题名

受稅率影響之異常財務盈餘與公司價值之關係

并列篇名

A Study of the Impact of Abnormal Financial Earnings on Firm Value: A Perspective of After-tax Valuation

DOI

10.6160/2007.06.05

作者

林松宏(Song-Horng Lin)；黃瑞靜(Jui-Ching Huang)

关键词

異常盈餘 ； 異常財務盈餘 ； 非稅成本 ； 兩稅合一 ； 股東可扣抵稅額 ； Residual income ； Abnormal financial earnings ； Non-tax cost ； Integrated taxes system ； Imputation tax credit

期刊名称

中山管理評論

卷期/出版年月

15卷2期（2007 / 06 / 01）

页次

393 - 431

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文將公司所得稅及股東所得稅納入Feltham and Ohlson (1995)、Harris and Kemsley(1999)及Zeng(2001)之異常盈餘模式中，延伸成為稅後評價模式，此模式認為公司價值是「帳面價值」與「稅後淨利」的函數，在公司稅存在情況下，利息費用具有抵稅效果，因此財務資產所產生的異常財務盈餘不但存在，而且可能增加公司價值。在稅後評價模式下，本文預期負債融資績效會對異常財務盈餘反應係數發生影響，實證結果發現異常財務盈餘確實可增加公司價值，且財務資產帳面值、營業資產帳面值、異常營業盈餘等亦與公司價值相關，惟未來異常財務盈餘持續性與未來異常營業盈餘持續性並不相同。 然而，在將非稅成本與兩稅合一因素納入模式後，實證結果指出非稅成本愈大的公司，其異常財務盈餘係數愈小，間接證實異常財務盈餘與公司融資活動有關。同時，在其他條件不變情況下，由於營所稅已非公司費用而係股東綜所稅之預繳，因此實證結果也指出兩稅合一後公司異常財務盈餘對公司價值之提高，較兩稅合一前為小，且有效稅率愈高的公司，其異常財務盈餘對公司價值的提高也愈小。此種結果也間接證實兩稅合一會使股東可扣抵稅額的租稅利益增加，進而減少舉債的租稅誘因。
英文摘要

