糖尿病照護成效與影響因素之探討：以台東某區域醫院糖尿病共同照護網為例

The Outcomes and Factors Associated with Diabetes Care: The Diabetes Shared Care Program in a Regional Hospital in Taitung, Taiwan

10.6288/TJPH2011-30-01-03

黃憶玫(Yi-Mei Huang)；張慈桂(Tzu-Kuei Chang)

台東地區 ； 糖尿病 ； 共同照護網 ； 糖化血色素 ； Taitung area ； Diabetes mellitus ； diabetes shared care program ； HbA1c

台灣公共衛生雜誌

30卷1期（2011 / 02 / 15）

19 - 28

繁體中文

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess 3-year outcomes and factors associated with those outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients who joined the diabetes shared-care program in Taitung, Taiwan. Methods: 242 type Ⅱ diabetic patients in a Taitung regional hospital were enrolled in this study and completed 4 follow-up measures. The principal measure was the patient's mean HbA1c at baseline and at each annual follow-up. A logistic regression model was used to examine the factors associated with poor glycemic control. Results: (1) The mean HbA1c level showed the greatest reduction in the first follow-up year. The level gradually increased over time (the mean values for HbA1c at baseline, 1(superscript st), 2(superscript nd), and 3(superscript rd) years were 9.12%, 7.93%, 8.20%, and 8.27% respectively, p＜0.05); however, the 3(superscript rd) year level of HbA1c was still a significant improvement over baseline. (2) Age＜65, aborigines, a higher HbA1c level at baseline, a longer duration of illness, and higher doses of medication were significantly associated with poor glycemic control. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the long-term efficacy of a diabetes shared- care program in HbA1c control. Age, ethnicity, initial HbA1c level, duration of illness, and medication used were significantly associated with poor diabetes control. It would be helpful in improving the quality of diabetes-care among the Taitung population if case management were combined with community resources.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess 3-year outcomes and factors associated with those outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients who joined the diabetes shared-care program in Taitung, Taiwan. Methods: 242 type Ⅱ diabetic patients in a Taitung regional hospital were enrolled in this study and completed 4 follow-up measures. The principal measure was the patient's mean HbA1c at baseline and at each annual follow-up. A logistic regression model was used to examine the factors associated with poor glycemic control. Results: (1) The mean HbA1c level showed the greatest reduction in the first follow-up year. The level gradually increased over time (the mean values for HbA1c at baseline, 1(superscript st), 2(superscript nd), and 3(superscript rd) years were 9.12%, 7.93%, 8.20%, and 8.27% respectively, p＜0.05); however, the 3(superscript rd) year level of HbA1c was still a significant improvement over baseline. (2) Age＜65, aborigines, a higher HbA1c level at baseline, a longer duration of illness, and higher doses of medication were significantly associated with poor glycemic control. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the long-term efficacy of a diabetes shared- care program in HbA1c control. Age, ethnicity, initial HbA1c level, duration of illness, and medication used were significantly associated with poor diabetes control. It would be helpful in improving the quality of diabetes-care among the Taitung population if case management were combined with community resources.

