家庭社經對台灣北部嬰幼兒出生至二歲飲食攝取及生長發展之影響

An examination of the effect of family socioeconomic status on dietary intakes and growth development from birth to two years of age in northern Taiwan

10.6288/TJPH201635105069

盧立卿(Li-Ching Lyu)；朱卉安(Huei-An Jhu)；賴又禎(Yu-Chen Lai)

家庭社經背景 ； 生長發展 ； 營養素攝取 ； 哺餵方式 ； family socioeconomic status ； growth development ； nutrient intakes ； feeding patterns

台灣公共衛生雜誌

35卷6期（2016 / 12 / 15）

658 - 670

繁體中文

目標：長期追蹤世代研究，探討不同家庭社經背景之嬰幼兒營養素攝取及哺餵方式與生長發展情形。方法：依家庭社經背景分成三組，並使用24小時飲食回憶評估，分析405名出生至2歲嬰幼兒其營養素攝取及哺餵方式。結果：不同家庭社經背景分組，出生至2歲的嬰幼兒體型在三組間無顯著差異。2歲時的營養素攝取情況，三組間也無顯著差異。嬰幼兒哺餵方式，雖然在嬰幼兒第6個月時，配方奶哺餵率以高社經組最低(42%, p=0.03)，母乳哺餵率以高社經組最高(33%, p=0.06)，但2歲時不同的哺餵方式其三組間無達顯著差異。此外母乳哺餵時間、副食品開始添加之月齡，隨著社經地位增高而增加，其中高社經組母乳哺餵時間最高(約6個月)；配方奶哺餵時間則是相反。完全哺餵母乳月數與副食品開始添加月齡呈顯著正相關，與副食品開始添加月齡呈顯著負相關。結論：不同社經背景之家庭，其哺餵狀況雖然不盡相同，但在2歲時的營養素攝取無顯著的差異，並且不會造成嬰幼兒營養攝取及生長上的顯著差異。

Objectives: We examined the effect of family socioeconomic status on nutrient intakes, feeding patterns, and the growth development of infants. Methods: Participants were divided into three groups according to the family socioeconomic status: low socioeconomic status, middle socioeconomic status, and high socioeconomic status. We analyzed the dietary intake by 24- hour recall by parents of 405 healthy infants from birth to two years of age. Results: Growth development (weight, length and head circumference) of infants in the three groups were not significantly different from age 0 to 2. The nutrient intakes of infants in the three groups were not significantly different at age 2. The proportion of formula feeding in the high socioeconomic group was significantly lowest (42%, p=0.03) at the 6th month, and the proportion of breastfeeding in the high socioeconomic group was highest (33%, p=0.06). The feeding methods for infants in the three groups were not significantly different at age 2. Family socioeconomic status was positively associated with the duration of breastfeeding and the month in which infants started to consume complementary food. The duration of exclusive breastfeeding in the high socioeconomic group was significantly highest (about 6 months). On the other hand, family socioeconomic status was negatively associated with the month in which infants started to consume complementary food. Conclusions: The family socioeconomic status of infants may affect the feeding patterns from birth to two years of age, but nutrient intakes and growth development at age 2 did not show significant differences.

