targets-an investigation of the factors affecting influenza vaccine uptake in older people and people with diabetes.Commun Dis Public Health,5,119-126.
  14. Magolda, MBB(1992).Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students, Intellectual Development.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  15. Magolda, MMB(2004).Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection.Educ Psychol,39,31-42.
  16. Nexoe, J,Kragstrup, J,Sogaard, J(1999).Decision on influenza vaccination among the elderly: a questionnaire study based on the health belief model and the multidimensional locus of control theory.Scand J Prim Health Care,17,105-110.
  17. Reichert, TA,Sugaya, N,Fedson, DS,Glezen, WP,Simonsen, L,Tashiro, M(2001).The Japanese experience with vaccinating schoolchildren against influenza.N Engl J Med,344,889-896.
  18. Santibanez, A,Patricia, N,Richard, KZ,Katz, J,Stephen, KW(2002).Knowledge and beliefs about influenza, pneumococcal disease, immunization among older people.J Am Geriatr Soc,50,1711-1716.
  19. Szilagyi, PG,Bordley, C,Vann, JC(2000).Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates.JAMA,284,1820-1827.
  20. Zimmerman, K,Santibanez, TA,Janosky, JE(2003).What affects influenza vaccination rates among older patients? An analysis from inner-city, suburban, rural, and veterans affairs practices.Am J Med,114,31-38.
  21. 吳肖琪(2001)。行政院衛生署兩年期補助計畫行政院衛生署兩年期補助計畫,台北:行政院衛生署。
  22. 孫幸筠、陳世英(2005)。漫談流行性感冒及流感疫苗。健康世界,229,8-14。
  23. 涂醒哲(1999)。台灣老人流感疫苗接種效益。台北:行政院衛生署疾病管制局。
  24. 陳素凰(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台北護理學院護理研究所。
  25. 黃惠萍、趙偉翔、何麗莉、王宗曦(2007)。疫情報導疫情報導,未出版
  26. 黃璉華(1993)。鄉村老人健康自評、信念與行為。公共衛生,20,221-233。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡炯青、陳政友、林國甯、朱玉如(2013)。2012年台北市5歲以下兒童肺炎鏈球菌結合疫苗接種率及其影響因素研究。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,32(5),463-475。
  2. 賴欣沛,施淑芳,林陳立(2016)。育齡婦女未來補接種麻疹—腮腺炎—德國麻疹混合疫苗之意願及願付價格之相關因素研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報,45,93-117。
  3. 廖彩涵、楊銘欽(2012)。影響家長讓小孩接種肺炎鏈球菌疫苗之相關因素:網路調查之應用。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,31(4),361-370。