台灣成年民眾室內空氣污染健康識能不足者之特性研究

Characteristics of Taiwanese adults with inadequate indoor air pollution health literacy

10.6288/TJPH.202212_41(6).111096

黃渝涵(Yu-Han Huang)；吳嘉玲(Jia-Ling Wu)；黃乙芹(Yi-Chin Huang)；侯文萱(Wen-Hsuan Hou)；榮建誠(Chien-Cheng Jung)；李佩珍(Pei-Chen Lee)；林明彥(Ming-Yeng Lin)；李中一(Chung-Yi Li)

室內空氣污染 ； 健康識能 ； 環境健康識能 ； 決策樹 ； 網路面訪 ； indoor air pollution ； health literacy ； environmental health literacy ； decision tree ； internet face-to-face interview

台灣公共衛生雜誌

41卷6期（2022 / 12 / 27）

639 - 650

繁體中文;英文

目標：本研究旨在利用經信效度確認之「室內空氣污染健康識能量表」來界定出我國成年民眾中室內空氣污染健康識能不足者族群之特性。方法：本研究屬於橫斷性研究，利用網路面訪方式，針對我國20歲以上之民眾進行訪談。樣本按台灣2020年4月成年人口地區、性別、與年齡分佈進行加權計算後，以決策樹模型歸類出屬於室內空氣污染健康識能不足（分數低於中位數者）的族群特性。結果：共蒐集647份問卷，加權樣本數為616人。決策樹模型分析結果指出，我國民眾室內空氣污染健康識能不足比例較高（158/234=67.5%）且人數占比較高的族群（36%）之族群特性為：自己或同住者的工作不會接觸室內空污資訊，且從事特定工作者。結論：本研究發現從事工作別以及民眾與其同住者的工作是否會接觸室內空污資訊為影響民眾室內空氣污染健康識能程度的重要因子，針對特定行業的工作族群開發適性衛教教材，並進行介入是台灣未來提升成年族群室內空氣污染健康識能可以考慮採行的作法。

Objectives: We used the Indoor Air Pollution Health Literacy (IAPHL) model to determine the characteristics of Taiwanese adults with inadequate health literacy regarding indoor pollution. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected data on the characteristics of Taiwanese participants aged ≥20 years through online questionnaires based on the IAPHL model. The responses were analyzed and categorized by region, gender, and age group of the interviewees as of April 2020. The characteristics of the participants with inadequate IAPHL (i.e., less than the median score) were described by using decision tree. Results: In total, 616 out of 647 questionnaires were included in the analysis after weighting. The decision tree model revealed that 67.5% (158/234) of Taiwanese citizens had inadequate IAPHL. Furthermore, 36% of the participants lacked information on indoor air pollution at their workplace or home. Conclusions: This study found occupation type and a lack of knowledge regarding indoor air pollution at the workplace are key predictors of inadequate IAPHL. These findings suggest that IAPHL can be better improved through the use of occupation specific educational materials for adults in Taiwan.

