研發與創新抵免之優先性：階層分析法研究

Prioritizing R&D and Innovation Tax Credits: An AHP Survey

10.6160/2016.09.04

張元杰(Yuan-Chieh Chang)；陳旻男(Min-Nan Chen)；陳佳慶(Chia-Ching Chen)；林淵博(Yuan-Po Lin)

研發 ； 創新 ； 租稅抵免 ； 階層分析法 ； R&D ； Innovation ； Tax Credits ； Analytic Hierarchy Process

中山管理評論

24卷3期（2016 / 09 / 01）

531 - 564

繁體中文

本文探討研發與創新『分類』與『項目』的租稅抵免優先性，以奧斯陸手冊（Oslo Manual）為創新分類為基礎，參考台灣《產業創新條例－公司研究發展支出適用投資抵減辦法》中尚未被抵免的項目，提出4個創新分類與10個項目的階層分析（AHP, Analytic Hierarchy Process）問卷，共收集51份研發創新租稅抵免專家的意見。結果發現專家們對於研發與創新分類的優先抵免看法一致，依序為：產品創新、行銷創新、製程創新、組織創新；產業別在優先抵免項目有所異同，製造業與服務業有四個相同優先項目是“產品試製材料支出”、“導入新製程及方法所需教育訓練支出”、“產品檢驗測試支出”、“風險評估相關支出”，相異的優先項目是製造業的“市場研究測試支出”與服務業的“組織改善人員薪資”。最後提出對研發政策與產業創新條例修正之建議。

This study examines the priorities of new R&D and innovation tax credits. The paper develops an AHP (analytic hierarchy process) questionnaire focusing on four innovation categories based on the Oslo Manual and ten new items of R&D tax credits that have not been considered in the Industrial Innovation Stipulates, Taiwan. The dataset of fifty-one experts is collected via the AHP survey. The results reveal that all experts have similar priorities among innovation categories across manufacturing and service industries. The priorities are identified as follows: (1) product innovation, (2) market innovation, (3) process innovation and (4) organizational innovation. However, there are similar and different views on priorities of the ten items between these two sectors. The similar top four R&D tax credit items are listed as prototyping expense, new process training expense, product certification and verification expense, and product risk evaluation expense. Differently, the marketing research expense evaluated by the manufacturing experts and the staff salary for organizational innovations evaluated by the service experts are listed at the top priority. Finally, some policy implications for R&D and innovation tax credit are suggested.

