The Association of Household Income, Healthcare Utilization, and Survival of Catastrophic Illnesses Patients: Using ESRD and Cancer as Examples

重大傷病患者家戶所得與醫療利用、存活狀況之相關—以末期腎臟病與癌症為例

10.6288/TJPH2013-32-04-04

魏璽倫(Shi-Lun Wei)；楊銘欽(Ming-Chin Yang)

全民健康保險 ； 重大傷病 ； 家戶所得 ； 醫療利用 ； 存活狀況 ； National Health Insurance ； catastrophic illness ； household income ； healthcare utilization ； survival

台灣公共衛生雜誌

32卷4期（2013 / 08 / 15）

331 - 345

英文

Objectives: To investigate the association of household income and healthcare utilization as well as survival status of patients with catastrophic illnesses under the NHI system in Taiwan. Methods: Data from the ”Survey of Family Income and Expenditure” (2003 to 2006) and the ”Registry of patients with catastrophic illness” were first linked to identify subjects. Patients with cancer or end stage renal disease (ESRD) holding only one NHI catastrophic illness card were included in this study. Information related to healthcare utilization was obtained from NHI claims data (2002 to 2007) and survival data was obtained from the ”National Registry of Deaths” (2003 to 2009). Negative binominal regression, multiple regression, and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to analyze the relationships among healthcare utilization, survival, and socioeconomic variables. Results: Regarding the healthcare utilization, the average length of stay (ALOS) of ESRD patients in the highest income bracket was 8.987 days longer than that of patients in the lowest bracket (p＜0.05). Hemodialysis usage, the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations presented no correlation with household income. Among cancer patients in the highest income bracket, the IRRs of outpatient visits and hospitalization were 1.18 (p＜0.05) and 2.11 (p＜0.001), respectively. The ALOS of those in the highest income bracket was 11.36 days longer than that of patients in the lowest income bracket (p＜0.001). With respect to survival status, male ESRD patients had a higher mortality than females (HR=1.82, p＜0.05). Among cancer patients, being males (HR=1.66, p＜0.05) and in the highest income bracket had higher mortality (HR=1.6, p＜0.05), those with the highest education level had lower mortality (HR=0.52, p＜0.05). Conclusions: The relationship between household income and healthcare utilization varied according to type of diseases. Income level was positively associated with healthcare utilization among cancer patients while patients in the highest income bracket had higher mortality. But the association was not significant among ESRD patients. Future researchers can conduct further analyses on other catastrophic illnesses.

Objectives: To investigate the association of household income and healthcare utilization as well as survival status of patients with catastrophic illnesses under the NHI system in Taiwan. Methods: Data from the ”Survey of Family Income and Expenditure” (2003 to 2006) and the ”Registry of patients with catastrophic illness” were first linked to identify subjects. Patients with cancer or end stage renal disease (ESRD) holding only one NHI catastrophic illness card were included in this study. Information related to healthcare utilization was obtained from NHI claims data (2002 to 2007) and survival data was obtained from the ”National Registry of Deaths” (2003 to 2009). Negative binominal regression, multiple regression, and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to analyze the relationships among healthcare utilization, survival, and socioeconomic variables. Results: Regarding the healthcare utilization, the average length of stay (ALOS) of ESRD patients in the highest income bracket was 8.987 days longer than that of patients in the lowest bracket (p＜0.05). Hemodialysis usage, the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations presented no correlation with household income. Among cancer patients in the highest income bracket, the IRRs of outpatient visits and hospitalization were 1.18 (p＜0.05) and 2.11 (p＜0.001), respectively. The ALOS of those in the highest income bracket was 11.36 days longer than that of patients in the lowest income bracket (p＜0.001). With respect to survival status, male ESRD patients had a higher mortality than females (HR=1.82, p＜0.05). Among cancer patients, being males (HR=1.66, p＜0.05) and in the highest income bracket had higher mortality (HR=1.6, p＜0.05), those with the highest education level had lower mortality (HR=0.52, p＜0.05). Conclusions: The relationship between household income and healthcare utilization varied according to type of diseases. Income level was positively associated with healthcare utilization among cancer patients while patients in the highest income bracket had higher mortality. But the association was not significant among ESRD patients. Future researchers can conduct further analyses on other catastrophic illnesses.

