當代生殖消費：以跨國大型商業精子銀行為考察對象

Contemporary reproductive consumption: a literature review of international commercial sperm banks

10.6288/TJPH.202302_42(1).111049

孫佳婷(Chia-Ting Sun)

供體精子 ； 捐贈受孕家庭 ； 跨境生殖照護 ； 人工協助生殖科技 ； 跨國大型商業精子銀行 ； donor sperm ； donor-conceived families ； cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) ； assisted reproductive technology (ART) ； international commercial sperm bank (ICSB)

台灣公共衛生雜誌

42卷1期（2023 / 02 / 24）

17 - 29

繁體中文;英文

生殖消費是人們透過消費進行生殖實踐的過程，本文主要針對以跨國大型商業精子銀行（international commercial sperm bank, ICSB）為對象之生殖消費開展考察。跨國大型商業精子銀行雖對女性生育與多元型態家庭構建提供了重要支持，成為全球跨境生殖照護與供體精子網絡中的要角，但人們對其評價分歧、多有批判，且目前相關論述多源自歐美，研究分佈亦呈現不均，台灣公眾與學術界對此則幾無相關討論。因此，本文旨在對相關文獻進行回顧與分析，以作為大眾理解跨國大型商業精子銀行與生殖消費的基礎。本文採用次級資料研究法，於2014年至2021年間，對學術文獻、專書、國際新聞媒體文本、國際組織資料庫、精子銀行及診所網站資料進行蒐羅與整合，並依據「以ICSB為對象之生殖消費」、「網路作為生殖消費之媒介與其管理」、「生殖消費與家庭網絡建構」及「生殖實踐中的消費選擇」之主題，分別呈現既有研究與常見論辯面向。本文認為，以生殖消費作為軸線，可為我們分析ICSB提供新的論述空間與資源，有利於未來賡續於研究與實務面向，對ICSB此一全球議題進行深入探究。

Reproductive consumption is the process of reproductive practice through commercial means. This paper focuses on reproductive consumption in international commercial sperm banks. International commercial sperm banks support female fertility and diverse family-making, and they facilitate cross-border reproductive care and donor sperm networks; nevertheless, they have been subject to various criticisms and valuations. To date, most of the relevant discourse originates in Europe and the United States, and the distribution of research is uneven; moreover, discussion of this topic in Taiwan at both the public and academic levels is limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to review and analyze the literature to enhance the understanding of international commercial sperm banks and reproductive consumption for further research and practical work. The study adopted secondary research as the primary research method and collected and integrated relevant material from the academic literature, monographs, international news media, international organization databases, and websites of sperm banks and clinics for the period from 2014 to 2021. Extant studies and common debates were categorized under the themes "reproductive consumption in international commercial sperm banks," "the internet as a medium of reproductive consumption and its management," "reproductive consumption and family network construction," and "consumption choices in reproductive practices." The author argues that the use of reproductive consumption as a framework offers a new space and resource for analyzing international commercial sperm banks, which is conducive to the further investigation of international commercial sperm banks for both research and practice.

