题名

作者回覆：當代生殖消費：以跨國大型商業精子銀行為考察對象

并列篇名

Authors' response to commentary: contemporary reproductive consumption: a literature review of international commercial sperm banks

DOI

10.6288/TJPH.202302_42(1).11104902

作者

孫佳婷(Chia-Ting Sun)

关键词
期刊名称

台灣公共衛生雜誌

卷期/出版年月

42卷1期（2023 / 02 / 24）

页次

31 - 31

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 吳嘉苓, CL(2011)。編排風險：多胚胎孕育的多重社會科技網絡。台灣社會學，22，111-156。
    連結：
  2. 孫佳婷, CT(2017)。全球化下生殖旅遊現況與評析。台灣衛誌，36，95-106。
    連結：
  3. Adrian, SW(2010).Sperm stories: policies and practices of sperm banking in Denmark and Sweden.Eur J Womens Stud,17,393-411.
  4. Agigian, A(2004).Baby Steps: How Lesbian Alternative Insemination is Changing the World.Middletown:Wesleyan University Press.
  5. Almeling, R(2011).Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm.California:University of California Press.
  6. Birenbaum-Carmeli, D(ed.),Inhorn, MC(ed.)(2009).Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies (Fertility, Reproduction and Sexuality).New York, NY:Berghahn Books.
  7. Bokek-Cohen, Y,Gonen, LD(2015).Sperm and simulacra: emotional capitalism and sperm donation industry.New Genet Soc,34,243-273.
  8. Critser, JK(1998).Current status of semen banking in the USA.Hum Reprod,13,55-67.
  9. Daniels, CR,Golden, J(2004).Popular eugenics, artificial insemination and the rise of the American sperm banking industry.J Soc Hist,38,5-27.
  10. Dominus S. Sperm donors can’t stay secret anymore. Here ’s what that means. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/26/magazine/spermdonor-questions.html?action=click&auth=login-facebook&contentCollection=Magazine&contentID=WhatsNext&module=WhatsNext&moduleDetail=undefined&pgtype=Multimedia®ion=Footer&version=WhatsNext. Accessed April 29, 2020.
  11. Eli BL, Dominus S. A family portrait: brothers, sisters, strangers. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/26/magazine/sperm-donor-siblings.html?mtrref=www.bing.com&gwh=6A5C39AE211601898952BF5095BB57BF&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALL. Accessed June 4, 2020.
  12. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Homepage. Available at: https://www.eshre.eu/. Accessed October 1, 2016.
  13. Fletcher, R(2006).Reproductive consumption.Fem Theor,7,27-47.
  14. Golombok, S(2015).Modern Families: Parents and Children in New Family Forms.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  15. Grand View Research.,未出版
  16. Harrison, K(2018).A virtual promise of happiness: kinship on the websites of Danish fertility clinics and sperm banks.Fem Media Stud,19,1096-1113.
  17. Hertz, R(2008).Single by Chance, Mothers by Choice: How Women are Choosing Parenthood Without Marriage and Creating the New American Family.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  18. Hertz, R,Nelson, MK(2019).Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings, and the Creation of New Kin.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  19. Inhorn, MC(2015).Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
  20. Jalbert, P,Leonard, C,Selva, J,David, PG(1989).Genetic aspects of artificial insemination with donor semen: the French CECOS federation guidelines.Am J Med Genet,33,269-275.
  21. Johnston, J,Zacharias, RL(2017).The future of reproductive autonomy.Hastings Cent Rep,47,S6-S11.
  22. Kroløkke, C(2009).Click a donor: Viking masculinity on the line.J Consum Cult,9,7-30.
  23. Lewak D. Not even a pandemiccan stop the sperminator from spreading his seed. Available at: https://nypost.com/2020/05/16/not-even-a-pandemiccan-stop-the-sperminator-from-spreading-his-seed/Accessed June 3, 2020.
  24. Martin, LJ(2009).Reproductive tourism in the age of globalization.Globalizations,6,249-263.
  25. Mason, MA,Ekman, T(2017).Babies of Technology: Assisted Reproduction and the Rights of the Child.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  26. Miller, AK(2010).She Looks Just Like You: A Memoir of (Nonbiological Lesbian) Motherhood.Boston:Beacon Press.
  27. Miller, D(1988).Appropriating the state on the council estate.Man, New Series,23,353-372.
