题名

精準分眾以創新:由使用者行為引導媒體服務設計

并列篇名

Innovation by Precision Targeting: Navigating Media Service Design by means of User Behavior

DOI

10.6160/SYSMR.201903_27(1).0001

作者

歐素華(Su-Hua Ou)

关键词

分眾需求 ; 以使用者為中心 ; 設計原則 ; 人物誌 ; 社會建構 ; Early Adopters ; User-centric Innovation ; Design Principles ; Persona ; Social Construction

期刊名称

中山管理評論

卷期/出版年月

27卷1期(2019 / 03 / 01)

页次

11 - 56

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

創新產品服務是否契合使用者需求,成為企業能否持續成長關鍵。不過為何許多企業導入設計思考或線上論壇,還是無法打動人心?使用者創新建議讓領先使用者創新或傾聽使用者聲音。但企業不易找到領先使用者,一般使用者又經常說一套作一套,以致創新淪為傷心。本文調查新聞媒體公司如何投入分眾調查以創新,主要有三點貢獻。一是精準分眾。分眾是具有連結力、專業度與推銷能力的早期採納者,可及性高且影響力廣。二是使用經驗。分析分眾使用經驗,更能精準聚焦核心需求。三是設計原則,由需求到創新之推理邏輯,可引導跨部門協作,忠實傳達使用者需求。就實務貢獻,本研究提出由分眾引導產品服務設計、跨眾傳播與經營變革。分眾,因精準分辨而得眾。

