科學博物館協力公眾參與科學之實踐－以沃爾巴克氏菌防治登革熱展示為例

Science museums as a platform for public engagement: exhibiting the Wolbachia dengue fever prevention method

10.6288/TJPH.202204_41(2).110126

郭世文(Shih-Wen Kuo)；吳佩修(Pei-Hsiu Wu)；王裕宏(Yu-Hung Wang)；王雅芳(Ya-Fang Wang)；劉韋良(Wei-Liang Liu)；陳佳靖(Chia-Ching Chen)

科學博物館 ； 公眾參與科學 ； 上游參與 ； 沃爾巴克氏菌生物防治法 ； science museum ； public engagement with science ； upstream public engagement ； Wolbachia method

台灣公共衛生雜誌

41卷2期（2022 / 04 / 29）

211 - 225

繁體中文

目標：「公眾參與科學」為新興科技政策制定前的重要工作，本研究旨在探究科學博物館如何作為公眾參與科學之平台，及其功能。方法：以研究者與國家蚊媒中心研究員合作，親身參與科學博物館的沃爾巴克氏菌防治登革熱展示的策展經驗為案例，經過展覽形成、展出、修正三階段，將研究員研究成果轉譯成為科普展示教育活動，在導覽後請觀眾留言，從留言中蒐集觀眾對此防治法的問題及疑慮，經編碼彙整為三大類面向，10個主題，並將研究員對該些問題的回應轉譯成為新單元補充於展示中。結果：分兩部分記錄實踐成果，第一部分介紹「沃爾巴克氏菌防治登革熱展示」的展示架構、學習目標及所設計的互動手法及教育活動；第二部分說明如何將觀眾留言及研究員回應製作成新的展示單元，以落實雙向互動的對話溝通。結論：經過實踐，驗證科學博物館可作為公眾參與公衛新興科技之平台，協助民眾與研究員雙向溝通、相互學習；本研究所收集的觀眾留言問題可提供沃爾巴克氏菌生物防治法未來研究方向及制定溝通策略之參考。

Objectives: Public engagement is essential when developing policies involving new technologies. This study explored the function of science museums as a platform for engaging the general public. Methods: In collaboration with the scientists at the National Mosquito-Borne Diseases Control Research Center, the researchers participated in curating, exhibiting, and modifying an exhibition showcasing the Wolbachia dengue fever prevention method. For this exhibition, the scientific research results were translated into educational activities and popular science displays. Questions from visitors were consolidated into ten subjects within three categories. These questions and the answers provided by scientists were incorporated into the exhibition. Results: The study results were recorded in two parts. The first part included the framework, interfacing design, and educational activities of the exhibition. The second part explained how the questions and answers were included in the modified exhibition to enhance dialog. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that science museums can be a platform for engaging with the general public on new technologies for public health and aid bidirectional communication between scientists and the public. The questions from the exhibition visitors provided pointers for future research and references for policy making.

