建構具專家及老人團體共識之台灣高齡友善城市指標

Development of indicators of the ageing-friendly city for Taiwan through a consensus of experts and the elderly

10.6288/TJPH.202002_39(1).108100

李佳霙(CHIA-ING LI)；廖麗娜(LI-NA LIAO)；李采娟(TSAI-CHUNG LI)；林志學(CHIH-HSUEH LIN)；劉秋松(CHIU-SHONG LIU)；林文元(WEN-YUAN LIN)；龍紀萱(CHI-HSUAN LUNG)；林雪淳(HSUEH-CHUN LIN)；王英偉(YING-WEI WANG)；張李淑女(SHU-NU CHANG LEE)；王中儀(JONG-YI WANG)；李心瑜(HSIN-YU LEE)；吳文慈(WEN-TZU WU)；林正介(CHENG-CHIEH LIN)

高齡友善城市 ； 環境監測 ； 指標 ； age-friendly cities ； environmental monitoring ； indicator

台灣公共衛生雜誌

39卷1期（2020 / 02 / 26）

41 - 51

繁體中文

目標：建立能與國際接軌的台灣高齡友善城市指標。方法：參考世界衛生組織（WHO）發展全球高齡友善城市指標的步驟，第一階段工作以縮減高齡友善候選指標庫為主。第二階段工作以技術面及實務面之可行性為主，依實務意見修改指標，再經專家意見修正後，建立台灣高齡友善城市指標。結果：第一階段工作將候選指標庫由75項縮減至38項。第二階段工作共發放64份問卷予專家及老人團體代表，回覆47份（回應率73.4%），分析後有15項指標其整體準則、技術性準則及實務性準則分數皆排名在前50%，有3項指標在所屬面向之下排名在前50%，其餘有10項指標屬國際指標，故候選指標庫由38項縮減至28項；彙整縣市實務意見，且參考WHO最新文件增加2項指標，進行22位專家意見調查後，建立台灣高齡友善城市指標共28項指標，其中23項為國際指標，5項為全國指標。結論：參照WHO指引及專家與老人團體看法建立台灣高齡友善城市指標，為監測及改善高齡友善環境程度，建議應定期收集台灣高齡友善城市指標數值。

Objectives: To develop indicators of the ageing-friendly city for Taiwan. Methods: We adopted the global indicators of the ageing-friendly city from the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop indicators for Taiwan. The first phase of our work involved creating a pool of candidate indicators and then reducing the number of indicators. Second, we evaluated the feasibility of the indicators from technical and practical aspects. We adopted suggestions and comments from practice staff members and experts to develop our final version. Results: In the first phase, the pool of candidate indicators was reduced from 75 to 38. In the second phase, we carried out a survey to assess the feasibility of indicators by involving 64 experts and representatives of elderly groups. The response rate was 73.4%. After quantitative analysis, 15 indicators had overall, technical, and practical criteria scores which ranked in the top 50%. Three indicators ranked in the top 50% of their domains, and another 10 international indicators were kept in this run. After a series of discussions, we finally obtained 28 indicators of the ageing-friendly city for Taiwan, including 23 international and 5 local indicators. Conclusions: A consensus of indicators of the ageing-friendly city for Taiwan was produced and guided by the procedures proposed by the WHO. Regularly reporting those indicators would be useful for the monitoring and improvement of age-friendliness among cities and counties.

1. Kano, M,Rosenberg, PE,Dalton, SD(2018).A global pilot study of age-friendly city indicators.Soc Indicat Res,138,1205-1227.
2. Kondo, K.(2016).Progress in aging epidemiology in Japan: the JAGES Project.J Epidemiol,26,331-336.
3. Orpana, H,Chawla, M,Gallagher, E,Escaravage, E(2016).Developing indicators for evaluation of age-friendly communities in Canada: process and results.Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can,36,214-223.
4. The Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study=JAGES(2013).JAGES HEART 2012: achievement and challenges, Japan.Proceedings of the 20th IAGG World Congress of Gerontology and Geriatrics,Seoul, Korea:
5. The University of Hawaii Center on Aging. Making Honolulu an age-friendly city: an action plan, 2015. Available at: https://www.honolulu.gov/rep/site/dts/dts_docs/Honolulu_Age-Friendly_City_Action_Plan_2015.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2019.
6. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The sustainable development goals and addressing statelessness, March 2017. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/58b6e3364.html. Accessed December 13, 2019
7. WHO(2014).Measuring the Age-Friendliness of Cities: A Guide to Using Core Indicators (Draft).Kobe, Japan:WHO Centre for Health Development.
8. WHO(2007).Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide.Geneva:WHO.
9. WHO(2014).,Kobe, Japan:WHO Centre for Health Development.
10. WHO(2015).Measuring the Age-Friendliness of Cities: A Guide to Using Core Indicators.Kobe, Japan:WHO Centre for Health Development.
11. WHO Regional Office for Europe(2018).Age-Friendly Environments in Europe: Indicators, Monitoring and Assessments.UN:WHO Regional Office for Europe.
12. 內政部：人口統計資料。https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346。引用2019/05/07。Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Demographic data. Available at: https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346. Accessed May 7, 2019. [In Chinese]
13. 胡志強, J,蔡炳坤, PK,黃美娜, MN,蔡淑鳳, SF(2012)。高齡友善城市之理念與實踐—台中市經驗。護理雜誌，59，5-11。
14. 國家發展委員會：中華民國人口推估（2018至2065年）。http://laborpedia.evta.gov.tw/link1.asp?did=B045&result=yes。引用2019/05/07。National Development Council. Population projections report in Taiwan, 2018-2065. Available at: https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346. Accessed May 7, 2019. [In Chinese]
15. 劉麗娟, LC(2014)。台灣建立健康及高齡友善城市之歷程、評量系統與未來趨勢。城市學學刊，5，87-114。

1. 羅素英,蕭伃伶,劉芳,黃若盈,陳鳳音,徐慧娟,周紫筠(2023)。建立臺灣高齡友善社區指引。護理雜誌，70(2)，84-94。