復能服務規範調整對接受長期照顧十年計畫2.0對象使用服務的影響因素分析－基於安德森健康服務利用行為模式的實證研究

Factors influencing service utilization of reablement services after specification adjustments of the 10-Year Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 in Taiwan: Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use

10.6288/TJPH.202304_42(2).111124

吳銘堂(Ming-Tang Wu)；廖宏恩(Hung-En Liao)

長期照顧2.0 ； 居家復能 ； 專業服務 ； long-term care 2.0 ； home reablement ； professional services

台灣公共衛生雜誌

42卷2期（2023 / 04 / 28）

214 - 232+ap1-6

繁體中文;英文

目標：本研究旨在探討衛福部於2020年前、後居家復能服務作業規範改變，服務使用者對服務與政策滿意度的影響。方法：本研究採橫斷面調查研究設計，援引Andersen健康服務利用行為模式為架構，設計具信效度結構式問卷，資料來源為現居台中市並於2018年1月起曾使用過居家復能者。結果：受訪者對服務滿意度為94.1%；另外相對於低度需求者，對照顧問題清單具中度需求者服務滿意度較低（OR=0.317）。2020年前、後均接受過服務者（n=177），對2020年前與後的政策滿意度分別為96.0%及50.3%。雖然以目標導向的補助次數是影響政策滿意度的共通決定因子，但服務手冊指引內容改變與部分服務組合評量適用性，可能是導致服務使用者滿意度差異的根本原因。復能服務規範調整對復能計畫執行的影響因素，並沒有明顯差異。結論：2020年根據長照復能服務操作指引相關規定執行後，政策滿意度明顯下滑。宜建立多面向照顧思維，不應以單一標準衡量所有專業服務組合，並藉由評值使服務期程與次數動態性合理化，讓不同失能程度者均能獲得符合所需的專業服務。

Objectives: This study explored changes in the operating norms of home reablement services implemented by the Ministry of Health and Welfare before and after 2020 and their effects on service users' satisfaction levels. Methods: This study adopted a cross-sectional survey design with Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use as the framework. A structured questionnaire was designed and distributed to individuals in Taichung who had used home reablement services since January 2018. Results: The respondents' level of satisfaction with the services was 94.1%, and those with moderate needs on the list of care problems were less satisfied than those with low needs (OR = 0.317). Those who had received services before and after 2020 (n = 177) had satisfaction levels of 96.0% and 50.3% with the policy before and after 2020, respectively. Although goal-oriented satisfaction with a subsidy program is often employed as a determinant of policy satisfaction, changes in service manual guidelines and the applicability of some service package measures may be the underlying causes of differences in service user satisfaction. The reablement service specification adjustments did not significantly affect the implementation of the reablement plan. Conclusions: After implementing changes in the operational guidelines for long-term care reablement services in 2020, users' satisfaction level with services declined significantly. Policymakers are advised to adopt a multidimensional approach to patient care and to not measure all professional service combinations by a single standard. Furthermore, policymakers should implement evaluations to assess the effectiveness of various combinations of service duration and frequency to ensure that service users with varying degrees of disability receive professional services that meet their needs.

