應用決策實驗室分析（(DEMATEL）與網路層級分析法（ANP）在研發專案計畫評選

Application of DEMATEL and ANP to the R&D Project Selection

10.6160/2014.09.04

周國村(Gwo-Tsuen Jou)；袁建中(Benjamin J. C. Yuan)

科技專案 ； 研發計畫評選 ； 多準則決策 ； 決策實驗室分析法 ； 層級分析法 ； 網路層級分析法 ； TDP ； R&D Project Selection ； MCDM ； DEMATEL ； AHP ； ANP

中山管理評論

22卷3期（2014 / 09 / 01）

543 - 572

繁體中文

本研究結合決策實驗室分析法（DEMATEL）與網路層級分析法（ANP）應在研究機構研發計畫提案評選。首先以決策實驗室分析法找出需求、技術與效益三個構面之間相依與回饋性，以及相互連結的因果關係。另，以網路層級分析法（Analytic Network Process, ANP）來評估準則之間可能存有的相互依存和回饋問題以及計算評選準則的權重。本文並針對紡織所兩個關鍵計畫：「產業用紡織品研究與開發四年計畫」包括十個子計劃提案，與「機能性紡織產業關鍵技術研發四年計畫」包括八個子計畫提案進行評選。本研究邀請五位專家以權重評分法進行評選，分別淘汰排序較落後的子計畫提案。另，本研究對於某些得分中等的計畫提案在某些評選準則得分較低者，可提供進一步改善的空間與建議。

A combination of methods, DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) and ANP (Analytic Network Process), is employed to the R&D project selection in a research institute. DEMATEL was first used to find the dependence and feedback, and a casual-effect diagram among three aspects, i.e. needs, technology, and benefit. ANP was then used to determine different weight of criteria in each aspect. To verify the feasibility, two key technology R&D programs from Taiwan Textile Research Institute (TTRI), ＂Technical Textiles R&D Program＂ and ＂Functional Textiles R&D Program＂, which consist of ten and eight projects respectively, were evaluated by five technical experts to give their subjective score on each criterion of the projects. The lower ranking projects were rejected based on the score weighting method. However, some projects with intermediate scores could be improved or revised by looking into their individual performance scores of each criterion.

