题名

私立大學的制度邏輯與社會資本對產學合作績效之影響

并列篇名

Impacts of Institutional Logics and Social Capital of Private Universities on the Performance of Academia-industry Collaborations

DOI

10.6160/SYSMR.202103_29(1).0004

作者

詹淑婷(Shu-Ting Chan)；葉匡時(Kuang S. Yeh)；鍾喜梅(Hsi-Mei Chung)

关键词

私立大學 ； 產學合作績效 ； 制度理論 ； 制度邏輯觀點 ； 社會資本 ； Private University ； Performance of Academia-Industry Collaboration ； Institutional Theory ； Institutional Logics Perspective ； Social Capital

期刊名称

中山管理評論

卷期/出版年月

29卷1期（2021 / 03 / 01）

页次

103 - 150

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

臺灣的私立大學在競爭激烈且高度制度規範的高等教育市場中，政府與專業團體提供規範與約束，成為影響私立大學發展的主要制度環境。組織的行為雖受制度環境約束，也受制於組織本身制度邏輯，進而影響私立大學對於產學合作政策的關注或績效表現。本文蒐集2003年至2013年臺灣私立大學的產學合作績效資料，從制度邏輯與社會資本之觀點，探討在高度制度規範的高等教育產業，家族控制的私立大學與宗教支持的私立大學，如何透過領導人或董事會社會資本的建構安排，影響產學合作績效。研究結果發現，即使在高度制度規範的產業環境中，組織回應制度政策的動機與行為並不完全趨同，組織本身的制度邏輯對於組織回應制度環境規範之作為與績效，具有關鍵性影響。
英文摘要

