题名

雲嘉南地區大氣細懸浮微粒濃度與交通污染源相關性分析

并列篇名

Correlation of atmospheric fine particulate matter with traffic sources in Yun-Chia-Nan area in Taiwan

DOI

10.6288/TJPH.201902_38(1).107104

作者

黃淑倫(SU-LUN HWANG);林裕清(YU-CHING LIN);蕭光佑(KUANG-YU HSIAO);林玠模(CHIEH-MO LIN);紀妙青(MIAO-CHING CHI);黃友珊(YU-SHAN HUANG)

关键词

雲嘉南 ; 細懸浮微粒 ; 機動車密度 ; Yun-Chia-Nan ; fine particulate matter ; motor vehicles density

期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

38卷1期(2019 / 02 / 22)

页次

19 - 30

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

目標:大氣細懸浮微粒(fine particulate matter, PM_(2.5))濃度可能受交通污染源的影響,本研究以台灣雲嘉南地區為研究地區,探討大氣PM_(2.5)與交通污染源的關係。方法:分析行政院環境保護署空氣品質監測站之PM_(2.5)數據及機動車密度登記資料。研究區域為雲林縣、嘉義縣市與台南市。以敘述性統計(平均值、中位數、最小值和最大值)分析PM_(2.5)濃度、氣象因子與機動車密度;以斯皮爾曼等級相關(Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient)探討PM_(2.5)濃度、氣象因子與機動車密度的相關性;以複迴歸分析機動車密度對PM_(2.5)濃度的影響。資料分析期間為2015年1至12月。結果:2015年雲嘉南地區PM_(2.5)平均濃度為26.4μg/m^3,冷季(11~4月,35.0μg/m^3)高於熱季(5~10月,17.8μg/m^3)。機動車平均密度分別為380.1(汽車)與734.8(機車)輛/平方公里。機動車密度雖與PM_(2.5)濃度呈正向關係但未達統計顯著,溫度為影響雲嘉南地區PM_(2.5)濃度之重要因子。機動車密度對PM_(2.5)的影響可能存在區域差異性。台南市:汽車密度每增加1輛/平方公里,PM_(2.5)增加0.762μg/m^3。嘉義市:機車密度每增加1輛/平方公里,PM_(2.5)增加0.362μg/m^3。嘉義縣:汽車密度每增加1輛/平方公里,PM_(2.5)增加0.977μg/m^3。雲林縣:汽車密度每增加1輛/平方公里,PM_(2.5)增加1.030μg/m^3。結論:溫度為影響雲嘉南地區大氣PM_(2.5)濃度的重要因子。交通污染源對雲嘉南地區PM_(2.5)的影響可能存在區域差異性,值得後續深入探討。