1. 周怡君, YC(2016)。德國與台灣身心障礙者政策與失能者長照政策的比較分析：復健模式的觀點。台大社工學刊，34，1-40。
   連結：
2. 陳亮汝, LJ,蔡麗珍, LC(2012)。影響出院準備服務個案使用不同長期照護服務之因素。醫務管理期刊，13，190-206。
   連結：
3. 劉佳柔, JR,謝明書, MS,蔡玉霞, YH,黃翠咪, CM,林雪蓉, SR,史麗珠, LC(2015)。台灣某縣市長期照顧居家式醫護類服務滿意度調查。若瑟醫護雜誌，9，20-34。
   連結：
4. 鄧桂芬, KF,李玉春, YC,楊哲銘, CM,黃國哲, KC(2019)。影響台灣家庭使用長照十年計劃2.0的相關因素分析。台灣衛誌，38，521-536。
   連結：
5. 羅玉岱, YT,林沛嫻, PH,張春瑤, CT,江怡慧, IH(2011)。居家失能患者使用長期照顧十年計畫服務之現況。台灣家庭醫學雜誌，21，79-92。
   連結：
6. Andersen, RM(1995).Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?.J Health Soc Behav,36,1-10.
7. Chou, YC,Kroger, T,Pu, CY(2015).Models of long-term care use among older people with disabilities in Taiwan: institutional care, community care, live-in migrant care and family care.Eur J Ageing,12,95-104.
8. Cochrane, A,Furlong, M,McGilloway, S,Molloy, DW,Stevenson, M,Donnelly, M(2016).Time-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,10,CD010825.
9. Langeland, E,Tuntland, H,Folkestad, B,Førland, O,Jacobsen, FF,Kjeken, I.(2019).A multicenter investigation of reablement in Norway: a clinical controlled trial.BMC Geriatr,19,29.
10. Legg, L,Gladman, J,Drummond, A,Davidson, A(2016).A systematic review of the evidence on home care reablement services.Clin Rehabil,30,741-749.
11. Lewin, G,De San Miguel, K,Knuiman, M(2013).A randomised controlled trial of the home independence program, an Australian restorative home-care programme for older adults.Health Soc Care Community,21,69-78.
12. Lewin, G,Vandermeulen, S(2010).A non randomised controlled trial of the Home Independence Program (HIP) an Australian restorative programme for older home care clients.Health Soc Care Community,18,91-99.
13. Mao, HF,Chang, LH,Tsai, AYJ,Huang, WN,Wang, J(2016).Developing a referral protocol for community based occupational therapy services in Taiwan a logistic regression analysis.PLoS One,11,e0148414.
14. Rabiee, P,Glendinning, C.(2011).Organisation and delivery of home care reablement what makes a difference?.Health Soc Care Community,19,495-503.
15. Sales, MP,Polman, R,Hill, KD,Karaharju-Huisman, T,Levinger, P(2015).A novel dynamic exercise initiative for older people to improve health and well-being: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMC Geriatr,15,68.
16. Slobbe, LCJ,Wong, A,Verheij, RA,van Oers, HAM,Polder, JJ(2017).Determinants of first-time utilization of long-term care services in the Netherlands: an observational record linkage study.BMC Health Serv Res,17,626.
17. Szanton, SL,Thorpe, RJ,Boyd, C(2011).Community aging in place, advancing better living for elders: a bio-behavioral-environmental intervention to improve function and health-related quality of life in disabled older adults.J Am Geriatr Soc,59,2314-2320.
18. Tessier, A,Beaulieu, MD,Mcginn, CA,Latulippe, R(2016).Effectiveness of reablement: a systematic review.Healthc Policy,11,49-59.
19. Tuntland, H,Aaslund, MK,Espehaug, B,Førland, O,Kjeken, I(2015).Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised controlled trial.BMC Geriatr,15,145.
20. Whitehead, PJ,Worthington, EJ,Parry, RH,Walker, MF,Drummond, E(2015).Interventions to reduce dependency in personal activities of daily living in community dwelling adults who use homecare services: a systematic review.Clin Rehabil,29,1064-1076.
21. WHO.World report on ageing and health.
22. Winkel, A,Langberg, H,Wæhrens, EE(2015).Reablement in a community setting.Disabil Rehabil,37,1347-1352.
23. 內政部統計處：統計報告：109年簡易生命表提要分析。https://www.moi.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=14661。引用2022/08/06。 Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Statistical report: summary analysis of abridged life table in 2020. Available at: https://www.moi.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=14661. Accessed August 6, 2022. [In Chinese]
24. 毛慧芬, HF,張玲慧, LH,蔡宜蓉, YJ(2020)。長期照顧2.0復能照護服務─觀念的翻轉與挑戰。台大護理，16，5-16。
25. 吳淑娟, SC,張育嘉, YC,葉德豐, TF(2012)。影響腦中風患者使用居家復健服務相關因素之探討。台灣復健醫學雜誌，40，147-159。
26. 李宜玲, YL(2014)。台北=Taipei，台北護理健康大學長期照護研究所=Department of Long-Term Care, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences。
