活躍老化之概念分析－以高齡者之賦權為主體

A concept analysis of active aging: the subject of empowerment for the elderly

10.6288/TJPH.202008_39(4).109037

黎沛姍(Pei-Shan Li)；謝佳容(Chia-Jung Hsieh)

高齡者 ； 活躍老化 ； 概念分析 ； 賦權 ； 實證 ； elderly ； active aging ； concept analysis ； empowerment ； evidence

台灣公共衛生雜誌

39卷4期（2020 / 08 / 24）

386 - 396

繁體中文

活躍老化為世界各國共同探索和追尋之目標與挑戰，有效建構高齡者的活躍老化已經是社會文化之歷程，並為高齡政策制定的重要基礎，所有以高齡者為核心，擴大至改善高齡者、家庭、社區和社會的活動都是活躍老化之元素。然而，活躍老化之概念不僅持續在發展，同時也具有多元特性，以多方面的視角詮釋活躍老化的概念，包含維持高齡者正常的日常生活活動功能及增加健康保障，以達到預期健康壽命的延續，並在此過程中達成獨立自主的態度發展生命歷程。因此，本文目的為運用Walker和Avant（2005）發展的概念分析步驟，針對活躍老化的概念發展與定義進行闡述，同時確認高齡者活躍老化之定義特徵包含健康壽命延續、賦權參與社會活動、工作意識及經濟安定、自立且安全的生活品質與擁有自信獲得尊重共五項，並列舉各項案例說明，最終提出國家層級概念活躍老化指標和個人層級活躍老化評估量表之實證測量工具的應用。期望借由多方面的視角來理解與詮釋活躍老化的概念，將有助於健康照護團隊人員能了解並應用此概念於高齡者的健康服務實務中，進而以高齡者之賦權為主體，達到貫徹「活躍老化」的整體目標之實踐作為。

Active aging has been a challenging goal that is being explored and pursued by countries all over the world. Effectively establishing active aging for the elderly is a social and cultural process that requires policy framework and planning. The elderly are at the core of the active aging strategy, although families, communities, and society are also essential components in its utilization. However, the adoption and practice of active aging have continuously developed in different ways and with different characteristics all over the world. Some of the traditional aspects in the active aging policy framework are daily activities for the elderly, health protection, and life expectancy. However, the modern senior population has ability to take active part in social and political processes, so the rights to independent development must also be considered. Therefore, this study used the analysis steps of Walker and Avant (2005) to describe the definitional features of an intermediate period, case report, the results and their causes, and measurement tools for active aging. The definitional features of active aging including healthy life extension, empowerment to participate in social activities, work consciousness and economic stability, self-confidence and safe quality of life, and have self-confidence and respect. Finally, the directions of the evidence-basic measurement tools of the national level active aging index and the individual level active aging assessment scale. A multidimensional perspective was used to explain the concept of active aging. The results could help health care team members to understand and apply the concept in health care practice for the elderly, and empowerment of the elderly could help to achieve the overall goal of ＂active aging.＂