英文摘要

Objectives: Levels of atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM_(2.5)) may be affected by the traffic sources. This article explores correlations between the PM_(2.5) level and traffic sources in Yun-Chia-Nan area in Taiwan. Methods: Data regarding PM_(2.5) levels and motor vehicle density in 2015 were obtained from Environmental Protection Administration monitoring stations and Environmental Resource Database, respectively. The study area covers four southwestern districts of Taiwan: Yunlin County, Chiayi City, Chiayi County, and Tainan City. Mean, median, minimum, and maximum values for PM_(2.5) levels, meteorological variables, and motor vehicle densities were calculated. The relationship between PM_(2.5), meteorological variables, and motor vehicle density was estimated using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. A multiple linear regression model was used to explore the associations of PM_(2.5) with motor vehicle density. The study duration was January-December 2015. Results: In 2015, the annual mean PM_(2.5) level was 26.4 μg/m^3; PM_(2.5) levels were higher in the colder season (November-April; 35.0 μg/m^3) than in the hotter season (May-October; 17.8 μg/m^3). The motor vehicle densities were 380.1 car/km^2 and 734.8 motorcycle/km^2. The relationship between motor vehicle density and PM_(2.5) level was positive, but nonsignificant. Temperature was the major factor influencing the PM_(2.5) levels. Moreover, the effects of motor vehicle density on the PM_(2.5) level varied geographically: for every 1-car/km^2 increase, the PM_(2.5) level increased by 0.762, 0.362, 0.977, and 1.030 μg/m^3 in Tainan City, Chiayi City, Chiayi County, and Yunlin County, respectively. Conclusions: Temperature is the major factor influencing PM_(2.5) levels in Yun-Chia-Nan area in Taiwan. The effect of traffic sources on PM_(2.5) level might have geographic variation. Further relevant research is warranted.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 邱聖崴, SW,吳治達, CD,張奕彩, YT,潘文驥, WC(2018)。台灣地區道路密度、長期細懸浮微粒暴露與發生高血壓之研究。台灣衛誌,37,125-136。
    連結:
  2. 黃淑倫, SL,林裕清, YC,郭素娥, SE(2016)。嘉南地區細懸浮微粒濃度與氣象因子相關性分析:2006-2014。台灣衛誌,35,575-586。
    連結:
  3. Batterman, S,Burke, J,Isakov, V,Lewis, T,Mukherjee, B,Robins, T(2014).A comparison of exposure metrics for traffic-related air pollutants: application to epidemiology studies in Detroit, Michigan.Int J Environ Res Public Health,11,9553-9577.
  4. Charron, A,Harrison, RM(2005).Fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM2.5-10) particulate matter on a heavily trafficked London highway: sources and processes.Environ Sci Technol,39,7768-7776.
  5. Chen, YC,Hsu, CY,Lin, SL(2015).Characteristics of concentrations and metal compositions for PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 in Yunlin county, Taiwan during air quality deterioration.Aerosol Air Qual Res,15,2571-2583.
  6. Cheng, YH,Li, YS(2010).Influences of traffic emissions and meteorological conditions on ambient PM10 and PM2.5 levels at a highway toll station.Aerosol Air Qual Res,10,456-462.
  7. Hawkins, TW,Holland, LA(2010).Synoptic and local weather conditions associated with PM2.5 concentration in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.Middle States Geographer,43,72-84.
  8. Hung, LJ,Tsai, SS,Chen, PS(2012).Traffic air pollution and risk of death from breast cancer in Taiwan: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) as a proxy marker.Aerosol Air Qual Res,12,275-282.
  9. Hwang, SL,Chi, MC,Guo, SE,Lin, YC,Chou, CT,Lin, CM.(2018).Seasonal variation and source apportionment of PM2.5-bound trace elements at a coastal area in southwestern Taiwan.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int,25,9101-9113.
  10. Hwang, SL,Guo, SE,Chi, MC(2016).Association between atmospheric fine particulate matter and hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in southwestern Taiwan: a population-based study.Int J Environ Res Public Health,13,366.
  11. Hwang, SL,Lin, YC,Guo, SE,Chi, MC,Chou, CT,Lin, CM.(2017).Emergency room visits for respiratory diseases associated with ambient fine particulate matter in Taiwan in 2012: a population-based study.Atmos Pollut Res,8,465-473.
  12. Kheirbek, I,Haney, J,Douglas, S,Ito, K,Matte, T(2016).The contribution of motor vehicle emissions to ambient fine particulate matter public health impacts in New York City: a health burden assessment.Environ Health,15,89.
  13. Leiva, GMA,Santibañez, DA,Ibarra, ES,Matus, CP,Seguel, R(2013).A five-year study of particulate matter(PM2.5) and cerebrovascular diseases.Environ Pollut,181,1-6.
  14. Lo, WC,Shie, RH,Chan, CC,Lin, HH(2017).Burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure in Taiwan.J Formos Med Assoc,116,32-40.
  15. Lu, HY,Lin, SL,Mwangi, JK,Wang, LC,Lin, HY(2016).Characteristics and source apportionment of atmospheric PM2.5 at a coastal city in southern Taiwan.Aerosol Air Qual Res,16,1022-1034.
  16. Tai, APK,Mickley, LJ,Jacob, DJ(2010).Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change.Atmos Environ,44,3976-3984.
  17. Valavanidis, A,Fiotakis, K,Vlachogianni, T(2008).Airborne particulate matter and human health: toxicological assessment and importance of size and composition of particles for oxidative damage and carcinogenic mechanisms.J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev,26,339-362.
  18. Wang, Q,Wang, J,He, MZ,Kinney, PL,Li, T(2018).A county-level estimate of PM2.5 related chronic mortality risk in China based on multi-model exposure data.Environ Int,110,105-112.
  19. WHO.Air quality guidelines-global update 2005.
  20. Xia, L,Shao, Y(2005).Modelling of traffic flow and air pollution emission with application to Hong Kong Island.Environ Model Software,20,1175-1188.
  21. Yang, JY,Chou, LD,Li, YC(2010).Prediction of shortterm average vehicular velocity considering weather factors in urban VANET environments.ICMLC,6,3039-3043.
  22. 王濤, T,王國祥, GX,周夢翩, MP(2016)。道路區域PM2.5濃度的影響因素研究。環境污染與防治,38,25-31。
  23. 行政院環境保護署:空氣污染排放量查詢系統。https://teds.epa.gov.tw/new_main2-0-1.htm。引用2018/09/25。Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Taiwan Emission Data System, TEDS. Available at: https://teds.epa.gov.tw/new_main2-0-1.htm. Accessed September 25, 2018. [In Chinese]
  24. 行政院環境保護署:空氣品質標準,2012。http://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/tw/b0206.aspx。引用2018/09/25。Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Taiwan Air Quality Standards 2012. Available at: http://taqm.epa.gov.tw/taqm/tw/b0206.aspx. Accessed September 25, 2018.
  25. 行政院環境保護署, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan).106年空氣品質年報.
  26. 張立農, LO,江孟玲, ML,林昭遠, CY(2015)。台灣交通空氣品質監測站PM 10變異影響因素之研究。水土保持學報,47,1235-1246。
  27. 黃姿榕, TJ(2011)。台北=Taipei,國立台灣大學職業醫學與工業衛生管理所=Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, National Taiwan University。
  28. 廖岳華, YH,鄒輝, H,肖辰暢, CC(2014)。長沙市城區典型交通路口PM10和PM2.5污染特徵研究。四川環境,33,36-41。
  29. 錢滄海, CH,陳奕愷, YK(2012)。濁水溪下游懸浮微粒與氣象因子關係之研究。水土保持學報,44,391-406。
  30. 關宏志, HZ,曹奇, Q,趙磊, L(2016)。PM2.5品質濃度變化特徵與交通流的關係—以北京市為例。北京工業大學學報,42,1372-1378。
被引用次数
  1. 蕭光佑,黃淑倫,陳玟諭,紀妙青,林裕清,林玠模(2021)。嘉義縣空氣盒子與環保署空氣監測站PM_(2.5)濃度差異之影響分析。醫學與健康期刊,10(1),11-33。