不同背景特徵的手術室護理人員對手術煙霧自覺症狀、知識、態度、自我防護行為及阻力因素之比較

Comparing different background characteristics in self-perceived symptoms, knowledge, attitude, self-protection behavior, and resistance factors for surgical smoke among operating room nurses

10.6288/TJPH.202106_40(3).110025

游景蘭(Ching-Lan Yu)；林麗虹(Li-Hung Lin)；謝素英(Suh-Ing Hsieh)；紀夙芬(Shu-Fen Chi)；王琦(CHI WANG)

手術煙霧 ； 知識 ； 態度 ； 自我防護行為 ； 阻力因素 ； surgical smoke ； knowledge ； attitude ； self-protection behaviors ； barrier

台灣公共衛生雜誌

40卷3期（2021 / 06 / 28）

268 - 282

繁體中文

目標：描述手術室護理人員所經驗過的手術煙霧症狀頻率與嚴重度；及其手術煙霧的知識、態度、自我防護行為及阻力因素，並比較不同背景特徵的手術煙霧症狀頻率與嚴重度、知識、態度、自我防護行為及阻力因素差異。方法：採描述性與比較性研究，方便取樣兩院區手術室護理人員，使用自擬結構式問卷，資料分析採描述性及單因子變異數分析。結果：症狀頻率與嚴重度前三高為想睡覺、流鼻水或其他鼻子不適、頭痛與咳嗽；不同年齡、護理及手術室工作總年資與每日平均工作時數的症狀頻率與嚴重度有顯著差異。知識答對率53.3％；態度平均數3.58分，而不同年齡、職稱、臨床工作職級、臨床工作科別、護理及手術室工作總年資的手術煙霧態度有顯著差異。自我防護行為平均數為1.47分，僅不同臨床工作科別有顯著差異，阻力因素平均數1.03分僅不同職稱有顯著差異。結論：期望此結果可提高手術室護理人員與醫療機構對手術煙霧職業傷害及相關防護方法的重視，並向人員宣導暴露之可能危害與加強自我防護行為。

Objectives: To describe the frequency and severity of symptoms of exposure to surgical smoke experienced by operating room nurses and to assess and compare the knowledge of, attitude toward, protective measures for, and resistance factors for surgical smoke among operating room nurses with different background characteristics. Methods: This descriptive and comparative study used a convenience sample of nurses at two operating rooms at a medical institute and asked the nurses to fill a structured self-report questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance. Results: The three most frequent and severe symptoms were sleepiness, runny nose or other nasal discomfort, and headache and cough. Significant differences in symptom frequency and severity were noted with respect to age, years of nursing/operating room experience, and daily working hours. The knowledge test on surgical smoke was answered correctly by 53.3% of the nurses. The mean score of attitude toward handling surgical smoke was 3.58 and was significantly different with respect to age, work title, clinical nursing ladder, clinical unit, and years of nursing/operating room experience. The mean score for self-protective behavior was 1.47 and significantly differed between different clinical units. The mean score for resistance factor was 1.03 and significantly differed between different work titles. Conclusions: These findings may increase the awareness of the hazards of exposure to surgical smoke and highlight the importance of implementing relevant protection measures, educating medical personnel on the potential risk of and injury after exposure, and improving self-protective behaviors.

