工業地域演化與路徑依賴－以臺北市工業區為例

The Evolution of Industrial District and Path Dependency-The Case of Taipei Industrial District

廖皇傑(Huang-Chieh Liao)

工業地域演化 ； 路徑依賴 ； 制度空間 ； 區位機會之窗 ； evolution of industrial district ； path dependency ； institutional space ； location window of opportunity

土地經濟年刊

24期（2013 / 07 / 01）

1 - 32

繁體中文

過去工業地域文獻多以廠商為研究主體，扣連聚集經濟、內生成長、創新系統、網絡組織與治理等概念而有不同實證研究，較少論及地方性制度空間的角色。本研究主要闡明臺北市工業地域的演化過程中制度空間的角色與轉化以及制度變遷的路徑依賴驅動因素，並探討路徑創造可能性。研究結果發現，工業地域演化過程受地租、全球化、去工業化及產權等因素特徵化路徑，並依交易成本與管制區分工業區、編定工業區、特定專用區及分區變更等演化路徑；地方政府以土地使用鬆綁的彈性制度性調整策略回應創造全球化空間，並支配性地以內科品牌制度再生產，引導工業地域朝去工業化地景轉型；強制性與誘致性的制度變遷互動演化過程與新的制度性調整引導生物科技、IC設計及數位內容、影視、策略性產業、企業總部等新的區位之窗機會；工業地域伴隨路徑依賴慣性演化而有制度趨同現象，大內科企業總部的繁榮經濟地景則為路徑依賴學習對象並自我強化經濟發展；創新加值的區中有區與突破制度閉鎖的浮動分區，路徑創造區位機會之窗。

In the past the industrial district literature study mainly includes manufacturers, buckle connected agglomeration economies, endogenous growth, innovation systems, network organization and governance concept and different empirical studies. They rarely discuss the role of the local institutional space. This study was to clarify the role and conversion of the institutional space and the dependant driven factor of the institutional change during Taipei's industrial district evolution. The possibility of creating new paths is also included. The results showed that, affected by factors like government rent, industrial district evolution, globalization, de-industrialization and property right the path became characterized. The evolutionary path of zoning industrial district, industrial district establishment, specifying designated district and zoning change was depended on transaction costs and regulatory distinction; the local government respond to the globalization process with flexible institutional strategy and create globalization space to dominantly guiding the de-industrialization transformation of industrial district; the mandatory and inducible institution's transform, interaction, and evolution and new institutional adjustment can guide biological technology, IC design and digital content, media, strategic industries, corporate headquarters to achieve location window of opportunity; the industrial district with dependant and customary path evolution consist a phenomenon of institutional convergence, compared with large corporate headquarters' prosperity and economic landscape in Neihu Technology Park is a living example of path dependency and self-reinforcing economic development; innovation and value-added of ”District within a district” and break institutional lock-in of ”Floating Zoning” in industrial district , path created the location window of opportunity.