1. Chu, Y.T.、Wu, S.C.、Lee, Y.C.、Lai, M.S.、Tam, S.C.(2010)。Assessing measures of comorbidity using national health insurance databases。Taiwan J Public Health，29，191-200。
   連結：
2. Hong, M.H.、Cheng, P.W.H.(2009)。Impact of choice of income and equivalence scale on economic well-being inequality。Taipei Econ Inq，45，11-63。
   連結：
3. Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Application and healthcare utilization of catastrophic illness patients in Taiwan, 2011. Application and medical utilization of catastrophic illnesses in 2011. Available at: http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_p01.aspx?class_no=25&now_fod_list_no=12320&level_no=2&doc_no=850572012. Accessed September 14, 2012.
4. Directorate-General of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2003 Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan Area. Taipei, Taiwan: Directorate-General of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan), 2003. [In Chinese: English abstract]
5. Directorate-General of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2005 Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan Area. Taipei, Taiwan, Directorate-General of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan), 2005. [In Chinese: English abstract]
6. Directorate-General of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2006 Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan Area. Taipei, Taiwan, Directorate-General of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan), 2006. [In Chinese: English abstract]
7. Directorate-General of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2004 Survey of Family Income and Expenditure in Taiwan Area. Taipei, Taiwan: Directorate-General of Budget Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan), 2004. [In Chinese: English abstract]
8. Abraham, G.,Jayaseelan, T.,Matthew, M.(2010).Resource settings have a major influence on the outcome of maintenance hemodialysis patients in South India.Hemodial Int,14,211-7.
9. Andersen, R.,Newman, J.F.(1973).Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in United States.Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc,51,95-124.
10. Aranda, M.A.,McGory, M.,Sekeris, E.,Maggard, M.,Ko, C.,Zingmond, D.S.(2008).Do racial/ethnic disparities exist in the utilization of high-volume surgeons for women with ovarian cancer?.Gynecol Oncol,111,166-72.
11. Asada, Y.,Kephart, G.(2007).Equity in health services use and intensity of use in Canada.BMC Health Serv Res,7,41.
12. Byers, T.E.,Wolf, H.J.,Bauer, K.R.(2008).The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States: findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study.Cancer,113,582-91.
13. Chang, H.J.,Hsieh, C.R.,Chiang, T.P.,Huang, S.C.(2004).Evaluation of the policy of catastrophic illness of national health insurance.Socioeconomic Law Institution Rev,33,27-76.
14. Chiu, W.T.(1999).Research Report Funded by the Bureau of National Health InsuranceResearch Report Funded by the Bureau of National Health Insurance,Taipei, Taiwan:Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C..
15. Coleman, M.P.,Rachet, B.,Woods, L.M.(2004).Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales up to 2001.Br J Cancer,90,1367-73.
16. Collins, J.,Metcalf, P.(2003).Access to dialysis in New Zealand renal services.N Z Med J,116,U455.
17. Culyer, A.J.(ed.),Newhouse, J.P.(ed.)(2000).Handbook of Health Economics.Amsterdam:North-Holland.
18. Eisenstein, E.L.,Sun, J.L.,Anstrom, K.J.(2009).Do income level and race influence survival in patients receiving hemodialysis?.Am J Med,122,170-80.
19. Forrest, L.F.,Adams, J.,Wareham, H.,Rubin, G.,White, M.(2013).Socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS Med,10,e1001376.
