末期醫療抉擇的家庭會議溝通模式之回溯性分析

Family conference communication patterns for end-stage patients

10.6288/TJPH.202204_41(2).110147

宋聖芬(Sheng-Fen Sung)；陳煌麒(Huang-Chi Chen)；楊婉萍(Wan-Ping Yang)

病人自主 ； 家庭會議 ； 醫療抉擇 ； 內容分析 ； patient autonomy ； family conference ； medical decision ； content analysis

台灣公共衛生雜誌

41卷2期（2022 / 04 / 29）

226 - 233

繁體中文

目標：家庭會議是促進醫療端與病家端的重要開放性溝通方式，藉此確認病人的意願，整合家屬意見，討論共識出適切的醫療抉擇。本研究目的為了解末期醫療抉擇的家庭會議中醫療端與病家端間的溝通模式。方法：以台灣南部一區域教學醫院，收集2009-2014年108位病人共125份的癌末醫療抉擇的家庭會議紀錄，進行病歷之回溯性分析。採內容分析歸納臨床上進行末期醫療抉擇家庭會議的常見溝通模式。結果：發現召開的家庭會議中，雖然有部分討論到以病人的意願與自主為最重要之考量，但實際上有病人參與共同討論的家庭會議為數不多，甚至有的會議家屬拒絕病人參與決策。質性分析歸納出家庭會議溝通模式包括了三主題九大類別：1.病主－尊重依循病人的自主決定；2.家主－由家屬代表發聲並代做決定；3.醫主－希望以醫師的經驗與建議為之。結論：期能以此研究結果為基礎，發展符合文化民情但具有效能的末期醫療抉擇與家庭會議溝通模式，進而深耕推動未來更尊重病人自主的醫病共享決策模式。

Objectives: Family conferences constitute a vital medium for facilitating open communication between a medical team, a patient, and the patient's family. Confirming the patient's wishes and incorporating their family's views during the formulation of decisions for end-stage medical care are crucial. The objective of this study was to determine the communication patterns arising between the health-care team, the patient, and the patient's family during a family conference for making decisions about end-stage medical care. Methods: This 5-year retrospective analysis reviewed charts for 125 family conference minutes concerning decisions for end-stage medical care; the charts were sourced from 108 patients residing in a regional teaching hospital in Southern Taiwan between 2009 and 2014. Content analysis was conducted to observe the common communication patterns during these family conferences. Results: Although some family conferences reached an agreement that patient willingness and autonomy should be prioritized, few conferences actually involved the patients. Some conferences were even held on the condition of no patient involvement. Our qualitative research identified several family conference communication patterns as follows: (a) patient-oriented patterns, where the patient's thoughts were considered to deliberate the medical decisions; (b) family-oriented patterns, where family members made decisions on behalf of the patient; and (c) medical-oriented patterns, where physicians were trusted to make decisions. Conclusions: The results of this study can serve as a reference for developing effective family conference communication patterns in which patient autonomy in making decisions concerning end-stage medical care is respected, thus promoting shared decision-making.

