組合式保證金系統之改良與比較：以TAIFEX交易資料實證

Portfolio-Based Margining Systems, Amelioration and Comparison: Evidence by TAIFEX Trading Data

10.6160/2013.03.01

黃瑋苓(Wei-Ling Huang)；劉德明(Der-Ming Lieu)

保證金系統 ； 單因子市場模型 ； margining system ； market model ； SPAN ； TIMS ； TAIFEX

中山管理評論

21卷1期（2013 / 03 / 01）

11 - 53

繁體中文

本研究分析且改良結合單因子市場模型與SPAN邏輯之組合式保證金系統Beta-Simulation，並以TAIFEX 中全體投資人實際未平倉部位投資組合為樣本做實證分析，檢驗此新系統相對於SPAN系統的優勢與用於實際交易市場的可行性。實證結果發現，以整戶交易部位風險暴露來做為保證金計算依據的Beta-Simulation系統，確實改進了SPAN 與TIMS 面臨跨商品交易之風險折抵問題並有效降低資金成本，不但保證金需求平均只有TAIFEX之SPAN保證金的74%，也可給予與SPAN同樣的保護。此外，本研究不但依實際市場客戶投資組合分配資料進行回溯測試，也以金融海嘯期間市場資料對Beta-Simulation系統進行壓力測試。結果， 在市場價格劇烈變動時，Beta-Simulation系統仍可以確實地捕捉投資人在實際市場波動下所面臨之風險而提供有效的風險衡量與保護。

This paper analyzes the strength and weakness of new portfolio-based margining system-Beta-Simulation which combines single factor market model with SPAN-like logic to calculate margin requirements. The new model is empirically tested using all actual open positions by Taiwan Futures Exchange's clearing members. Evidences show that the new model is not only easier than SPAN in computational procedure but also offer sounder theoretical basis than SPAN or TIMS for credit offset estimates among individual stock options or Futures. Back tests show that the new model only needs 74% of TAIFEX SPAN margin requirements but it can offer the same protection in the same confidence interval. The new model also passes the Stress test simulated by testing against the period when the world financial tsunami swayed the world.

1. 周恆志、陳勝源(2004)。漲跌幅限制與極值理論在期貨保證金設定上之應用。風險管理學報，6(2)，207-228。
   連結：
2. 劉德明、戴良安(2007)。股票衍生性金融商品組合保證金系統之建構與比較。中山管理評論，15(4)，809-846。
   連結：
3. Black, F.(1976).The Pricing of Commodity Contracts.Journal of Financial Economics,3(1-2),167-179.
4. Black, F.,Scholes, M.(1973).The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.Journal of Political Economy,81(3),637-654.
5. Cotter, J.,Dowd, K.(2010).Estimating Financial Risk Measures for Futures Positions: A Nonparametric Approach.Journal of Futures Markets,30(7),689-703.
6. Cotter, J.,Dowd, K.(2006).Extreme Spectral Risk Measures: An Application to Futures Clearinghouse Margin Requirements.Journal of Banking and Finance,30(12),3469-3485.
7. Figlewski, S.(1984).Margins and Market Integrity: Margin Setting for Stock Index Futures and Options.Journal of Futures Markets,4(3),385-416.
8. Geisst, C. R.(2002).Wheels of Fortune: the History of Speculation from Scandal to Respectability.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
9. Hartzmark, M.(1986).The Effect of Changing Margin Levels on Futures Performance.Journal of Business,59(2),147-180.
10. Hunter, W.(1986).Rational Margins on Futures Contracts: Initial Margins.Review of Research in Futures Markets,5(2),160-173.
11. Jorion, P.(2001).Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk.New York:McGraw-Hill.
12. Kupiec, P. H.(1994).The Performance of S&P 500 Futures Product Margins under the SPAN Margining System.Journal of Futures Markets,14(7),789-811.
13. Kupiec, P. H.,White, A. P.(1996).Regulatory Competition and the Efficiency of Alternative Derivative Product Margining System.Journal of Futures Markets,16(8),943-968.
14. Lam, K.,Sin, C. Y.,Leung, R.(2004).A Theoretical Framework to Evaluate Different Margin-Setting Methodologies.Journal of Futures Markets,24(2),117-145.
15. Longin, F. M.(1999).Optimal Margin Level in Futures Markets: Extreme Price Movements.Journal of Futures Markets,19(2),127-152.
16. OCC(2008).Financial Guarantee.Chicago:Options Clearing Corporation.
17. Sharpe, F.(1963).A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis.Management Science,9(2),227-293.
18. 李進生、顧廣平、林研秀、袁淑芳(2006)。SPAN保證金系統風險參數之設計。臺灣期貨市場，8(4)，51-63。
19. 林蒼祥、顧廣平、孫效孔(2006)。SPAN系統與現行保證金制度之比較。臺灣期貨市場，8(4)，22-50。
20. 張森林、石百達、李存修、施宗佐(2009)。臺股指數期貨保證金估計模型及結構比之研究。期貨與選擇權學刊，2(2)，109-138。
21. 劉德明(2000)。風險值計量模型之理論與實證—以風險值的角度比較SPAN 與TIMS對含選擇權的投資組合風險衡量的正確性。台北:臺灣證券集中保管公司。
22. 蔡蒔銓、林蒼祥、李進生、段昌文(2006)。SPAN系統風險參數之敏感度分析。臺灣期貨市場，8(5)，29-43。