1. Barrett、 J,邱家宜, E(2012)。追求民主－作為公共空間的博物館。博物館學季刊，26，7-28。
   連結：
2. 江淑琳, SL,張瑜倩, YC(2016)。更民主的科學溝通─科學類博物館實踐公眾參與科學之角色初探。傳播研究與實踐，6，199-227。
   連結：
3. 陳慧娟, HC.(2003)。溝通策略與博物館展示設計。博物館學季刊，17，733-742。
   連結：
4. 鄭瑞洲, JC,林煥祥, HS(2020)。台灣公民對非制式科學教育場域的態度與參訪動機之研究。科技博物，24，63-84。
   連結：
5. Bell, L(2008).Engaging the public in technology policy: A new role for science museums.Sci Comm,29,386-398.
6. Bisanti, M(2012).Museums- from local to global.JCOM,11,1-7.
7. Burchell, K,Franklin, S,Holden, K.(2009).,London, UK:London School of Economics and Political Science.
8. Costa, GB,Smithyman, R,O’Neill, SL,Moreira, LA(2020).How to engage communities on a large scale? Lessons from World Mosquito Program in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Gates Open Res,4,109.
9. Dijkstra, AM,Critchley, CR(2016).Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafes: public risk perceptions contextualized.Publ Understand Sci,25,71-87.
10. Dunn, A.(2011).Community Engagement–Under the Microscope.London:Wellcome Trust.
11. Fischer, F(1993).Reconstructing policy analysis: a post-positivist perspective.Pol Sci,25,333-339.
12. Hendrichs, J(ed.),Pereira, R(ed.),Vreysen, MJB(ed.)(2021).Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management.Boca Raton:CRC Press.
13. International Council of Museums. Museum definition. Available at: https://reurl.cc/gz7NKV. Accessed September 11, 2021.
14. Irwin, A(2006).The politics of talk: coming to terms with the "new" scientific governance.Soc Stud Sci,36,299-320.
15. Kolopack, PA,Parsons, JA,Lavery, JV.(2015).What makes community engagement effective?: lessons from the Eliminate Dengue Program in Queensland Australia.PLoS Negl Trop Dis,9,e0003713.
16. Kurath, M,Gisler, P(2009).Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication in the age of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology.Publ Understand Sci,18,559-573.
17. Kurath, M,Gisler, P(2009).Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio-and nanotechnology.Publ Understand Sci,18,559-573.
18. Laurent, B(2012).Science museums as political places. Representing nanotechnology in European science museums.JCOM,11,1-6.
19. Liu, WL,Yu, HY,Chen, YX(2022).Lab-scale characterization and semi-field trials of Wolbachia Strain wAlbB in a Taiwan Wolbachia introgressed Ae. aegypti strain.PLoS Negl Trop Dis,16,e0010084.
20. McCallie, E,Bell, L,Lohwater, T(2009).,Washington, DC:Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education=CAISE.
21. McNaughton, D(2012).The importance of long-term social research in enabling participation and developing engagement strategies for new dengue control technologies.PLoS Negl Trop Dis,6,e1785.
22. McNaughton, D,Duong, TT(2014).Designing a community engagement framework for a new dengue control method: a case study from central Vietnam.PLoS Negl Trop Dis,8,e2794.
23. Murray, JV,Jansen, CC,De Barro, P(2016).Risk associated with the release of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes into the environment in an effort to control dengue.Front Public Health,4,43.
24. Noy, C.(2016)."My Holocaust experience was great!": entitlements for participation in museum media.Discourse Comm,10,274-290.
25. Pieczka, M,Escobar, O(2012).Dialogue and science: innovation in policy-making and the discourse of public engagement in the UK.Sci Publ Pol,40,113-126.
26. Rayner, S(2003).Democracy in the age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making.Sci Publ Pol,30,163-171.
27. Ritchie, SA,van den Hurk, AF,Smout, MJ,Staunton, KM,Hoffmann, AA(2018).Mission accomplished? We need a guide to the "Post Release" world of wolbachia for Aedes borne disease control.Trends Parasitol,34,217-226.
28. Rogers-Hayden, T,Pidgeon, N(2007).Moving engagement "upstream"? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering’s inquiry’.Publ Understand Sci,16,345-364.
29. Sandell, R(ed.),Nightingale, E(ed.)(2012).Museums, Equality and Social Justice.London, UK:Routledge.
30. Stratyner, B(1995).Memory books: a method of dialogic retrospection in the gallery.J Mus Educ,20,7-9.
31. The Royal Society,the Royal Academy of Engineering(2004).Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties.London, UK:RS.
32. Weller, AS(1985).Museums for a new century.J Aesthetic Educ,19,143-149.
33. WHO(2017).Global Vector Control Response 2017-2030.Geneva:WHO.
34. Wilsdon, J,Willis, R.(2004).See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream.London, UK:Demos.
35. Wilsdon, J,Wynne, B,Stilgoe, J.(2005).The Public Value of Science.London:Demos.
36. 李芷維, CW(2016)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系=Department of Adult and Continuing Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
37. 張美珍, MC.(2008)。歡迎你來動手—談科學博物館內國小科技教育的展示與活動規劃。生活科技教育月刊，41，3-416。
38. 劉婉珍, WC(2011).博物館觀眾研究.台北=Taipei:三民書局=San Min Book.

1. (2024)。登革熱防治專責人員對於應用沃爾巴克氏菌做為防治技術之態度。台灣公共衛生雜誌，43(2)，183-198。