Walk Score®作為台灣地區宜走性環境測量工具之效度檢驗

Validation of Walk Score® for estimating neighborhood walkability in Taiwan

10.6288/TJPH.201908_38(4).108036

賴鼎富(Ting-Fu Lai)；林倩宇(Chien-Yu Lin)；黃翊軒(Yi-Hsuan Huang)；廖邕(Yung Liao)

Walk Score® ； 宜走性環境 ； 地理資訊系統 ； Walk Score® ； neighborhood walkability ； geographic information system

台灣公共衛生雜誌

38卷4期（2019 / 08 / 15）

445 - 452

繁體中文

目標：即使在美國、加拿大、與日本地區，已有研究證實Walk Score®作為宜走性環境測量工具之效度，但對於台灣地區仍屬未知，因此本研究檢驗Walk Score®與使用地理資訊系統（geographic information system，GIS）所取得之客觀宜走性環境指標之相關性，以驗證Walk Score®應用於台灣地區之效度。方法：以台灣地區之65歲以上高齡者為目標族群，進行電腦輔助電訪調查，蒐集自陳資料（社會人口學變項與居住之村里），有效樣本為1,040人；使用GIS計算五項客觀宜走性環境指標（人口密度、十字路口密度、總目的地數、人行道面積與大眾運輸站點密度），接著使用Walk Score®網站（https://www.walkscore.com/）取得各村里Walk Score分數，使用皮爾森相關係數（Pearson's correlation coefficient）檢視Walk Score分數與客觀宜走性環境指標（GIS）的相關程度。結果：統計顯示Walk Score分數與客觀宜走性環境指標具有顯著正相關，其中Walk Score分數與十字路口密度（r＝0.7）及總目的地數量（r＝0.7）之相關性最高。結論：本研究結果與西方國家及日本一致，Walk Score®作為宜走性環境測量工具，具有易操作與低成本的特性，且在台灣地區有良好的效度，但該工具在東部及離島的應用須較為謹慎。建議未來政策制定者與公共衛生研究者能利用Walk Score®以取得台灣各鄰里之宜走性。

Objectives: Although some studies have evaluated the concurrent validity of the Walk Score® as a measure of neighborhood walkability in the United States, Canada, and Japan, whether the Walk Score® is a valid measure in Taiwan has not yet been determined. Accordingly, this study examined how Walk Score® is correlated with geographic information system (GIS)-derived characteristics of neighborhood walkability for residential neighborhoods in Taiwan. Methods: A computer-assisted, telephone-based survey was conducted on older Taiwanese adults. Self-reported data (sociodemographic and residential neighborhood) were collected from 1040 Taiwanese residents aged 65 years or older. Five environmental characteristics (population density, intersection density, local destinations, sidewalk availability, and access to public transportation) were calculated for each neighborhood by using a GIS. Consequently, Walk Scores were calculated on the Walk Score® website (https://www.walkscore.com/) by inputting residential neighborhood information. The Pearson correlation coefficients between Walk Score® data and objective measures of environmental attributes (GIS data) were determined. Results: Significant positive correlations were discovered between the Walk Score® data and five GIS-derived environmental characteristics. Walk Score® was most strongly associated with intersection density (r = 0.70) and number of local destinations (r = 0.70). Conclusions: Consistent with the results obtained in Western countries and Japan, Walk Score®, a simple and low-cost tool, appears to also be a valid measure of neighborhood walkability in Taiwan. However, the tool should be applied with caution in the eastern regions and offshore islands of Taiwan. Walk Score® data can enable policy makers and public health practitioners to identify the walkability of local areas in Taiwan.