1. 黃毅志(2008)。如何精確測量職業地位？「改良版台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構。台東大學教育學報，19，151-9。
   連結：
2. 衛生福利部國民健康署： 國人膳食營養素參考攝取量。http://www.hpa.gov.tw/Bhpnet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicArticle.aspx?No=201308300011&parentid=201205100003。引用2016/07/29 Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Dietary Reference Intakes, DRIs. Available at: http://www.hpa.gov.tw/Bhpnet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicArticle.aspx?No=201308300011&parentid=201205100003. Accessed July 29, 2016. [In Chinese]
3. 衛生福利部國民健康署：新版兒童生長曲線。http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicBulletin.aspx?No=200905050002&parentid=200712250006。引用2016/01/28。Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). New Child Growth Standards. Available at: http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicBulletin.aspx?No=200905050002&parentid=200712250006. Accessed January 28, 2016. [In Chinese]
4. 衛生福利部國民健康署：孕產婦關懷中心網站，母乳哺育國內現況。http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicArticle.aspx?No=201403250001&parentid=201110060004。引用2016/03/25。Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Pregnant women's concerns website. The national status of breastfeeding. Available at: http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicArticle.aspx?No=201403250001&parentid=201110060004. Accessed March 25, 2016. [In Chinese]
5. Andres, A,Cleves, MA,Bellando, JB,Pivik, RT,Casey, PH,Badger, TM.(2011).Developmental status of 1-year-old infants fed breast milk, cow's milk formula, or soy formula.Pediatrics,129,1134-40.
6. Cecil, JE,Watt, P,Murrie, IS(2005).Childhood obesity and socioeconomic status: a novel role forheight growth limitation.Int J Obes,29,1199-203.
7. Devaney, B,Kalb, L,Briefel, R,Zavitsky-Novak, T,Clusen, N,Ziegler, P.(2004).Feeding infants and toddlers study: overview of the study design.J Am Diet Assoc,104(1 Suppl 1),8-13.
8. Dubois, L,Girard, M.(2003).Social inequalities in infant feeding during the first year of life. The Longitudinal Study of Child Development in Quebec (LSCDQ1998-2002).Public Health Nutr,6,773-83.
9. González-Cossío, T,Moreno-Macías, H,Rivera, JA(2003).Breast-feeding practices in Mexico: results from the Second National Nutrition Survey, 1999.Salud Publica Mex,45(Suppl 4),S477-89.
10. Haku, M.(2007).Breastfeeding: factors associated with the continuation of breastfeeding. The current situation in Japan and recommendations for further research.J Med Invest,54,224-34.
11. Haschke, F,van't Hof, MA.(2000).Euro-growth references for body mass index and weight for length.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr,31,S48-59.
12. Hawkins, SS,Griffiths, LJ,Dezateux, C,Law, C,Millennium Cohort Study Child Health Group(2007).Maternal employment and breastfeeding initiation: findings from the Millennium Cohort Study.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol,21,242-7.
13. Heck, KE,Braveman, P,Cubbin, C,Chavez, GF,Kiely, JL.(2006).Socioeconomic status and breastfeeding initiation among California mothers.Public Health Rep,121,51-9.
14. Hollingshead, AB(1957).Two Factor Index of Social Position.New Haven:Privately Mimeographed.
15. Kurinij, N,Shiono, PH,Ezrine, SF,Rhoads, GG.(1989).Does maternal employment affect breast-feeding?.Am J Public Health,79,1247-50.
16. Pols, H.(2007).August Hollingshead and Frederick Redlich: poverty, socioeconomic status, and mental illness.Am J Public Health,97,1755.
17. Rivera, JA,Gonzalez-Cossio, T,Flores, M(2001).Multiple micronutrient supplementation increases the growth of Mexican infants.Am J Clin Nutr,74,657-63.
18. Romulus-Nieuwelink, JJ,Doak, C,Albernaz, E,Victora, CG,Haisma, H.(2011).Breast milk and complementaryfood intake in Brazilian infants according to socioeconomic position.Int J Pediatr Obes,6,e508-14.
19. Skinner, JD,Bounds, W,Carruth, BR,Morris, M,Ziegler, P.(2004).Predictors of children's body mass index: a longitudinal study of diet and growth in children aged 2-8 y.Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord,28,476-82.
20. Vingraite, J,Bartkeviciute, R,Michaelsen, KF.(2004).A cohort study of term infants from Vilnius, Lithuania: feeding patterns.Acta Paediatr,93,1349-55.
21. Wijlaars, LP,Johnson, L,van Jaarsveld, CH,Wardle, J.(2011).Socioeconomic status and weight gain in early infancy.Int J Obes,35,963-70.
22. 王元玲(2003)。桃園=Taoyuan，中原大學心理學研究所=Department of Psychology, Chung Yuan Christian University。
23. 行政院主計總處(2010)。中華民國職業標準分類（第六次修訂）。台北=Taipei:行政院主計總處=Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)。
24. 李介耀(2008)。彰化=Changhua，國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系=Department of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education。
25. 陳惠欣、黃惠煐、汪嵩遠(2012)。生命期營養。台中=Taichung:華格納企業有限公司=Wagners Publishing。
26. 陳毓璟、林宜靜(2003)。幼兒營養與膳食。台北=Taipei:五南圖書出版股份有限公司=Wu-Nan Book Inc。
27. 蔡秀玲、郭靜香、蔡佩芬(1997)。生命期營養。台北=Taipei:藝軒圖書出版社=Yi Hsient Publishing Co.。
28. 盧立卿、李芳靚、陳秀瑩、方麗容、江忻蓉(2011)。台灣母乳哺餵嬰兒一至十二個月秤重試驗及營養素攝取量之研究。台灣營養學會雜誌，36，87-98。
29. 蘇郁芬(2008)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所=Department of Human Development and Family Studies, National Taiwan Normal University。

1. 盧立卿、陳韻伶、徐桂婷(2018)。長期追蹤研究台灣幼童飲食攝取與生長速度。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，37(6)，626-637。