题名

醫師適用勞動基準法的爭議－以會計師、律師經驗為鏡

并列篇名

Dispute about physicians being covered by the Labor Standards Act - the experience of accountants and lawyers

DOI

10.6288/TJPH201635105055

作者

張濱璿(Brian Pin-Hsuan Chang)；張耀懋(Yao-Mao Chang)

关键词

勞基法 ； 醫師工時 ； 醫師勞動權益 ； 醫師過勞 ； Labor Standards Act ； working hours of physicians ； labor rights of physicians ； physician overworking

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

35卷5期（2016 / 10 / 01）

页次

459 - 476

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

醫師工作過勞已是社會議題，醫師勞動權益的保障，已不能忽視。「勞動基準法」所定的規範，是勞動權益的最低標準，受僱醫師希望能獲得渴望已久的保障。其他行業適用勞基法過程上也面臨類似問題。但從社會公義角度，醫師納入勞基法究竟是對民眾醫療權益的保障或是減損？當其他排班的醫療人員均納入勞基法保障，以及當類似具有長時間工作性質的會計師、律師陸續納入勞基法保障後，醫師尚未納入的正當性為何？到底醫師適用勞基法可能遇到的問題以及解決的方法是什麼？本文將從勞動基準法上規範的勞動權益保障分析出發，並藉由會計師、律師適用的進程，觀察此二自由職業的適用經驗，進一步提出醫師適用勞基法可能的方式以及需要的配套措施，以提供未來政策規劃之參考。
英文摘要

Overwork has caused strokes or death for many physicians, and is currently a widespread social controversy. The protection of working rights of physicians is an issue that cannot be neglected. The Labor Standards Act (the Act) was enacted to provide minimum standards for working conditions. Employed physicians hope to get this long-awaited protection. Problems occurred when the Act was applied to to other businesses. From the perspective of social justice, however, will having physicians covered by the Act protect public health and prevent impairment? Other medical staff are covered by the the Act, as are accountants and lawyers who have similar long working hours, so should physicians not also be covered by the Act? In the end, what problems and their solutions may we encounter when physicians are included under the Act? This article will analyze the issue in terms of the protection of labor rights by the Act, and from the observation of the application process to accountants and lawyers; finally, we propose a way for physicians to be covered by the Act along with necessary supporting measures.
主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 陳偉婷：準衛福部長：住院醫師109年納勞基法。http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201605035013-1.aspx。引用2016/06/01。Chen WT. Acting Minister of Health and Welfare: the plan to include resident physicians under the Labor Standards Law by 2020. Available at: http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201605035013-1.aspx. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  2. 最高法院：92年台上字2108號民事判決。http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/06/01。Supreme Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2003 Tai-Shang-Zi No. 2108 Civil Judgement. Available at: http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  3. 鄧桂芬： 準衛福部長林奏延： 4 年內住院醫師納勞基法。http://health.udn.com/health/story/5999/1671190。引用2016/06/01。Deng GF. Acting Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Tsou-Yen: the plan to include resident physicians under the Labor Standards Law within four years. Available at: http://health.udn.com/health/story/5999/1671190. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  4. 最高法院：97年度台上字第1358號民事判決。http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/06/01。Supreme Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2008 Tai-Shang-Zi No. 1358 Civil Judgement. Available at: http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  5. 最高法院：93年台上字913號民事判決。http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/06/01。Supreme Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2004 Tai-Shang-Zi No. 913 Civil Judgement. Available at: http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  6. Department of Health, U.K. More flexibility for NHS doctors under European Working Time Directive. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/more-flexibility-for-nhs-doctors-under-europeanworking-time-directive. Accessed June 1, 2016.
  7. 最高法院：100年台上字第1191號民事判決。http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/06/01。Supreme Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2011 Tai-Shang-Zi No. 1191 Civil Judgement. Available at: http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  8. 中華民國會計師公會聯合會：有關勞委會等勞動主管機關就勞基法彈性工時規定及程序於會計業之可能適用途徑。http://www.roccpa.org.tw/archive/11(33).doc。引用2016/06/01。National Federation of Certified Public Accountant Associations of the Republic of China. Concerns about possible pathways to apply the flexible working hour regulations and procedures of the Labor Standards Law to the accounting profession by appropriate authorities including the Council of Labor Affairs. Available at: http://www.roccpa.org.tw/archive/11(33).doc. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  9. 台北高等行政法院：104年度簡上字第5號、104年度訴字第1887號行政判決意旨。http://tpb.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/09/24。Taipei Higher Administrative Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2015 Chien-Shang-Zi No. 5, 2015 Su-Zi No. 1887 Administrative Decision. Available at: http://tpb.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed September 24, 2016. [In Chinese]
  10. 鄧桂芬：衛福部長：受僱醫師納勞基法工時先脫鉤。http://a.udn.com/focus/2016/06/07/21953/index.html。引用2016/06/01。Deng GF. Minister of Health and Welfare: working hours not included when employed physicians are included under the Labor Standards Law. Available at: http://a.udn.com/focus/2016/06/07/21953/index.html. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  11. 最高法院：85年台上字246號民事判決。http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/06/01。Supreme Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 1996 Tai-Shang-Zi No. 246 Civil Judgement. Available at: http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  12. 最高法院101年台上字第544號民事判決。http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/06/01。Supreme Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2012 Tai-Shang-Zi No. 544 Civil Judgement. Available at: http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  13. United States Department of Labor. Overtime for white collar workers: overview and summary of final rule. Available at https://www.dol.gov/sites/default/files/overtime-overview.pdf. Accessed August 19, 2016.
  14. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Common program requirements, effective on July 1, 2011. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Common-Program-Requirements. Accessed May 16, 2016.
  15. 監察院：新聞稿：監察院對行政院、行政院衛生署、行政院勞工委員會糾正案(中華民國101年4月17日)。http://www.cy.gov.tw/sp.asp?xdURL=./di/Message/message_1.asp&ctNode=903&mp=1&msg_id=3895。引用2016/09/24。The Control Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Press release: corrections from The Control Yuan to Executive Yuan, Department of Health, and Council of Labor Affairs (April 17, 2012). Available at: http://www.cy.gov.tw/sp.asp?xdURL=./di/Message/message_1.asp&ctNode=903&mp=1&msg_id=3895. Accessed September 24, 2016. [In Chinese]
  16. 最高法院：100年台上字第1878號民事判決。http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/06/01。Supreme Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2011 Tai-Shang-Zi No. 1878 Civil Judgement. Available at: http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  17. 最高法院：92年台上字第353號民事判決。http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/。引用2016/06/01。Supreme Court, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2003 Tai-Shang-Zi No. 353 Civil Judgement. Available at: http://tps.judicial.gov.tw/. Accessed June 1, 2016. [In Chinese]
  18. 王澤鑑(2002)。民法概要。台北=Taipei:三民書局=San Min Book。
  19. 余天琦、施穎弘(2016)。行政法院近來關於出勤紀錄及加班費之見解。理律法律雜誌雙月刊，6，6-7。
  20. 蔡瑞麟(2015)。勞動基準法第84條之1核備的法律性質─再論釋字第726號解釋。台灣法學雜誌，279，170-8。
被引用次数
  1. 譚家惠,楊銘欽,陳錫杰,陳佳宜,陳仁傑,吳育庭(2019)。應用離散事件電腦模擬技術推估主治醫師工時限制對我國醫療服務提供之影響－以六個外科系專科別為例。台灣公共衛生雜誌，38(6)，617-632。
  2. (2018)。論受僱醫師納入適用勞基法─脫離囚徒困境改變遊戲規則。興大法學，24，47-132。
print cancel