题名

公司治理機制對創新、多角化策略及公司績效之影響-研發密集產業之實證

并列篇名

The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Innovation and Diversification Strategies as Well as on Performance: R&D-Intensive Industry

DOI

10.6160/2007.03.02

作者

洪榮華(Jung-Hua Hung);陳香如(Hsiang-Ju Chen);林慧珍(Hui-Chen Lin)

关键词

公司治理 ; 創新策略 ; 多角化策略 ; 中介效果 ; 干擾效果 ; Corporate Governance ; Innovation Strategy ; Diversification Strategy ; Mediating Effect ; Moderating Effect

期刊名称

中山管理評論

卷期/出版年月

15卷1期(2007 / 03 / 01)

页次

37 - 60

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文採固定/隨機效果模型,探討公司治理變數與公司策略、績效的關係,以研發密集產業為對象,期間為1997 到2001 年。理論上,治理機制的發揮,將促進股東的利益,抑制經理人的不良企圖;股東偏好創新策略,以極大化其財富;經理人則傾向多角化策略,以極大化自身效用。實證結果顯示,公司治理機制和創新策略、市場績效的關係多與預期相符,和多角化策略、會計績效的關係則異同參半。其他發現如下:(1)策略變數的中介與干擾效果皆只獲部分支持,(2)使用不同的績效指標會得到不同的結果,(3)管理者持股率的非線性,僅在符號上呈現,未具統計顯著性。

英文摘要

This paper uses fixed/random effects model analysis to investigate the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on strategies and performance for R&D-intensive industries during 1997-2001. Theoretically, corporate governance protects stockholders from managerial opportunism. Stockholders prefer wealth maximizing innovation strategies while managers prefer to maximize their own utility through diversification strategies. Our results show that the relationships between corporate governance mechanisms and innovation strategy are almost consistent with our expectation, yet only weakly supported in cases where diversification was adopted. Other findings include the following: (1) The mediating and moderating effects of strategy variables are only slightly significant. (2) Empirical results are varied across performance proxies. (3) Management ownership has an insignificantly nonlinear impact on performance.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Agrawal, A.,Mandelker, G.N.(1990).Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendments.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,25(2),143-161.
  2. Anderson, R. C.,Bates, T. W.,Bizjak, J. M.,Lemmon, M. L.(2000).Corporate Governance and Firm Diversification.Financial Management,5-22.
  3. Ayadi, F.,Dufrene, U. B.,Obi, C. P.(1996).Firm Performance Measures: Temporal Roadblock to Innovation?.Managerial Finance,22,18-32.
  4. Baysinger, B. D.,Kosnik, R. D.,Turk, T. A.(1991).Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy.Academy of Management Journal,34(1),205-214.
  5. Baysinger, B.,Hoskisson, R. E.(1990).The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy.Academy of Management Review,15(1),72-87.
  6. Chaganti, R.,Damanpour, F.(1991).Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance.Strategic Management Journal,12,479-491.
  7. Denis, D. J.,Denis, D. K.,Sarin, A.(1997).Agency Problems, Equity Ownership, and Corporate Diversification.Journal of Finance,52(1),135-160.
  8. Fama, E. F.,Jensen, M. C.(1983).Separation of Ownership and Control.Journal of Law and Economics,26,301-325.
  9. Fosberg, R. H.(1999).Leadership Structure and CEO Compensation.American Business Review,17,50-56.
  10. Goodstein, J.,Gautam, K.,Boeker, W.(1994).The Effects of Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change.Strategic Management Journal,15,241-250.
  11. Graves, S. B.,Waddock, S. A.(1990).Institutional Ownership and Control: Implications for Long-Term Corporate Strategy.Academy of Management Executive,4(1),75-83.
  12. Hair, J. F.,Jr., Anderson,R. E., Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate Data Analysis.fifth edition, N.J:Prentice-Hall.
  13. Hill, C. W. L.,Snell, S. A.(1988).External Control, Corporate Strategy, and Firm Performance in Research-Intensive Industries.Strategic Management Journal,9,577-590.
  14. Hill, C. W. L,Hitt, M. A.,Hoskisson, R. E.(1988).Declining U.S. Competitiveness: Reflections on a Crisis.Academy of Management Executive,2(1),51-60.
  15. Jacquemin, A. P.,Berry, C. H.(1979).Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth.Journal of Industrial Economics,27(4),359-369.
  16. Kochhar, R.,David, P.(1996).Institutional Investors and Firm Innovation: A Test of Competing Hypotheses.Strategic Management Journal,17,73-84.
  17. Lang, L. H. P.,Stulz, R. M.(1994).Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance.Journal of Political Economy,102(6),1248-1280.
  18. Leland, H. E.,Pyle, D. H.(1977).Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation.Journal of Finance,32(2),371-384.
  19. Morck, R.,Shleifer, A.,Vishny, R. W.(1988).Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.Journal of Financial Economics,20,293-315.
  20. Pearce, J. A.,Zahra, S. A.(1992).Board Composition from Strategic Contingency Perspective.Journal of Management Studies,29(4),411-438.
  21. Pettigrew, A. M.(1992).On Studying Managerial Elites.Strategic Management Journal,13,163-182.
  22. Pfeffer, J.(1972).Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment.Administrative Science Quarterly,17,218-228.
  23. Teece, D. J.(1980).Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1,223-247.
  24. Weisbach, M. S.(1988).Outside Directors and CEO Turnover.Journal of Financial Economics,20,431-460.
  25. Yermack, D.(1996).Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors.Journal of Financial Economics,40,185-211.
  26. 王元章(2001)。內部人持股、風險、股利、負債、投資與公司價值。證券市場發展季刊,13(3),29-69。
  27. 杜玉振、黃荃、林容竹(2002)。董事會特性對經營績效、財務決策之影響研究-以台灣上市公司為例。管理與系統,9(3),345-368。
  28. 邱毅、張訓華(1991)。股權結構、董事會組成與企業財務績效。台北市銀月刊,22(5),11-31。
  29. 俞海琴、周本鄂(1994)。臺灣地區上市公司董監事、關係人持股比率和公司托賓Q關係之研究。管理評論,13(1),79-98。
  30. 黃旭輝、陳隆麒、謝劍平(2001)。公司成長機會對管理者持股與董事會組成影響之研究。中山管理評論,9(1),37-59。
  31. 詹文男、張朝清、曾秀芳(2002)。我國資通訊產業智慧資本調查分析。技術尖兵,32-34。
  32. 劉韻僖、葉匡時(1999)。企業監控之研究。經濟情勢暨評論,5(1),1-22。
被引用次数
  1. 黃心怡(2016)。股票購回宣告效果之研究-BCG模型觀點。臺中科技大學企業管理系碩士班學位論文。2016。1-59。
  2. 李聖婕(2017)。從公司治理探討食安事件對食品相關產業股價之影響。臺中科技大學企業管理系碩士班學位論文。2017。1-67。