Private universities in Taiwan compete to seize the legitimacy as well as the resources in the highly competitive and regulative education environment. Government rules and professional norms provide the possible sources of isomorphism on universities; however, the indigenous institutional logics of private universities will demonstrate the heterogeneities on their strategic choices. Private universities in Taiwan can be classified into two types: those controlled by family or family business groups and those founded by religious organizations. Given that these universities guild by two different institutional logics, i.e., family logic and religion logic, this research argues that the different private universities that guild by the distinctive institutional logics will possibly have specific strategies choices even in a highly regulated and competitive education environment. This research employs institutional logics perspective and social capital theory to address the performance of academia-industry collaborations (AIC) and are interested to know how the indigenous institutional logics in each private university may co-act with university's social capital and thereby influences its inclination and strategic choices on AIC. The family-controlled private universities prefer to utilize the social capital of President and heterogeneity of the Board of Directors as resources. However, the religion-founded private universities prefer to obtain resources through the social ties among their founding organizations. This research utilizes the longitudinal data of private universities in Taiwan from 2003 to 2013. The evidence of this research contributes to the issues that addressing the organizational strategic choices from institutional logics and social capital viewpoint in a highly regulative environment.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 李宗榮, Z. R.(2009)。制度變遷與市場網絡：臺灣大型企業間董監事跨坐的歷史考察，1962-2003。臺灣社會學，17，101-160。
    連結：
  2. 林本炫, P. H.(2006)。我國私立大學的設立、經營和合併問題。教育與社會研究，10，65-92。
    連結：
  3. 林尚平, S. P.,陳宥杉, Y. S.,雷漢聲, H. S.,陳達仁, D. R.,黃銘傑, M. J.,蔡渭水, W. S.,黃家齊, G. Q.,張克群, K. Q.(2009)。行政院國科會產學合作機制之發展現況與未來建議。商管科技季刊，10(1)，1-28。
    連結：
  4. 許文瑞, W. R.(2018)。世界主要國家大學衍生企業策略對我國高等教育創新轉型之啟示。教育脈動，13
    連結：
  5. 許瓊文, C. W.,張保隆, P. L.(2013)。以動態能力觀點探討產學研發合作行為。管理與系統，20(1)，1-26。
    連結：
  6. 黃炳欽, B. Q.,張國保, G. B.(2007)。教育部推動產學合作現況與發展方向。人文社會科學研究，1(1)，1-19。
    連結：
  7. 溫肇東, C. T.,樊學良, H. L.(2013)。日本產學合作之理論研究及政策實踐歷程。管理與系統，20(2)，201-226。
    連結：
  8. 葛孟堯, M. Y.,劉江彬, C. B.,耿筠(2010)。影響我國大學技術移轉績效因素之研究。科技管理學刊，15(2)，55-82。
    連結：
  9. 鍾喜梅, H. M.,葉家豪, C. H.(2010)。家族連結、政商關係與多角化擴張：臺灣家族企業集團的跨時分析。組織與管理，3(1)，67-106。
    連結：
  10. 鍾喜梅, H. M.,鄭力軒, L. H.,詹淑婷, S. T.,林佳慧, C. H.(2012)。醫院與大學在家族企業集團股權鏈之角色：制度與資源依賴觀點的辯證。人文及社會科學集刊，24(3)，399-438。
    連結：
  11. 輔仁大學， 2018 ，取自 http://www.fju.edu.tw/ 。 (Fu Jen Catholic University, 2018, http://www.fju.edu.tw/, accessed on December 18, 2018.)
  12. Aguilera, R. V.,Judge, W. Q.,Terjesen, S. A.(2018).Corporate Governance Deviance.Academy of Management Review,43(1),87-109.
  13. Anthony, D. L.,Appari, A.,Johnson, M. E.(2014).Institutionalizing HIPAA Compliance Organizations and Competing Logics in US Health Care.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,55(1),108-124.
  14. Bae, Z. T.,Park, S.(2008).University Technology Commercialization and Academic Entrepreneurship in Korea.2nd Workshop for SPF funded Project
  15. Barney, J.(1991).Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.Journal of Management,17(1),99-120.
  16. Beck, N.,Katz, J. N.(1995).What to Do and Not to Do with Tme-series Cross-section Data.American Political Science Review,89(3),634-647.
  17. Beckert, J.(1999).Agency, Entrepreneurs and Institutional Change: The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations.Organization Studies,20(5),777-799.
  18. Beckman, C. M.,Schoonhoven, C. B.,Rottner, R. M.,Kim, S.-J.(2014).Relational Pluralism in De Novo Organizations: Boards of Directors as Bridges or Barriers to Diverse Alliance Portfolios?.Academy of Management Journal,57(2),460-483.
  19. Berrone, P.,Cruz, C.,Gomez-Mejia, L. R.(2012).Socioemotional wealth in family firms theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research.Family Business Review,25(3),258-279.
  20. Burt, R. S.(2000).The Network Structure of Social Capital.Organizational Behavior,22,345-423.
  21. Casciaro, T.,Piskorski, M. J.(2005).Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory.Administrative Science Quarterly,50(2),167-199.
  22. Cheng, M. Y.(2008).University Technology Transfer and Commercialization: The Case of Multimedia University, Malaysia.2nd workshop for SPF funded Project
  23. Chung, H. M.,Chan, S. T.(2012).Ownership Structure, Family Leadership, and Performance of Affiliate Firms in Large Family Business Groups.Asia Pacific Journal of Management,29(2),303-329.
  24. Cohen, W. M.,Nelson, R. R.,Walsh, J. P.(2002).Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D.Management Science,48(1),1-23.
  25. Coleman, J. S.(1988).Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.American Journal of Sociology,94,95-120.
  26. Deeds, D. L.,DeCarolis, D.,Coombs, J.(2000).Dynamic Capabilities and New Product Development in High Technology Ventures: An Empirical Analysis of New Biotechnology Firms.Journal of Business Venturing,15(3),211-229.
  27. Di Gregorio, D.,Shane, S.(2003).Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-ups than Others?.Research Policy,32(2),209-227.
  28. DiMaggio, P. J.,Powell, W. W.(1983).The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Rields.American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160.
  29. Dyer, J. H.,Singh, H.(1998).The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage.Academy of Management Review,23(4),660-679.
  30. Fontana, R.,Geuna, A.,Matt, M.(2006).Factors Affecting University–industry R&D Projects: The Importance of Searching, Screening and Signaling.Research Policy,35(2),309-323.
  31. Friedman, J.,Silberman, J.(2003).University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?.The Journal of Technology Transfer,28(1),17-30.
  32. Fukuyama, F.(1995).Trust: Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity.New York:Free press.