1. 黃琝琇、林建甫(2010)。取消促進產業升級條例租稅減免之總體經濟效果。臺灣經濟預測與政策，41(1)，1-45。
   連結：
2. 經濟部工業局，2015，「公司研究發展支出適用投資抵減辦法」，http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=J0030113, accessed on August 3, 2016. (Industrial Development Bureau, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2015,“Regulations Governing the Reduction of Expenditures for Corporate Research and Development,” http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=J0030113, accessed on August 3, 2016.)
3. Arrow, K. J.(1962).Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention.The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors,Princeton, NJ:
4. Bloom, N.,Griffith, R.,Reenen, J. V.(2002).Do R&D tax credits work? evidence from a panel of countries.Journal of Public Economics,85(1),1-31.
5. Boden, M.(ed.),Miles, I.(ed.)(2000).Services and the Knowledge-Based Economy.London:Continuum.
6. Brouwer, E.,Kleinknecht, A.(1997).Measuring the unmeasurable: a country's non-R&D expenditure on product and service innovation.Research Policy,25(8),1235-1242.
7. Cappelen, A.,Fjarli, E.,Foyn, F.,Hageland, T.,Moen, J.,Raknerud, A.,Rybalka, M.(2010).Evaluation of the Norwegian R&D tax credit scheme.Journal of Technology Management and Innovation,5(3),96-109.
8. Cassiman, B.,Veugelers, R.(2002).R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium.American Economic Review,92(4),1169-1184.
9. Cummins, J. G.,Hassett, K. A.,Hubbard, R. G.(1996).Tax reform and investment: a cross-country comparison.Journal of Public Economics,62(1-2),237-273.
10. Damanpour, F.(1991).Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators.Academy of Management Journal,34(3),555-591.
11. David, A. P.,Hall, B. H.,Toole, A. A.(2000).Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? a review of the econometric evidence.Research Policy,29(4-5),497-529.
12. Djellal, F.,Francoz, D.,Gallouj, C.,Gallouj, F.,Jacquin, J.(2003).Revising the definition of research and development in the light of the specificities of services.Science and Public Policy,30(6),415-429.
13. Ettlie, J. E.,Reza, E. M.(1992).Organizational integration and process innovation.Academy of Management Journal,35(4),795-827.
14. Evangelista, R.,Savona, M.(2003).Innovation, employment and skills in services: firm and sectoral evidence.Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,14(4),449-474.
15. Fagerberg, J.(ed.),Mowery, D. C.(ed.),Nelson, R. R.(ed.)(2005).The Oxford Handbook of Innovation.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
16. Falk, R.(2007).Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms' innovation activities: survey evidence from Austria.Research Policy,36(5),665-679.
17. Feldman, M. P.,Kelly, M. R.(2006).The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: government R&D policy, economic incentive and private firm behavior.Research Evaluation,35(10),1509-1521.
18. Freel, M. S.(2005).Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms.Technovation,25(2),123-134.
19. Gallouj, F.(2002).Innovation in the Service Economy: The New Wealth of Nations.Northampton, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
20. Griliches, Z.(1979).Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth.Bell Journal of Economics,10(1),92-166.
21. Griliches, Z.(1992).The search for R&D spillovers.Scandinavian Journal of Economics,94(Supplement),29-47.
22. Gronroos, C.,Ojasalo, K.(2004).Service productivity: towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services.Journal of Business Research,57(4),414-423.
23. Hall, B.,Van Reenen, J.(2000).How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? a review of the evidence.Research Policy,29(4-5),449-469.
24. Henderson, R. M.,Clark, K. B.(1990).Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product and the failure of established firms.Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1),9-30.
25. Hipp, C.,Grupp, H.(2005).Innovation in the service sector: The demand for servicespecific innovation measurement concepts and typologies.Research Policy,34(4),517-535.
26. Hyvarinen, J.,Rautiainen, A. M.(2007).Measuring additionality and systemic impacts of public research and development funding- the case of TEKES, Finland.Research Evaluation,16(3),205-215.
27. Jaffe, A. B.(1986).Technological opportunity and spillover of R&D: evidence from firms patents, profits, and market value.American Economic Review,76(5),984-1001.
28. Jaffe, A. B.(1998).The importance of spillovers in the policy mission of the advanced technology program.Journal of Technology Transfer,23(2),11-19.
29. Johansson, J. K.,Douglas, S. P.,Nonaka, I.(1985).Assessing the impact of country of origin on product evaluations: a new methodological perspective.Journal of Marketing Research,22(4),388-396.
30. Kamien, M. I.,Muller, E.,Zang, I.(1992).Research joint ventures and R&D cartels.American Economic Review,82(5),1293-1306.
31. Klette, T. J.,Moen, J.,Griliches, Z.(2000).Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduces market failures? microeconometric evaluation studies.Research Policy,29(4-5),471-495.
32. Lu, L. Y. Y.,Yang, C.(2006).The R&D and marketing cooperation across new product development stages: an empirical study of Taiwan's industry.Industrial Marketing Management,33(7),593-605.
33. Luukkonen, T.(2000).Additionality of EU framework programmes.Research Policy,29(6),711-724.
34. Martin, S.(2002).Spillovers, appropriability, and R&D.Journal of Economics,75(1),1-32.
35. Martin, S.,Scott, J. T.(2000).The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation.Research Policy,29(4-5),437-447.
36. Miles, I.(2007).Research and development (R&D) beyond manufacturing: the strange case of service R&D.R&D Management,37(3),249-268.
37. Mohnen, P. A.,Nadiri, M. I.,Prucha, I. R.(1986).R&D, production structure and rates of return in the U.S., Japanese and German manufacturing: a non-separable dynamic facto demand model.European Economic Review,30(4),749-771.
38. Mowery, D. C.,Rosenberg, N. P.(1989).Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
39. OECD(2004).Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2006.Paris:OECD Publishing.
40. OECD(2005).Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.Paris:OECD Publishing.
41. OECD(2002).Tax Incentives for Research and Development: Trends and Issues.Paris:OECD Publishing.
42. Plessis, M. D.(2007).The role of knowledge management in innovation.Journal of Knowledge Management,11(4),20-29.
43. Rossi, P. H.,Freeman, H. E.(1993).Evaluation: A Systematic Approach.London:Sage.
44. Saaty, T. L.(1977).A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,15(2),234-281.
45. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process.New York:McGraw-Hill.
46. Schumpeter, J. A.(1983).Theory of Economic Development: An Enquiry into Profits, Capital, Interest and the Business Cycle.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
47. Scriven, M.(1996).Types of evaluation and types of evaluator.Evaluation Practice,17(2),151-161.
48. Song, M.,Thieme, R. J.(2006).A cross-national investigation of the R&D-marketing interface in the product innovation process.Industrial Marketing Management,35(3),308-322.
49. Sundbo, J.(1997).Management of innovation in services.The Service Industries Journal,17(3),432-455.
50. Suzumura, K.(1992).Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers.American Economic Review,82(5),1307-1320.
51. Timothy, B.,Hugh, C.,Luke, G.(1995).What difference does it make? additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms.International Journal of Technology Management,10(4-5),587-600.
52. Utterback, J. M.,Abernathy, W. J.(1975).A dynamics model of process, and product innovation.Omega,3(6),639-656.
53. Warda, J.(2006).Tax treatment of business investments in intellectual assets: an international comparison.OECD.
54. Warda, J.(2002).Measuring the value of R&D tax treatments in OECD countries.STI Review,27,185-211.
55. West, M. A.,Anderson, N. R.(1996).Innovation in top management teams.Journal of Applied Psychology,81(6),680-693.
56. 王健全(2008)。產業政策工具研究計畫。台北=Taipei, TW:經濟部工業局=Industrial Development Bureau, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
57. 杜英儀(2010)。服務業研發創新之租稅獎勵及政府資金投入研究。台北=Taipei, TW:行政院經濟建設委員會=National Development Council, Executive Yuan。
58. 科技部(2013)。科學技術統計要覽。台北=Taipei, TW:科技部=Ministry of Science and Technology。
59. 財政部(2014)。103 年財政統計年報。台北=Taipei, TW:財政部=Ministry of Finance。
60. 張朝欽(2008)。政府支援企業研發之政策工具國際比較。科技發展政策報導，1，20-52。
61. 簡禎富(2005)。決策分析與管理。台北=Taipei, TW:雙葉書廊=YehYeh Book Gallery。