  28. Mohr S. Aspiring towards reproductive masculinity: the mobility of donor semen and the regimes of intimate (im)mobility at Danish sperm banks. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1245012&dswid=8945. Accessed September 6, 2019
  29. Mohr S. Sperm donors and the biosociality of gender: masculinity and sexuality in times of reproductive biomedicine. Available at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-70063. Accessed September 6, 2019.
  30. Mohr, S(2015).Living kinship trouble: Danish sperm donors’ narratives of relatedness.Med Anthropol,34,470-484.
  31. Mohr, S(2018).Being a Sperm Donor: Masculinity, Sexuality, and Biosociality in Denmark.New York, NY:Berghahn Books.
  32. Mohr, S(2014).Containing sperm-managing legitimacy: lust, disgust, and hybridity at Danish sperm banks.J Contemp Ethnogr,45,319-342.
  33. Mohr, S,Koch, L(2016).Transforming social contracts: the social and cultural history of IVF in Denmark.Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online,2
  34. Murray, HT(1996).New reproductive technologies and the family.New Ways of Making Babies: National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction,Bloomington:
  35. Pennings, G(2000).The right to choose your donor: a step towards commercialization or a step towards empowering the patient?.Hum Reprod,15,508-514.
  36. Pennings, G(2010).The rough guide to insemination: cross-border travelling for donor semen due to different regulations.Facts Views Vis Obgyn
  37. Perrin, EC,Siegel, BS(2013).Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Promoting the well-being of children whose parents are gay or lesbian.Pediatrics,131,e1374-e1383.
  38. Plotz, D(2006).The Genius Factory: The Curious History of the Nobel Prize Sperm Bank.New York, NY:Random House Trade Paperbacks.
  39. Pollock, A(2003).Complicating power in high-tech reproduction: narratives of anonymous paid egg donors.J Med Hum,24,241-263.
  40. Quiroga, SS(2007).Blood is thicker than water: policing donor insemination and the reproduction of whiteness.Hypatia,22,143-161.
  41. Robinson, S,Pizer, HF(1985).Having a Baby Without a Man: The Woman’s Guide to Alternative Insemination.New York, NY:Simon & Schuster Inc.
  42. Rose, N(2007).The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  43. Ryan-Flood, R,Payne, JG(2018).Transnationalising Reproduction: Third Party Conception in a Globalised World.Abingdon:Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  44. Saward M. Decolonising the sperm bank. Available at: https://www.killyourdarlings.com.au/article/decolonising-the-sperm-bank/. Accessed March 25, 2020.
  45. Spar, DL(2006).The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce Conception.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
  46. Storrow, RF(2005).Quests for conception: fertility tourists, globalization and feminist legal theory.Hastings Law J,57,295-330.
  47. Sun, CT(2019).Reconsider contemporary capitalism through reproductive tourism.Vestnik SPbSU (Sociology),12,36-50.
  48. Sven, B(2011).Reproductive agency and projects: Germans searching for egg donation in Spain and the Czech Republic.Reprod Biomed Online,23,600-608.
  49. Swanson, KW(2012).The birth of the sperm bank.Ann Iowa,71,241-276.
  50. United Nations Human Rights. Convention on the rights of the child. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child. Accessed December 14, 2022.
  51. Van, Hoof, W,Pennings, G,de Sutter, P(2015).Cross-border reproductive care for law evasion: a qualitative study into the experiences and moral perspectives of French women who go to Belgium for treatment with donor sperm.Soc Sci Med,124,391-397.
  52. Woodward, JT(2015).Third-party reproduction in the internet age: the new, patient-centered landscape.Fertil Steril,104,525-530.
  53. 孫佳婷, CT(2021)。新竹=Hsinchu，國立交通大學社會與文化研究所=Institute of Social Research and Cultural Studies, National Chiao Tung University。
  54. 章梅芳（譯）, MF(Trans.)(2010).懷孕文化史─懷孕、醫學和文化（1750-2000）.北京=Beijing:北京大學出版社=Peking University Press.
  55. 董旭英（譯）, HY(Trans.),黃儀娟（譯）, YJ(Trans.)(2000).次級資料研究法.台北=Taipei:弘智文化=Hurng-Chih Book.
  56. 蕭郁雯（譯）, YW(Trans.)(2004).從機會到選擇：遺傳學與正義.台北=Taipei:巨流=Chuliu Publisher.
被引用次数
  1. (2023)。以Pierre Bourdieu之文化資本概念分析跨國大型商業精子銀行之捐贈者檔案組構。人口學刊，67，95-128。
print cancel