1. Chang, H.C.,Chang, Y.C.,Lee, S.M.(2007).The effectiveness of hospital-based diabetes case management: an example from a northern Taiwan regional hospital.J Nurs Res,15,296-309.
   連結：
2. Tang, P.L.,Yuan, W.L.,Tseng, H.F.(2005).Clinical follow-up study on diabetes patients participating in a health management plan.J Nurs Res,13,253-62.
   連結：
3. 徐慧君、翁慧卿、林育慈(2004)。糖尿病患介入疾病管理在經濟面、臨床面及滿意度成效評估之初探—以南部某區域醫院糖尿病病患為例。醫務管理期刊，5，222-42。
   連結：
4. 陳都文、王俊毅(2009)。糖尿病共同照護網對偏遠地區中老年患者健康狀況之成效。台灣衛誌，28，334-43。
   連結：
5. 台東縣政府：台東縣台東市人口統計，2003。http://web2.taitung.gov.tw/department/m1/1401.htm。引用2008/03/24。Taitung County Government. Population statistics in Taitung city. Available at: http://web2.taitung.gov.tw/department/m1/1401.htm. Accessed March 24, 2008.[In Chinese]
6. 行政院衛生署：民國95年死因統計上冊統計表。台北：行政院衛生署，2007。Department of Health, Exective Yuan, R.O.C.(Taiwan). Statistics of Causes of Death Volume I, 2006. Taipei: Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan), 2007.
7. 行政院衛生署國民健康局：94年國民健康訪問暨藥品濫用調查/健康狀況與疾病盛行率。http://olap.bhp.doh.gov.tw/search/ListHealth0.aspx?menu=1&mode=1&year=94。引用2008/03/24。Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health,Exective Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Available at: http://olap.bhp.doh.gov.tw/search/ListHealth0.aspx?menu=1&mode=1&year=94. Accessed March 24, 2008. [In Chinese]
8. Ahmann, A.J.(2007).Guidelines and performance measures for diabetes.Am J Manag Care,13(Suppl 2),S41-6.
9. Association AD(2007).Standards of medical care in diabetes-2007.Diabetes Care,30(Suppl 1),S4-41.
10. Benoit, S.R.,Fleming, R.,Philis-Tsimikas, A.,Ji, M.(2005).Predictors of glycemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study.BMC Public Health,5,36.
11. Björk, S.(2001).The cost of diabetes and diabetes care.Diabetes Res Clin Pract,54(Suppl 1),S13-8.
12. Chen, C.C.,Li, C.I.,Chen, R.H.,Wang, T.Y.,Chang, C.T.,Yei, K.M.(2005).Factors related to poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetic outpatients in a medical center.Mid Taiwan J Med,10,90-8.
13. Couper, J.J.,Taylor, J.,Fotheringham, M.J.,Sawyer, M.(1999).Failure to maintain the benefits of home-based intervention in adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Care,22,1933-7.
14. David, G.B.,Wendy, A.D.,Carole, A.C.,Timothy, M.E.D.(2003).Diabetes education and knowledge in patients with type 2 diabetes from the community: the Fremantle Diabetes Study.J Diabetes Complications,17,82-9.
15. Forouhi, N.G.,Wareham, N.J.(2006).Epidemiology of diabetes.Medicine,34,57-60.
16. Goudswaard, A.N.,Stolk, R.P.,Zuithoff, N.P.,de Valk, H.W.,Rutten, G.E.(2004).Long-term effects of self-management education for patients with Type 2 diabetes taking maximal oral hypoglycaemic therapy: a randomized trial in primary care.Diabet Med,21,491-6.
17. Hearnshaw, H.,Lindenmeyer, A.(2006).What do we mean by adherence to treatment and advice for living with diabetes? A review of the literature on definitions and measurements.Diabet Med,23,720-8.
18. Ng, T.P.,Goh, L.G.,Tan, Y.(2005).Ethnic differences in glycaemic control in adult Type 2 diabetic patients in primary care: a 3-year follow-up study.Diabet Med,22,1598-604.
19. Norris, S.L.,Nichols, P.J.,Caspersen, C.J.(2002).The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review.Am J Prev Med,22(4 Suppl),15-38.
20. Renders, C.M.,Valk, G.D.,Franse, L.V.,Schellevis, F.G.,van Eijk, J.T.,van der Wal, G.(2001).Long-term effectiveness of a quality improvement program for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice.Diabetes Care,24,1365-70.
21. Shojania, K.G.,Ranji, S.R.,McDonald, K.M.(2006).Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.JAMA,296,427-40.
22. Stratton, I.M.,Adler, A.I.,Neil, H.A.(2000).Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study.BMJ,321,405-12.
23. Wild, S.,Roglic, G.,Green, A.,Sicree, R.,King, H.(2004).Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.Diabetes Care,27,1047-53.
24. 李玉春(2004)。行政院衛生署國民健康局九十三年度科技發展計畫，計畫編號DOH93-HP-1103行政院衛生署國民健康局九十三年度科技發展計畫，計畫編號DOH93-HP-1103,台北=Taipei:行政院衛生署國民健康局=Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health, Executive Yuan。
25. 李璟佩、朱正一、吳篤安(2007)。東台灣糖尿病一般門診照護模式與糖尿病共同照護疾病管理模式之比較。慈濟醫學雜誌，19，66-73。
26. 林紹雯、柯碧玲、陳素娥、陳明琪、張雅芬(2003)。糖尿病共同照護網實施成效：中部某區域醫院為例。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌，23，55-66。
27. 邱淑媞(2003)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣大學流行病學研究所=Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, National Taiwan University。
28. 劉棻(2007)。台灣糖尿病共同照護網推行現況與挑戰。領導護理，7，28-34。
29. 蔡政麟、葉玲玲、楊志良、孫培然(2007)。納入糖尿病共同照護網後影響病患遵醫囑行為之研究—以某區域教學醫院為例。童綜合醫學雜誌，1，11-22。
30. 賴美淑、邱淑媞(2002)。糖尿病共同照護之概念與內涵。台灣醫學，6，560-8。

1. 施培艾(2017)。家醫科與內分泌科糖尿病照護品質之比較。國立臺灣大學流行病學與預防醫學研究所學位論文。2017。1-58。