  33. Granovetter, M. S.(1985).Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510.
  34. Granovetter, M. S.(1973).The Strength of Weak Ties.American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380.
  35. Greenwood, R.,Díaz, A. M.,Li, S. X.,Lorente, J. C.(2010).The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses.Organization Science,21(2),521-539.
  36. Greve, H.,Zhang, C. M.(2017).Institutional Logics and Power Sources: Merger and Acquisition Decisions.Academy of Management Journal,60(2),671-694.
  37. Gulati, R.,Kilduff, M.,Li, S.,Shipilov, A.,Tsai W.(2010).Special Research Forum: Call for Papers on Relational Pluralism of Individuals, Teams, and Organizations.Academy of Management Journal,53(5),1210-1211.
  38. Hillman, A. J.,Cannella, A. A.,Paetzold, R. L.(2000).The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change.Journal of Management Studies,37(2),235-256.
  39. Hillman, A. J.,Dalziel, T.(2003).Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives.Academy of Management Review,28(3),383-396.
  40. Hillman, A. J.,Withers, M. C.,Collins, B. J.(2009).Resource Dependence Theory: A Review.Journal of Management,35(6),1404-1427.
  41. Jaskiewicz, P.,Heinrichs, K.,Rau, S. B.,Reay, T.(2016).To Be or not to Be: How Family Firms Manage Family and Commercial Logics in Succession.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,40(4),781-813.
  42. Karra, N.,Tracey, P.,Phillips, N.(2006).Altruism and Agency in the Family Firm: Exploring the Role of Family, Kinship, and Ethnicity.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,30(6),861-877.
  43. Katila, R.,Rosenberger, J. D.,Eisenhardt, K. M.(2008).Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships.Administrative Science Quarterly,53(2),295-332.
  44. Kilduff, M.,Tsai, W.(2003).Social Networks and Organizations.CA:Sage.
  45. Lin, N.(2001).Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action.London:Cambridge University Press.
  46. Lounsbury, M.(2007).A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds.Academy of Management Journal,50(2),289-307.
  47. Lounsbury, M.(ed.),Boxenbaum, E.(ed.)(2013).Institutional Logics in Action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations.Bingley, UK:Emerald.
  48. Marquis, C.,Lounsbury, M.(2007).Vive La Résistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community Banking.Academy of Management Journal,50(4),799-820.
  49. Meyer, J. W.,Rowan, B.(1977).Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.American Journal of Sociology,83(2),340-363.
  50. Miller, D.,Le Breton-Miller, I.,Lester, R. H.(2011).Family and Lone Founder Ownership and Strategic Behavior: Social Context, Identity, and Institutional Logics.Journal of Management Studies,48(1),1-25.
  51. Mizruchi, M. S.(1996).What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates.Annual Review of Sociology,22,271-298.
  52. Oliver, C.(1991).Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes.Academy of Management Review,16(1),145-179.
  53. Parmigiani, A.,Rivera-Santos, M.(2011).Clearing a Path through the Forest: A Meta-review of Interorganizational Relationships.Journal of Management,37(4),1108-1136.
  54. Peng, M. W.,Jiang, Y.(2010).Institutions Behind Family Ownership and Control in Large Firms.Journal of Management Studies,47(2),253-273.
  55. Perkmann, M.,Walsh, K.(2009).The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-industry Relations on Public Research.Industrial and Corporate Change,18(6),1033-1065.
  56. Pfeffer, J.,Salancik, G. R.(1978).The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.NY:Harper and Row Publishers.
  57. Powell, W. W.(Ed.),DiMaggio P. J.(Ed.)(1991).Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  58. Powell, W. W.(ed.),DiMaggio, P. J.(ed.)(1991).The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  59. Powers, J. B.,McDougall, P.(2005).Policy Orientation Effects on Performance with Licensing to Start-ups and Small Companies.Research Policy,34(7),1028-1042.
  60. Ranganathan, R.,Rosenkopf, L.(2014).Do Ties Really Bind? The Effect of Knowledge and Commercialization Networks on Opposition to Standards.Academy of Management Journal,57(2),515-540.
  61. Ritchie, W. J.,Kolodinsky, R. W.(2003).Nonprofit Organization Financial Performance Measurement: An Evaluation of New and Existing Financial Performance Measures.Nonprofit Management and Leadership,13(4),367-381.
  62. Scott, W. R.(2008).Institutions and Organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  63. Shipilov, A. V.,Greve, H. R.,Rowley, T. J.(2010).When Do Interlocks Matter? Institutional Logics and the Diffusion of Multiple Corporate Governance Practices.Academy of Management Journal,53(4),846-864.
  64. Thornton, P. H.(2004).Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing.CA:Stanford University Press.
  65. Thornton, P. H.,Ocasio, W.,Lounsbury, M.(2012).The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  66. Tripole, Martin R.(ed.)(1999).Promise Renewed: Jesuit Education for a New Millennium.Chicago:Loyola Press.
  67. Veugelers, R.,Cassiman, B.(2005).R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities. Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing.International Journal of Industrial Organization,23(5),355-379.
  68. Wald, K. D.,Calhoun-Brown, A.(2014).Religion and Politics in the United States.Lanham:Rowman and Littlefield.
  69. Wallmark, J. T.(1997).Inventions and Patents at Universities: The Case of Chalmers University of Technology.Technovation,17(3),127-139.
  70. Wong P. K.,Ho, Y. P.,Singh, A.(2008).Towards a "Global Knowledge Enterprise: The Entrepreneurial University Model of the National University of Singapore.2nd Workshop for SPF funded Project
  71. Zucker, L.(ed.)(1988).Institutional Patterns and Organizations.Cambridge, MA:Ballinger.
  72. 吳清山, C. S.(2010).高等教育評鑑議題研究.臺北=Taipei:高等教育文化事業=H-EDU.
  73. 杜聰明, C. M.(1963)。臺灣基督教會醫學史。臺灣醫學會雜誌，69(2)，541-562。
  74. 周志宏, Z. H.(2013)。宗教與私立學校。臺灣教育評論月刊，2(8)，1-12。
  75. 官有垣, Y. Y.(2000)。非營利組織在臺灣的發展：兼論政府對財團法人基金會的法令規範。中國行政評論，10(1)，75-110。
  76. 林南, N.(2007)。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1(1)，1-32。
  77. 郭育仁, Y. R.,嚴萬璋, W. C.(2014)。國際創新創業發展模式對臺灣之啟示。產業與管理論壇，16(4)，4-25。
  78. 黃心台, X. T.(2009).計量經濟學.臺北=Taipei:新陸書局=Shinlou Books.
print cancel