1. Hou, WH,Huang, YC,Lu, CY(2021).A national survey of ambient air pollution health literacy among adult residents of Taiwan.BMC Public Health,21,1604.
   連結：
2. 胡至沛, CP,鄭仁雄, JH(2020)。居家環境室內空氣品質認知與管理策略之探討。物業管理學報，11，1-13。
   連結：
3. 徐美苓, ML(2019)。風險感知、價值觀、議題傳播及空污防制行為意向。新聞學研究，138，25-73。
   連結：
4. Abolhasani, R,Araghi, F,Tabary, M,Aryannejad, A,Mashinchi, B,Robati, RM(2021).The impact of air pollution on skin and related disorders: a comprehensive review.Dermatol Ther,34,e14840.
5. Auberry, K(2018).Increasing students’ ability to identify fake news through information literacy education and content management systems.Ref Libr,59,179-187.
6. Badland, HM,Duncan, MJ(2009).Perceptions of air pollution during the work-related commute by adults in Queensland, Australia.Atmos Environ,43,5791-5795.
7. Cho, M,Lee, YM,Lim, SJ,Lee, H(2020).Factors associated with the health literacy on social determinants of health: a focus on socioeconomic position and work environment.Int J Environ Res Public Health,17,6663.
8. Cleary, EG,Patton, AP,Wu, HC(2017).Making air pollution visible: a tool for promoting environmental health literacy.JMIR Public Health Surveill,3,e16.
9. Dingle, P,Lalla, F(2002).Indoor air health risk perceptions in Australia.Indoor Built Environ,11,275-284.
10. Dodson, RE,Boronow, KE,Susmann, H(2020).Consumer behavior and exposure to parabens, bisphenols, triclosan, dichlorophenols, and benzophenone-3: results from a crowdsourced biomonitoring study.Int J Hyg Envir Heal,230,113624.
11. Finn, S,O’Fallon, L(2017).The emergence of environmental health literacy-from its roots to its future potential.Environ Health Perspect,125,495-501.
12. Ho, TG,Hosseinzadeh, H,Rahman, B,Sheikh, M(2018).Health literacy and health-promoting behaviours among Australian-Singaporean communities living in Sydney metropolitan area.Proc Singapore Healthcare,27,125-131.
13. Huang, S,Guo, C,Qie, R(2021).Solid fuel use and cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Indoor Air,31,1722-1732.
14. Koester, BD,Sloane, S,Fujimoto, EM,Fiese, BH,Su, LYF(2021).What do childcare providers know about environmental influences on children’s health? Implications for environmental health literacy efforts.Int J Environ Res Public Health,18,5489.
15. Lee, SY,Tsai, TI,Tsai, YW,Kuo, K(2010).Health literacy, health status, and healthcare utilization of Taiwanese adults: results from a national survey.BMC Public Health,10,614.
16. Li, L,Yang, A,He, X(2020).Indoor air pollution from solid fuels and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environ Pollut,259,113914.
17. Morgan, J,Daugherty, R,Hilchie, A,Carey, B(2003).Sample size and modeling accuracy of decision tree based data mining tools.J Manag Inform Decis Sci,6,77-92.
18. Pennycook, G,Rand, DG(2021).The psychology of fake news.Trends Cogn Sci,25,388-402.
19. Pun, VC,Dowling, R,Mehta, S(2021).Ambient and household air pollution on early-life determinants of stunting-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environ Sci Pollut Res,28,26404-26412.
20. Quick, BL,Bates, BR,Romina, S(2009).Examining antecedents of clean indoor air policy support: implications for campaigns promoting clean indoor air.Health Commun,24,50-59.
21. Simonds, VW,Margetts, M,Rudd, RE(2019).Expanding environmental health literacy -- a focus on water quality and tribal lands.J Health Commun,24,236-243.
22. Song, YY,Lu, Y(2015).Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction.Shanghai Arch Psychiatry,27,130-135.
23. Sørensen, K,Van den Broucke, S,Fullam, J(2012).Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models.BMC Public Health,12,80.
24. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). What are the trends in indoor air quality and their effects on human health? Available at: https://www.epa.gov/report-environment/indoor-air-quality. Accessed April 3, 2022.
25. WHO(2017).Shanghai declaration on promoting health in the 2030 agenda for sustainable development.Health Promot Int,32,7-8.
26. WHO. Household air pollution. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_3. Accessed March 27, 2022.
27. Wineburg S, McGrew S, Breakstone J, Ortega T. Evaluating information: the cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Stanford Digital Repository. Available at: http://purl.stanford.edu/fv751yt5934. Accessed July 16, 2022.
28. 黃渝涵, YH(2022)。台南=Tainan，國立成功大學公共衛生研究所=Department of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University。
29. 蔡昀臻, YC(2015)。屏東=Pingtung，國立屏東科技大學環境工程與科學所=Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology。

1. 鄭翔如,葉淑婷,黃渝涵,陳嬿今,陳華芬,李商琪,李中一(2023)。中文版SATED睡眠健康評估量表之發展與信效度驗證。台灣公共衛生雜誌，42(5)，494-505。