20. Garcia-Garcia, G.,Briseño-Rentería, G.,Luquín-Arellan, V.H.,Gao, Z.,Gill, J.,Tonelli, M.(2007).Survival among patients with kidney failure in Jalisco, Mexico.J Am Soc Nephrol,18,1922-7.
21. Goodridge, D.,Hawranik, P.,Duncan, V.,Turner, H.(2012).Socioeconomic disparities in home health care service access and utilization: a scoping review.Int J Nurs Stud,49,1310-9.
22. Hsiung, B.Y.(2000).Reforming the catastrophic health care measure of the national health insurance of Taiwan: a case study.Socioeconomic Law Institution Rev,25,131-55.
23. Jensen, K.E.,Hannibal, C.G.,Nielsen, A.(2008).Social inequality and incidence of and survival from cancer of the female genital organs in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994-2003.Eur J Cancer,44,2003-17.
24. Kima, C.W.,Leeb, S.Y.,Moon, O.R.(2008).Inequalities in cancer incidence and mortality across income groups and policy implications in South Korea.Public Health,122,229-36.
25. Klag, M.J.,Whelton, P.K.,Randall, B.L.,Neaton, J.D.,Brancati, F.L.,Stamler, J.(1997).End-stage renal disease in African-American and white men. 16-year MRFIT findings.JAMA,277,1293-8.
26. Lu, J.F.R.,Li, C.L.,Chuang, Y.C.(1999).Inpatient care use by patients with catastrophic illness under national health insurance in Taiwan.Taiwan J Public Health,18,283-92.
27. Maddison, A.R.,Asada, Y.,Urquhart, R.(2011).Inequity in access to cancer care: a review of the Canadian literature.Cancer Causes Control,22,359-66.
28. Marinovich, S.,Lavorato, C.,Rosa-Diez, G.,Bisigniano, L.,Fernández, V.,Hansen-Krogh, D.(2012).The lack of income is associated with reduced survival in chronic haemodialysis.Nefrologia,32,79-88.
29. Morris, C.R.,Snipes, K.P.,Schlag, R.,Wright, W.E.(1999).Sociodemographic factors associated with prostatectomy utilization and concordance with the physician data query for prostate cancer (United States).Cancer Causes Control,10,503-11.
30. Puigpinos, R.,Borrell, C.,Antunes, J.L.F.(2009).Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality in Barcelona: 1992-2003.BMC Public Health,9,35.
31. Regidor, E.,Martinez, D.,Calle, M.E.,Astasio, P.,Ortega, P.,Dominguez, V.(2008).Socioeconomic patterns in the use of public and private health services and equity in health care.BMC Health Serv Res,8,183.
32. Rosengren, A.,Wilhelmsen, L.(2004).Cancer incidence, mortality from cancer and survival in men of different occupational classes.Eur J Epidemiol,19,533-40.
33. Sen, B.,Blackburn, J.,Morrisey, M.A.(2012).Did copayment changes reduce health service utilization among CHIP enrollees? Evidence from Alabama.Health Serv Res,47,1603-20.
34. van Doorslaer, E.(ed.),Wagstaff, A.(ed.),Rutten, F.(ed.)(1993).Equity in the Finance and Delivery of Health Care: An International Perspective.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
35. van Doorslaer, E.,Wagstaff, A.,Calonge, S.(1992).Equity in the delivery of health care: some international comparisons.J Health Econ,11,389-411.
36. Walker, A.,Pearse, J.,Thurecht, L.,Harding, A.(2006).Hospital admissions by socio-economic status: does the 'inverse care law' apply to older Australians?.Aust N Z J Public Health,30,467-73.
37. Watanabe, R.,Hashimoto, H.(2012).Horizontal inequity in healthcare access under the universal coverage in Japan; 1986-2007.Soc Sci Med,75,1372-8.
38. Woods, L.M.,Rachet, B.,Coleman, M.P.(2006).Origins of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival: a review.Ann Oncol,17,5-19.
39. Yoon, T.H.,Lee, S.Y.,Kim, C.W.,Kim, S.Y.,Jeong, B.G.,Park, H.K.(2011).Inequalities in medical care utilization by South Korean cancer patients according to income: a retrospective cohort study.Int J Health Serv,41,51-66.