台灣國中生班級社會網絡指標及位置與被霸凌經驗之關係

Effects of Social Network Indicators and Positions in Class on Bullied Experiences among Junior High School Students in Taiwan

10.6288/TJPH201433103028

林妤容(Yu-Jung Lin)；吳文琪(Wen-Chi Wu)；李均揚(Chun-Yang Lee)；林岱嬋(Dai-Chan Lin)；江宜珍(Yi-Chen Chiang)

中心性 ； 社會網絡位置 ； 被凌者 ； 被凌經驗 ； centrality ； social network position ； victimization ； bullied experience

台灣公共衛生雜誌

33卷4期（2014 / 08 / 01）

397 - 409

繁體中文

目標：了解台灣國中生被凌經驗之分佈，並探討其於班級內的社會網絡指標及位置與被凌經驗之關係。方法：使用國科會計畫「台灣國中生欺凌行為的類型與角色及其與健康的關係」之部分資料進行分析。樣本自北中南東各隨機抽出五所國中，於7~9年級各隨機抽出兩班，有效樣本共2,474人。社會網絡位置採提名法，每人提名至多3位同學，以UCINET軟體進行社會網絡分析，依據被提名總數（向內中心性）及提名他人總數（向外中心性），將研究樣本分類於身處班級內不同之社會網絡位置，共分為孤鳥型、一廂情願型、自我孤立者、小團體成員、大團體成員等四類。被凌經驗分為肢體式、口語式及關係式被凌，應用SAS軟體進行邏輯斯迴歸分析，探討班級社會網絡指標及位置與被凌經驗的關係。結果：男生、向內中心性較低者及一廂情願型的學生較常肢體／口語式被凌；女生較易關係式被凌；孤鳥型易肢體／關係式被凌；小團體成員則較少關係式被凌。結論：不同社會網絡位置與學生被凌經驗有關，建議可觀察其所屬社會網絡位置，及早偵測學生被凌情形以預防被凌後產生之負向影響。

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to realize the rate of being bullied among junior high school students in Taiwan and to investigate the effect of social network indicators and positions on bullied experiences. Methods: Part of the data from the National Science Council research project ＂The relationship of health and characters of Taiwan junior high school students in School violence＂ was obtained in this study for analysis purpose. The sample involved 2,474 seventh to ninth graders in northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan via stratified, multistage, random cluster sampling. UCINET software was utilized to generate the social network indicators. Social network positions were obtained using peer nomination (nominated up to three classmates). The sample was classified into the isolates, sources, sinks, clique members and liaisons based on the numbers of indegree and outdegree. Bullied behaviors could be classified into three types as the physical, verbal and relational. Logistic regression models were analyzed by SAS software. Results: Boys of lower indegree and source were more likely to be physical/verbal bullied (compared to girls of outdegree and clique members, respectively); girls were more likely to be relationally bullied than boys; isolated students was associated with the experience of physical/relational bullied; and liaisons were more likely to be relationally bullied. Conclusions: Social network positions were significantly associated with bullied experiences. Teachers and school facilitators should recognize the association in advance for school bullying prevention.

