题名

台灣版WHOQOL-OLD問卷之發展與驗證

并列篇名

Development and validation of the WHOQOL-OLD in Taiwan

DOI

10.6288/TJPH201736106018

作者

姚開屏(Grace Yao)；錢承君(Cheng-Chun Chien)；張育誠(Yu-Chen Chang)；林韋伶(Wei- Ling Lin)；王榮德(Jung-Der Wang)；謝清麟(Ching-Lin Hsieh)；林茂榮(Mau-Roung Lin)

关键词

生活品質 ； 老人 ； WHOQOL-100 ； WHOQOL-BREF ； WHOQOL-OLD ； quality of life ； senior ； WHOQOL-100 ； WHOQOL-BREF ； WHOQOL-OLD

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

36卷3期（2017 / 06 / 15）

页次

239 - 258

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

目標：發展及驗證台灣版世界衛生組織老人生活品質問卷（WHOQOL-OLD）。方法：研究之初先以標準化程序進行問卷的翻譯，然後於2012年六至八月，以橫斷面研究設計在大台北地區與嘉義地區收集438名60歲以上社區老人的資料，包括WHOQOL-OLD、WHOQOLBREF、短式台灣老年憂鬱量表（Geriatric Depression Scale-15, GDS-15）、巴氏量表（Barthel Index, BI）、簡短式智能評估（Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE）。心理計量分析包括內部一致性信度、內容效度、建構效度、同時效標關聯效度、預測效度與區辨效度，採用的統計方法有相關、迴歸、兩獨立樣本t檢定、驗證性因素分析等。結果：WHOQOL-OLD問卷之內部一致性係數介於0.71~0.86。問卷題目與自己所屬的向度之相關（r= 0.62~0.88）都高於跟其他向度之相關。驗證性因素分析（confirmatory factor analysis）大略支持WHOQOL-OLD為兩階層因素之理論模型。WHOQOL-OLD六個層面跟多個同時效標之相關雖然幾乎都達到0.01的顯著水準，但部分相關仍不如預期假設的強。在預測數個整體生活品質指標方面（除WHOQOLBREF的整體自評題G1、G2外），WHOWQOL-OLD六個層面的解釋力約達到四成，而且是一個可接受的外加模組。最後，WHOQOL-OLD可區別健康與較不健康的老人。結論：研究結果支持WHOQOL-OLD台灣版問卷有良好的信、效度，可以使用在如同本研究樣本較為健康的台灣六十歲以上的社區老人。
英文摘要

