不吸菸者對於二手菸接受意願與願受價格之初探

A pilot study to estimate the willingness to accept of the secondhand smoking from current non-smokers

10.6288/TJPH201736105088

李玉春(Yue-Chune Lee)；張麗娟(Li-Chuan Chang)；陳珮青(Pei-Ching Chen)

二手菸 ； 願受價格 ； second-hand smoking ； willingness to accept (WTA)

台灣公共衛生雜誌

36卷1期（2017 / 02 / 15）

44 - 53

繁體中文

目標：探究不吸菸者對二手菸接受意願以及願意接受補貼的價格及其影響因素。方法：本研究為橫斷性研究，資料來自國民健康署2013年及2015年菸品健康福利捐全國電話訪問調查，以統計次數及百分比呈現基本特質分佈情形，以邏輯斯迴歸分析影響二手菸接受意願因素，及多元邏輯斯迴歸分析二手菸願受價格因素。結果：研究對象為現在不吸菸者（含從未吸菸與過去吸菸者），兩年樣本為1,926人，樣本大多為女性（55.04%）、60歲以上（22.95%）、大學以上 （35.90%）、已婚（70.26%）、無職業（45.70%）、從未吸菸（90.05%）。不吸菸者有74.39%不願意接受補貼，願意接受二手菸補償價格平均為272元。邏輯斯迴歸分析發現，年代、性別、年齡、吸菸狀態為影響接受二手菸補貼意願之因素，即2015年、男性、較年輕族群（18-49歲）、過去吸菸者傾向願意接受二手菸之補貼。結論：不吸菸者約七成五不願意接受二手菸補貼，而願意接受二手菸補償價格平均為272元。過去吸菸、男性、年輕者會影響不吸菸者接受二手菸補貼之意願。初探研究成果可提供政府訂定二手菸排放汙染費最低標準之參考。

Objectives: This study explores whether nonsmokers are willing to accept secondhand smoke, and factors associated with the behavior. Methods: The study design used the data of 2013 and 2015 Tobacco Health and Welfare Surcharge Telephone Survey obtained from the Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare. The two computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) surveys recruited a nationally representative sample of adults aged 18 and older in 2013 and 2015. We analyzed factors associated with the acceptance of secondhand smoke exposure using logistic and multinomial regression analysis. Results: Among 1926 persons, there were 55.0% women, 23.0% over 60 years old, 35.1% with higher education, 70.3% married and 45.7% unemployed. With 90.05% of never smokers, most nonsmokers (74.39%) did not want to accept the subsidy. Those who were willing to accept secondhand smoke would like to have a mean subsidy of NTD 272, ranged from NTD 256 to 290 for each secondhand smoke exposure. Results of the logistic regression analysis showed that participants of year 2015 (compared to year 2013), males, younger groups (18-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years), and former smokers (compared to never smokers) tends to be willing to accept subsidy for a second-hand smoke exposure. Conclusions: Approximately 75% of non-smokers were unwilling to accept the secondhand smoke subsidy. Ex-smokers and young men were more likely to accept the subsidies ranged from NTD 256 to 290 for each exposure.

1. Su, FC,Lee, MC,Hsieh, WS(2007).The effect of prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure on infant health.Taiwan J Public Health,26,472-81.
   連結：
2. 吳珮瑛、劉哲良、蘇明達(2005)。受訪金額在開放選擇條件評估支付模式的作用—引導或是誤導。農業經濟半年刊，77，1-43。
   連結：
3. 張景行、李佳珍、盧永祥(2014)。台灣菸農對菸權的願受價格之研究。調查研究─方法與應用，32(S)，129-58。
   連結：
4. 張景行、李佳珍、盧永祥(2014)。台灣菸農對菸權的願受價格之研究。調查研究─方法與應用，32(S)，129-58。
   連結：
5. 陳培君、李中一、林瑞雄、宋鴻樟(2002)。婦女抽菸及二手煙暴露和低出生體重嬰兒。台灣衛誌，21，321-8。
   連結：
6. 傅祖壇、林億明(2014)。健康風險認知、減重需求與其願付價值。經濟研究，50，69-99。
   連結：
7. 傅祖壇、葉寶文(2005)。應用CVM在健康效益之評估—高血壓疾病預防之願付價值。經濟論文叢刊，33，1-32。
   連結：
8. 曾妙慧(2013)。台灣民眾對居家服務的貨幣價值評估：假設市場評價法的應用。台灣衛誌，32，251-63。
   連結：
9. 曾妙慧(2013)。台灣民眾對居家服務的貨幣價值評估：假設市場評價法的應用。台灣衛誌，32，251-63。
   連結：
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondhand smoke (SHS) facts. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/general_facts/. Accessed November 20, 2016.
11. 衛生福利部國民健康署：菸害防制資訊網。http://tobacco.hpa.gov.tw/。引用2016/11/20。Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Smoking prevention and control information network. Available at: http://tobacco.hpa.gov.tw/. Accessed November 20, 2016. [In Chinese]
12. 郎慧珠、何俊傑、劉錦添：假設市場評價法在健康經濟學之應用。http://qolce.ntumc.org/pdf/book/chap06.doc。引用2016/11/20。Lang HC, Ho JJ, Liu JT. Application of the contingent valuation method to health economics. Available at: http://qolce.ntumc.org/pdf/book/chap06.doc. Accessed November 20, 2016. [In Chinese]
13. Bishop, RC,Heberlein, TA(1979).Measuring values of extramarket goods: are indirect measures biased?.Am J Agric Econ,61,926-30.
14. Hanemann, M,Loomis, J,Kanninen, B(1991).Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation.Am J Agric Econ,73,1255-63.
15. Lang, HC(2010).Willingness to pay for lung cancer treatment.Value Health,13,743-49.
16. Liu, JT,Hammitt, JK,Wang, JD,Liu, JL(2000).Mother's willingness to pay for her own and her child's health: a contingent valuation study in Taiwan.Health Econ,9,319-26.
17. Mankiw, NG(2015).Principles of Economics.Stamford, CT:Cengage Learning.
18. Mansour, AY,Bakhsh, Z(2015).Measuring willingness to accept second-hand smoke exposure.Am J Health Behav,39,849-55.
19. Ramsey, SD,Sullivan, SD,Psaty, BM,Patrick, DL(1997).Willingness to pay for antihypertensive care: evidence from a staff-model HMO.Soc Sci Med,44,1911-7.