DRG為基礎前瞻性支付制度對髖關節骨折／置換術的醫療利用與照護結果之影響

Impact of the Drg-Based Prospective Payment System on Medical Utilization and Outcomes of Care for Hip Fracture and Hip Replacement

10.6288/TJPH201534103115

羅郁婷(Yu-Ting Lo)；張冠民(Guann-Ming Chang)；董鈺琪(Yu-Chi Tung)

髖部骨折 ； 髖關節置換術 ； 診斷關聯群 ； 照護結果 ； hip fracture ； hip replacement surgery ； diagnosis related groups ； outcomes of care

台灣公共衛生雜誌

34卷2期（2015 / 04 / 15）

180 - 192

繁體中文

目標：為了抑制上漲的健康照護費用，美國自1983年實施診斷關聯群（diagnosis related groups, DRG）為基礎的前瞻性支付制度，台灣於2010年1月實施以TW-DRG為基礎支付制度。很少研究探討實施DRG為基礎支付制度對於醫療利用及照護結果之影響，且研究結果並不一致。本研究目的係探討TW-DRG為基礎支付制度，對於髖部骨折與髖關節置換術之醫療利用與照護結果之影響。方法：資料取自2008年至2011年全民健康保險研究資料庫全國性樣本，選取主診斷為髖部骨折或主處置為髖關節置換術予以分析。本研究使用分段廣義估計方程式，控制趨勢、病人及醫院特性，以檢測實施TW-DRG為基礎支付制度，對於住院日數、30日再住院及30日死亡之影響。結果：實施TW-DRG為基礎支付制度與住院日數減少有關，及與30日再住院呈下降趨勢有關。結論：實施DRG為基礎支付制度，造成住院日數下降與30日再住院呈現下降趨勢。DRG為基礎支付制度的推行，可能促使醫療提供者建立較佳髖部骨折與髖關節置換術照護模式，以控制醫療利用，且改善再住院率。

Objectives: To reduce rising health care costs, prospective payment systems based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) were introduced in the United States in 1983. Taiwan implemented the TW-DRG-based payment system in January 2010. Few studies have examined the impact of DRG-based payment systems on medical utilization and outcomes of care, and the results have been inconsistent. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the TW-DRG-based payment system on medical use and outcomes of care for patients with hip fractures and patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Methods: Data were derived from the nationwide sample through the National Health Insurance Research Database between 2008 and 2011. Patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture or patients who underwent primary hip replacement surgery were selected for analysis. Segmented generalized estimating equations were used to determine the impact of the TW-DRG-based payment system on the length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day mortality rate when adjusted for trend, patient, and hospital characteristics. Results: The implementation of the TW-DRG-based payment system was associated with a decrease in the length of stay, and with a decreasing trend in the 30-day readmission rate. Conclusions: The implementation of a DRG-based payment system in Taiwan led to a decline in the length of stay and a declining trend in the 30-day readmission rate. DRG-based payment systems might facilitate the development of a better model by which to contain medical utilization and improve readmission rates for patients with hip fractures and patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