Objectives: To develop and validate the WHOQOL-OLD-Taiwan version. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. First, we translated this questionnaire by following standard procedure. After a pilot study, we collected data from 438 seniors over 60 years of age from communities in greater Taipei and Chiayi from June to October, 2012. In addition to filling out the WHOQOL-OLD, the participants also completed the WHOQOL-BREF, Geriatric Depression Scale-15, Barthel Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination as the criterion variables. We examined the following psychometric properties: internal consistency reliability, content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity, predictive validity, and discriminant validity by using correlation analysis, regression analysis, two independent group t-tests, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The internal consistency coefficients were between 0.71~0.86. The correlation coefficients between each item (r=0.62~0.88) and the facet of belonging were higher than those with other facets. Confirmatory factor analysis generally supported the idea that the WHOQOLOLD was a second-order factor model, which indicated that six factors were subsumed under an overall ＂quality of life＂ factor. Most of the correlation coefficients between the facets of WHOQOL-OLD and several concurrent criteria were statistically significant (p ＜ 0.01), but some correlations were not as high as expected. Except for predicting G1 and G2, the WHOQOL-OLD explained about 40% of the variation in the overall quality of life indices. This study also showed that the WHOQOL-OLD was a good add-on module. Elderly people with better and worse health conditions could be discriminated by the WHOQOL-OLD through independent group t-tests (p ＜ 0.01). Conclusions: The WHOQOL-OLD-Taiwan version has good psychometric properties. The WHOQOL-OLD module appears to be a useful instrument for use with community-dwelling Taiwanese seniors.
主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 內政部：內政統計查詢網。http://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100。引用2017/02/20。Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Statistic. Available at: Accessed February 20, 2017. [In Chinese]
  2. WHO. WHOQOL-OLD: manual. Available at: http://www.diakonova.no/neted/services/file/?hash=a17f4bcd06910c546670c6fbdee0cb0f. Accessed February 8, 2017.
  3. WHO. Resources for New WHOQOL Centers. Geneva: WHO (MNH/PSF/95.2), 1995..
  4. WHO. The wisdom year: aging into the 21th century. Available at: http://wisdom.unu.edu/en/ageingsocieties/.Accessed February 20, 2017.
  5. WHO. WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. Field trial version. Available at: http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/76.pdf?ua=1. Accessed February 20, 2017.
  6. Brink, TL,Yesavage, JA,Lum, O,Heersema, PH,Adey, M,Rose, TL(1982).Screening tests for geriatric depression.Clin Gerontologist,1,37-43.
  7. Caballero, FF,Miret, M,Power, M(2013).Validation of an instrument to evaluate quality of life in the aging population: WHOQOL-AGE.Health Qual Life Outcomes,11,177.
  8. Ceremnych, J(2003).Focus group discussion with older adults and carers for development of pilot WHOQOLOLD measure.Acta Med Litu,10,152-8.
  9. Chachamovich, E,Fleck, MP,Trentini, C,Power, M(2008).Brazilian WHOQOL-OLD module version: a Rasch analysis of a new instrument.Rev Saude Publica,42,308-16.
  10. Chang, YC,Yao, G,Hu, SC,Wang, JD(2015).Depression affects the scores of all facets of the WHOQOLBREF and may mediate the effects of physical disability among community-dwelling older adults.PLoS One,10,e0128356.
  11. Chien, CW,Wang, JD,Yao, G,Hsieh, CL(2007).Development and verification of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assisted interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect.Qual Life Res,16,1375-81.
  12. Chien, CW,Wang, JD,Yao, G,Hsueh, IP,Hsieh, CL(2009).Agreement between the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan Chinese and Taiwanese versions in elderly people.J Formos Med Assoc,108,164-9.
  13. Conrad, I,Matschinger, H,Riedel-Heller, S,von Gottberg, C,Kilian, R(2014).The psychometric properties of the German version of the WHOQOL-OLD in the German population aged 60 and older.Health Qual Life Outcomes,12,105.
  14. da, Rocha, NS,Power, MJ,Bushnell, DM,Fleck, MP(2012).The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: comparative psychometric properties to its parent-WHOQOLBREF.Value Health,15,449-57.
  15. Eser, E,Eser, S(2012).The WHOQOL-OLD module: psychometric properties of the Turkish national data pool.Qual Life Res,21,24.
  16. Eser, E,Eser, S,Ozyurt, BC,Fidaner, C(2005).Perception of quality of life by a sample of Turkish older adults: WHOQOL-OLD project Turkish focus group results.Turk Geriatri Derg,8,169-83.
  17. Fang, J,Power, M,Lin, Y,Zhang, J,Hao, Y,Chatterji, S(2012).Development of short versions for the WHOQOLOLD module.Gerontologist,52,66-78.
  18. Fleck, MP,Chachamovich, E,Trentini, C(2006).Development and validation of the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-OLD module.Rev Saude Publica,40,785-91.