1. Addley, S,Quinn, D.(2018).Surgical smoke risk - a survey of operating roomstaff.Occup Environ Med,75,A166.
2. AORN, Inc(2017).Guideline summary: surgical smoke safety.AORN J,105,498-500.
3. Asdornwised, U,Pipatkulchai, D,Damnin, S,Chinswangwatanakul, V,Boonsripitayanon, M,Tonklai, S(2018).Chinswangwatanakul V, Boonsripitayanon M, Tonklai S. Recommended practices for the management of surgical smoke and bio-aerosols for perioperative nurses in Thailand.J Perioperat Nurs,31,33-41.
4. Ball, K(2010).Surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: compliance among perioperative nurses.AORN J,92,e1-e23.
5. Chapman, LW,Korta, DZ,Lee, PK,Linden, KG(2017).Awareness of surgical smoke risks and assessment of safety practices during electro surgery among US dermatology residents.JAMA Dermatol,153,467-468.
6. Chavis, S,Wagner, V,Becker, M,Bowerman, MI,Jamias, MS(2016).Clearing the air about surgical smoke: an education program.AORN J,103,289-296.
7. Creative Research Systems. The survey system: sample size calculator. Available at: https://surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. Accessed May 15, 2020.
8. Ebel, RL,Frisbie, DA(1991).Essentials of Educational Measurement.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
9. Edwards, BE,Reiman, RE(2012).Comparison of current and past surgical smoke control practices.AORN J,95,337-350.
10. Edwards, BE,Reiman, RE(2008).Results of a survey on current surgical smoke control practices.AORN J,87,739-749.
11. Hackethal V. A new look at tobacco use and headaches. Available at: https://www.neurologylive.com/view/new-look-tobacco-use-and-headaches. Accessed January 25, 2020.
12. Hill, DS,O’Neill, JK,Powell, RJ,Oliver, DW(2012).Surgical smoke - a health hazard in the operating theatre: a study to quantify exposure and a survey of the use of smoke extractor systems in UK plastic surgery units.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,5,911-916.
13. Ilce, A,Yuzden, GE,van Giersbergen, MY(2016).The examination of problems experienced by nurses and doctors associated with exposure to surgical smoke and the necessary precautions.J Clin Nurs,26,1555-1561.
14. Karadag, SA(2020).Knowledge of the operating room team members about surgical smoke safety.Int J Caring Sci,13,489-496.
15. Khoshdel, H,Amouzeshi, A,Amouzeshi, Z,Unesi, Z(2011).Surgical team’ knowledge about electrocautery smoke complications in the educational hospitals in Birjand, 2011.J Surg Trauma,2014(2),17-20.
16. Okoshi, K,Kobayashi, K,Kinoshita, K,Tomizawa, Y,Hasegawa, S,Sakai, Y(2015).Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel.Surg Today,45,957-965.
17. Romano, F,Gustén, J,De Antonellis,Joppolo, CM(2017).Electrosurgical smoke: ultrafine particle measurements and work environment quality in different operating theatres.Int J Environ Res Public Health,14,137.
18. Spearman, J,Tsavellas, G,Nichols, P(2007).Current attitudes and practices to wards diathermy smoke.Ann R Coll Surg Engl,89,162-165.
19. Steege, AL,Boiano, JM,Sweeney, MH(2016).Secondhand smoke in the operating room? precautionary practices lacking for surgical smoke.Am J Ind Med,59,1020-1031.
20. Tan, E,Russell, K(2017).Surgical plume and its implications: a review of the risk and barriers to a safe work place.J Perioperat Nurs,30,33-39.
21. Ulmer, BC(2008).The hazards of surgical smoke.AORN J,87,721-734+735-738.
22. Wang, HK,Mo, F,Ma, CG(2015).Evaluation of fine particles in surgical smoke from an urologist’s operating room by time and by distance.Int Urol Nephrol,47,1671-1678.
23. York, K,Autry, M(2018).Surgical smoke: putting the pieces together to become smoke-free.AORN J,107,692-702.
24. 台灣手術全期護理學會=Taiwan periOperative Registered Nurses Association(2017)。正視「手術煙霧」。台灣手術護理學會會訊，2，7。
25. 吳惠馨, HH,陳瑛瑛, YY,傅玲, L(2016)。影響手術室空氣中微生物之因素與控制。感染控制雜誌，26，195-201。
26. 衛生福利部：民國107年醫療機構現況及醫院醫療服務量統計。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp4487-49166-113.html。引用2020/06/30。 Ministry of Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Current status of medical institutions and statistics of hospital medical services in 2018. Available at: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-4487-49166-113.html. Accessed June 30, 2020. [In Chinese]

1. 李榮芬(Jung-Fen Lee);洪曉佩(Shiao-Pei Hung);明金蓮(Jin-Lain Ming)(2022)。手術煙霧安全。榮總護理。39(4)。347-352。