1. 李佳綺, CC,胡淑貞, SC,李中一, CY(2015)。台灣活躍老化政策的現狀與未來發展。長期照護雜誌，19，117-126。
   連結：
2. 徐慧娟, HC(2015)。活躍老化指標初探。長期照護雜誌，19，109-115。
   連結：
3. 陳明芳, MF(2013)。活力老化與老年經濟安全體系：歐陸與台灣的對話。人文及社會科學集刊，25，175-219。
   連結：
4. Bélanger, E,Ahmed, T,Filiatrault, J,Yu, HT,Zunzunegui, MV(2015).An empirical comparison of different models of active aging in Canada: the international mobility in aging study.Gerontologist,57,197-205.
5. Cattaneo, LB,Chapman, AR(2010).The process of empowerment: a model for use in research and practice.Am Psychol,65,646-659.
6. Davey, JA(2002).Active ageing and education in mid and later life.Ageing Soc,22,95-113.
7. Fernández-Ballesteros, R(2008).Active Ageing: The Contribution of Psychology.Gottingen:Hogrefe & Huber.
8. Fernandez-Ballesteros, R,Olmos, R,Santacreu, M,Bustillos, A,Molina, MA(2017).The role of perceived discrimination on active aging.Arch Gerontol Geriatr,71,14-20.
9. Haber, D.(2019).Health Promotion and Aging: Practical Applications for Health Professionals.Portland:Springer.
10. Lam, KL,Lee, SLT.,未出版
11. Lim, EZ,Thompson, C.(2016).Measuring active ageing among older adults in Singapore.Ageing Soc,36,1853-1869.
12. Marsillas, S,De Donder, L,Kardol, T(2017).Does active ageing contribute to life satisfaction for older people? Testing a new model of active ageing.Eur J Ageing,14,295-310.
13. Meleis, AI(2017).Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress.Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
14. Morse, JM,Mitcham, C,Hupcey, JE,Tasón, MC(1996).Criteria for concept evaluation.J Adv Nurs,24,385-390.
15. Paul, C,Ribeiro, O,Teixeira, L(2012).Active aging: an empirical approach to the WHO Model.Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res,2012,382972.
16. Salazar-Barajas, ME,Salazar-González, BC,Gallegos-Cabriales, EC(2017).Middle-range theory: coping and adaptation with active aging.Nurs Sci Q,30,330-335.
17. Schroots, JJF(2012).On the dynamics of active aging.Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res,2012,818564.
18. Wallerstein, N(2006).What is the Evidence on Effectiveness of Empowerment to Improve Health.Copenhagen:WHO Regional Office for Europe.
19. WHO(2002).WHO. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. Geneva: WHO Ageing and the Life Course Section, 2002; 12-8.
20. 內政部戶政司：人口年齡結構指標。https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346。引用2020/01/19。Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (Taiwan). An important indicator of population age structure. Available at: https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346. Accessed January 19, 2020. [In Chinese]
21. 全國法規資料庫：老人福利法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050037。引用2020/01/19。Laws & Regulations Database of the Republic of China. Senior Citizens Welfare Act. Available at: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050037. Accessed January 19, 2020
22. 呂寶靜, BJ(2014)。從活力老化觀點談健康促進：美國的作法，台灣的借鏡。社區發展季刊，145，172-183。
23. 李世代, SD(2010)。活躍老化的理念與本質。社區發展季刊，132，59-72。
24. 林麗惠, LH(2012)。活躍老化指標建構及其對老人教育政策之啟示。成人及終身教育學刊，19，77-111。
25. 莊子瑩, TY,陳若琳, JL(2017)。高齡者家庭支持、自我價值和活躍老化之關聯研究。輔仁民生學誌，23，65-82。
26. 莊秀美, HM,賴明俊, MJ(2012)。活躍老化日本推動「生涯現役社會營造」相關課題之探討。社區發展季刊，132，252-263。
27. 郭登聰, TT(2014)。建構「高齡友善城市」：從活躍老化到在地老化的重要課題—以社區照顧關懷據點為例。輔仁社會研究，4，1-42。
28. 楊志良, CL(2010)。由活躍老化觀點建構國民健康新願景。社區發展季刊，132，26-40。
29. 蔡妍妮, YN(2017)。由女性學員之認知學習模式與活躍老化之相關研究。華醫學報，46，80-107。
30. 衛生福利部國民健康署, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan)(2016)。,台北=Taipei:衛生福利部國民健康署=Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan)。
31. 衛生福利部國民健康署, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan)(2015)。,台北=Taipei:衛生福利部國民健康署=Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan)。

1. 陳欣蘭,張育瑄(2023)。居家機構應用自立支援照顧於失能個案效益之研究。管理資訊計算，12(1)，25-36。
2. 陳雪芬,祁安美(2023)。高齡健康促進之在地老化與高齡友善政策。長期照護雜誌，26(1)，17-26。
3. 羅一馨,劉智淇,王雅鈴(2022)。高齡學習者社會接觸動機與活躍老化之關係：老化態度之中介效果。教育科學研究期刊，67(3)，177-204。
4. 張志銘,張世沛,洪宗漢,施國森(2023)。宇宙樁參與者社會支持、活躍老化與生活品質之關係研究。運動與遊憩研究，18(2)，113-135。
5. (2024)。自我的湧現與重構：長者適應身體衰弱歷程之經驗探究。臺灣諮商心理學報，12(1)，99-137。