This paper extends Feltham-Ohlson (1995), Harris & Kemsley (1999) and Zeng's (2001) residual income models by adding corporate tax and shareholders tax to form the tax-adjusted market valuation model, and suggests that the market value of a firm is a function of book value and after-tax earnings. Due to tax deductibility on interest expense, financial assets can generate non-zero abnormal financial earnings, and thus enhance the market value of a firm. We expect, under the tax-adjusted framework, that debt-financing performance has impacts on earnings response coefficient of abnormal financial earnings. Our empirical results indicate that abnormal financial earnings certainly can increase firm market value and that financial assets book value, operating assets book value and abnormal operating earnings are related to firm value. But, earnings persistence of abnormal financial earnings and that of abnormal operating earnings are different. However, after incorporating non-tax cost and integrated taxes system into the tax-adjusted market valuation model, we find that abnormal financial earnings response coefficient is smaller for firms with relatively higher non-tax cost. Such result indirectly confirms the influence of debt-financing activities on abnormal financial earnings. In addition, ceteris paribus, since corporate income tax is no longer an operating expense for an enterprise, instead, it can be used to offset shareholders' individual income taxes. These empirical results also suggest that abnormal financial earnings response coefficient after the enactment of 1998 integrated taxes system in Taiwan is lower than that before 1998, and abnormal financial earnings response coefficient is lower for firms with relatively higher effective tax rate either before or after 1998. Such finding also indirectly confirms firms with greater imputation tax credit will tend to have lower debt under integrated taxes system.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 汪瑞芝、陳明進(2004)。兩稅合一制前後上市公司股利發放之實證研究。管理評論，21(2)，257-278。
    連結：
  2. 趙雅儀、吳清在(2005)。兩稅合一稅制對上市公司股利稅評價效果影響之研究。中華會計學刊，5(2)，169-205。
    連結：
  3. Amir, E.,M. Kirschenheiter,K. Wilard.(2001).The aggregation and valuation of deferred taxes.Review of Accounting Studies,6(2/3),275-297.
  4. Amir, E.,M. Kirschenheiter,K. Wilard.(1997).The valuation of deferred taxes.Contemporary Accounting Research,14(4),597-622.
  5. Amir, E.M.,T. Sougiannis.(1999).Analysts` interpretation and investors` valuation of tax carry forwards.Contemporary Accounting Research,16(1),1-33.
  6. Amoako-Adu, B.(1983).Corporate valuation and personal taxes: Extension and application to Canada.The Financial Review,18,281-291.
  7. Amoako-Adu, B.,M. Rashid,M. Stebbins(1992).Capital gains tax and equity values: Empirical test of stock price reaction to the introduction and reduction of capital gains tax exemption.Journal of Banking and Finance,16,275-287.
  8. Working paper
  9. Working paper
  10. Bernard, V. L.(1995).the Feltham-Ohlson framework: Implication for empiricists.Contemporary Accounting Research,11,737-747.
  11. Working paper
  12. Biddle, G.G.,R.M. Bowen,J.S. Wallace.(1997).Does EVA beat earnings? Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values.Journal of Accounting and Economics,24,301-336.
  13. Bradley, M.,G. A. Jarrell,E. H. Kim.(1984).On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence.The Journal of Finance,39(3),857-878.
  14. Brown, L. D.(1996).Influential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis.Accounting, Organizations and Society,21,723-754.
  15. Callen, J. L.,D. Segal.(2005).Empirical tests of the Feltham-Ohlson (1995) model.Review of Accounting Studies,10,409-429.
  16. Cloyd, B.,J. Pratt,T. Stock(1996).The use of financial accounting choice to support aggressive tax positions: Public and private firms.Journal of Accounting Research,34(1),23-43.
  17. Dechow, P.M.,A.P. Hutton,R. G. Sloan.(1999).An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model.Journal of Accounting and Economics,26,1-34.
  18. Dhaliwal, D.,R. Trezevant,S. W. Wang.(1992).Taxes, investment-related tax shields and capital structure.Journal of the American Taxation Association,14,1-21.
  19. Feitham, G.,J. Ohlson.(1995).Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operation and financial activities.Contemporary Accounting Research,11,689-731.
  20. Ferri, M. G.,W. H. Jones.(1979).Determinant of financial structure: A new methodological approach.The Journal of Finance,34,631-644.
  21. Francis, J.,P. Olsson,D. R. Oswald.(2000).Comparing the accuracy and explanatory ability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value estimations.Journal of Accounting Research,38(1),45-70.
  22. Frankel, R.,C. M. C. Lee.(1998).Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock return.Journal of Accounting and Economics,25,283-319.
  23. Givoly, D.,C. Hayn,A. R. Ofer,O. Sang.(1992).Taxes and capital structure Evidence from firms' response to the Tax Reform Act of 1986.The Review of Financial Studies,5(2),331-355.
  24. Graham, J. R.(1996).Debt and marginal tax rate.Journal of Financial Economics,41(1),41-74.
  25. Graham, J. R.(2003).Taxes and corporate finance: A review.The Review of Financial Studies,16(4),1075-1129.
  26. Graham, J. R.(2000).How Big Are the tax benefits of debt?.The Journal of Finance LV,5,1901-1941.
  27. Guenther, D.,E. Maydew,S. Nutter.(1997).Financial reporting, tax costs, and book-tax conformity.Journal of Accounting and Economics,23(3),225-248.
  28. Harris, T. S.,D. Kemsley.(1999).Dividend taxation in firm valuation: New evidence.Journal of Accounting Research,37,375-291.