  19. Folstein, MF,Folstein, SE,McHugh, PR(1975)."Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.J Psychiat Res,12,189-98.
  20. Gobbens, RJ,van, Assen, MA(2016).Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD.Health Qual Life Outcomes,14,103.
  21. Halvorsrud, L,Kalfoss, M,Diseth, A(2008).Reliability and validity of the Norwegian WHOQOL-OLD.Scand J Caring Sci,22,292-305.
  22. Hawthorne, G,Davidson, N,Quinn, K(2006).Issues in conducting cross-cultural research: implementation of an agreed international procotol designed by the WHOQOL Group for the conduct of focus groups eliciting the quality of life of older adults.Qual Life Res,15,1257-70.
  23. Hwang, HF,Liang, WM,Chiu, YN,Lin, MR(2003).Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan.Age Ageing,32,593-600.
  24. Kullmann, L,Troznai, T,Varju, C(2007).Assessment of the quality of life of elderly people in Hungary by the WHOQOL-OLD instrument; psychometric properties.Int J Rehab,30,99.
  25. Leplege, A,Perret-Guillaume, C,Ecosse, E,Hervy, MP,Ankri, J,von Steinbüchel, N(2013).A new instrument to measure quality of life in older people: the French version of the WHOQOL-OLD.Rev Med Interne,34,78-84.
  26. Liu, CY,Wang, SJ,Teng, EL(1997).Depressive disorders among older residents in a Chinese rural community.Psychol Med,27,943-9.
  27. Liu, R,Wu, S,Hao, Y(2013).The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrumentolder adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation.Health Qual Life Outcomes,11,156.
  28. Lucas, R,Monteserín, R,Juncà, S(2003).Quality of life and socio-demographic characteristics of older adults (the WHOQOL-OLD project).Qual Life Res,12,851.
  29. Mahoney, PL,Barthel, DW(1965).Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.Md State Med J,14,61-5.
  30. McHorney, CA,Ware, JE, Jr,Lu, JF,Sherbourne, CD(1994).The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF- 36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.Med Care,32,40-66.
  31. Nosikov, A(ed.),Gudex, C(ed.)(2003).EUROHIS: Developing Common Instruments for Health Surveys.Amsterdam, The Netherlands:IOS Press.
  32. O'Connell, K,Skevington, S,Saxena, S,WHOQOL HIV Group(2003).Preliminary development of the World Health Organisation's Quality of Life HIV instrument (WHOQOL-HIV): analysis of the pilot version.Soc Sci Med,57,1259-75.
  33. Orley, J(ed.),Kuyen, W(ed.)(1994).Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives.Heidelberg, Berlin:Springer-Verlag.
  34. Peel, NM,Bartlett, H(2007).Measuring quality of life in older people: reliability and validity of WHOQOLOLD.Australas J Ageing,26,162-7.
  35. Power, M,Quinn, K,Schmidt, S,WHOQOL-OLD Group(2005).Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module.Qual Life Res,14,2197-214.
  36. Power, MJ,Green, AM,WHOQOL-Dis Group(2010).Development of the WHOQOL disabilities module.Qual Life Res,19,571-84.
  37. Schmidt, S,Mühlan, H,Power, M(2006).EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study.Eur J Public Health,16,420-8.
  38. Sheikh, JA,Yesavage, JA(1986).Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent findings and development of a shorter version.Clin Gerontologist,5,165-73.
  39. The WHOQOL Group(1995).The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization.Soc Sci Med,41,1403-9.
  40. The WHOQOL Group(1994).Development of the WHOQOL: rationale and current status.Int J Ment Health,23,24-56.
  41. The WHOQOL-SRPB Group(2006).A cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion and personal beliefs as components of quality of life.Soc Sci Med,62,1486-97.
  42. United, Nations(2015).World population ageing 2015.
  43. Van Biljon, L,Nel, P,Roos, V(2015).A partial validation of the WHOQOL-OLD in a sample of older people in South Africa.Glob Health Action,8,28209.
  44. Vilar, M,Sousa, LB,Simoes, MR(2016).The European Portuguese WHOQOL-OLD module and the new facet Family/Family life: reliability and validity studies.Qual Life Res,25,2367-72.
  45. Yao, G,Chung, CW,Yu, CF,Wang, JD(2002).Development and verification of reliability and validity of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version.J Formos Med Assoc,101,342-51.
  46. 姚開屏、台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組(2004)。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。台北=Taipei:國立台灣大學心理系=Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University。
  47. 姚開屏、台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組(2004)。台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。台北=Taipei:國立台灣大學心理系=Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University。
  48. 郭乃文、劉秀枝、王珮芳(1988)。「簡短式智能評估」之中文施測與常模建立。復健醫學雜誌，16，52-9。
  49. 郭乃文、劉秀枝、王珮芳、徐道昌(1989)。中文版「簡短式智能評估」（MMSE）之簡介。臨床醫學月刊，23，39-42。
  50. 廖以誠、葉宗烈、楊延光(2004)。台灣老年憂鬱量表之編製與信、效度研究。台灣精神醫學，18，30-41。
  51. 謝博瑜(2016)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣大學心理學研究所=Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University。
被引用次数
  1. 陳玟如(2023)。影響成年毒品施用者生活品質之相關因素探討。台灣公共衛生雜誌，42(4)，423-435。
  2. 蘇芩儀,趙曉芳(2022)。在地老化實踐、外在連續性與都市老人生活品質研究：以臺北市為例。臺大社會工作學刊，46，83-125。
print cancel