1. 麻匡復、邊泰明(2006)。無須政府的產業群聚？內湖科技園區發展的公共領域與制度變遷。公共行政學報，20，1-32。
   連結：
2. 湯國榮、莊翰華、曾宇良(2011)。失序的空間發展─都市計畫中工業區住宅化的解構分析。華岡地理學報，27，1-17。
   連結：
3. 楊友仁(2004)。經濟地理學的制度轉向：一個理論性回顧與研究取向的建議。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報，12，69-80。
   連結：
4. 臺北市政府產業發展局科技產業服務中心(2012) ， 臺北科技走廊，http://www.doed.taipei.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=26792&CtUnit=14783&BaseDSD=7&mp=105006
5. Amin, A.(ed.),Thrift, N.(ed.)(1994).Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
6. Arthur, W. B.(1989).Competing technologies, increasing returns, and 'lock-in' by historical events.Economic Journal,99(394),116-131.
7. Asheim, B.(1996).Industrial Districts as'Learning Regions': A Condition for Prosperity.European Planning Studies,4(4),379-400.
8. Bathelt, H.,Boggs, J. S.(2003).Toward a reconceptualization of regional development paths: is Leipzig's media cluster a continuation of a rupture with the past?.Economic Geography,79(3),265-93.
9. Belussi, F.(Ed),Gottardi, G.(Ed),Rullani, E.(Ed)(2003).The Technological Evolution of Districts.Boston, MA:Kluwer.
10. Belussi, F.,Pilotti, L.(2002).Knowledge creation, learning and innovation in Italian industrial districts.Geografiska Annaler Series B,84(2),125-139.
11. Belussi, F.,Sedita, S.R.(2009).Life-cycle vs. Multiple Path Dependency in Industrial Districts.European Planning Studies,17(4),505-528.
12. Boschma, R.,Lambooy, J.(1999).Evolutionary economics and economic geography.Journal of Evolutionary Economics,9(4),411-429.
13. Boschma, R.A.,van der Knaap, G.A.(1997).New technology and windows of locational opportunity: indeterminacy, creativity and chance.Economics and Evolution,Cheltenham:
14. Canie¨ls, M.,Romijn, H.(2005).What drives innovativeness in industrial clusters? Transcending the debate.Cambridge Journal of Economics,29(4),497-515.
15. Cooke, P.,Uranga, M. G.,Etxebarria, G.(1998).Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective.Environment and Planning A,30(9),1563-1584.
16. David, P. A.(1985).Clio & the economics of QWERTY.American Economic Review,75(2),332-337.
17. Ellison, Glenn,Glaeser, Edward L.(1997).Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach.Journal of Political Economy,105(5),889-927.
18. Hodgson, G.M.(1993).Economics and Evolution: Bring Life Back into Economics.Cambridge:Polity Press.
19. Humphrey, J.,Schmitz, H.(2002).How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?.Regional Studies,36(9),1017-1027.
20. Humphrey, J.,Schmitz, H.(1995).Principles for Promoting Clusters & Networks of SMEs.Vienna:United Nations Industrial.
21. Lambooy, J. G.(2002).Knowledge & urban economic development: an evolutionary perspective.Urban Studies,39(5/6),1019-1035.
22. Loasby, B.(2000).Market institutions and economic evolution.Journal of Evolutionary Economics,10(3),297-309.
23. Mahoney, James W.(2001).Path-Dependent Explanations of Regime Change: Central America in Comparative Perspective.Comparative International Development,36(1),111-141.
24. Markusen, A.(1996).Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology on Industrial Districts.Economic Geography,72(3),293-313.
25. Martin, R.,Sunley, P.(2006).Path dependence and regional economic evolution.Journal of Economic Geography,6(4),395-437.
26. Moulaert, F.,Sekia, F.(2003).Territorial innovation models: a critical survey.Regional Studies,37,289-302.
27. North, D.(1990).Institutions, Institutional change and Economic Performance.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
28. Poter, M.E.(1998).Clusters and the new economics of competition.Harvard Business Review,76,77-90.
29. Sammarra, A.,Belussi, F.(2006).Evolution and relocation in fashion-led Italian districts: Evidence from two case-studies.Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,18(6),543-562.
30. Schienstock, Gerd(2007).From Path Dependency to Path Creation. Finland on its Way to the Knowledge-Based Economy.Current Sociology,55(1),92-109.
31. Scott, A. J.(2006).Geography and Economy.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
32. Setterfield, M.(1997).Rapid Growth abd Relative Decline: Modelling Macroeconomic Dynamics with Hysteresis.London:Macmillan.
33. Sheppard, E.(ed.),Barnes, T.J.(ed.)(2000).A Companion to Economic Geography.Oxford:Blackwell.
34. Storper, M.(1997).The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy.New York:Guilford Press.
35. Sydow, J.,Schreyogg, G.,Koch, J.(2005).Organizational Paths:Path Dependency and Beyond.21st EGOS Colloquium,Berlin, Germany:
36. To¨dling, F.,Trippl, M.(2004).Like Phoenix from the Ashes? The renewal of Clusters in Old Industrial Areas.Urban Studies,41(5-6),1175-1195.
37. Tyre, M.,Orlikowski, J.(1994).Windows of opportunity: Emporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations.Organization Science,5(1),98-118.
38. 財團法人台大建築與城鄉研究發展基金會(1996)。,臺北市政府都市發展局。
39. 楊瑞龍(1994)。論我國制度變遷方式與制度選擇目標的衝突及其協調。經濟研究，1994(5)，40-49。