1. 張婷, T(2017)。論台灣病人自主權之現狀與挑戰。法令月刊，68，122-139。
   連結：
2. 陳婉君, WC,潘雪幸, HH,劉淑皎, SC(2020)。某離島醫護人員對末期病人撤除維生醫療行為意向及其相關因素探討。安寧療護雜誌，24，112-126。
   連結：
3. 黃漢忠, HC(2019)。從儒家的觀點省察病人自主權利法的限制：以永久性植物人為例。應用倫理評論，67，63-64。
   連結：
4. Bengtsson, M(2016).How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis.Nursing Plus Open,2,8-14.
5. Boss, RD,Donohue, PK,Larson, SM,Arnold, RM,Roter, DL(2016).Family meetings in the neonatal intensive care unit: observation of communication dynamics and contributions.Pediatr Crit Care Med,17,223-230.
6. Davidson, JE,Aslakson, RA,Long, AC(2017).Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU.Crit Care Med,45,103-128.
7. Glod, SA,Kang, A,Wojnar, M(2020).Family meeting training curriculum: a multimedia approach with real-time experiential learning for residents.MedEdPORTAL,6,10883.
8. Hashim, MJ(2017).Patient-centered communication: basic skills.Am Fam Physician,95,29-34.
9. Krippendorff, K.(1985).Content Analysis - An Introduction to Its Methodology.Newbury Park, CA:SAGE Publications.
10. Kuntz, JG,Kavalieratos, D,Esper, GJ(2020).Feasibility and acceptability of inpatient palliative care e-family meetings during COVID-19 pandemic.J Pain Symptom Manage,60,e28-e32.
11. Lincoln, YS,Guba, EG.(1985).Naturalistic Inquiry.Newbury Park, CA:SAGE Publications.
12. Luckett, T,Phillips, J,Agar, M,Virdun, C,Green, A,Davidson, PM(2014).Elements of effective palliative care models: a rapid review.BMC Health Serv Res,14,1-22.
13. October, TW,Dizon, ZB,Roter, DL(2018).Is it my turn to speak? An analysis of the dialogue in the family-physician intensive care unit conference.Patient Educ Couns,101,647-652.
14. Phua, J,Joynt, GM,Nishimura, M(2016).Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in low-middle-income versus high-income Asian countries and regions.Intensive Care Med,42,1118-1127.
15. Roller, MR,Lavrakas, PJ(2015).Applied Qualitative Research Design: A Total Quality Framework Approach.New York, NY:Guilford Publications.
16. Silva, RSD,Trindade, GSS,Paixão, GPDN,Silva, MJPD(2018).Family meeting in palliative care: concept analysis.Rev Bras Enferm,71,206-213.
17. Sullivan, SS,da Rosa Silva, CF,Meeker, MA(2015).Family meetings at end of life: a systematic review.JHPN,17,196-205.
18. Thomas, T,Kuhn, I,Barclay, S(2017).Inpatient transfer to a care home for end-of-life care: what are the views and experiences of patients and their relatives? A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the UK literature.Palliat Med,31,102-108.
19. Washington, KT,Parker, O,Gage, LA,Albright, DL,Demiris, G(2016).A multimethod analysis of shared decision-making in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings including family caregivers.Palliat Med,30,270-278.
20. Williams, LA,Moeke-Maxwell, T,Wiles, J(2018).How family caregivers help older relatives navigate statutory services at the end of life: a descriptive qualitative study.Palliat Med,32,1124-1132.
21. 伍碧琦, PCD,吳麗珍, LJ,陳彩鳳, TF,蔡來蔭, LY(2011)。南部某醫學中心住院病人對病人自主態度與其相關因素之探討。長庚護理，22，451-462。
22. 郭巧雯, CW,黃露萩, LC,方文熙, D,劉翠瑤, TY,游麗瑾, LC,馮容莊, RC(2018)。護理人員對家庭會議的態度與行為。北市醫學雜誌，15，78-90。
23. 陳淑廷, ST,沈秀宜, HY,黃淑芬, SF(2015)。為善終而做撤除維生系統之經驗分析。北市醫學雜誌，12，57-67。
24. 游麗瑾, LC,郭巧雯, CW,黃露萩, LC(2016)。醫病溝通會議之推動：護理觀點。北市醫學雜誌，14，40-51。
25. 馮容莊, RC,俞克弘, KH,黃露萩, LC(2017)。台北市某社區型醫院醫病溝通會議之成效。北市醫學雜誌，14，23-39。
26. 黃露萩, LC,郭俐蘭, LL,鄒淑萍, SP(2018)。召開家庭會議改善醫病溝通。北市醫學雜誌，15，91-103。
27. 蔡甫昌, FC,郭蕙心, HH(2017)。病人自主權利法之倫理觀點與實務挑戰。台灣醫學，21，62-72。

1. 洪韡倢,洪芳明,林怡萍,王昭萍(2023)。加護病房重症末期病人的醫療決策與處置──北部某醫學中心之經驗。安寧療護雜誌，27(2)，115-129。