27. 李羚榕：「我要成為照顧（居家）服務員！」怎麼做呢？照（居）服員養成步驟報你知。https://www.ilong-termcare.com>Article>Detail/402。引用2016/09/21。 Lee LJ. I want to be a home-care attendant. What should I do? Steps you should know in becoming a home-care attendant. Available at: https://www.ilong-termcare.com>Article>Detail/402. Accessed September 21, 2016. [In Chinese]
28. 李逸：長照四大服務：2、專業服務改善生活品質減輕照顧負荷。https://www.commonhealth.com.tw/blog/blogTopic.action?nid=3625。引用2020/05/19。 Lee Y. Four major long-term care services: (2) professional services to improve the quality of life and reduce the burden of care. Available at: https://www.commonhealth.com.tw/blog/3625. Accessed May 19, 2020. [In Chinese]
29. 社團法人臺灣職能治療學會：專家報告：復能與銀髮族。http://www.ot.org.tw/?action=society-publishlist-detail&id=13。引用2020/05/19。 Taiwan Occupational Therapy Association. Expert papers: reablement and older people. Available at: http://www.ot.org.tw/?action=society-publish-list-detail&id=13. Accessed March 19, 2020. [In Chinese: English abstract]
30. 徐秉澤, PT(2020)。桃園=Taoyuan，長庚大學健康照護產業碩士學位學程=Master Degree Program in Health and Long-Term Care Industry, Chang Gung University。
31. 國家發展委員會=National Development Council.中華民國人口推估（2020年至2070年）.
32. 陳正芬, CF,吳淑瓊, SC(2006)。家庭照顧者對長期照護服務使用意願之探討。人口學刊，32，83-121。
33. 陳百鍊, PL,顏碧慧, PH,吳宗哲, ZJ,楊舜鈞, SJ(2021)。居家物理治療復能活動對於社區失能長者之療效論文摘要。物理治療，46，137-138。
34. 陳建佑, CY(2020)。台南=Tainan，成功大學職能治療學系研究所=Department of Occupational Therapy, National Cheng Kung University。
35. 陳鳴聲, MS(2018)。安德森衛生服務利用行為模型演變及其應用。南京醫科大學學報（社會科學版），83，5-8。
36. 游曉微, HW,廖泰翔, TH,蔡季蓉, CJ,盧昱樺, YH,賴香妙, HM(2021)。長照2.0復能服務使用者特質初探－論文摘要。物理治療，46，106-107。
37. 蔡宜蓉, YJ,陳美香, MC,毛慧芬, HF,張玲慧, LH,周映君, YC,黃百川。,未出版
38. 衛生福利部：長照專業服務手冊。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-49634-4dcee073-bc31-45e0-88f8-f31876d506b1.html。引用2018/11/06。 Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Handbook for long-term care services. Available at: https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-54904-e1f4e368-5b3c-4997-80ec-a40f6f50977d.html. Accessed November 6, 2018. [In Chinese]
39. 衛生福利部：長期照顧（照顧服務、專業服務、交通接送服務、輔具服務及居家無障礙環境改善服務）給付及支付基準。https://newrepat.sfaa.gov.tw/home/msg/detail/4bc1e2b4768e5d850176ac137e722de9。引用2020/12/29。 Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Benefits and payment basis for long-term care (e.g., care service, professional service, transportation service, assistive device service, and accessible environment improvement service). Available at: https://newrepat.sfaa.gov.tw/home/msg/detail/4bc1e2b4768e5d850176ac137e722de9. Accessed December 29, 2020. [In Chinese]
40. 衛生福利部：長照十年計畫2.0成果報告。https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/F90052EC873423BB?A=C。引用2019/09/05。 Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). The results report of the ten-year long-term care plan 2.0. Available at: https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/F90052EC873423BB?A=C. Accessed September 5, 2019. [In Chinese]
41. 衛生福利部：復能多元服務試辦計畫（草案）。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-51068-dbdd4cf3-cf0d-490f-a53b-e34a0f8ae20d.html。引用2018/08/08。 Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Multidimensional Reablement Program（draft）.Available at: https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-51068-dbdd4cf3-cf0d-490f-a53b-e34a0f8ae20d.html. Accessed August 8, 2018. [In Chinese]
42. 衛生福利部：長照復能服務操作指引：觀念篇。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-53705-8071aa4c-9bdb-40fe-9ca4-6e008d62cd07.html。引用2018/07/03。 Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Operation guidelines for long-term care rehabilitation services: concepts. Available at: https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-53705-8071aa4c-9bdb-40fe-9ca4-6e008d62cd07.html. Accessed July 3, 2018. [In Chinese]
43. 衛生福利部社會及家庭署：長期照顧十年計畫摘要本。https://1966.gov.tw。引用2022/07/03。 Social and Family Affairs Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). The ten-year long-term care plan 2.0 summary. Available at: https://1966.gov.tw. Accessed July 3, 2022. [In Chinese]