1. Arbel, A.,Shapira, Y.(1999).A decision framework for evaluating vacuum pumping technology.Journal of Vacuum Science Technology,4(2),387-411.
2. Berry, M. M.,Taggart, J. H.(1994).Managing technology and innovation: A review.R&D Management,24(4),341-353.
3. Chiu, Y. J.,Chen, H. C.,Tzeng, G. H.,Shyu, J. Z.(2006).Marketing strategy based on customer behavior for the LCD-TV.International Journal of Management and Decision Making,7(2-3),143-165.
4. Coldrick, S.,Longhurst, P.,Ivey, P.,Hannis, J.(2005).An R&D options selection model for investment decisions.Technovation,25(3),185-193.
5. Efstathiades, A.,Tassou, S. A.,Oxinos, G.,Antoniou, A.(2000).Advanced manufacturing technology transfer and implementation in developing countries: The case of the Cypriot manufacturing industry.Technovation,20(2),93-102.
6. Gerdsri, N.,Kocaoglu, D. F.(2007).Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to build a strategic framework for technology roadmapping.Mathematical and Computer Modelling,46(7-8),1071-1080.
7. Gregory, M. J.(1995).Technology Management: A process approach.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,209(5),347-355.
8. Hamalainen, R. P.,Salo, A. A.,Poysti, K.(1992).Observations about consensus seeking in a multiple criteriaenvironment.Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference,Hawaii, USA.:
9. Hori, S.,Shimizu, Y.(1999).Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems.Control Engineering Practice,7(11),1413-1419.
10. Hsu, Y. G.,Tzeng, G. H.,Shyu, J. Z.(2003).Fuzzy multiple criteria selection of government-sponsored frontier technology R&D projects.R&D Management,33(5),539-551.
11. Huang, C. C.,Chu, P. Y.,Chiang, Y. H.(2008).A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection.Omega,36(6),1038-1052.
12. Huang, G. O.,Mark, K. L.(1999).Current practices of engineering change management in UK manufacturing industries.International Journal of Operations and Production Management,19(1),21-37.
13. Lei, D. T.(2000).Industry evolution and competence development: The imperatives of technological convergence.International Journal of Technology Management,19(7-8),699-735.
14. Liou, J. J. H.,Tzeng, G. H.,Chang, H. C.(2007).Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model.Air Transport Management,13(4),243-249.
15. Melachrinoudis, E.,Rice, K.(1991).The prioritization of technologies in a research laboratory.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,38(3),269-278.
16. Ou Yang, Y. P.,Shieh, H. M.,Leu, J. D.,Tzeng, G. H.(2008).A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined with DEMATEL and ANP with Applications.International Journal of Operations Research,5(3),160-168.
17. Piipo, P.,Tuominen, M.(1990).Promoting innovation management by decision support systems: Facilitating new product' relevance to the corporate objectives.Consulting in innovation: Practice-methods-perspectives,Amsterdam, NL:
18. Prasad, A. V. S.,Somasekhara, N.(1990).The analytic hierarchy process for choice of technologies.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,38(2),151-158.
19. Ramanujam, V.,Saaty, T. L.(1981).Technological choice in the less developed countries: An analytical hierarchy approach.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,19(1),81-98.
20. Saaty, T. L.(1980).Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation.New York:McGraw-Hill.
21. Saaty, T. L.(1996).Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process.Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publications.
22. Sakakibara, M.(1997).Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan:who benefits and how.Research Policy,26(4-5),447-473.
23. Schroder, R.,Sohal, A. S.(1999).Organizational characteristics associated with AMT adoption: Towards a contingency framework.International Journal of Operations and Production Management,19(12),1270-1129.
24. Shehabuddeen, N.,Probert, D.,Phaal, R.(2006).From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework.Technovation,26(3),324-335.
25. Shen, Y. C.,Lin, G. T. R.,Tzeng, G. H.(2011).Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection.Expert Systems with Applications,38(3),1468-1481.
26. Steensma, K. H.,Fairbank, J. F.(1999).Internalizing external technology: A model of governance mode choice and an empirical assessment.The journal of high technology management research,10(1),1-35.
27. Suh, C. K.,Suh, E. H.,Baek, K. C.(1994).Prioritizing telecommunications technologies for long-range R&D planning to the year 2006.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,41(3),264-275.
28. Tamura, M.,Nagata, H.,Akazawa, K.(2003).Structural Modeling and systems analysis of various factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable society.The 3rd International Conference on Decision Support for Telecommuications and Information Society,Warsaw, Poland:
29. Torkkeli, M.,Tuominen, M.(2002).The contribution of technology selection to core competencies.International Journal of Production Economics,77(3),271-284.
30. Tzeng, G. H.,Chiang, C. H.,Li, C. W.(2007).Evaluating intertwined effects in elearning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL.Expert Systems with Applications,32(4),1028-1044.
31. Wu, W. W.,Lee, Y. T.(2007).Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process.Expert Systems with Applications,32(3),841-847.
32. Wu, W. Y.,Sukoco, B. M.,Li, C. Y.,Chen, S. H.(2009).An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for supplier selection with bundling problem.Expert Systems with Applications,36(2),2327-2337.
33. Yap, C.,Souder, W.(1993).A filter system for technology evaluation and selection.Technovation,13(7),449-469.
34. Yu, O. S.,Hsu, G. J. Y.,Chen, T. Y.(1998).Introduction to technological management:technological forecast and planning.Taipei, TW:Wu Nam Publishing Company.
35. 鄧振源(2005)。計畫評估─方法與運用。基隆:運籌規劃暨管理研究中心。
36. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（上）。中國統計學報，27(6)，5-22。

1. 廖珗洲,張憲寬,林子怡,余文德,王榮進(2022)。AIoT影像感測器在建築物安全應用與效益研究。建築學報，122，1-20。
2. 林文苑(2019)。鄉鎮市區層級災害耐韌力指標關聯性與權重之DANP分析以及空間聚集性分析之應用。臺灣土地研究，22(1)，59-103。
3. 謝昌亨、張曉楨(2017)。以決策實驗室法探討第三方支付業務之評估因素。會計與財金研究，10(1)，45-74。
4. 鄭青展、張曉楨、林君璘(2016)。航運金融服務授信評估因素之探討。會計與財金研究，9(2)，1-32。
5. 鍾政偉(2020)。應用專家決策模式建構地方創生發展觀光策略指標之研究。休閒產業管理學刊，13(1)，27-50。
6. (2023)。非營利組織轉型社會企業關鍵因素之初探：工作整合型社會企業為例。空大行政學報，37，27-56。