  29. Kern, B. B.,M. H. Morris.(1992).Taxes and firm size: The effect of tax legislation during the 1986s.Journal of the American Taxation Association,14,80-96.
  30. Lev, B.(1989).On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: Lessons and directions from two decades of empirical research.Journal of Accounting Research,27,153-201.
  31. Lev, B.,T. Sougiannis(1996).The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D.Journal of Accounting and Economics,21,107-138.
  32. Liu, Chi-Chun,Suming Lin,Der-Fen Huang.(2001).Factors influencing corporate effective tax rates in Taiwan.Taiwan Accounting Review,2,57-84.
  33. Lo, K.,T. Lvs(2000).The ohlson model: Contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications.Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,15(3),337-367.
  34. Lundholm, R.,T. O`Keefe.(2001).Reconciling value estimates from discounted cash flow model and the residual income model.Contemporary Accounting Research,18(2),311-335.
  35. MacKie-Mason, J.K.(1990).Do taxes affect corporate financing decisions?.The Journal of Finance,15(5),1471-1493.
  36. Miller, M.(1977).Debt and taxes.The Journal of Finance,32,216-276.
  37. Mills, L.,K. Newberry(2001).The influence of tax and non-tax costs on book-tax reporting differences: Public and private firms.The Journal of the American Taxation Association,23(1),1-19.
  38. Modigliani, F.,M. Miller.(1958).The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment.American Economic Review,48,261-297.
  39. Modigliani, F.,M. Miller.(1963).Corporate income taxes and the costs of capital: A correction.American Economic Review,LIII(3),433-443.
  40. Ohlson, J.(2005).On accounting-based valuation formulae.Review of Accounting Studies,10,323-347.
  41. Ohlson, J.(1995).Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation.Contemporary Accounting Research,Spring,661-687.
  42. Omer, T. C.,K. H. Molloy,D. A. Ziebart.(1991).Measurement of effective corporate tax rates using financial statement information.Journal of the American Taxation Association,13,57-72.
  43. Penman, S. H.(1996).The articulation of price-earnings ratios and market-to-book ratio and the evaluation of growth.Journal of Accounting Research,34(2),235-259.
  44. Penman, S. H.,T. Sougiannis.(1998).A comparison of dividend, cash flow and earnings approaches to equity valuation.Contemporary Accounting Research,15,343-383.
  45. Penman, S. H.,T. Sougiannis.(1997).The dividend displacement property and the substitution of anticipated earnings for dividends in equity valuation.The Accounting Review,72(1),1-21.
  46. Porcano, T.M.(1986).Corporate tax rates: Progressive, proportional, or regressive.Journal of the American Taxation Association,8,17-31.
  47. Rajan, R. G.,L. Zingales.(1995).What do we know about capital structure choice? Some evidence from international data.The Journal of Finance,50,1421-1460.
  48. Richardson, G.,S. Tinaikar.(2004).Accounting based valuation models: what have we learned?.Accounting and Finance,44,223-255.
  49. Scholes, M.,M. Wolfson,M. Erickson,E. Maydew,T. Shevlin(2001).Taxes and Business Strategy A Planning Approach.Upper Saddle River, NJ.:Prentice-Hall..
  50. Scott, W. R.(2000).Financial Accounting Theory.Prentice-Hall..
  51. Shum, P. M.(1996).Taxes and corporate debt policy in Canada: An empirical investigation.Canadian Journal of Economics,29,556-572.
  52. Trezevant, R. H.(1992).Debt financing and tax status: Test of the substitution effect and the tax exhaustion hypothesis using firms` response to the economic recovery tax act of 1981.The Journal of Finance,47(4),1557-1568.
  53. Trezevant, R. H.(1996).LIFO adoption and the tax shield substitution effect.Journal of the American Taxation Association,18,18-31.
  54. Wilkie, P. J.,S. T. Limberg.(1993).Measuring explicit tax (dis) Advantage for corporate taxpayers: An alternative to average effective tax rates.Journal of the American Taxation Association,15,46-71.
  55. Yu, H. C.,M. C. Chi,C. Y. Hsu.(2003).The nature of corporate income tax under a full imputation tax regime: A test of functional fixation.Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,30,589-619.
  56. Working Paper
  57. 吳清在、林松宏、陳亭如(2004)。兩稅合一是甭改變「營利事業所得稅」之股價攸關性。實踐大學高雄校區2004管理與創意研討會
  58. 汪瑞芝、陳明進、台北大學會計系編印(2002)。兩稅合一前很上市公司資本結構之實證研究。2002會計理論與實務研討會論文集
  59. 周行一、徐燕山、蘇瓜藤(2000)。淺談管理學門財務與會計領域之新進學者及博士生如何掌握研究方向與方法論。人文與社會科學簡訊，3(2)，55-59。
  60. 孫克難、孫運璿學術基金會贊助(1997)。兩稅合一方案之檢討與改進。兩稅合一研討會實錄
  61. 孫明德(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中興大學企業管理研究所。
  62. 張仲岳、梁鈺涓(2001)。所得稅暨退休金會計準則公報攸關陸資訊品質之探討。會計評論，33，27-55。
  63. 張慧珊(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版博士論文。
  64. 曹壽民、金成隆、藍心梅、陳進雄、東吳大學會計系編印(2001)。會計基礎評價模式在台灣股市的適用性之研究。2001會計理論與實務研討會論文集
  65. 許崇源(2000)。兩稅合一制對我國營利事業所得稅會計處理及投資人財務報表使用之影響。會計研究月刊，172，42-59。
  66. 許崇源、俞洪昭、洪盈城、戚務君(2000)。兩稅合一制度對公司屬性與股票報酬關聯性之影響。會計評論，32，81-101。
  67. 許崇源、彭火樹、劉正田、東吳大學會計系編印(1998)。Felthalm and Ohlsoll會計基礎評價模式及線性資訊模式之辨正與測試。1998會計新環境國際研究討會論文集
  68. 陳明進(2002)。營利事業有效利稅率決定因素之實證研究。會計評論，34，57-75。
  69. 傅鍾仁(1998)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學會計研究所未出版博士論文。
  70. 黃瑞靜、徐守德、廖四郎(2001)。兩稅台一對公司價值、股利政策與資本結構之影響－動態資本結構模型之應用與台灣產業的實證研究。管理評論，20(2)，55-86。
  71. 劉正田(2001)。研發支出資本化之會計基礎股票評價。會計評論，33，1-26。
  72. 劉正田(1999)。企業商譽與研發投資關係之研究。科技管理學刊，48(2)，105-124。
被引用次数
  1. 黃雅婷,黃朝信,陳計良,李德冠(2019)。股東可扣抵稅額減半規定對公司現金股利政策之影響：從所有權結構來探討。中原企管評論，17(2)，43-71。
  2. 汪瑞芝、李依純(2015)。所得稅資訊內涵對盈餘持續性之影響。當代會計，16(2)，145-173。
  3. 魏妤珊、廖俊煌、黃法蓉(2016)。董事身份特性與企業風險管理對企業避稅之影響。商管科技季刊，17(2)，141-183。
  4. 詹凌菁、彭火樹、郭翠菱、吳安妮(2016)。臺灣會計領域研究之回顧與展望。管理學報，33(1)，139-187。
print cancel