1. 吳文琪、陸玓玲、李蘭(2013)。台灣地區國中學生霸凌角色之分佈及其與個人和家庭因素之分析。台灣衛誌，32，372-81。
   連結：
2. 吳文琪、陸玓玲、李蘭(2013)。台灣地區國中學生霸凌角色之分佈及其與個人和家庭因素之分析。台灣衛誌，32，372-81。
   連結：
3. 吳文琪、陸玓玲、李蘭(2013)。台灣地區國中學生霸凌角色之分佈及其與個人和家庭因素之分析。台灣衛誌，32，372-81。
   連結：
4. 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23，77-98。
   連結：
5. 楊雪華、陳端容、李蘭、柯姍如(2002)。台北市某高中一年級學生的班級人際網路位置與吸菸行為的關係。台灣衛誌，21，164-72。
   連結：
6. Almquist, YB,Östberg, V(2013).Social relationships and subsequent health‐related behaviours: linkages between adolescent peer status and levels of adult smoking in a Stockholm cohort.Addiction,108,629-37.
7. Arseneault, L,Bowes, L,Shakoor, S(2010).Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: 'much ado about nothing'.Psychol Med,40,717-29.
8. Baldry, AC(2004).The impact of direct and indirect bullying on the mental and physical health of Italian youngsters.Aggress Behav,30,343-55.
9. Baumeister, RF,Leary, MR(1995).The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychol Bull,117,497-529.
10. Björkqvist, K,Lagerspetz, KM,Kaukiainen, A(1992).Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression.Aggress Behav,18,117-27.
11. Branch, S(2005).Exploration of upwards bullying: an interview study.Griffith, Australia:Griffith University.
12. Cotterell, J(1996).Social Networks and Social Influences in Adolescence.New York:Taylor & Francis.
13. Crick, NR,Casas, JF,Ku, HC(1999).Relational and physical forms of peer victimization in preschool.Dev Psychol,35,376-85.
14. Emerson, RM(1962).Power-dependence relations.Am Sociol Rev,27,31-41.
15. Hanish, LD,Guerra, NG(2000).The roles of ethnicity and school context in predicting children's victimization by peers.Am J Community Psychol,28,201-23.
16. Hawley, PH(1999).The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective.Dev Rev,19,97-132.
17. Haynie, DL(2001).Delinquent peers revisited: does network structure matter?.Am J Sociol,106,1013-57.
18. Hunter, SC,Boyle, JM(2002).Perceptions of control in the victims of school bullying: the importance of early intervention.Educ Res,44,323-36.
19. Jimerson, SR,Swearer, SM,Espelage, DL(2010).Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective.New York:Taylor & Francis.
20. Jones, DC,Newman, JB,Bautista, S(2005).A three ‐ factor model of teasing: the influence of friendship, gender, and topic on expected emotional reactions to teasing during early adolescence.Soc Dev,14,421-39.
21. Kessler, RC,Molnar, BE,Feurer, ID,Appelbaum, M(2001).Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey.Int J Law Psychiatry,24,487-508.
22. Knack, JM,Tsar, V,Vaillancourt, T,Hymel, S,McDougall, P(2012).What protects rejected adolescents from also being bullied by their peers? The moderating role of peer‐valued characteristics.J Res Adolesc,22,467-79.
23. Knoke, D,Yang, S(2008).Social Network Analysis.United Kingdom:Sage Publications.
24. Kupersmidt, JB,Coie, JD(1990).Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence.Child Dev,61,1350-62.
25. Lance,CE,Vandenberg, RJ(2009).Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences.New York:Taylor & Francis Group.
26. Magee, JC,Galinsky, AD(2008).Social hierarchy: the self‐reinforcing nature of power and status.Acad Manag Ann,2,351-98.
27. Modin, B,Östberg, V,Almquist, Y(2011).Childhood peer status and adult susceptibility to anxiety and depression. A 30-year hospital follow-up.J Abnorm Child Psychol,39,187-99.
28. Nansel, TR,Overpeck, M,Pilla, RS,Ruan, WJ,Simons-Morton, B,Scheidt, P(2001).Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment.JAMA,285,2094-100.
29. Neal, JW,Cappella, E(2012).An examination of network position and childhood relational aggression: integrating resource control and social exchange theories.Aggress Behav,38,126-40.
30. Olweus, D(1997).Bully/victim problems in school: facts and intervention.Eur J Psychol Educ,12,495-510.
31. Olweus, D(1994).Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program.J Child Psychol Psychiatry,35,1171-90.
32. Olweus, D(1993).Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
33. Pellegrini, AD,Long, JD(2002).A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school.Br J Dev Psychol,20,259-80.
34. Rosner, B(2010).Fundamentals of Biostatistics.Boston, Massachusetts:Cengage Learning.
35. Salmivalli, C(2010).Bullying and the peer group: a review.Aggress Violent Behav,15,112-20.
36. Scheithauer, H,Hayer, T,Petermann, F,Jugert, G(2006).Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: age trends, gender differences, and correlates.Aggress Behav,32,261-75.
37. Seals, D,Young, J(2003).Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression.Adolescence,38,735-47.
38. Sijtsema, JJ,Veenstra, R,Lindenberg, S,Salmivalli, C(2009).Empirical test of bullies' status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige.Aggress Behav,35,57-67.
39. Talbott, JA(ed.),Hales, RE(ed.),Yudofsky, SC(ed.)(1988).Textbook of Psychiatry.Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Press.
40. Vaillancourt, T,Hymel, S,McDougall, P(2003).Bullying is power: implications for school-based intervention strategies.J Appl Sch Psychol,19,157-76.
41. Veenstra, R,Lindenberg, S,Oldehinkel, AJ,De Winter, AF,Verhulst, FC,Ormel, J(2005).Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: a comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents.Dev Psychol,41,672-82.
42. Wang, J,Iannotti, RJ,Nansel, TR.(2009).School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber.J Adolesc Health,45,365-75.
43. Zimmer-Gembeck, MJ,Nesdale, D,McGregor, L,Mastro, S,Goodwin, B,Downey, G(2013).Comparing reports of peer rejection: associations with rejection sensitivity, victimization, aggression, and friendship.J Adolesc,36,1237-46.
44. Zimmer-Gembeck, MJ,Pronk, RE,Goodwin, B,Mastro, S,Crick, NR(2013).Connected and isolated victims of relational aggression: associations with peer group status and differences between girls and boys.Sex Roles,68,363-77.
45. 吳齊殷、李文傑(2001)。青少年友誼網絡的特質與變遷：長期追蹤研究。青少年生命歷程與生活調適研討會，台北=Taipei:
46. 李蘭、晏涵文、陳富莉、陸玓玲、吳文琪、江宜珍(2010)。健康行為與健康教育。台北=Taipei:巨流圖書股份有限公司=Chuliu Publisher。
47. 兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2004)。,台北=Taipei:兒童福利聯盟文教基金會=Child Welfare League Foundation。
48. 兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2007)。,台北=Taipei:兒童福利聯盟文教基金會=Child Welfare League Foundation。

1. Yu-Jung Lin(林妤容);Xian Li(李賢);Chun-Yang Lee(李均揚);Wen-Chi Wu(吳文琪);Hao-Jan Yang(楊浩然);Yi-Chen Chiang(江宜珍)(2022)。Interaction Effects between Social Network Indicators (In/Out-Degree Centrality) and Humor Expression in the Adolescent Experience of Being Bullied。中華心理衛生學刊。35(4)。347-379。