英文摘要

Innovating products and services to meet users' unsatisfied need has become top priority for corporates' growth. However, as most enterprises engaged in design thinking, focus group, or online community, their innovation still cannot meet users' requirement. User-centric innovation literature describes various tools to learn from users while user innovation highlights the importance of lead users, however, enterprises found it is not easy to get access to lead users or learn from target audience. This article examines how a newspaper company innovates products and services from the design principles, extracting from its core audience using experience. There are three main theoretical contributions. First of all, this paper emphasizes the early adopters as the main target audience. Comparing with lead user or user community, early adopters are more accessible, have some specific domain knowledge, and are influential to other users. The more precise description of the early adopters, the more clear of their pain points. Secondly, this paper inspires enterprises to learn from users' experience. Users' sense making for products and services provides important reference points for innovation. Comparison in users' mind instead of producers' mind can help enterprises shorten learning curves and avoid ineffective designs. Thirdly, this paper highlights the importance of design principles. By turning users' pain points into design principles, producers can have reasonable design instead of over design or insufficient services. Practically, this article suggests media companies to learn from the early adopters by having precise personas, analyzing users' experience, and coming up with dedicated design principles.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 陳俊良, C. L.,林耀欽, Y. C.(2017)。承億文旅:設計思考家的創新三箭與挑戰。管理評論,36(2),17-18。
    連結:
  2. 陳俊良, C. L.,林耀欽, Y. C.(2017)。承億文旅:設計思考家的創新三箭與挑戰。管理評論,36(2),17-18。
    連結:
  3. 蕭瑞麟, R. L.,許瑋元, W. Y.(2010)。資安洞見:由使用者痛點提煉創新來源。組織與管理,3(2),93-128。
    連結:
  4. Antorini, Y. M.,Albert, M. M., Jr,Askildsen, T.(2012).Collaborating With Customer Communities: Lessons From the Lego Group.MIT Sloan Management Review,53(3),73-79.
  5. Brannen, M. Y.(2004).When Mickey Loses Face: Recontextualization, Semantic Fit, and the Semiotics of Foreignness.Academy of Management Review,29(4),593-616.
  6. Brown, T.(2009).Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation.New York:HarperCollins Publishers.
  7. Chase, R. B.(2004).It's Time to Get to First Principles in Service Design.Managing Service Quality: An International Journal,14(2/3),126-128.
  8. Cusumano, M. A.,Mylonadis, Y.,Rosenbloom, R. S.(1992).Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta.Business History Review,66(1),51-94.
  9. Di Gangi, P. M.,Wasko, M. M.,Hooker, R. E.(2010).Getting Customers' Ideas to Work for You: Learning from Dell, How to Succeed with Online User Innovation Communities.MIS Quarterly Executive,9(4),213-228.
  10. Drucker, P. F(1985).Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practices and Principles.New York:HarperCollins.
  11. Ei, S.,Arie, Y. L.(2017).A Resource Dependence Perspective on Low-Power Actors Shaping Their Regulatory Environment: The Case of Honda.Organization Studies,38(8),1039-1058.
  12. Enos, J. L.(1962).Petroleum Progress and Profits: A History of Process Innovation.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  13. Freeman, C.(1968).Chemical Process Plant: Innovation and the World Market.National Institute Economic Review,45,29-57.
  14. Garrety, K.(1997).Social Worlds, Actor-Networks and Controversy: The Case of Cholesterol, Dietary Fat and Heart Disease.Social Studies of science,27(5),727-773.
  15. Garud, R.,Rappa, M. A.(1994).A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: The Case of Cochlear Implants.Organization Science,5(3),344-362.
  16. Griffin, A.,Hauser, J. R.(1996).Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature.Journal of Product Innovation Management,13(3),191-215.
  17. Hargadon, A.(1998).Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation.California Management Review,40(3),209-227.
  18. Hargadon, A.,Sutton, R. I.(1997).Technology Brokering and Innovation in A Product Development Firm.Administrative Science Quarterly,42(4),716-749.
  19. Hienerth, C.,Keinz, P.,Lettl, C.(2011).Exploring the Nature and Implementation Process of User-Centric Business Models.Long Range Planning,44(5-6),344-374.
  20. Oudshoorn, N.,Pinch, T.(2003).How Users Matter: the Co-construction of Users and Technology.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  21. Petersen, S. I.,Hussain, S.(2012).Design Insights from User Research and Crowdsourcing.Design Management Review,23(3),60-68.
  22. Porter, M. E.(1990).The Competitive Advantage of Nations.New York Macmillan:Free Press.
  23. Pruitt, J.,Adlin, T.(2010).The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design.San Francisco:Elsevier.
  24. Randall, T.,Terwiesch, C.,Ulrich, K. T.(2005).Principles for User Design of Customized Products.California Management Review,47(4),68-85.
  25. Rogers, E. M.(1995).Diffusion of innovation.New York:Free Press.
  26. Rosenberg, N.(1963).Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910.The Journal of Economic History,23(4),414-443.
  27. Schultz, M.,Hatch, M. J.(2003).The Cycles of Corporate Branding: The Case of the Lego Company.California Management Review,46(1),6-26.
  28. Schwartz, B.(2004).The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, Vol. 6.New York:Harper Collins.
  29. Shah, S.(2000).Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologySloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Cambridge, MA:.
  30. Sutton, R. I.,Hargadon, A.(1996).Brainstorming Groups in Context: Effectiveness in A Product Design Firm.Administrative Science Quarterly,41(4),685-718.
  31. von Hippel, E.(1986).Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts.Management Science,32(7),791-805.
  32. von Hippel, E.(1988).The sources of innovation.Oxford:New York University Press.
  33. von Hippel, E.(2005).Democratizing innovation.Boston:MIT Press.
  34. von Hippel, E.,Katz, R.(2002).Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits.Management Science,48(7),821-833.
  35. Yin, R. K.(1994).Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  36. 林偉文, W. W.(2011)。創意教學與創造力的培育—以設計思考為例。教育資料與研究雙月刊,100,53-74。
  37. 林雅萍, Y. P.(2013)。國立政治大學商學院=National Chengchi University。
  38. 陳沛芳, P. F.(2016)。東吳大學企業管理學系研究所=Soochow University。
  39. 陳姿靜, T. C.(2016)。東吳大學企業管理學系研究所=Soochow University。
  40. 陳筱涵, H. H.(2016)。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所=National Chengchi University。
  41. 陳慧娟, H. C.,何明泉, M. C.(2012)。科學博物館策展模式的設計思考。科技博物,16(3),109-138。
  42. 劉宛婷, W. T.(2009)。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所=National Chengchi University。
  43. 鄭家宜, C. I.(2014)。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所=National Chengchi University。
  44. 蕭瑞麟, R. L.(2017).不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辨脈絡.台北=Taipei:五南出版社=Wunan Publishing Co..
被引用次数
  1. 關欣,蕭瑞麟(2023)。相對感受:參考點對於顧客體驗的影響。組織與管理,16(2),1-67。
  2. 李怡慧(2019)。類粉絲效應:網路負面口碑的抑制與弱化。組織與管理,12(2),55-111。
  3. 歐素華(2019)。新資源融舊餐飲:由使用者體驗轉換資源稼動方式與服務設計。組織與管理,12(2),1-53。