區域醫院及醫學中心醫療人員使用安全針具扎傷之經驗

Experience in using of safety-engineered medical devices and related needlestick injuries in healthcare workers in regional hospitals and medical centers

10.6288/TJPH.202204_41(2).110087

歐育珊(Yu-Shan Ou)；吳雪菁(Hsueh-Ching Wu)；郭育良(Yue Leon Guo)；蕭淑銖(Judith Shu-Chu Shiao)

醫療法第56條 ； 安全針具 ； 使用經驗 ； Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act ； safety-engineered medical devices ； user experience

台灣公共衛生雜誌

41卷2期（2022 / 04 / 29）

200 - 210

繁體中文

目標：台灣醫療法規範醫療院所應提供安全針具後，醫療人員之扎傷率已有下降趨勢；但在台灣EPINet通報系統的扎傷事件統計中，仍可看到有工作人員沒有適時選用安全針具，或是安全針具未能避免扎傷事件的情形。本研究目的為探索台灣區域醫院與醫學中心之醫療人員使用安全針具仍發生扎傷的狀況與困境。方法：本研究對象為曾被安全針具扎傷之醫療人員，訪談內容以遭安全針具扎傷之事件經過以及安全針具使用之心得為主，並透過質性內容分析法歸納出核心主題。結果：共有25位醫療人員接受訪談，訪談後歸納出醫療人員認為安全針具使用上不夠便利與安全針具替代範圍不全面兩個主題，其中包含沒有真正好用的安全針具、未上過教育訓練、缺乏便於使用安全針具的環境以及醫師的治療項目沒有安全針具共四個次主題。結論：台灣在安全針具的使用上仍有進步的空間。建議針具製造商應持續改善現存安全針具的設計並拓展更多安全針具種類，也建議醫療院所配合所引進之安全針具，調整安全針具教育時機以及調整尖銳物回收桶、工作車等工作環境配置。

Objectives: The incidence of sharps injury in Taiwan has declined after the enactment of the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act. However, some healthcare workers still use conventional devices in high-risk procedures, and some safety-engineered medical device (SEMD) users experience sharps injury. In this study, we explored the problems of using SEMDs in regional hospitals and medical centers in Taiwan. Methods: We included healthcare workers who had sharps injury due to the use of SEMDs. The interviews focused on the process of sharps injury and participants' experience of using SEMDs. We analyzed the interview data by using the qualitative content analysis method. Results: Twenty-five healthcare workers were interviewed. We noted that the participants did not find the use of SEMDs to be sufficiently convenient. This indicated that SEMDs were not easy to use and that improper training and unfavorable work environment further reduced their use. Our findings also revealed that replacement of SEMDs were not comprehensive, especially in the procedure of the physicians. Conclusions: We recommend the manufacturers to improve the existing SEMDs and introduce more types of SEMDs. Healthcare facilities should involve the users in the purchase process, provide appropriate training, and establish a more convenient work environment for promoting the use of SEMDs.

1. 吳雪菁, HC,謝曼麗, ML,郭育良, YL,陳宜傳, YC,歐育珊, YS,蕭淑銖, SC(2019)。台灣安全針具法實施五年後安全針具替換率與針扎率的變化。台灣衛誌，38，509-520。
   連結：
2. An, HS,Ko, S,Bang, JH,Park, SW(2018).Elimination of lancet-related needlestick injuries using a safety-engineered lancet: experience in a hospital.Infect Chemother,50,319-327.
3. Chambers, A,Mustard, CA,Holness, DL,Nichol, K,Breslin, FC(2015).Barriers to the adoption of safety-engineered needles following a regulatory standard: lessons learned from three acute care hospitals.Healthc Policy,11,90-101.
4. Fukuda, H,Yamanaka, N(2016).Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.J Hosp Infect,92,147-153.
5. Griswold, S,Bonaroti, A,Rieder, CJ(2013).Investigation of a safety-engineered device to prevent needlestick injury: why has not StatLock stuck?.BMJ Open,3,e002327.
6. Jackson, AP,Almerol, LA,Campbell, J,Hamilton, L(2020).Needlestick injuries: the role of safety-engineered devices in prevention.Br J Nurs,29,S22-S30.
7. Mitchell, AH,Parker, GB,Kanamori, H,Rutala, WA,Weber, DJ(2017).Comparing non-safety with safety device sharps injury incidence data from two different occupational surveillance systems.J Hosp Infect,96,195-198.
8. Parantainen, A,Verbeek, JH,Lavoie, MC,Pahwa, M.(2011).Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,11,CD009170.
9. Schuurmans, J,Lutgens, SP,Groen, L,Schneeberger, PM(2018).Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries?.J Hosp Infect,100,99-104.
10. Spruce, L.(2016).Back to basics: sharps safety.AORN J,104,30-36.
11. Tarigan, LH,Cifuentes, M,Quinn, M,Kriebel, D(2015).Prevention of needle-stick injuries in healthcare facilities: a meta-analysis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,36,823-829.
12. WHO(2015).WHO Guideline on the Use of Safety-Engineered Syringes for Intramuscular, Intradermal and Subcutaneous Injections in Health-Care Settings.Geneva:WHO.
13. 梁淑媛, SY,莊宇慧, YH,吳淑芳, SF(2012)。內容分析技巧在護理質性資料之初步應用。護理雜誌，59，84-90。
14. 衛生福利部統計處：機構執業醫事人員數及每萬人口執業醫事人員數。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-5301-62356-113.html。引用2022/03/14。 Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Number of medical personnel and the number of medical personnel per 10,000 population. Available at: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-5301-62356-113.html. Accessed March 14, 2022. [In Chinese]
15. 謝曼麗, ML,蕭淑銖, SC(2020).針扎職業危害預防策略成效評估研究.新北市=New Taipei City:勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所=Institute of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health, Ministry of Labor, R.O.C. (Taiwan).
16. 簡杏津, HC,黃惠美, HM,施玥羽, YY.(2020)。某醫學中心護理部安全針具使用成效之探討。感染控制雜誌，30，1-9。

1. 蕭淑銖,歐育珊,陳宜傳,秦唯珊,林挺迪,吳雪菁,王立潔(2022)。醫院安全風氣：由科學到政策—臺灣針扎防治歷程。護理雜誌，69(5)，7-13。