1. 吳肖琪、簡麗年、吳義勇(2004)。探討術前合拼症指標與醫療利用及手術相關結果之關聯性—以全股（髖）關節置換健保申報資料為例。台灣衛誌，23，121-9。
   連結：
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Inpatient quality indicators: technical specifications. Available at: http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/IQI_TechSpec.aspx. Accessed April 6, 2013
3. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署：Tw-DRGs支付方案問答輯—管理面、支付通則、分類架構。http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=17&menu_id=1027&WD_ID=1036&webdata_id=4600。引用2015/01/20。National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Questions and answers on the Tw-DRGs payment program–management, payment principles, and categorization framework. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=17&menu_id=1027&WD_ID=1036&webdata_id=4600. Accessed January 20, 2015. [In Chinese]
4. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署：DRGs支付制度。http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=17&menu_id=1027&webdata_id=937&WD_ID=1036。引用2013/05/10。National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). DRGs payment system. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=17&menu_id=1027&webdata_id=937&WD_ID=1036. Accessed May 10, 2013. [In Chinese]
5. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署：Tw-DRGs支付通則。http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=17&menu_id=1027&webdata_id=937&WD_ID=1036。引用2013/04/03。National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Tw-DRGs payment principles. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=17&menu_id=1027&webdata_id=937&WD_ID=1036. Accessed April 3, 2013. [In Chinese]
6. Adams, AS,Zhang, F,LeCates, RF(2009).Prior authorization for antidepressants in Medicaid: effects among disabled dual enrollees.Arch Intern Med,169,750-6.
7. Beaupre, LA,Cinats, JG,Senthilselvan, A(2006).Reduced morbidity for elderly patients with a hip fracture after implementation of a perioperative evidence-based clinical pathway.Qual Saf Health Care,15,375-9.
8. Deyo, RA,Cherkin, DC,Ciol, MA(1992).Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.J Clin Epidemiol,45,613-9.
9. Fitzgerald, JF,Fagan, LF,Tierney, WM,Dittus, RS(1987).Changing patterns of hip fracture care before and after implementation of the prospective payment system.JAMA,258,218-21.
10. Fitzgerald, JF,Moore, PS,Dittus, RS(1988).The care of elderly patients with hip fracture: changes since implementation of the prospective payment system.N Engl J Med,319,1392-7.
11. Geissler, A,Scheller-Kreinsen, D,Quentin, W,EuroDRG Group(2012).Do diagnosis-related groups appropriately explain variations in costs and length of stay of hip replacement? A comparative assessment of DRG systems across 10 European countries.Health Econ,21,103-15.
12. Glickman, SW,Ou, FS,DeLong, ER(2007).Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.JAMA,297,2373-80.
13. Hardin, JW,Hilbe, JM(2003).Generalized Estimating Equations.Boca Raton, Fla:Chapman & Hall/CRC.
14. Holloway, JJ,Thomas, JW(1989).Factors influencing readmission risk: implications for quality monitoring.Health Care Financ Rev,11,19-32.
15. Huang, CC,Chung, KP,Kuo, NC,Hung, CL(2005).Effectiveness of coping strategies used by hospitals in response to implementation of a case-based payment system by the National Health Insurance program.J Formos Med Assoc,104,468-75.
16. Jarvelin, J,Hakkinen, U(2012).Can patient injury claims be utilised as a quality indicator?.Health Policy,104,155-62.
17. Kahn, KL,Draper, D,Keeler, EB(1991).The Effects of the DRG-based Prospective Payment System on Quality of Care for Hospitalized Medicare Patients: Executive Summary..Santa Monica, CA:RAND Corporation.
18. Keeler, EB,Kahn, KL,Draper, D(1990).Changes in sickness at admission following the introduction of the prospective payment system.JAMA,264,1962-8.
19. Kisner, C,Colby, LA(2002).Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques.Philadelphia:Davis.
20. Lien, HM,Chou, SY,Liu, JT(2008).Hospital ownership and performance: evidence from stroke and cardiac treatment in Taiwan.J Health Econ,27,1208-23.
21. Lim, EK(2004).Casemix in Singapore - 5 years on.Ann Acad Med Singapore,33,660-1.
22. Lo-Ciganic, WH,Boudreau, RM,Gray, SL(2013).Changes in cholesterol-lowering medications use over a decade in community-dwelling older adults.Ann Pharmacother,47,984-92.
23. Louis, DZ,Yuen, EJ,Braga, M(1999).Impact of a DRG-based hospital financing system on quality and outcomes of care in Italy.Health Serv Res,34,405-15.
24. Mark, D.(2004).Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention.New York:McGraw-Hill.
25. Mathauer, I,Wittenbecher, F(2012).DRG-based Payment Systems in Low- and Middle-income Countries: Implementation Experiences and Challenges.Geneva:WHO.
26. Neuman, MD,Archan, S,Karlawish, JH,Schwartz, JS,Fleisher, LA(2009).The relationship between short-term mortality and quality of care for hip fracture: a metaanalysis of clinical pathways for hip fracture.J Am Geriatr Soc,57,2046-54.
27. Ray, WA,Griffin, MR,Baugh, DK(1990).Mortality following hip fracture before and after implementation of the prospective payment system.Arch Intern Med,150,2109-14.
28. Seagroatt, V,Tan, HS,Goldacre, M,Bulstrode, C,Nugent, I,Gill, L(1991).Elective total hip replacement: incidence, emergency readmission rate, and postoperative mortality.BMJ,303,1431-5.
29. Shmueli, A,Intrator, O,Israeli, A(2002).The effects of introducing prospective payments to general hospitals on length of stay, quality of care, and hospitals' income: the early experience of Israel.Soc Sci Med,55,981-9.
30. Tung, YC,Chang, GM,Chen, YH(2009).Associations of physician volume and weekend admissions with ischemic stroke outcome in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study.Med Care,47,1018-25.
31. Tung, YC,Chang, GM,Cheng, SH(2015).Long-term effect of fee-for-service-based reimbursement cuts on processes and outcomes of care for stroke: interrupted time-series study from Taiwan.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,8,30-7.
32. Wagner, AK,Soumerai, SB,Zhang, F,Ross-Degnan, D.(2002).Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research.J Clin Pharm Ther,27,299-309.
33. 林亞蓉、楊榮森、曹昭懿(2007)。台灣全民健康保險制度下髖關節置換手術之醫療利用與費用。物理治療，32，200-9。
34. 洪秀娟、楊榮森、曹昭懿(2005)。台灣髖部骨折之流行病學。台灣醫學，9，29-38。

1. 蔣玉滿,黃惠卿,黃珊,郭美玲(2020)。建置多媒體影音護理指導提升人工膝關節置換術病人自我照顧認知的正確率。長庚護理，31(4)，503-516。
2. 廖珮瑜,黃瓊瑤,傅鍾仁,周俊志(2022)。實施臨床路徑對醫療資源耗用及照護品質之影響－平衡計分卡觀點。當代會計，23(2)，289-320。
3. 廖思詠、董鈺琪、游宗憲(2018)。醫院策略與急性心肌梗塞照護品質之關係。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，37(6)，651-663。
4. 潘人豪、詹前隆、陳麗資、陳厚全、郭靜燕(2016)。評估脊椎融合術納入全民健保診斷關聯群對醫療費用影響因子分析。醫學與健康期刊，5(2)，57-71。
5. 楊銘欽、黃昱瞳、黃光華、陳珮青、郭年真、李玉春(2016)。實施全民健康保險住院診斷關聯群支付制度對醫療機構之影響。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，35(3)，268-280。