1. 吳嘉苓, CL(2011)。編排風險：多胚胎孕育的多重社會科技網絡。台灣社會學，22，111-156。
   連結：
2. 孫佳婷, CT(2017)。全球化下生殖旅遊現況與評析。台灣衛誌，36，95-106。
   連結：
3. Adrian, SW(2010).Sperm stories: policies and practices of sperm banking in Denmark and Sweden.Eur J Womens Stud,17,393-411.
4. Agigian, A(2004).Baby Steps: How Lesbian Alternative Insemination is Changing the World.Middletown:Wesleyan University Press.
5. Almeling, R(2011).Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm.California:University of California Press.
6. Birenbaum-Carmeli, D(ed.),Inhorn, MC(ed.)(2009).Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies (Fertility, Reproduction and Sexuality).New York, NY:Berghahn Books.
7. Bokek-Cohen, Y,Gonen, LD(2015).Sperm and simulacra: emotional capitalism and sperm donation industry.New Genet Soc,34,243-273.
8. Critser, JK(1998).Current status of semen banking in the USA.Hum Reprod,13,55-67.
9. Daniels, CR,Golden, J(2004).Popular eugenics, artificial insemination and the rise of the American sperm banking industry.J Soc Hist,38,5-27.
10. Dominus S. Sperm donors can’t stay secret anymore. Here ’s what that means. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/26/magazine/spermdonor-questions.html?action=click&auth=login-facebook&contentCollection=Magazine&contentID=WhatsNext&module=WhatsNext&moduleDetail=undefined&pgtype=Multimedia®ion=Footer&version=WhatsNext. Accessed April 29, 2020.
11. Eli BL, Dominus S. A family portrait: brothers, sisters, strangers. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/26/magazine/sperm-donor-siblings.html?mtrref=www.bing.com&gwh=6A5C39AE211601898952BF5095BB57BF&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALL. Accessed June 4, 2020.
12. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Homepage. Available at: https://www.eshre.eu/. Accessed October 1, 2016.
13. Fletcher, R(2006).Reproductive consumption.Fem Theor,7,27-47.
14. Golombok, S(2015).Modern Families: Parents and Children in New Family Forms.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
15. Grand View Research.,未出版
16. Harrison, K(2018).A virtual promise of happiness: kinship on the websites of Danish fertility clinics and sperm banks.Fem Media Stud,19,1096-1113.
17. Hertz, R(2008).Single by Chance, Mothers by Choice: How Women are Choosing Parenthood Without Marriage and Creating the New American Family.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
18. Hertz, R,Nelson, MK(2019).Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings, and the Creation of New Kin.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
19. Inhorn, MC(2015).Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
20. Jalbert, P,Leonard, C,Selva, J,David, PG(1989).Genetic aspects of artificial insemination with donor semen: the French CECOS federation guidelines.Am J Med Genet,33,269-275.
21. Johnston, J,Zacharias, RL(2017).The future of reproductive autonomy.Hastings Cent Rep,47,S6-S11.
22. Kroløkke, C(2009).Click a donor: Viking masculinity on the line.J Consum Cult,9,7-30.
23. Lewak D. Not even a pandemiccan stop the sperminator from spreading his seed. Available at: https://nypost.com/2020/05/16/not-even-a-pandemiccan-stop-the-sperminator-from-spreading-his-seed/Accessed June 3, 2020.
24. Martin, LJ(2009).Reproductive tourism in the age of globalization.Globalizations,6,249-263.
25. Mason, MA,Ekman, T(2017).Babies of Technology: Assisted Reproduction and the Rights of the Child.New Haven:Yale University Press.
26. Miller, AK(2010).She Looks Just Like You: A Memoir of (Nonbiological Lesbian) Motherhood.Boston:Beacon Press.
27. Miller, D(1988).Appropriating the state on the council estate.Man, New Series,23,353-372.
28. Mohr S. Aspiring towards reproductive masculinity: the mobility of donor semen and the regimes of intimate (im)mobility at Danish sperm banks. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1245012&dswid=8945. Accessed September 6, 2019
29. Mohr S. Sperm donors and the biosociality of gender: masculinity and sexuality in times of reproductive biomedicine. Available at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-70063. Accessed September 6, 2019.
30. Mohr, S(2015).Living kinship trouble: Danish sperm donors’ narratives of relatedness.Med Anthropol,34,470-484.
31. Mohr, S(2018).Being a Sperm Donor: Masculinity, Sexuality, and Biosociality in Denmark.New York, NY:Berghahn Books.
32. Mohr, S(2014).Containing sperm-managing legitimacy: lust, disgust, and hybridity at Danish sperm banks.J Contemp Ethnogr,45,319-342.
33. Mohr, S,Koch, L(2016).Transforming social contracts: the social and cultural history of IVF in Denmark.Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online,2
34. Murray, HT(1996).New reproductive technologies and the family.New Ways of Making Babies: National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction,Bloomington:
35. Pennings, G(2000).The right to choose your donor: a step towards commercialization or a step towards empowering the patient?.Hum Reprod,15,508-514.
36. Pennings, G(2010).The rough guide to insemination: cross-border travelling for donor semen due to different regulations.Facts Views Vis Obgyn
37. Perrin, EC,Siegel, BS(2013).Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Promoting the well-being of children whose parents are gay or lesbian.Pediatrics,131,e1374-e1383.
38. Plotz, D(2006).The Genius Factory: The Curious History of the Nobel Prize Sperm Bank.New York, NY:Random House Trade Paperbacks.
39. Pollock, A(2003).Complicating power in high-tech reproduction: narratives of anonymous paid egg donors.J Med Hum,24,241-263.
40. Quiroga, SS(2007).Blood is thicker than water: policing donor insemination and the reproduction of whiteness.Hypatia,22,143-161.
41. Robinson, S,Pizer, HF(1985).Having a Baby Without a Man: The Woman’s Guide to Alternative Insemination.New York, NY:Simon & Schuster Inc.
42. Rose, N(2007).The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
43. Ryan-Flood, R,Payne, JG(2018).Transnationalising Reproduction: Third Party Conception in a Globalised World.Abingdon:Taylor & Francis Ltd.
44. Saward M. Decolonising the sperm bank. Available at: https://www.killyourdarlings.com.au/article/decolonising-the-sperm-bank/. Accessed March 25, 2020.
45. Spar, DL(2006).The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce Conception.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
46. Storrow, RF(2005).Quests for conception: fertility tourists, globalization and feminist legal theory.Hastings Law J,57,295-330.
47. Sun, CT(2019).Reconsider contemporary capitalism through reproductive tourism.Vestnik SPbSU (Sociology),12,36-50.
48. Sven, B(2011).Reproductive agency and projects: Germans searching for egg donation in Spain and the Czech Republic.Reprod Biomed Online,23,600-608.
49. Swanson, KW(2012).The birth of the sperm bank.Ann Iowa,71,241-276.
50. United Nations Human Rights. Convention on the rights of the child. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child. Accessed December 14, 2022.
51. Van, Hoof, W,Pennings, G,de Sutter, P(2015).Cross-border reproductive care for law evasion: a qualitative study into the experiences and moral perspectives of French women who go to Belgium for treatment with donor sperm.Soc Sci Med,124,391-397.
52. Woodward, JT(2015).Third-party reproduction in the internet age: the new, patient-centered landscape.Fertil Steril,104,525-530.
53. 孫佳婷, CT(2021)。新竹=Hsinchu，國立交通大學社會與文化研究所=Institute of Social Research and Cultural Studies, National Chiao Tung University。
54. 章梅芳（譯）, MF(Trans.)(2010).懷孕文化史─懷孕、醫學和文化（1750-2000）.北京=Beijing:北京大學出版社=Peking University Press.
55. 董旭英（譯）, HY(Trans.),黃儀娟（譯）, YJ(Trans.)(2000).次級資料研究法.台北=Taipei:弘智文化=Hurng-Chih Book.
56. 蕭郁雯（譯）, YW(Trans.)(2004).從機會到選擇：遺傳學與正義.台北=Taipei:巨流=Chuliu Publisher.

1. (2023)。以Pierre Bourdieu之文化資本概念分析跨國大型商業精子銀行之捐贈者檔案組構。人口學刊，67，95-128。