1. 賴鼎富, TF,廖邕, Y,薛名淳, MC,林倩宇, CY(2018)。Walk Score®之相關文獻回顧：身體活動、步行行為及慢性疾病風險。台灣衛誌 ，37，375-393。
   連結：
2. Cao, X,Mokhtarian, PL,Handy, SL(2007).Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach.Transportation,34,535-556.
3. Carr, LJ,Dunsiger, SI,Marcus, BH(2011).Validation of Walk Score for estimating access to walkable amenities.Br J Sports Med,45,1144-1148.
4. Carr, LJ,Dunsiger, SI,Marcus, BH(2010).Walk Score™ as a global estimate of neighborhood walkability.Am J Prev Med,39,460-463.
5. Ding, D,Lawson, KD,Kolbe-Alexander, TL(2016).The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases.Lancet,388,1311-1324.
6. Duncan, DT,Aldstadt, J,Whalen, J,Melly, SJ,Gortmaker, SL(2011).Validation of walk score for estimating neighborhood walkability: an analysis of four US metropolitan areas.Int J Environ Res Publ Health,8,4160-4179.
7. Hajna, S,Ross, NA,Joseph, L,Harper, S,Dasgupta, K(2015).Neighbourhood walkability, daily steps and utilitarian walking in Canadian adults.BMJ Open,5,e008964.
8. Inoue, S,Ohya, Y,Odagiri, Y(2011).Perceived neighborhood environment and walking for specific purposes among elderly Japanese.J Epidemiol,21,481-490.
9. Kawachi, I(ed.),Berkman, LF(ed.)(2003).Neighborhoods and Health.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
10. Koohsari, MJ,Sugiyama, T,Hanibuchi, T(2018).Validity of Walk Score ® as a measure of neighborhood walkability in Japan.Prev Med Rep,9,114-117.
11. Lee, IM,Shiroma, EJ,Lobelo, F,Puska, P,Blair, SN,Katzmarzyk, PT(2012).Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.Lancet,380,219-229.
12. Nykiforuk, CI,McGetrick, JA,Crick, K,Johnson, JA(2016).Check the score: field validation of street smart walk score in Alberta, Canada.Prev Med Rep,4,532-539.
13. Sallis, JF,Owen, N,Fisher, E.(2015).Ecological Models of Health Behavior. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
14. Sugiyama, T,Neuhaus, M,Cole, R,Giles-Corti, B,Owen, N.(2012).Destination and route attributes associated with adults’ walking: a review.Med Sci Sports Exerc,44,1275-1286.
15. WHO(2010).Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health.Geneva:WHO Press.
16. WHO. Prevalence of insufficient physical activity. Available at: https://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/physical_activity_text/en/. Accessed April 19, 2019
17. 內政部國土測繪中心：台灣通用電子地圖圖層內容說明。https://emap.nlsc.gov.tw/emap/index.php/menu-10-1/category/5-guides?download=130:108。引用2019/04/19。 National Land Surveying and Mapping Center, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (Taiwan). The description of Taiwan e-Map layer content. Available at: https://emap.nlsc.gov.tw/emap/index.php/menu-10-1/category/5-guides?download=130:108. Accessed April 19, 2019. [In Chinese]
18. 台北市政府主計處：中華民國106年台北市統計年報。http://w2.dbas.taipei.gov.tw/NEWS_WEEKLY/abstract/11.htm。引用2019/04/19。Department of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Taipei City Government. Statistical yearbook 2017. Available at: http://w2.dbas.taipei.gov.tw/NEWS_WEEKLY/abstract/11.htm. Accessed April 19, 2019.
19. 交通部：道路交通管理處罰條例。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=K0040012。引用2019/04/19。Ministry of Transportation and Communications, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Road Traffic Management and Penalty Act. Available at: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=K0040012. Accessed April 19, 2019.
20. 行政院主計總處：106年家庭收支調查報告。https://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/doc/result/106.pdf。引用2019/04/19。Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Report on the survey of family income and expenditure, 2017. Available at: https://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/doc/result/106.pdf. Accessed April 19, 2019. [In Chinese : English abstract]
21. 教育部體育署：中華民國104年運動城市調查。台北：教育部體育署，2015。Sports Administration, Ministry of Education, R.O.C. (Taiwan). The Sports City Investigation in 2015 in R.O.C. (Taiwan). Taipei: Sports Administration, Ministry of Education, R.O.C. (Taiwan), 2015.

1. (2023)。Relationships Between Physical Activity and Sedentary Time Among Rural Older Adults Living in Highly Walkable Neighborhoods。大專體育學刊，25(4)，424-435。